Florida Statute 296.08 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XX
VETERANS

Chapter 296
VETERANS' HOMES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 296.08

296.08 Priority of admittance.—

(1) In determining the eligibility of applicants to the home, the administrator shall give admittance priority in accordance with the following schedule:

(a) Those veterans with wartime service, as defined in s. 1.01(14), who have service-connected disability or disabilities but are not in need of hospitalization or nursing home care.

(b) Those veterans with wartime service, as defined in s. 1.01(14), who have non-service-connected disability or disabilities but are not in need of hospitalization or nursing home care.

(c) Those veterans with wartime service, as defined in s. 1.01(14), other than those described in paragraphs (a) and (b).

(d) Those veterans with peacetime service, as defined in s. 296.02.

(e) The spouses or surviving spouses of veterans described in this subsection.

(2) Before admission, each applicant shall file with the administrator a certificate of eligibility, together with a certified copy of his or her discharge, and any other information that the administrator determines to be necessary for admission purposes.

History.—s. 8, ch. 89-168; s. 9, ch. 92-80; s. 256, ch. 95-148; s. 6, ch. 98-16; s. 3, ch. 2024-250.

F.S. 296.08 on Google Scholar

F.S. 296.08 on Casetext

Amendments to 296.08

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 296.08

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 296.08.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 296.08

Total Results: 7

Hoag v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-07-08

Citation: 12 So. 3d 907, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9331, 2009 WL 1940815

Snippet: Hoag's total sentencing points would have been 296.8, with a maximum permissible sentence of 336 months

Ganson v. STATE, DEPT. OF ADMIN.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-07-07

Citation: 554 So. 2d 516, 1989 WL 74845

Snippet: months prior to effective date" which included "296.8 Manic depressive psychosis." The doctor concluded

Rose v. Sheehan Buick, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-12-05

Citation: 204 So. 2d 903

Snippet: Florida Atlantic Coast Land Co. v. Alford, 150 Fla. 296, 8 So.2d 483; Compare Myers v. Hurley Motor Company

Carroll v. Fellure

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-04-21

Citation: 185 So. 2d 768, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5301

Snippet: Baptist Church v. Lattimer, 103 Neb. 755, 174 N.W. 296, 8 A.L.R. 98 (1919), in which the question of majority

Boyle v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1950-08-01

Citation: 47 So. 2d 693, 1950 Fla. LEXIS 1062

Snippet: *694 Atlantic Coast Land Co. v. Alford, 150 Fla. 296, 8 So.2d 483. Chapter 849, Fla. Stat. 1941, F.S.A

General Properties Co. Inc. v. Rellim Investment Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1942-07-17

Citation: 9 So. 2d 295, 151 Fla. 136, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1121

Snippet: Florida Atlantic Coast Land Co. v. Alford, 150 Fla. 296, 8 So.2d 483. With the limited allegations in the

Fairchild v. House ex rel. Knight

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1882-01-15

Citation: 18 Fla. 770

Snippet: whole case. 4 Fla., 359; 16 Wend., 61, 85; 5 Paige, 296; 8 Cow., 338; 1 Beasley, 312. Postponing the . consideration