Florida Statute 279.06 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIX
PUBLIC BUSINESS

Chapter 279
REGISTERED PUBLIC OBLIGATIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 279.06

279.06 Execution of certificated registered public obligations.—

(1) A certificated registered public obligation shall be executed by the issuer by the manual or facsimile signature or signatures of authorized officers. Any signature of an authorized officer may be attested by the manual or facsimile signature of another authorized officer.

(2) In addition to the signatures referred to in subsection (1), any certificated registered public obligation or any writing relating to an uncertificated registered public obligation may include a certificate or certificates signed by the manual or facsimile signature of an authenticating agent, registrar, transfer agent, or trustee, or the like.

(3) At least one signature of an authorized officer or other person set forth in subsection (2), required or permitted to be placed on a certificated registered public obligation, shall be a manual signature.

History.—s. 5, ch. 83-271.

F.S. 279.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 279.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 279.06

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 279.06

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 279.06.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 279.06

Total Results: 20

Casbar v. Dicanio

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-01-24

Citation: 666 So. 2d 1028, 1996 WL 23498

Snippet: dissolution is legitimate. Ex parte Hayes, 25 Fla. 279, 6 So. 64 (Fla. 1889). Indeed, the presumption of

Carpenter v. Sylvester

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-10-17

Citation: 267 So. 2d 370, 58 A.L.R. 3d 183

Snippet: 99 Fla. 972, 128 So. 7; Ex parte Hayes, 25 Fla. 279, 6 So. 64. The question involved here, of whether

Smith v. Wise

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-04-14

Citation: 234 So. 2d 145

Snippet: status, is legitimate. Ex parte Hayes, 25 *147 Fla. 279, 6 So. 64, 65. The presumption of the legitimacy of

Sanders v. Yancey

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-07-01

Citation: 122 So. 2d 202

Snippet: sec. 11. The court in Ex parte Hayes, 25 Fla. 279, 6 So. 64, 65, stated in holding a bastardy complaint

Armstrong v. Snowden

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-12-30

Citation: 107 So. 2d 619

Snippet: 10, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Ex parte Hayes, 25 Fla. 279, 6 So. 64; Gossett v. Ullendorff, 114 Fla. 159, 154

Ex Parte: Charles Franklin Stirrup

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1944-11-17

Citation: 19 So. 2d 712, 155 Fla. 173, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 501

Snippet: under the laws of the State. Ex Parte Hays, 25 Fla. 279, 6 So. 64; Ex Parte Bailey,39 Fla. 734, 23 So. 552;

Bishop v. State Ex Rel. Garnette

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-02-03

Citation: 186 So. 413, 136 Fla. 268

Snippet: father of the child. See Ex Parte Hayes, 25 Fla. 279, 6 So. 64; Thomas v. State, ex rel. Roberts, 37 Fla

State v. Rowe

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-05-03

Citation: 128 So. 7, 99 Fla. 972

Snippet: defendant in error relies on Ex Parte Hays, 25 Fla. 279, 6 So. R. 64. In that case this Court speaking of

Johnson v. State Ex Rel. Fox

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-04-02

Citation: 127 So. 317, 99 Fla. 711

Snippet: Fla. 196, 9 So. R. 659; Ex parte Hays, 25 Fla. 279, 6 So. R. 64; Ex parte Bailey, 39 Fla. 734, 23 So

Ex Parte Amos

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-12-06

Citation: 114 So. 760, 94 Fla. 1023, 1927 Fla. LEXIS 895

Snippet: Ex parte Robinson, supra; ExParte Hays, 25 Fla. 279, 6 So.2d Rep. 64. The fourth count therefore charges

Ex parte Amos

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-01-11

Citation: 93 Fla. 5, 112 So. 289, 1927 Fla. LEXIS 1058

Snippet: in law a crime. See also Ex Parte Hays, 25 Fla. 279, 6 South. Rep. 64, which was a bastardy proceeding

Ex Parte Amos

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-01-11

Citation: 112 So. 289, 93 Fla. 4

Snippet: in law a crime. See also Ex Parte Hays, 25 Fla. 279, 6 So.2d Rep. 64, which was a bastardy proceeding

Foxworth v. Law

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1919-05-08

Citation: 77 Fla. 596, 82 So. 55

Snippet: Ex Parte Bailey, supra; Ex Parte Hays, 25 Fla. 279, 6 South. Rep. 64; Lewis v. Nelson, supra. As the

Ex parte Davidson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1918-08-13

Citation: 76 Fla. 272, 79 So. 727, 1918 Fla. LEXIS 311

Snippet: state an offense under the law, parte Hays, 25 Fla. 279, 6 South. Rep. 64; Sims v. State, or the court is

In re Robinson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1917-05-14

Citation: 73 Fla. 1068, 75 So. 604, 1917 Fla. LEXIS 547

Snippet: offense known to the law. See Ex parte Hays, 25 Fla. 279, 6 South. Rep. 64; Ex parte Bailey, 39 Fla. 734, 23

Flores v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1916-11-21

Citation: 72 Fla. 302

Snippet: v. State, 18 Fla. 883; Ex Parte Hays, 25 Fla. 279, 6 South. Rep. 64; Bond v. State, 34 Fla. 45, 15 South

Mooneyham v. Bowles

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1916-11-03

Citation: 72 Fla. 259, 72 So. 931

Snippet: 734, 23 South. Rep. 552; Ex Parte Hays, 25 Fla. 279, 6 South. Rep. 64; Ex Parte Knight, 52 Fla. 144, 41

Campbell v. State ex rel. Harrison

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1912-06-15

Citation: 64 Fla. 39

Snippet: of the bastard child. See Ex part Hayes, 25 Fla. 279, 6 South. Rep. 64. A motion made to dismiss the proceeding

Porter v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1911-06-15

Citation: 62 Fla. 79

Snippet: 734, 23 South. Rep. 552; Ex parte Hays, 25 Fla. 279, 6 South. Rep. 64; Ex parte Knight, 52 Fla. 144, 41

Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Southern Investment Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1907-01-15

Citation: 53 Fla. 832

Snippet: Theobold v. Louisivlle, N. O. &. T. Ry. Co., 66 Miss. 279, 6 South Rep. 230; it is said: “The weight of judicial