Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 250.19 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 250.19 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 250.19

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XVII
MILITARY AFFAIRS AND RELATED MATTERS
Chapter 250
MILITARY AFFAIRS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 250.19
250.19 Expenses for travel on military business.—Any officer or enlisted person of the Florida National Guard, traveling on military business not with troops, in obedience to the orders of the Governor, must be reimbursed for expenses incurred in the performance of such duties as prescribed by law for state officers and employees.
History.—s. 28, ch. 8502, 1921; CGL 2040; s. 1, ch. 25112, 1949; s. 103, ch. 95-148; s. 17, ch. 2003-68.
Note.—Former s. 250.31.

F.S. 250.19 on Google Scholar

F.S. 250.19 on Casetext

Amendments to 250.19


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 250.19
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 250.19.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 250.19

Total Results: 5

Reynolds v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-08-29

Citation: 963 So. 2d 908, 2007 WL 2428452

Snippet: 17A Lee R. Russ, et al., Couch on Insurance 3d § 250:19 (2000) (citing Vann and Grand Union as representing

Atkins v. State, Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-05-12

Citation: 383 So. 2d 313, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16617

Snippet: entitled to reimbursement from the state under Section 250.19. Thus, Atkins had no state remedy for injuries

Atkins v. STATE, DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY, ETC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-05-12

Citation: 383 So. 2d 313

Snippet: entitled to reimbursement from the state under Section 250.19. Thus, Atkins had no state remedy for injuries

Tyler v. Akerman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1923-05-12

Citation: 85 Fla. 485, 96 So. 838

Snippet: 2517; Switzer v. City of Wellington, 40 Kan. 250, 19 Pac. Rep. 620, 10 Am. St. Rep. 196; Duval County

Duval County v. Charleston Lumber & Manufacturing Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1903-01-15

Citation: 45 Fla. 256

Snippet: Rep. 485; Switzer v. City of Wellington, 40 Kan. 250, 19 Pac. Rep. 620; Mayor, etc. of Baltimore v. Root