Florida Statute 253.67 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XVIII
PUBLIC LANDS AND PROPERTY

Chapter 253
STATE LANDS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 253.67

253.67 Definitions.—As used in ss. 253.67-253.75:

(1) “Aquaculture” means the cultivation of aquatic organisms and associated activities, including, but not limited to, grading, sorting, transporting, harvesting, holding, storing, growing, and planting.

(2) “Board” means the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund.

(3) “Department” means the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.

(4) “Water column” means the vertical extent of water, including the surface thereof, above a designated area of submerged bottom land.

History.—s. 1, ch. 69-46; ss. 25, 27, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 76, ch. 94-356; s. 2, ch. 96-247; s. 3, ch. 2000-364; s. 5, ch. 2005-157.

F.S. 253.67 on Google Scholar

F.S. 253.67 on Casetext

Amendments to 253.67

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 253.67

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 253.67.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 253.67

Total Results: 5

Flores v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-05-23

Citation: 819 So. 2d 740, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 499, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1093, 2002 WL 1028332

Snippet: Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Cubberly, 68 Fla. 253, 67 So. 133 (1914), for the "rule that an insurance

Schneer v. Allstate Indem. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-10-18

Citation: 767 So. 2d 485, 2000 WL 628247

Snippet: National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Cubberly, 68 Fla. 253, 67 So. 133, 135 (1913). Unfortunately, where there

Flores v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-07-21

Citation: 772 So. 2d 4, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9201, 2000 WL 1005252

Snippet: National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Cubberly, 68 Fla. 253, 67 So. 133 (1914) (reaffirming the rule in Hollis)

Dept. of Banking and Finance v. Credicorp

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-10-31

Citation: 684 So. 2d 746

Snippet: local interests." Freeman v. Hewit, 329 U.S. 249, 253, 67 S.Ct. 274, 277, 91 L.Ed. 265 (1946). Second, "[t]o

Miller v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-06-28

Citation: 212 So. 2d 388, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5325

Snippet: MANN, Judge. The only testimony relative to value during the trial of these defendants for grand larceny and breaking and entering a dwelling house with intent to commit grand larceny is the following: “Q. Would you tell the Jury what was missing? A. A stereo, two TV’s, á Hallicrafter ship-to-shore radio, a watch, some records. Q. All right. And what value did you place on all of this ? A. Eight hundred. Q. Eight hundred dollars ? A. (Witness nodded affirmatively.)” This is insufficient. Suarez