Florida Statute 218.05 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 218
FINANCIAL MATTERS PERTAINING TO POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 218.05

218.05 Certain bonds sold to Federal Government, etc., validated.—

(1) All bonds heretofore issued for the purpose of financing or aiding in financing any work, undertaking or project by any public body to which any loan or grant has heretofore been made or agreed to be made by the United States through the Federal Emergency Administrator of Public Works for the purpose of financing or aiding in financing of such work, undertaking or project, including all proceedings for the authorization and issuance of such bonds and the sale, execution and delivery thereof, are validated, ratified, approved and confirmed, notwithstanding any lack of power of such public body or the governing board, council or commission or officers thereof, to authorize and issue such bonds, or to sell, execute or deliver the same, and notwithstanding any defects or irregularities in such proceedings, or in such sale, execution or delivery; and such bonds are and shall be binding, legal, valid and enforceable obligations of such public body.

(2) The term “bonds” includes bonds, notes, warrants, debentures, certificates of indebtedness, revenue certificates and all instruments or obligations evidencing or representing indebtedness, or evidencing or representing the borrowing of money or evidencing or representing a charge, lien, or encumbrance on specific revenues, income or property of a public body, including all instruments or obligations payable from a special fund.

History.—ss. 1, 4, ch. 17750, 1937; CGL 1940 Supp. 1365(43),(45).

F.S. 218.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 218.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 218.05

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 218.05

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 218.05.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 218.05

Total Results: 11

Cabrera v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-10-08

Citation: 884 So. 2d 482, 2004 WL 2254537

Snippet: State, 710 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Id. at 218. [5] See Kelly v. State, 795 So.2d 135 (Fla. 5th DCA

Jarrouge v. Hanna

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-03-24

Citation: 596 So. 2d 153, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3773, 1992 WL 55225

Snippet: 221, 28 L.Ed. 751 (1884), reh. denied, 114 U.S. 218, 5 S.Ct. 857, 29 L.Ed. 94 (1885).

Alvarez v. Department of Professional Regulation

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-07-27

Citation: 546 So. 2d 726, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 382, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 728, 1989 WL 84101

Snippet: unrestricted licenses to petitioners under section 455.-218(5), Florida Statutes (1987),4 and that mandamus is

Boyd v. Panama City Boat Yard, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-04-07

Citation: 522 So. 2d 1058, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 894, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1452, 1988 WL 31729

Snippet: 031. . See e.g. 11 Fla.Jur.2d Contracts Section 218; 5 Fla.Jur.2d Bailments Section 9; 12 Fla.Jur.2d Conversion

Ritter v. Brengle

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-04-06

Citation: 185 So. 2d 7, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5227

Snippet: Fla., 73 So.2d 403, 405; Felshin v. Sir, 149 Fla. 218, 5 So.2d 600.” Further, it has been held that where

Gentile v. Austin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-07-21

Citation: 166 So. 2d 155, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 3939

Snippet: was appellee. See also Felshin v. Sir, 149 Fla. 218, 5 So.2d 600. Affirmed.

Easton v. Weir

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-12-14

Citation: 125 So. 2d 115

Snippet: 474, 145 So. 72; Felshin v. Sir, 1942, 149 Fla. 218, 5 So.2d 600. It is equally well established that

Wiley v. Dow

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-11-18

Citation: 107 So. 2d 166

Snippet: person of the tenant. See Felshin v. Sir, 149 Fla. 218, 5 So.2d 600, and Brooks v. Peters, 157 Fla. 141,

Chaney v. Headley

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1956-10-31

Citation: 90 So. 2d 297

Snippet: Fla., 73 So.2d 403, 405; Felshin v. Sir, 149 Fla. 218, 5 So.2d 600. True, there was a conflict in available

Fisher v. Board of County Com'rs of Dade County

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1956-01-06

Citation: 84 So. 2d 572

Snippet: to maintain and repair said street paving is $2,218.05, and the estimated amount required annually to

Feigen v. Sokolsky

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1953-06-02

Citation: 65 So. 2d 769, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1344

Snippet: question for the jury. See Felshin v. Sir, 149 Fla. 218, 5 So.2d 600, 602; Steele v. Independent Fish Co.