Florida Statute 161.33 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 161
BEACH AND SHORE PRESERVATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 161.33

161.33 Cooperation with federal, state, and other governmental entities.—

(1) The board of county commissioners, for itself or on behalf of any and all duly established beach and shore preservation districts within the county, may enter into cooperative agreements and otherwise cooperate with, and meet the requirements and conditions of, federal, state and other local governments and political entities, or any agencies or representative thereof, for the purpose of improving, furthering and expediting the beach and shore preservation program.

(2) The board of county commissioners and the department, for and on behalf of each or any district created in accordance with parts I and II of this chapter, are authorized to receive and accept from any federal agency, grants for or in aid of any beach and shore preservation program contemplated by this part, and to receive and accept aid or contributions from any source, of money, property and other things of value. The board of county commissioners is authorized to make application for federal participation in the cost of any beach and shore preservation program under any Acts of Congress and all amendments thereto.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-408; ss. 25, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 30, ch. 94-356.

F.S. 161.33 on Google Scholar

F.S. 161.33 on Casetext

Amendments to 161.33

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 161.33

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 161.33.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 161.33

Total Results: 4

Eaton v. Eaton

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-08-26T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 16 So. 3d 289

Snippet: $1,100 for alimony, $672.48 for child support, and $161.33 for the children's medical insurance. The … failed to deduct from his retained income the $161.33 per month he was ordered to pay for the children

Knowles v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1964-06-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 165 So. 2d 201

Snippet: .1955). . See: L'Engle v. Holmes, 44 Fla. 161, 33 So. 247 (1902); Counne v. Saffa, 87 So.2d 586 (

The Richter Jewelry Co. v. Schweinert

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1935-12-19T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 169 So. 750, 125 Fla. 199, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1673

Snippet: Harrison, 17 Ala. 774; Houghton v. Burden, 228 U.S. 161, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 491, 57 L.Ed. 780; Matthews v. Coe

Wicker v. Trust Co. of Fla.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1933-04-13T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 147 So. 586, 109 Fla. 411

Snippet: written agreement. Houghton v. Burden, 228 U.S. 161, 33 Sup. Ct. 491,57 L.Ed. 790. Parol testimony can