Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 163.358 (2025)
Exercise of powers in carrying out community redevelopment and related activities.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
163.358 Exercise of powers in carrying out community redevelopment and related activities.—Each county and municipality has all powers necessary or convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of this part, including those powers granted under s. 163.370. A county or municipality may delegate such powers to a community redevelopment agency created under s. 163.356, except the following, which continue to vest in the governing body of the county or municipality:
(1) The power to determine an area to be a slum or blighted area, or combination thereof; to designate such area as appropriate for community redevelopment; and to hold any public hearings required with respect thereto.
(2) The power to grant final approval to community redevelopment plans and modifications thereof.
(3) The power to authorize the issuance of revenue bonds as set forth in s. 163.385.
(4) The power to approve the acquisition, demolition, removal, or disposal of property as provided in s. 163.370(4) and the power to assume the responsibility to bear loss as provided in s. 163.370(4).
(5) The power to approve the development of community policing innovations.
(6) The power of eminent domain.
History.—s. 2, ch. 77-391; s. 70, ch. 81-259; s. 7, ch. 84-356; s. 34, ch. 91-45; s. 5, ch. 98-314; s. 9, ch. 2006-11.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1980–2008 · leading case: City of Parker v. State, 992 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 2008).
City of Parker v. State, 992 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 2008). “358, Florida Statutes (2006), of the Community Redevelopment Act provides that " [e]ach county and municipality has all powers necessary or convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of this part." (Emphasis added.) One of the "provisions of this part" is…”
Striton Props., Inc. v. City of Jacksonville Beach, 533 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). “" § 163.358, Fla. Stat. (1977). The agency may prepare, or cause to be prepared, a community redevelopment plan, or any person or agency, public or private, may submit such a plan to the agency.”
State v. Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency, 392 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 1980). “§ 163.358. In a chartered county, the powers conferred by the act are conferred on the county governing body.”
Lyes v. City of Riviera Beach, 166 F.3d 1332 (11th Cir. 1999). “With the exception of certain enumerated powers, they are granted “all the powers necessary or convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of [the community redevelopment agency legislation]_” Fla. Stat. Ann. § 163.358 (West 1990 & Supp.”
Circa Ltd. v. City of Miami, 79 F.3d 1057 (11th Cir. 1996). “Fla.Stat. § 163.358(2). Therefore, the agency may solicit and select proposals for redevelopment plans, but the agency may not implement those proposals until the local government gives its final approval to the proposed plan.”
Lyes v. City of Riviera Beach, FL, 126 F.3d 1380 (11th Cir. 1997). “See Fla. Stat. Ann. §§ 163.358 , 163.370. Appellees argue, consistent with the district court's order, that the operations of the CRA and the City are not interrelated because the entities have separate bank accounts, offices, and records, and because Florida law describes a…”
Key West Harbour Dev. Corp. v. City of Key West, 738 F. Supp. 1390 (S.D. Fla. 1990). “Defendants claim that they had legislative power, as the City Commission, to rescind the redevelopment plan, see Fla. Stat. § 163.358 (1989); the relevant statutory section provides: the municipality’s governing body shall continue to have “[t]he power to determine an area .”
Lyes v. City of Riviera Beach, FL (11th Cir. 1997). “” Fla. Stat. Ann. § 163.358 (West 1990 & Supp.”
Lyes v. City of Riviera Beach, FL (11th Cir. 1997). “" Fla. Stat. Ann. § 163.358 (West 1990 & Supp.”
Price v. City of Fort Pierce, 625 F. Supp. 979 (S.D. Fla. 1986). “Ibid at §§ 163.358 and 163.370(l)(a). The City of Fort Pierce declared that slum and blighted areas existed in the community and that redevelopment was in its best interests.”
— 163.358(2) — 1 case
Circa Ltd. v. City of Miami, 79 F.3d 1057 (11th Cir. 1996). “Fla.Stat. § 163.358(2). Therefore, the agency may solicit and select proposals for redevelopment plans, but the agency may not implement those proposals until the local government gives its final approval to the proposed plan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.