Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 163.330 (2025)
Short title.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
163.330 Short title.—This part shall be known and may be cited as the “Community Redevelopment Act of 1969.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1979–2008 · leading case: Wade v. Brown, 928 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
Wade v. Brown, 928 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). “See § 163.330, Fla. Stal. As an alternative to appointing independent members to make up the CRA, the “governing body” may declare itself to be the CRA.”
State v. Leon Cnty., Fla., 410 So. 2d 1346 (Fla. 1982). “[2] Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, §§ 163.330 163.450. [3] We see this as part of this Court's function in reviewing bond validations to determine whether the issuing agency had the power to act and whether it exercised that power in accordance with law.”
Katz v. Dade Cnty., 367 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). “And, although the county may have been proceeding under the Community Development Act, §§ 163.330, et seq., Fla.Stat. (1977), no finding of necessity required by § 163.”
Circa Ltd. v. City of Miami, 79 F.3d 1057 (11th Cir. 1996). “Background Through the Community Redevelopment Act (CRA), Fla.Stat. §§ 163.330-163.450, Florida state law gives local governments broad authority to undertake redevelopment projects for impoverished neighborhoods.”
Key West Harbour Dev. Corp. v. City of Key West, 738 F. Supp. 1390 (S.D. Fla. 1990). “The Florida Statutes provide for the modification of Redevelopment Plans, but do not specify procedures a governing body should follow in the event that it chooses to rescind such a plan. See id. To modify Redevelopment Plans, governing bodies must hold a public hearing on a…”
City of Hollywood Cmty. Redevelopment Agency v. 1843, LLC, 980 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). “See § 163.330-375, Fla. Stat. (1979). A “two-tiered” model is applied in determining whether a condemning authority has met its burden of proving rea *1142 sonable necessity for a taking.”
Fulmore v. Charlotte Cnty., 928 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). “The Appellants (the Landowners) in these consolidated cases challenge the trial court's orders rejecting their constitutional challenge to the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969 (the Act), §§ 163.330.463, Fla. Stat. (2003), and allowing the taking of their property through the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.