Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 220.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 220.02 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 220.02

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 220
INCOME TAX CODE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 220.02
220.02 Legislative intent.
(1) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this code to impose a tax upon all corporations, organizations, associations, and other artificial entities which derive from this state or from any other jurisdiction permanent and inherent attributes not inherent in or available to natural persons, such as perpetual life, transferable ownership represented by shares or certificates, and limited liability for all owners. It is intended that any limited liability company that is classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes and is defined in and organized pursuant to chapter 605 or qualified to do business in this state as a foreign limited liability company not be subject to the tax imposed by this code. It is the intent of the Legislature to subject such corporations and other entities to taxation hereunder for the privilege of conducting business, deriving income, or existing within this state. This code is not intended to tax, and shall not be construed so as to tax, any natural person who engages in a trade, business, or profession in this state under his or her own or any fictitious name, whether individually as a proprietorship or in partnership with others, or as a member or a manager of a limited liability company classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes; any estate of a decedent or incompetent; or any testamentary trust. However, a corporation or other taxable entity which is or which becomes partners with one or more natural persons shall not, merely by reason of being a partner, exclude from its net income subject to tax its respective share of partnership net income. This statement of intent shall be given preeminent consideration in any construction or interpretation of this code in order to avoid any conflict between this code and the mandate in s. 5, Art. VII of the State Constitution that no income tax be levied upon natural persons who are residents and citizens of this state.
(2) It is the intent of the Legislature that the tax levied by this code be construed to be an excise or privilege tax measured by net income and that such tax not be deemed or construed to be a property tax or a tax on property or a tax measured by the value of property for any purpose.
(3) It is the intent of the Legislature that the income tax imposed by this code utilize, to the greatest extent possible, concepts of law which have been developed in connection with the income tax laws of the United States, in order to:
(a) Minimize the expenses of the Department of Revenue and difficulties in administering this code;
(b) Minimize the costs and difficulties of taxpayer compliance; and
(c) Maximize, for both revenue and statistical purposes, the sharing of information between the state and the Federal Government.
(4) It is the intent of the Legislature that the tax imposed by this code be prospective in effect only. Consistent with this intention and the intent expressed in subsection (3), it is hereby declared to be the intent of the Legislature that:
(a) “Income,” for purposes of this code, including gains from the sale, exchange, or other disposition of property, be deemed to be created for Florida income tax purposes at such time as such income is realized for federal income tax purposes;
(b) No accretion of value, no accrual of gain, and no acquisition of a right to receive or accrue income which has occurred or been generated prior to November 2, 1971, be deemed to be “property,” or an interest in property, for any purpose under this code; and
(c) All income realized for federal income tax purposes after November 2, 1971, be subject to taxation in full by this state and be taxed in the manner and to the extent provided in this code.
(5) It is the intent of the Legislature that, if there is included in any taxpayer’s net income subject to tax under this code any item or items of income which are determined to be improperly so included because of a conflict with any federal statute, the Constitution of the United States, or the State Constitution, all such items of income be excluded from the net incomes of all taxpayers subject to tax under this code, but all other provisions of this chapter, and their application, not be invalidated or in any way impaired by such required exclusion of an item or items of income.
(6)(a) It is the intent of the Legislature that the enterprise zone jobs credit provided by s. 220.181 be applicable only to those businesses located in an enterprise zone. It is further the intent of the Legislature to provide an incentive for the increased provision of employment opportunities leading to the improvement of the quality of life of those employed and the positive expansion of the economy of the state as well as the economy of present enterprise zones.
(b) Any person charged with any criminal offense arising from a civil disorder associated with an emergency, as defined in s. 220.03(1)(i), and found guilty, whether or not adjudication of guilt or imposition of sentence is suspended, deferred, or withheld, is not eligible to make application for, receive, or in any other manner enjoy the benefits or any form of assistance available under chapter 80-247, Laws of Florida.
(c) This subsection expires on the date specified in s. 290.016 for the expiration of the Florida Enterprise Zone Act.
(7)(a) It is the intent of the Legislature that the enterprise zone property tax credit provided by s. 220.182 be applicable only to those new or expanded businesses located in enterprise zones which make a positive expansionary contribution to the economy of this state and to the economy of their local communities in terms of new jobs for residents of enterprise zones and improvements to real and personal property located in enterprise zones.
(b) Any person charged with any criminal offense arising from a civil disorder associated with an emergency, as defined in s. 220.03(1)(i), and found guilty, whether or not adjudication of guilt or imposition of sentence is suspended, deferred, or withheld, is not eligible to make application for, receive, or in any other manner enjoy the benefits or any form of assistance available under chapter 80-248, Laws of Florida.
(c) This subsection expires on the date specified in s. 290.016 for the expiration of the Florida Enterprise Zone Act.
1(8) It is the intent of the Legislature that credits against either the corporate income tax or the franchise tax be applied in the following order: those enumerated in s. 631.828, those enumerated in s. 220.191, those enumerated in s. 220.181, those enumerated in s. 220.183, those enumerated in s. 220.182, those enumerated in s. 220.1895, those enumerated in s. 220.195, those enumerated in s. 220.184, those enumerated in s. 220.186, those enumerated in s. 220.1845, those enumerated in s. 220.19, those enumerated in s. 220.185, those enumerated in s. 220.1875, those enumerated in s. 220.1876, those enumerated in s. 220.1877, those enumerated in s. 220.1878, those enumerated in s. 220.193, those enumerated in former s. 288.9916, those enumerated in former s. 220.1899, those enumerated in former s. 220.194, those enumerated in s. 220.196, those enumerated in s. 220.198, those enumerated in s. 220.1915, those enumerated in s. 220.199, those enumerated in s. 220.1991, and those enumerated in s. 220.1992.
(9) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, it is the intent of the Legislature that, except as otherwise provided under the Internal Revenue Code, for the purposes of this chapter, the term “qualified subchapter S subsidiary,” as that term is defined in s. 1361(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, shall not be treated as a separate corporation or entity from the S corporation parent to which the subsidiary’s assets, liabilities, income, deductions, and credits are attributed under s. 1361(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
History.s. 1, ch. 71-984; s. 1, ch. 72-278; s. 5, ch. 80-77; ss. 1, 5, 6, ch. 80-247; ss. 1, 9, 10, ch. 80-248; s. 2, ch. 82-119; s. 3, ch. 82-177; s. 5, ch. 82-232; s. 59, ch. 83-3; s. 11, ch. 83-297; ss. 18, 19, ch. 83-310; s. 10, ch. 83-334; s. 36, ch. 84-356; s. 16, ch. 87-99; s. 15, ch. 88-201; s. 22, ch. 88-388; s. 8, ch. 89-167; s. 48, ch. 94-136; s. 1517, ch. 95-147; s. 3, ch. 97-50; s. 1, ch. 98-61; s. 2, ch. 98-100; s. 7, ch. 98-101; s. 11, ch. 98-132; s. 2, ch. 98-189; s. 1, ch. 98-293; s. 22, ch. 98-342; s. 94, ch. 99-2; ss. 16, 17, ch. 99-378; ss. 29, 30, ch. 2000-210; s. 6, ch. 2001-225; s. 23, ch. 2005-287; s. 11, ch. 2006-230; s. 2, ch. 2009-50; s. 5, ch. 2010-24; s. 11, ch. 2010-147; ss. 5, 6, ch. 2011-76; s. 14, ch. 2013-16; s. 15, ch. 2015-148; s. 25, ch. 2015-221; s. 41, ch. 2020-2; s. 29, ch. 2021-31; s. 4, ch. 2021-193; s. 25, ch. 2022-97; s. 17, ch. 2023-17; s. 27, ch. 2023-157; s. 21, ch. 2023-173; s. 36, ch. 2024-158.
1Note.

