Florida Statute 177.111 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES

Chapter 177
LAND BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 177.111

177.111 Instructions for filing plat.—After the approval by the appropriate governing body required by s. 177.071, the plat shall be recorded by the circuit court clerk or other recording officer upon submission thereto of such approved plat. The circuit court clerk or other recording officer shall maintain in his or her office a book of the proper size for such papers so that they shall not be folded, to be kept in the vault. A print or photographic copy must be filed in a similar book and kept in his or her office for the use of the public. The clerk shall make available to the public a full size copy of the record plat at a reasonable fee.

History.—s. 1, ch. 71-339; s. 1, ch. 76-110; s. 937, ch. 95-147; s. 7, ch. 99-259.

F.S. 177.111 on Google Scholar

F.S. 177.111 on Casetext

Amendments to 177.111

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 177.111

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 177.111.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 177.111

Total Results: 20

The Florida Bar v. KIVISTO

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-05-12

Citation: 62 So. 3d 1137, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 208, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 1052, 2011 WL 1793382

Snippet: 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992); In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 L.Ed.2d 599 (1991); In re McDonald

Florida Bd. of Bar Examiners Ex Rel. Ramos

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-08-27

Citation: 17 So. 3d 268, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 483, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1394

Snippet: 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992); In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 L.Ed.2d 599 (1991); In re McDonald

Steele v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-07-09

Citation: 14 So. 3d 221, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 437, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1015

Snippet: 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992); In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 L.Ed.2d 599 (1991); In re McDonald

Steele v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-07-09

Citation: 14 So. 3d 221, 2009 WL 1955293

Snippet: 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992); In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 L.Ed.2d 599 (1991); In re McDonald

Pettway v. McNeil

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-07-17

Citation: 987 So. 2d 20, 2008 WL 2130286

Snippet: 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992); In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 L.Ed.2d 599 (1991); In re McDonald

Mora v. McNeil

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-05-23

Citation: 984 So. 2d 513, 2008 WL 731769

Snippet: Ed.2d 305 (1992); In re Sindram, *516 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 L.Ed.2d 599 (1991); In re McDonald

The Florida Bar v. Thompson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-03-20

Citation: 979 So. 2d 917, 2008 WL 731902

Snippet: 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992); In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 L.Ed.2d 599 (1991); In re McDonald

Tate v. McNeil

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-03-13

Citation: 983 So. 2d 502, 2008 WL 659037

Snippet: 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992); In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 L.Ed.2d 599 (1991); In re McDonald

Hamilton v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-11-16

Citation: 945 So. 2d 1121, 2006 WL 3317024

Snippet: 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992); In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 L.Ed.2d 599 (1991); In re McDonald

May v. Barthet

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-06-22

Citation: 934 So. 2d 1184, 2006 WL 1699473

Snippet: 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992); In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 L.Ed.2d 599 (1991); In re McDonald

Sibley v. FLORIDA JUD. QUALIFICATIONS COM'N

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-04-27

Citation: 973 So. 2d 425, 2006 WL 1096636

Snippet: 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992); In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 L.Ed.2d 599 (1991); In re McDonald

Perrine v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-12-14

Citation: 919 So. 2d 520, 2005 WL 3414352

Snippet: see generally McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U.S. 171, 177, 111 S.Ct. 2204, 2208, 115 L.Ed.2d 158 (1991) (dictum)

Walton v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-05-29

Citation: 847 So. 2d 438, 2003 WL 21250855

Snippet: 156, 111 S.Ct. 486; see also McNeil, 501 U.S. at 177, 111 S.Ct. 2204. The conversations at issue here were

Wassman v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-10-12

Citation: 797 So. 2d 626, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14459

Snippet: of one liability. Gonia v. O'Brion, 223 Mass. 177, 111 N.E. 787. And so it is said that it is too late

Martin v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-01-20

Citation: 747 So. 2d 386, 2000 WL 44055

Snippet: petitions within ten years); In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 L.Ed.2d 599 (1991) (requiring petitioner

Vickson v. Singletary

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-04-06

Citation: 734 So. 2d 376, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 175, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 574

Snippet: petitions within 10 years); In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 L.Ed.2d 599 (1991) (requiring petitioner

Vickson v. Singletary

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-04-06

Citation: 734 So. 2d 376, 1999 WL 190487

Snippet: petitions within 10 years); In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 L.Ed.2d 599 (1991) (requiring petitioner

Holmes v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-03-15

Citation: 669 So. 2d 360, 1996 WL 111782

Snippet: reasoning set forth in In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 L.Ed.2d 599, reh'g denied, 498

Sapp v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-09-22

Citation: 660 So. 2d 1146, 1995 WL 557547

Snippet: unless counsel is present." McNeil, 501 U.S. at 177, 111 S.Ct. at 2208, citing Roberson, 486 U.S. 675,

Martin v. Marko

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-03-15

Citation: 651 So. 2d 819, 1995 WL 106257

Snippet: pauperis rule, Rule 39. In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 *821 L.Ed.2d 599, reh'g denied