Florida Statute 215.92 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 215
FINANCIAL MATTERS: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 215.92

215.92 Definitions relating to Florida Financial Management Information System Act.—For the purposes of ss. 215.90-215.96:

(1) “Auditable” means the presence of features and characteristics that are needed to verify the proper functioning of controls in any given information subsystem.

(2) “Board” means the Financial Management Information Board.

(3) “Coordinating council” or “council” means the Florida Financial Management Information System Coordinating Council.

(4) “Data or data code” means representation of facts, concepts, or instructions in a formalized manner suitable for communication, interpretation, or processing by humans or by automatic means. The term includes any representations such as characters or analog quantities to which meaning is, or might be, assigned.

(5) “Design and coordination staff” means the personnel responsible for providing administrative and clerical support to the board, coordinating council, and secretary to the board. The design and coordination staff shall function as the agency clerk for the board and the coordinating council. For administrative purposes, the design and coordination staff are assigned to the Department of Financial Services but they are functionally assigned to the board.

(6) “Functional owner” means the agency, or the part of the judicial branch, that has the legal responsibility to ensure that a subsystem is designed, implemented, and operated in accordance with ss. 215.90-215.96.

(7) “Functional system specifications” means the detailed written description of an information subsystem. These specifications are prepared by the functional owner of the system; describe, in the functional owner’s language, what an information subsystem is required to do; and describe the features, characteristics, controls, and internal control measures to be incorporated into the information subsystem. Such specifications are the basis for the preparation of the technical system specifications by the functional owner.

(8) “Information system” means a group of interrelated information subsystems.

(9) “Information subsystem” means the entire collection of procedures, equipment, and people devoted to the generation, collection, evaluation, storage, retrieval, and dissemination of data and information within an organization or functional area in order to promote the flow of information from source to user.

History.—s. 1, ch. 80-45; s. 28, ch. 92-142; s. 21, ch. 97-286; s. 15, ch. 2003-138; s. 229, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 215.92 on Google Scholar

F.S. 215.92 on Casetext

Amendments to 215.92

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 215.92

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 215.92.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 215.92

Total Results: 5

Flynn v. Estevez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-06-27

Citation: 221 So. 3d 1241, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9295

Snippet: religious belief.” Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 215, 92 S.Ct. 1526, 32 L.Ed.2d 15 (1972). Here, the conduct

Freeman v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-02-13

Citation: 924 So. 2d 48, 2006 WL 357826

Snippet: 127 (1982); Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 215, 92 S.Ct. 1526, 32 L.Ed.2d 15 (1972); Gillette v. United

Warner v. City of Boca Raton

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-09-02

Citation: 887 So. 2d 1023, 2004 WL 1944456

Snippet: (1945)); see also Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 215, 92 S.Ct. 1526, 32 L.Ed.2d 15 (1972) ("A way of life

Malicki v. Doe

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-03-14

Citation: 814 So. 2d 347, 2002 WL 390021

Snippet: religious belief." Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 215, 92 S.Ct. 1526, 32 L.Ed.2d 15 (1972); see Sanders v

Florida Bar v. Morris

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-06-14

Citation: 452 So. 2d 545, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3101

Snippet: So.2d 1274 (Fla.1982). Costs in the amount of $1,215.92 were found to be reasonable and taxed to the respondent