Florida Statute 210.22 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 210
TAX ON TOBACCO PRODUCTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 210.22

210.22 Declaration of legislative intent.—In the event that any section or clause hereof shall for any reason be held or declared invalid, the same shall be eliminated and the remaining portion or portions hereof shall remain in full force and effect as if such invalid clause or section had not been incorporated herein, provided that ss. 210.03 and 210.20 are declaratory of the specific legislative intent in the passage of this part, and should either of said sections be declared unconstitutional, ineffective, or invalid, then in such event, the entire part shall become inoperative and void.

History.—s. 3, ch. 26320, 1949; s. 16, ch. 87-86.

F.S. 210.22 on Google Scholar

F.S. 210.22 on Casetext

Amendments to 210.22

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 210.22

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 210.22.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 210.22

Total Results: 20

Vance v. Fields

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-03-09

Citation: 172 So. 2d 613, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4382

Snippet: assignee. 6 Am.Jur.2nd, Assignments, Sec. 26, page 210; 22 Fla.Jur. Mortgages, Sec. 540, page 621, and the

Freeze v. County of Pinellas

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-10-17

Citation: 146 So. 2d 97

Snippet: Conroy v. City of Battle Creek (1946) 314 Mich. 210, 22 N.W.2d 275; Tietjen v. Mayor and Alderman of Savannah

Ullendorff v. Brown

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1945-12-11

Citation: 24 So. 2d 37, 156 Fla. 655, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 960

Snippet: Vol. VIII, Sec. 2216 (d), p. 170; Sec. 2221, p. 210; 22 L.R.A.N.S. 513; 15 Am. Jur. p. 842, Dead Bodies

Thomas v. Burke, Et Ux.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-01-31

Citation: 200 So. 69, 146 Fla. 5, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1058

Snippet: judgment of this Court in Kahn v. Weinlander,39 Fla. 210, 22 So. 653, in which it was held: "In a contest between

Rorick v. Chancey

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-10-26

Citation: 195 So. 418, 142 Fla. 290

Snippet: Section 3132 R. G. S., Kahn v. Weinlander, 39 Fla. 210, 22 So. 653. "In Florida there is no special statute

Foster v. Thornton

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1937-09-16

Citation: 179 So. 882, 131 Fla. 277

Snippet: clear and strict proof. Kahn v. Weinlander, 39 Fla. 210,22 South. Rep. 653. It nowhere appears from the answer

Bender v. General Electric Supply Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-11-15

Citation: 157 So. 573, 117 Fla. 275, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1248

Snippet: ownership of such lands. Kahn v. Weinlander, 39 Fla. 210, 22 So. R. 653." While in the case of Russ v. Blackshear

Davis Ex Rel. Estate of Davis v. DeVane

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-05-06

Citation: 148 So. 587, 110 Fla. 108

Snippet: 19 So. 628; Kahn et al. v. Weinlander, 39 Fla. 210, 22 So. 653; American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. etc

Delbeck Investment Co. v. Raff

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-09-19

Citation: 136 So. 683, 102 Fla. 942, 1931 Fla. LEXIS 2355

Snippet: statute in the cases of Kahn vs. Weinlander, 39 Fla. 210, 22 So. 653; Farrell v. Forest Investment Co., 73 Fla

Rorick v. Stilwell

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-04-01

Citation: 133 So. 609, 101 Fla. 4

Snippet: Section 3132, R.G.S., Kahn vs. Weinlander, 39 Fla. 210, 22 So. 653. In Florida there is no special statute

Weaver-Loughridge Lumber Co. v. Kirkland

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-03-04

Citation: 126 So. 773, 99 Fla. 427

Snippet: ownership of such lands. Kahn v. Weinlander, 39 Fla. 210, 22 So. R. 653. The original judgment of this Court

Hummell v. Harrington

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1926-06-29

Citation: 109 So. 320, 92 Fla. 87

Snippet: the case of Kahn et al. v. Weinlander, 39 Fla. 210,22 South. Rep. 653, held: "In a contest between creditors

Johnson v. Sumner

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-11-23

Citation: 82 Fla. 377, 90 So. 171

Snippet: court in the ease-%. Kahn v. Weinlander, 39 Fla. 210, 22 South. Rep. 653 ;“Ina contest between creditors

Farrell v. Forest Investment Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1917-01-31

Citation: 73 Fla. 191, 74 So. 216

Snippet: England.” In the case of Kahn v. Weinlander, 39 Fla. 210, 22 South. Rep. 653, this court speaking of the above

Charlotte Harbor & Northern Railway Co. v. Lancaster

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1915-07-13

Citation: 70 Fla. 200

Snippet: *209injunction. See Kahn v. Weinlander, 39 Fla. 210, 22 South. Rep. 653; Thebaut v. Canova, 11 Fla. 143;

Snell v. Richardson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1914-04-28

Citation: 67 Fla. 386, 65 So. 592

Snippet: such statute, see Kahn v. Weinlander, 39 Fla. 210, 22 South. Rep. 653; Long v. Anderson, 48 Fla. 279

Russell v. Stickney

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1911-06-15

Citation: 62 Fla. 569

Snippet: oath in their bill. Kahn v. Weinlander, 39 Fla. 210, 22 South. Rep. 653, and Pinney v. Pinney, 46 Fla.

Hobbs v. Frazier

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1911-01-15

Citation: 61 Fla. 611

Snippet: trustee. In the case of Kahn v. Weinlander, 39 Fla., 210, 22 South. Rep., 653, this court held that in a contest

City of Ocala v. Anderson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1909-06-15

Citation: 58 Fla. 415

Snippet: 31 South. Rep. 830; Kahn v. Weinlander, 39 Fla. 210, 22 South. Rep. 653; Section 1877 General Statutes

Worley v. Dade County Security Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1906-06-15

Citation: 52 Fla. 666

Snippet: waived in the bill (Kahn v. Weinlander, 39 Fla. 210, 22 South Rep. 653) but this did not excuse the signing