Florida Statute 163.065 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 163
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 163.065

163.065 Miami River Improvement Act.—

(1) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the “Miami River Improvement Act.”

(2) FINDINGS; PURPOSE.—

(a) The Miami River Commission was created by chapter 98-402, Laws of Florida, to be the official coordinating clearinghouse for all public policy and projects related to the Miami River.

(b) The United States Congress has provided funding for an initial federal share of 80 percent for the environmental and navigational improvements to the Miami River. The governments of the City of Miami and Miami-Dade County are coordinating with the Legislature and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection to determine how the 20-percent local share will be provided.

(c) Successful revitalizing and sustaining the urban redevelopment of the areas adjacent to the Miami River is dependent on addressing, through an integrated and coordinated intergovernmental plan, a range of varied components essential to a healthy urban environment, including cultural, recreational, economic, and transportation components.

(d) The purpose of this section is to ensure a coordinated federal, state, regional, and local effort to improve the Miami River and adjacent areas.

(3) AGENCY ASSISTANCE.—All state and regional agencies shall provide all available assistance to the Miami River Commission in the conduct of its activities.

(4) PLAN.—The Miami River Commission, working with the City of Miami and Miami-Dade County, shall consider the merits of the following:

(a) Development and adoption of an urban infill and redevelopment plan, under ss. 163.2511-163.2520, which participating state and regional agencies shall review for the purposes of determining consistency with applicable law.

(b) Development of a greenway/riverwalk and blueway, where appropriate, as authorized in s. 260.011, to provide an attractive and safe connector system of bicycle, pedestrian, and transit routes and water taxis to link jobs, waterfront amenities, and people, and contribute to the comprehensive revitalization of the Miami River.

History.—s. 26, ch. 2000-170; s. 23, ch. 2001-60; s. 185, ch. 2010-102; s. 2, ch. 2012-90.

F.S. 163.065 on Google Scholar

F.S. 163.065 on Casetext

Amendments to 163.065

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 163.065

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 163.065.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 163.065

Total Results: 8

DIRTY DUCK 16004, LLC, DIRTY DUCK 16008, LLC v. TOWN OF REDINGTON BEACH

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-11-08

Snippet: opposition, the Town argues that to construe section 163.065(2) in that manner does not give full effect to

Ralph Monroe v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-28

Citation: 191 So. 3d 395, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 192, 2016 WL 1700525, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 900, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6438

Snippet: for lodging, at the time of the offense. Id. at 163-65. The court found this argument waived because the

Monroe v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-10-27

Citation: 148 So. 3d 850, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17461, 2014 WL 5420656

Snippet: for lodging, at the time of the offense. Id. at 163-65. The court found this argument waived because the

Branson v. Rodriguez-Linares

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-07-25

Citation: 143 So. 3d 1070, 2014 WL 3673881, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11388

Snippet: Giallanza v. Giallanza, 787 So.2d 162, 163-65 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), this court held that an injunction

Miles v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-03-23

Citation: 60 So. 3d 447, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3976, 2011 WL 1007946

Snippet: required to terminate the interrogation. Id. at 163— 65. Even if the statement could be construed as an

Boettcher v. IMC Mortg. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-05-12

Citation: 871 So. 2d 1047, 2004 WL 1057824

Snippet: Norton Co. v. Smyth, 112 Wash.App. 865, 51 P.3d 159, 163-65 (2002); HMO-W, Inc. v. SSM Health Care Sys., 234

Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Maxwell

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-03-17

Citation: 523 So. 2d 668, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 703, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1066, 1988 WL 21668

Snippet: owed. An additional billing was generated for $163.65 and was sent to Maxwell. Nationwide received no

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Keilen

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-03-01

Citation: 183 So. 2d 547, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5542

Snippet: HENDRY, Chief Judge. This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, as executrix, in the sum of $501 and for the plaintiff, a widow, in the sum of $86,000 against both defendants in actions which were consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal. The action arose out of a collision at a railroad crossing between defendant, Florida East Coast Railway Company, and a car owned by defendant, Broward Auto Rental, Inc. The plaintiff sued both defendants