Florida Statute 279.08 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIX
PUBLIC BUSINESS

Chapter 279
REGISTERED PUBLIC OBLIGATIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 279.08

279.08 Seal.—When a seal is required or permitted in the execution of any certificated registered public obligation, an authorized officer may cause the seal to be printed, engraved, stamped, or otherwise placed in facsimile on the obligation. The facsimile seal has the same legal effect as the impression of the seal.

History.—s. 7, ch. 83-271.

F.S. 279.08 on Google Scholar

F.S. 279.08 on Casetext

Amendments to 279.08

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 279.08

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 279.08.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 279.08

Total Results: 7

State v. Fleming

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-02-03

Citation: 61 So. 3d 399, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 50, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 331, 2011 WL 320959

Snippet: 89 L.Ed.2d 631 (1986). Parker, 873 So.2d at 277, 279.[8] The trial court denied the motion, and Parker

In re Estate of Duke

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-02-26

Citation: 219 So. 2d 124, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6162

Snippet: proponent in that regard. Bancroft v. Otis, 91 Ala. 279, 8 So. 286, 24 Am.St.Rep. 904. In the case of Newman

In Re: Estate of Aldrich Withington v. Acton

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-09-12

Citation: 3 So. 2d 856, 148 Fla. 121

Snippet: 28 R.C.L., pg. 146, Bancroft v. Otis, 91 Ala. 279, 8 So. 286, 24 A.S.R., 904. The contestants carried

In Re: Estate of Donne'ly v. Ashby

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-07-15

Citation: 188 So. 108, 137 Fla. 459

Snippet: proponent in that regard. Bancroft v. Otis, 91 Ala. 279,8 So. 286. "In the case of Newman v. Smith, 82 So

Estate Clara R. Starr v. Wilson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1935-12-26

Citation: 170 So. 620, 125 Fla. 536, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1675

Snippet: proponent in that regard. Bancroft v. Otis, 91 Ala. 279,8 So. 286. *Page 544 In the case of Newman v. Smith

Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Scarborough

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1906-06-15

Citation: 52 Fla. 425

Snippet: progress of the trial. 1 Thompson’s Trials, Sec. 279; 8 Ency. of Pl. & Pr., 93; Ryan v. Couch, 66 Ala.

Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. Williams

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1896-01-15

Citation: 37 Fla. 406

Snippet: 417; Kelly vs. Union Railway & Transit Co., 95 Mo. 279, 8 S. W. Rep. 420, S. C. 35 Am. & Eng. R. R. Cases