E. M. WATKINS COMPANY, INC. v. BOARD OF REGENTS,
414 So. 2d 583 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
. . . , to give it the construction sought by Watkins would directly contravene the provisions of Section 255.0515 . . . Further, the transcript of the legislative committee hearings on Section 255.0515 clearly indicates that . . . These policy reasons, implicit in Section 255.0515, thus prevent competitive advantage, insure the quality . . . By its third issue Watkins makes a multi-pronged attack upon the constitutionality of Section 255.0515 . . . Any fair and reasonable reading of Section 255.0515 implicitly authorizes that agency to do so. . . .
