Syfert Injury Law Firm

City of Treasure Island v. Tahitian Treasure Island, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-10-27T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: as the Coastal Zone Protection Act of 1985. § 161.52, Fla. Stat. (1985). In passing it, the legislature

Atlantis at Perdido Ass'n, Inc. v. Warner

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-07-06T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 932 So. 2d 1206

Snippet: 2004). The Florida Legislature enacted section 161.052, Florida Statutes, in 1970 to prohibit certain

St. Joseph Land & Development Co. v. Florida Department of Natural Resources

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-03-17T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 596 So. 2d 137, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2800, 1992 WL 51254

Snippet: reason, or unsupported by facts or logic. Section 161.052, Florida Statutes, adopted by the 1970 Legislature…of Mexico.” Contrary to the language of Section 161.052, in adopting Section 161.053 the Legislature did

DEPT. OF NAT. RESOURCES v. Wingfield Dev. Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-05-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 581 So. 2d 193

Snippet: statutes which the rule implements are §§ 370.02(5), 161.052 and 161.053. Of particular importance to note is

Town of Palm Beach v. STATE, DEPT. OF NAT'L RES.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-04-10T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 577 So. 2d 1383

Snippet: fall within the meaning and intent of Sections 161.052 and 161.053, Florida Statutes: (f) Maintenance

St. Joe Paper Co. v. FLA. DEPT OF NATURAL RES.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-12-20T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 536 So. 2d 1119

Snippet: 1970, the Florida Legislature enacted section 161.052, Florida Statutes, prohibiting certain construction…quot; within the legislative intent of section 161.052, and with the resulting conclusion that the Department

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1986-08-14T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: would appear to be permissible. See, however, s. 161.052(1), F.S., prohibiting a county, among others, from…provided in subsection (4), the provisions of s. 161.052 shall be superseded by the provisions of this section…existing ground elevations." If the terms of s. 161.052(1), F.S., are applicable to the project in question…entirely local projects. But see, ss. 161.041 and 161.052, F.S., pertaining to coastal construction on state

City of Daytona Beach Shores v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1985-12-11T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 483 So. 2d 405

Snippet: the Coastal Zone Protection Act of 1985, sections 161.52-161.58, Florida Statutes (1985). In the provision

State Dept., Natural Res. v. Sunset Realty

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-08-09T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 474 So. 2d 363

Snippet: activity. General Authority 161.052, 161.053, 370.021 FS. Law Implemented 161.052, 161.053, 370.021(1) FS.…variance is requested under the provisions of Section 161.052(2)(b), Florida Statutes, or Section 161.053(2)(

Celotex Corp. v. Copeland

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1985-06-13T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 471 So. 2d 533

Snippet: , 392 N.E.2d 1352 (1979), aff'd, 85 Ill.2d 161, 52 Ill.Dec. 1, 421 N.E.2d 864 (1981); Louisville Trust

Woodholly v. DEPT. OF NATURAL RES.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-06-15T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 451 So. 2d 1002

Snippet: line or the 50-foot setback requirement (Section 161.052) does not preclude all development of or alteration

Copeland v. Armstrong Cork Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-04-24T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 447 So. 2d 922

Snippet: Illinois: Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos, 85 Ill.2d 161, 52 Ill. Dec. 1, 5, 421 N.E.2d 864, 868 (Ill. 1981)

Held v. Trafford Realty Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-06-02T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 414 So. 2d 631

Snippet: mean high water mark of the Atlantic Ocean [sec. 161.052, Fla. Stat. (1979)], runs through the residence

Town of Indialantic v. McNulty

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-04-29T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 400 So. 2d 1227

Snippet: restoration and erosion control projects... . [14] §§ 161.052(2)(b), 161.053(4), Fla. Stat. (1979). See § 163.3177… construct beyond the "dune line". § 161.052(2), Fla. Stat. (1979). [25] Indialantic, Fla.,… Beach v. Lachman, 71 So.2d 148 (Fla. 1953); § 161.052(2), Fla. Stat. (1979); Fla. Admin. Code Rule 16B…151 Fla. 677, 10 So.2d 307 (1942). [31] Section 161.052(7), Fla. Stat. (1979), declares new construction

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1979-08-10T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: See ss. 161.041 and 161.051, F. S. 1977, and ss. 161.052, 161.053, and 161.061, F. S. (1978 Supp.);see also

State Ex Rel. Shevin v. INDICO CORPORATION

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-08-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 319 So. 2d 173

Snippet: violations of coastal construction requirements under § 161.052, Florida Statutes, and violations of Development… violate the 50-foot setback line imposed by § 161.052, Florida Statutes, and a summary judgment was entered…:[1] "... [T]he projects violated Section 161.052, Florida Statutes, which prohibits building within…violate the 50-foot setback line imposed by Section 161.052, Florida Statutes, and a Summary Judgment was entered

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1974-04-16T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: feet landward of the erosion control line (s. 161.052, F.S.), or as determined on a county-by-county …permitting or setback line authority. Sections 161.052, 161.053, and 161.041, F.S. The federal government

State Ex Rel. Keefe v. City of St. Petersburg

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1933-01-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 144 So. 313, 106 Fla. 742

Snippet: or taken away. See Hunter v. Pittsburg, 207 U.S. 161,52 L.Ed. 151, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 40; Commonwealth v.

Smith v. Gail

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1902-06-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 44 Fla. 803

Snippet: resulted in a verdict for the plaintiffs below, for $161.52, upon which judgment was entered’ upon the same