Florida Statute 161.52 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 161
BEACH AND SHORE PRESERVATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 161.52

161.52 Short title.—Sections 161.52-161.58 may be cited as the “Coastal Zone Protection Act of 1985.”

History.—s. 36, ch. 85-55.

F.S. 161.52 on Google Scholar

F.S. 161.52 on Casetext

Amendments to 161.52

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 161.52

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 161.52.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 161.52

Total Results: 19

City of Treasure Island v. Tahitian Treasure Island, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-10-27

Citation: 253 So. 3d 649

Snippet: as the Coastal Zone Protection Act of 1985. § 161.52, Fla. Stat. (1985). In passing it, the legislature

Atlantis at Perdido Ass'n, Inc. v. Warner

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-07-06

Citation: 932 So. 2d 1206, 2006 WL 1835321

Snippet: (2004). The Florida Legislature enacted section 161.052, Florida Statutes, in 1970 to prohibit certain

St. Joseph Land & Development Co. v. Florida Department of Natural Resources

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-03-17

Citation: 596 So. 2d 137, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2800, 1992 WL 51254

Snippet: reason, or unsupported by facts or logic. Section 161.052, Florida Statutes, adopted by the 1970 Legislature

DEPT. OF NAT. RESOURCES v. Wingfield Dev. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-05-28

Citation: 581 So. 2d 193, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4783, 1991 WL 87671

Snippet: statutes which the rule implements are §§ 370.02(5), 161.052 and 161.053. Of particular importance to note is

Town of Palm Beach v. STATE, DEPT. OF NAT'L RES.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-04-10

Citation: 577 So. 2d 1383

Snippet: fall within the meaning and intent of Sections 161.052 and 161.053, Florida Statutes: (f) Maintenance

St. Joe Paper Co. v. FLA. DEPT OF NATURAL RES.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-12-21

Citation: 536 So. 2d 1119

Snippet: 1970, the Florida Legislature enacted section 161.052, Florida Statutes, prohibiting certain construction

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1986-08-14

Snippet: would appear to be permissible. See, however, s. 161.052(1), F.S., prohibiting a county, among others, from

City of Daytona Beach Shores v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-12-12

Citation: 483 So. 2d 405, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 629

Snippet: the Coastal Zone Protection Act of 1985, sections 161.52-161.58, Florida Statutes (1985). In the provision

State Dept., Natural Res. v. Sunset Realty

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-08-09

Citation: 474 So. 2d 363

Snippet: variance is requested under the provisions of Section 161.052(2)(b), Florida Statutes, or Section 161.053(2)(b)

Celotex Corp. v. Copeland

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-06-13

Citation: 471 So. 2d 533, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 309, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3419

Snippet: 307, 392 N.E.2d 1352 (1979), aff'd, 85 Ill.2d 161, 52 Ill.Dec. 1, 421 N.E.2d 864 (1981); Louisville Trust

Woodholly v. DEPT. OF NATURAL RES.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-06-15

Citation: 451 So. 2d 1002

Snippet: line or the 50-foot setback requirement (Section 161.052) does not preclude all development of or alteration

Copeland v. Armstrong Cork Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-04-25

Citation: 447 So. 2d 922

Snippet: Illinois: Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos, 85 Ill.2d 161, 52 Ill. Dec. 1, 5, 421 N.E.2d 864, 868 (Ill. 1981)

Held v. Trafford Realty Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-06-02

Citation: 414 So. 2d 631

Snippet: mean high water mark of the Atlantic Ocean [sec. 161.052, Fla. Stat. (1979)], runs through the residence

Town of Indialantic v. McNulty

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-04-29

Citation: 400 So. 2d 1227, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19391

Snippet: restoration and erosion control projects... . [14] §§ 161.052(2)(b), 161.053(4), Fla. Stat. (1979). See § 163

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1979-08-10

Snippet: See ss. 161.041 and 161.051, F. S. 1977, and ss. 161.052, 161.053, and 161.061, F. S. (1978 Supp.);see also

State Ex Rel. Shevin v. INDICO CORPORATION

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-08-28

Citation: 319 So. 2d 173

Snippet: violations of coastal construction requirements under § 161.052, Florida Statutes, and violations of Development

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1974-04-16

Snippet: feet landward of the erosion control line (s. 161.052, F.S.), or as determined on a county-by-county

State Ex Rel. Keefe v. City of St. Petersburg

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-01-02

Citation: 144 So. 313, 106 Fla. 742

Snippet: or taken away. See Hunter v. Pittsburg, 207 U.S. 161,52 L.Ed. 151, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 40; Commonwealth v

Smith v. Gail

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1902-06-15

Citation: 44 Fla. 803

Snippet: resulted in a verdict for the plaintiffs below, for $161.52, upon which judgment was entered’ upon the same