Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 222.29 (2025)

No exemption for fraudulent transfers.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

222.29 No exemption for fraudulent transfers.—An exemption from attachment, garnishment, or legal process provided by this chapter is not effective if it results from a fraudulent transfer or conveyance as provided in chapter 726.

History.—s. 4, ch. 93-256.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 19 cases, 1994–2019 · leading case: Havoco of Am., Ltd. v. Hill, 790 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 2001).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Havoco of Am., Ltd. v. Hill, 790 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 2001). · cites it 5× “105 or Fla. Stat. §§ 222.29 and 222.30? Havoco of America, Ltd.”

In Re Clements, 194 B.R. 923 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1996). · cites it 8× “Subsequent to the transfer at issue in Barker, the Florida legislature enacted Fla.Stat. § 222.29 and § 222.30. Fla.Stat.”

In Re Wilbur, 206 B.R. 1002 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1997). · cites it 9× “In his amended pleading, Trustee raised additional grounds for his objections, contending that Debtor’s Ponte Vedra house does not quality as homestead under the Florida Constitution, and the homestead status of the Ponte Vedra house arose from fraudulent conversion, and is…”

In Re Hendricks, 237 B.R. 821 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1999). · cites it 11× “Fla.Stat. § 222.29 (1997) (emphasis added).”

In Re Thomas, 172 B.R. 673 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1994). · cites it 4× “§§ 222.29-.30. *674 FINDINGS OF FACT The facts are undisputed.”

Bank Leumi Trust Co. of New York v. Lang, 898 F. Supp. 883 (S.D. Fla. 1995). · cites it 2× “See also Fla.Stat. § 222.29 (1993) and Fla. Stat. § 726.”

Spector v. Spector, 226 So. 3d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017). · cites it 2× “Section 222.29, Florida Statutes (2015), removes -the statutory protection if the exemption results from - a fraudulent transfer or conveyance as provided in chapter 726.”

In Re Tabone, 247 B.R. 541 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2000). · cites it 5× “See Fla.Stat.Ann. §§ 222.29 and 222.30 (West 1999).”

In Re Mathews, 360 B.R. 732 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2007). · cites it 4× “See Fla. Stat. Ann. § 222.29 (West 2005) 2 and Fla.”

Havoco of Am., Ltd. v. Elmer C. Hill, 255 F.3d 1321 (11th Cir. 2001). “105 or Fla. Stat. §§ 222.29 and 222.30? Id. at 1144 .”

Mehdipour v. Rensin (In re Rensin), 600 B.R. 870 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 2019). · cites it 4× “30 or if the exemption results from a fraudulent transfer or conveyance in violation of Fla. Stat. § 222.29 , all payment rights under an annuity contract are exempt from process.”

Havoco of Am., Ltd. v. Hill, 197 F.3d 1135 (11th Cir. 1999). · cites it 2× “12 Similarly, courts are split regarding the impact of Fla. Stat. §§ 222.29 and 222.30. In 1993, the Florida legislature amended the Florida Code specifically to make the conversion of a non-exempt asset into an exempt asset with the intent to hinder, delay, or defraud the…”

Show all 19 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.