Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 215.74 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 215.74 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 215.74

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 215
FINANCIAL MATTERS: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 215.74
215.74 Pledge of constitutional fuel tax; consent by counties and state agency supervising state road system.Any portion of the constitutional fuel tax provided for and allocated to the account of each of the several counties by s. 9(c), Art. XII of the State Constitution may be pledged and used for the payment of bonds issued by the division; provided, however, that such funds may only be pledged and used with the consent of the state agency supervising the state road system and the governing body of the county to the account of which such portion of the constitutional fuel tax is allocated.
History.s. 19, ch. 69-230; s. 36, ch. 83-3; s. 132, ch. 95-417.

F.S. 215.74 on Google Scholar

F.S. 215.74 on Casetext

Amendments to 215.74


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 215.74
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 215.74.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 215.74

Total Results: 1

Giller v. McIntosh

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-03-11

Citation: 309 So. 2d 218, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14368

Snippet: PER CURIAM. The plaintiff, Norman M. Giller, has appealed an order granting a new trial in his action for damages against Donald W. McIntosh. The order of the trial judge is upon the ground that the verdict for the plaintiff was against the manifest weight of the evidence. In this same trial, Donald W. McIntosh was a third party plaintiff against Harold A. Schuler. The order granting motions for new trial also granted the motion of third party defendant Schu-ler for a new trial upon the same ground