Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 171.052 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 171.052 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 171.052

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES
Chapter 171
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 171.052
171.052 Criteria for contraction of municipal boundaries.—
(1) Only those areas which do not meet the criteria for annexation in s. 171.043 may be proposed for exclusion by municipal governing bodies. If the area proposed to be excluded does not meet the criteria of s. 171.043, but such exclusion would result in a portion of the municipality becoming noncontiguous with the rest of the municipality, then such exclusion shall not be allowed.
(2) The ordinance shall make provision for apportionment of any prior existing debt and property.
History.—s. 1, ch. 74-190.

F.S. 171.052 on Google Scholar

F.S. 171.052 on Casetext

Amendments to 171.052


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 171.052
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 171.052.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 171.052

Total Results: 5

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2004-04-30

Snippet: boundaries of municipalities in this state." 8 Section 171.052(1), Fla. Stat. And see s. 171.043, Fla. Stat.,

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1998-12-10

Snippet: city boundaries under the provisions of section 171.052, Florida Statutes. Finally, by excluding this property

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1991-03-26

Snippet: except as otherwise provided herein. 6 Section 171.052, F.S. 7 Section 171.043(1) and (2), F.S. 8 See

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1976-11-15

Snippet: the rejection is based must be stated). Section 171.052(1) (criteria for contraction) clearly provides

Wicoma Investment Co. v. Pridgeon

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-05-05

Citation: 188 So. 597, 137 Fla. 540, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1868

Snippet: Am. Rep. 327; Mears v. New York R. Co.,75 Conn. 171, 52 A. 610, 96 Am. St. Rep. 192, 56 L.R.A. 884. Under