A. Section 12, ch. 2021-193, provides that “[t]he Department of Revenue is authorized, and all conditions are deemed met, to adopt emergency rules under s. 120.54(4), Florida Statutes, for the purpose of implementing provisions related to the New Worlds Reading Initiative Tax Credit created by this act. Notwithstanding any other law, emergency rules adopted under this section are effective for 6 months after adoption and may be renewed during the pendency of procedures to adopt permanent rules addressing the subject of the emergency rules.”

B. Section 41, ch. 2022-97, provides that “[t]he Department of Revenue is authorized, and all conditions are deemed met, to adopt emergency rules under s. 120.54(4), Florida Statutes, for the purpose of implementing changes related to the Strong Families tax credit program and the New Worlds Reading Initiative tax credit program made by this act. Notwithstanding any other law, emergency rules adopted under this section are effective for 6 months after adoption and may be renewed during the pendency of procedures to adopt permanent rules addressing the subject of the emergency rules.”

C. Section 43, ch. 2023-17, provides:

“(1) The Department of Revenue is authorized, and all conditions are deemed met, to adopt emergency rules under s. 120.54(4), Florida Statutes, for the purpose of implementing provisions related to the Live Local Program created by this act. Notwithstanding any other law, emergency rules adopted under this section are effective for 6 months after adoption and may be renewed during the pendency of procedures to adopt permanent rules addressing the subject of the emergency rules.

