Cases from cite.case.law:

FRESH GARLIC PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, L. L. C. Co. Co. Co. Co. Co. Co. Co. v. UNITED STATES, Co. Co. Co., 190 F. Supp. 3d 1302 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2016)

. . . substitute for mandamus of Commerce to. immediately adjust the plaintiffs unlawful cash deposit rate from 198.08% . . .

DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS COALITION, v. UNITED STATES,, 816 F. Supp. 2d 1342 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2012)

. . . There, an importer sought mandamus for the Department to lower the cash deposit rate from 198.08% to . . .

EPOCH DESIGN LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 810 F. Supp. 2d 1366 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2012)

. . . the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”), on which Customs assessed anti-dumping duties at the rate of 198.08% . . . entry of merchandise on March 28, 2008, Customs assessed antidumping duties at the “PRC-Wide” rate of 198.08% . . . demonstrated both de facto and de jure independence from government control, and a "PRC-Wide” rate of 198.08% . . . see also id. ¶ 14 (asserting that "the collection of anti-dumping duties by Customs at the rate of 198.08% . . .

Co. Co. Co. v., 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 200 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . demonstrated both de facto and de jure independence from government control, and a PRC-wide rate of 198.08% . . .

FAIRMONT DESIGNS, INC. Co. Co. Co. v. UNITED STATES,, 477 F. Supp. 2d 1278 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . demonstrated both de facto and de jure independence from government control, and a PRC-wide rate of 198.08% . . .

GUANGZHOU MARIA YEE FURNISHINGS, LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 425 F. Supp. 2d 1320 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

. . . and, therefore, assessed Maria Yee the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) -wide cash deposit rate of 198.08% . . .

DECCA HOSPITALITY FURNISHINGS, LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 427 F. Supp. 2d 1249 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

. . . Decca Hospitality Furnishings, LLC (“Decca”), was entitled to a 6.65% cash deposit rate instead of the 198.08% . . . to all importers who did not establish independence from state-control, i.e., the “PRC-wide” rate of 198.08% . . . Decca claims that because of its current cash deposit rate of 198.08%, and its inability to obtain credit . . . After all, this court has determined that application of the 198.08% rate is unlawful. . . . Currently, Commerce requires Decca to post a 198.08% cash deposit — a rate almost thirty times that found . . .

v., 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 374 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

. . . and, therefore, assessed Maria Yee the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”)-wide cash deposit rate of 198.08% . . .

LLC, v., 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 357 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

. . . Decca Hospitality Furnishings, LLC (“Decca”), was entitled to a 6.65% cash deposit rate instead of the 198.08% . . . to all importers who did not establish independence from state-control, i.e., the “PRC-wide” rate of 198.08% . . . Decca claims that because of its current cash deposit rate of 198.08%, and its inability to obtain credit . . . After all, this court has determined that application of the 198.08% rate is unlawful. . . . Currently, Commerce requires Decca to post a 198.08% cash deposit - a rate almost thirty times that found . . .

DECCA HOSPITALITY FURNISHINGS, LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 412 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2005)

. . . Decca”) and, therefore, assessed Decca the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”)-wide cash deposit rate of 198.08% . . .

GUANGZHOU MARIA YEE FURNISHINGS, LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 412 F. Supp. 2d 1301 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2005)

. . . Based on this presumption, in this investigation, Commerce applied the PRC antidumping rate of 198.08% . . . Commerce found that Maria Yee was state-controlled and therefore applied the PRC-wide anti-dumping rate of 198.08% . . .

v., 29 Ct. Int'l Trade 1470 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2005)

. . . Based on this presumption, in this investigation, Commerce applied the PRC antidumping rate of 198.08% . . . Commerce found that Maria Yee was state-controlled and therefore applied the PRCwide anti-dumping rate of 198.08% . . .

DECCA HOSPITALITY FURNISHINGS, LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 391 F. Supp. 2d 1298 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2005)

. . . Commerce assigned all other parties a rate of 198.08%. Final Determination, 69 Fed.Reg. at 67,316. . . .

LLC, Et Al. v. Et Al., 29 Ct. Int'l Trade 920 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2005)

. . . Commerce assigned all other parties a rate of 198.08%. Final Determination, 69 Fed. Reg. at 67,316. . . .

LLC, ET AL. v. ET AL., 29 Ct. Int'l Trade 1504 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2005)

. . . Decca”) and, therefore, assessed Decca the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”)-wide cash deposit rate of 198.08% . . .