Florida Statute 279.15 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIX
PUBLIC BUSINESS

Chapter 279
REGISTERED PUBLIC OBLIGATIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 279.15

279.15 Applicability.—

(1) Unless at any time prior to or at original issuance of a registered public obligation the official or official body of the issuer determines otherwise, this act is applicable to such registered public obligation notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary. When this act is applicable, no contrary provision shall apply.

(2) Nothing in this act limits or prevents issuance of obligations in any other form or manner authorized by law.

(3) Unless determined otherwise pursuant to subsection (1), the provisions of this act are applicable with respect to obligations which heretofore have been approved by vote, referendum, or hearing, authorizing or permitting the authorization of obligations in bearer and registered form, or in bearer form only; and such obligations need not be resubmitted for a further vote, referendum, or hearing, for the purpose of authorizing or permitting the authorization of registered public obligations pursuant to this act.

History.—s. 12, ch. 83-271.

F.S. 279.15 on Google Scholar

F.S. 279.15 on Casetext

Amendments to 279.15

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 279.15

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 279.15.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 279.15

Total Results: 8

Hlad v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-07-19

Citation: 565 So. 2d 762, 1990 WL 98751

Snippet: United States v. Romano, 382 U.S. 136, 86 S.Ct. 279, 15 L.Ed.2d 210 (1965); Shelton v. Coleman, 136 Fla

MacMillan v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-04-27

Citation: 358 So. 2d 547

Snippet: United States v. Romano, 382 U.S. 136, 86 S.Ct. 279, 15 L.Ed.2d 210 (1965); Fitzgerald v. State, 339 So

Brown v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-05-05

Citation: 334 So. 2d 597

Snippet: United States v. Romano, 382 U.S. 136, 86 S.Ct. 279, 15 L.Ed.2d 210 (1965); United States v. Gainey, 380

Hamilton v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-02-25

Citation: 329 So. 2d 283

Snippet: Ed.2d 658 (1965). [5] 382 U.S. 136, 86 S.Ct. 279, 15 L.Ed.2d 210 (1965). [6] 232 So.2d 166, 168 (Fla

Dirk v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-05-29

Citation: 305 So. 2d 187

Snippet: United States v. Romano, 382 U.S. 136, 86 S.Ct. 279, 15 L.Ed.2d 210 (1965). The rational connection test

Miakka Estates, Inc. v. B. L. E. Realty Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-03-31

Citation: 181 So. 423, 132 Fla. 307, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1749

Snippet: v. Standard Oil Co., 49 Ohio St. 137, 30 N.E. 279, 15 L.R.A. 145,34 Am. St. Rep. 541. * * * "In the case

Wofford v. Wofford

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1937-10-18

Citation: 176 So. 499, 129 Fla. 445, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1131

Snippet: v. Standard Oil Co., 49 Ohio St. 137, 30 N.E. 279, 15 L.R.A. 145, 34 Am. St. Rep. 541. * * * "In the

Biscayne Realty & Insurance v. Ostend Realty Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-03-11

Citation: 148 So. 560, 109 Fla. 1

Snippet: Standard Oil Co., 49 Ohio St. 137,30 N.E. Rep. 279, 15 L.R.A. 145. In the latter case the State commenced