Florida Statute 137.05 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 137
BONDS OF COUNTY OFFICERS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 137.05

137.05 Duty of boards of county commissioners.—The board of county commissioners of each county shall at its regular meetings in January and June of each year examine carefully as to the sufficiency of bonds of the county officers, and if it has reason to believe that the sufficiency of any bond has become impaired, it must at once require the officer to execute and file with the proper officer a new bond for the same amount and under the same conditions as his or her former bond.

History.—s. 2, ch. 4413, 1895; GS 825; RGS 1572; CGL 2420; s. 839, ch. 95-147; s. 24, ch. 98-34.

F.S. 137.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 137.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 137.05

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 137.05

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 137.05.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 137.05

Total Results: 17

EDMUND ACCARDI v. REGIONS BANK

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-12-08T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: deficiency judgment.” Laws of Florida 2013, c. 2013–137, § 5. (Additions to statute emphasized). To decide

Sylvia Higgins and Collier Higgins v. Dyck O'Neal, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-06-09T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 201 So. 3d 157

Snippet: claim for a deficiency judgment. See Ch. 13–137, § 5, Laws of Fla. (Emphasis added). In addressing

Robert G. Reid v. Compass Bank

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-05-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 164 So. 3d 49

Snippet: a deficiency judgment. See Ch. 13-137, § 5, Laws of Fla. (Emphasis added). 2

Suarez v. Port Charlotte HMA, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-04-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 171 So. 3d 740

Snippet: remedy.” Marburg v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 5 U.S. 137, 169, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803); see also

Jimenez v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-10-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 45 So. 3d 935

Snippet: , provided a sentencing range of 82.5 months to 137.5 months in prison; however, Florida law required

Smith v. Krosschell

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-01-11T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 892 So. 2d 1145

Snippet: and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur. NOTES [1] Ch. 01-137, § 5 at 788, Laws of Fla. 2D04-514 District

Hallmon v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-06-23T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 876 So. 2d 662

Snippet: score? MR. COHN: He scores 82.5, 137.5 months. THE COURT: 82.5,137.5 months. MR. COHN: And we’ve had numerous

Szymanowski v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-12-31T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 870 So. 2d 137

Snippet: to withdraw his plea after the State requested a 137.5 month sentence, the maximum sentence allowable under…after re-sentencing. The trial court then imposed a 137.5 month sentence with three year mandatory minimum…months imprisonment based on a range of 82.5 to 137.5 months rather than to the maximum. He also alleged

Robbins v. Kornfield

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-01-21T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 834 So. 2d 955

Snippet: Legislature amended Section 193.155 in 2001. See Ch. 01-137, § 5, at 788, Laws of Fla. (amending § 193.155, Fla

Lopez v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-12-27T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 833 So. 2d 283

Snippet: x27;s score, his maximum sentence is reduced to 137.5 months. As Lopez was sentenced to 144 months, this

Burton v. Powell

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-08-10T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 547 So. 2d 330

Snippet: please to alter it. Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 5 U.S. 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803). 89-92 District

Orpheus Investments, SA v. Ryegon Investments, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-10-18T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 447 So. 2d 257

Snippet: .Ed. 813 (1926); Mayfield v. Richards, 115 U.S. 137, 5 S.Ct. 1187, 29 L.Ed. 334 (1885); Mitchell v. Clark

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1974-06-24T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: sureties on same, your attention is directed to ss. 137.05 and137.09, F.S., respectively. Florida

Landon v. Metropolitan Dade County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1973-07-24T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 280 So. 2d 714

Snippet: The court, thus, concluded that: (21 So.2d at 137) “[5] No aspect of the law of tax assessments is fraught

Dade County Classroom Teachers Association, Inc. v. Legislature

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1972-11-07T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 269 So. 2d 684

Snippet: the historic case of Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 5 U.S. 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803); and in the many years

St. Joe Paper Co. v. Gulf Mosouito Control District

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1961-01-19T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 125 So. 2d 895

Snippet: a point; thence South 1 degree 15 minutes West 137.5 feet to a Point of Beginning, containing approximately

Colby v. Colby

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1960-05-20T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 120 So. 2d 797

Snippet: authorities: Walker v. Walker, 1936, 132 Ohio St. 137, 5 N.E.2d 405; Koenig v. Koenig, Mo. App. 1945, 191