Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 279.07 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 279.07 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 279.07

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIX
PUBLIC BUSINESS
Chapter 279
REGISTERED PUBLIC OBLIGATIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 279.07
279.07 Valid and binding execution; signatures.
(1) Any certificated registered public obligation which is signed by the authorized officers at the time of its signing shall remain valid and binding, notwithstanding the fact that, before its issuance, any or all of such officers have ceased to fill their respective offices.
(2) Any authorized officer who is empowered to sign any certificated registered public obligation may adopt as and for his or her signature the signature of a predecessor in office in the event that the predecessor’s signature appears on such obligation. An authorized officer incurs, by adoption of a predecessor’s signature, no liability that would not be incurred by such authorized officer if the signature were that of such authorized officer.
History.s. 6, ch. 83-271; s. 62, ch. 85-80; s. 187, ch. 95-148.

F.S. 279.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 279.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 279.07


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 279.07
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 279.07.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 279.07

Total Results: 2

Lightbourne v. McCollum

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-11-01

Citation: 969 So. 2d 326, 2007 WL 3196533

Snippet: error. Abamar Hous. & Dev., Inc., 698 So.2d at 279. [7] The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Salter v. St. Jean

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-12-29

Citation: 170 So. 2d 94

Snippet: Ownby v. Prisock, (1962) 243 Misc. 203, 138 So.2d 279; 7 Am.Jur.2d, Attorneys at Law, § 229. Therefore,