The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . For instance, during the July test, the exteri- or left boot temperature reading at 2625 seconds was 217.18 . . .
. . . instance during the July 2003 test, the exterior left boot temperature reading at 2625 seconds was 217.18 . . .
. . . . § 217.18, because NEC did not appeal most of the fourteen other forest plans it alleges the Forest . . .
. . . . § 217.18. . . .
. . . difference between the contract price of $274.88 per ton and the value at the time of the breach, $217.18 . . .
. . . . § 217.18. . . .
. . . . § 217.18 (1989); 36 C.F.R. § 215.20 (1993). . . . At first blush, it is arguable that plaintiffs are bound by 36 C.F.R. § 217.18 (effective since 1989) . . . However, upon closer consideration, the Court finds that plaintiffs are not bound by 36 C.F.R. § 217.18 . . .
. . . . § 217.18. So section 10(c) required exhaustion, and Glisson failed to exhaust. . . .
. . . . § 217.18, which states: Policy in event of judicial proceedings It is the position of the Department . . . In addition, 36 C.F.R. § 217.18 is a policy statement, defined as “statements issued by an agency to . . . As a regulation intended to serve an only an advisory function, 36 C.F.R. § 217.18 does not require exhaustion . . .
. . . The procedure to be followed by a creditor in protecting such rights as are provided by section 217.18 . . .
. . . respondent, allowed by the order of the District Court, was that this amount should be reduced by $217.18 . . .