Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 163.3211 (2025)

Conflict with other statutes.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

163.3211 Conflict with other statutes.—Where this act may be in conflict with any other provision or provisions of law relating to local governments having authority to regulate the development of land, the provisions of this act shall govern unless the provisions of this act are met or exceeded by such other provision or provisions of law relating to local government, including land development regulations adopted pursuant to chapter 125 or chapter 166. Nothing in this act is intended to withdraw or diminish any legal powers or responsibilities of state agencies or change any requirement of existing law that local regulations comply with state standards or rules.

History.—s. 17, ch. 75-257; s. 17, ch. 85-55; s. 25, ch. 87-224.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1979–1994 · leading case: City of Sanibel v. Buntrock, 409 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

City of Sanibel v. Buntrock, 409 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). · cites it 2× “It points to section 163.3211, Florida Statutes (1979), which provides that if the Act is in conflict with other laws relating to local governments having authority to regulate the development of land, its provisions "shall govern unless the provisions of this act are met or…”

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Mayor, 633 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). “Section 163.3211 specifically requires that the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act controls when in conflict with other statutes.”

López Torres v. Dep't of Transp., 488 So. 2d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). · cites it 2× “§ 163.3211, Fla. Stat. (1983). [7] There has been no demonstration in this appeal that the DOT has failed to comply with the relevant statutory scheme authorizing it to plan for and construct the bridge in question, including those provisions requiring public hearings and…”

City of Boca Raton v. Cnty. of Palm Beach, 372 So. 2d 982 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). · cites it 2× “Section 163.3211, Florida Statutes. When you put the provisions of Sections 163.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.