Cases from cite.case.law:

CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH, v. SMITH, 853 So. 2d 495 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Furthermore, section 180.21, Florida Statutes, states that “[t]he authority and powers granted by [Chapter . . .

STATE v. CITY OF WEST PANAMA CITY BEACH,, 127 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 1961)

. . . Section 180.08, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., we think the appellant overlooks the provisions of Section 180.21 . . .

PERLMAN v. C. FELDMANN, 129 F. Supp. 162 (D. Conn. 1952)

. . . They were, respectively, $124,421.09 and $195,-180.21. . . .

JOSEPH ROTHSCHILD v. THE UNITED STATES, 62 Ct. Cl. 297 (Ct. Cl. 1926)

. . . The voucher was approved for payment in the sum of $180.21, but was denied payment by the Comptroller . . . The plaintiff is now suing here to recover the said sum of $180.21. . . . The voucher was approved for payment in the sum of $180.21, but the Comptroller General in decision dated . . . If he is entitled to receive same, the amount thereof is $180.21. . . .

ARMOUR CO. v. RENAKER, 191 F. 48 (C.C.E.D. Ky. 1911)

. . . Patterson prepared at Cynthiana on January 10th or 11th there is credited to defendants the sum of $180.21 . . .