“(2) This section expires July 1, 2026.”

F.S. 220.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 220.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 220.02


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 220.02
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 220.02.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 220.02

Total Results: 20

State of Florida Department of Revenue v. Verizon Communications Inc. & Affiliates, foreign corporations

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-28

Snippet: heavily mirror the federal income tax laws. See § 220.02(3), Fla. Stat. (1972); Dep’t of Revenue v. Am.

Verizon Communications Inc. & Affiliates v. State of Florida Department of Revenue, an agency of the State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-28

Snippet: ‘piggyback’ on the provisions of the IRC”). Indeed, § 220.02(3), Florida Statutes, includes a “Legislative intent”

Darriue Montgomery v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-11-09

Citation: 230 So. 3d 1256

Snippet: provisions of Chapter 2014-220. 2 In 1999, the Florida

Del Pilar v. DHL Global Customer Solutions

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-10-24

Citation: 993 So. 2d 142, 2008 WL 4682324

Snippet: see generally Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2)(a) (1958); Harper ex rel. Daley v. Toler, 884 So

Golden West Financial Corp. v. Florida Department of Revenue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-02-19

Citation: 975 So. 2d 567, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2129, 2008 WL 420039

Snippet: with the income tax laws of the United States.” § 220.02(3), Fla. Stat. We have previously acknowledged

Harper Ex Rel. Daley v. Toler

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-10-22

Citation: 884 So. 2d 1124, 2004 WL 2364230

Snippet: of control" referred to in Restatement section 220(2)(a) has been recognized as the "most important factor

Black v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-05-31

Citation: 819 So. 2d 208, 2002 WL 1085251

Snippet: County paid was not determined by the market. *220 2. Montauk also purchased the entire tranche of Fannie

Sweet v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-01-31

Citation: 810 So. 2d 854, 2002 WL 122156

Snippet: have been different." Rutherford, 727 So.2d at 220. 2. INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE DURING PENALTY PHASE In

Siegle v. Progressive Consumers Ins. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-06-13

Citation: 788 So. 2d 355, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8033, 2001 WL 649672

Snippet: class was ever certified. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.220. [2] Following the dismissal, the insureds appealed

Freedom Labor Contractors of Florida, Inc. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-03-21

Citation: 779 So. 2d 663, 2001 WL 273470

Snippet: Id. at 174; Restatement (Second) of Agency §§ 220(2) (1958). [2] "[Freedom Labor] is not shown to be

KPMG Peat Marwick v. NAT. UNION FIRE INS. CO.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-07-13

Citation: 765 So. 2d 36, 2000 WL 986007

Snippet: Certified Pub. Accountants, Professional Standards § 220.02. Rather than acting as an advocate with an undivided

Fort Pierce Tribune v. Williams

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-02-15

Citation: 678 So. 2d 355, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1149, 1996 WL 63382

Snippet: factors set forth in Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2) (1958). In reaching our decision, we certified

Keith v. News & Sun Sentinel Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-09-07

Citation: 667 So. 2d 167, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 454, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1423, 1995 WL 811523

Snippet: that constitutes a "distinct occupation," Sec. 220(2)(b), and that the provisions of the contract in

Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Demario

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-09-06

Citation: 661 So. 2d 319, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9369, 1995 WL 521106

Snippet: the terms of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.220. [2] As we view the matter, the effect of the order

International Ass'n of Machinists v. Tucker

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-02-24

Citation: 652 So. 2d 842, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1851, 1995 WL 73566

Snippet: in 1 Restatement of the Law, Agency (2d ed.) § 220(2), have to do with the difference between employees

Small v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-02-03

Citation: 630 So. 2d 1087, 1994 WL 26986

Snippet: discovery in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 1.220[2] would result in harm or prejudice to the defendant

Fmw Properties v. Peoples First Fin.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-08-12

Citation: 606 So. 2d 372, 1992 WL 191327

Snippet: appeal of a nonfinal order. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.220. [2] We have noted our earlier decision in DeAtley

Dart Indus., Inc. v. DEPT. OF LABOR & EMP. SEC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-03-20

Citation: 596 So. 2d 725, 1992 WL 51249

Snippet: not in business. Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2) (1958). Of these factors, the principal factor

Walker v. Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-06-14

Citation: 561 So. 2d 1198, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4277, 1990 WL 26946

Snippet: that constitutes a "distinct occupation," Sec. 220(2)(b) [Restatement of the Law of Agency], and that

Wiseman v. Miami Rug Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-05-11

Citation: 524 So. 2d 726, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1112, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1862, 1988 WL 44264

Snippet: independent contractor are those enumerated in section 220(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Agency (1958). See