Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 161.52 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 161.52 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 161.52

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 161
BEACH AND SHORE PRESERVATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 161.52
161.52 Short title.Sections 161.52-161.58 may be cited as the “Coastal Zone Protection Act of 1985.”
History.s. 36, ch. 85-55.

F.S. 161.52 on Google Scholar

F.S. 161.52 on Casetext

Amendments to 161.52


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 161.52
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 161.52.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 161.52

Total Results: 19

City of Treasure Island v. Tahitian Treasure Island, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-10-27

Citation: 253 So. 3d 649

Snippet: as the Coastal Zone Protection Act of 1985. § 161.52, Fla. Stat. (1985). In passing it, the legislature

Atlantis at Perdido Ass'n, Inc. v. Warner

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-07-06

Citation: 932 So. 2d 1206, 2006 WL 1835321

Snippet: (2004). The Florida Legislature enacted section 161.052, Florida Statutes, in 1970 to prohibit certain

St. Joseph Land & Development Co. v. Florida Department of Natural Resources

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-03-17

Citation: 596 So. 2d 137, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2800, 1992 WL 51254

Snippet: reason, or unsupported by facts or logic. Section 161.052, Florida Statutes, adopted by the 1970 Legislature

DEPT. OF NAT. RESOURCES v. Wingfield Dev. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-05-28

Citation: 581 So. 2d 193, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4783, 1991 WL 87671

Snippet: statutes which the rule implements are §§ 370.02(5), 161.052 and 161.053. Of particular importance to note is

Town of Palm Beach v. STATE, DEPT. OF NAT'L RES.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-04-10

Citation: 577 So. 2d 1383

Snippet: fall within the meaning and intent of Sections 161.052 and 161.053, Florida Statutes: (f) Maintenance

St. Joe Paper Co. v. FLA. DEPT OF NATURAL RES.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-12-21

Citation: 536 So. 2d 1119

Snippet: 1970, the Florida Legislature enacted section 161.052, Florida Statutes, prohibiting certain construction

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1986-08-14

Snippet: would appear to be permissible. See, however, s. 161.052(1), F.S., prohibiting a county, among others, from

City of Daytona Beach Shores v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-12-12

Citation: 483 So. 2d 405, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 629

Snippet: the Coastal Zone Protection Act of 1985, sections 161.52-161.58, Florida Statutes (1985). In the provision

State Dept., Natural Res. v. Sunset Realty

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-08-09

Citation: 474 So. 2d 363

Snippet: variance is requested under the provisions of Section 161.052(2)(b), Florida Statutes, or Section 161.053(2)(b)

Celotex Corp. v. Copeland

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-06-13

Citation: 471 So. 2d 533, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 309, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3419

Snippet: 307, 392 N.E.2d 1352 (1979), aff'd, 85 Ill.2d 161, 52 Ill.Dec. 1, 421 N.E.2d 864 (1981); Louisville Trust

Woodholly v. DEPT. OF NATURAL RES.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-06-15

Citation: 451 So. 2d 1002

Snippet: line or the 50-foot setback requirement (Section 161.052) does not preclude all development of or alteration

Copeland v. Armstrong Cork Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-04-25

Citation: 447 So. 2d 922

Snippet: Illinois: Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos, 85 Ill.2d 161, 52 Ill. Dec. 1, 5, 421 N.E.2d 864, 868 (Ill. 1981)

Held v. Trafford Realty Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-06-02

Citation: 414 So. 2d 631

Snippet: mean high water mark of the Atlantic Ocean [sec. 161.052, Fla. Stat. (1979)], runs through the residence

Town of Indialantic v. McNulty

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-04-29

Citation: 400 So. 2d 1227, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19391

Snippet: restoration and erosion control projects... . [14] §§ 161.052(2)(b), 161.053(4), Fla. Stat. (1979). See § 163

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1979-08-10

Snippet: See ss. 161.041 and 161.051, F. S. 1977, and ss. 161.052, 161.053, and 161.061, F. S. (1978 Supp.);see also

State Ex Rel. Shevin v. INDICO CORPORATION

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-08-28

Citation: 319 So. 2d 173

Snippet: violations of coastal construction requirements under § 161.052, Florida Statutes, and violations of Development

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1974-04-16

Snippet: feet landward of the erosion control line (s. 161.052, F.S.), or as determined on a county-by-county

State Ex Rel. Keefe v. City of St. Petersburg

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-01-02

Citation: 144 So. 313, 106 Fla. 742

Snippet: or taken away. See Hunter v. Pittsburg, 207 U.S. 161,52 L.Ed. 151, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 40; Commonwealth v

Smith v. Gail

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1902-06-15

Citation: 44 Fla. 803

Snippet: resulted in a verdict for the plaintiffs below, for $161.52, upon which judgment was entered’ upon the same