Syfert Injury Law Firm

Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc., and University of Florida Board of Trustees

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-11

Snippet: and for expenses incurred to administer it. § 766.314(2)(a), (3), Fla. Stat.; see also § 766.303(1), Fla

Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc., and University of Florida Board of Trustees

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-11

Snippet: and for expenses incurred to administer it. § 766.314(2)(a), (3), Fla. Stat.; see also § 766.303(1), Fla

Bulgin v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-05-19

Citation: 912 So. 2d 307, 2005 WL 1176056

Snippet: an arrest under a real or pretended authority; *314 (2) An actual or constructive seizure or detention

State v. C.C.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-04-14

Citation: 884 So. 2d 81, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5019, 2004 WL 784539

Snippet: the trial court had discretion under section 985.314(2) to select an “equivalent program of similar intensity”

Reed v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-12-19

Citation: 837 So. 2d 366, 2002 WL 31833870

Snippet: spite, an evil intent." Gaylord, 356 So.2d at 314.[2] We also agree that using the inaccurate definition

Knox v. District School Bd. of Brevard

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-05-03

Citation: 821 So. 2d 311, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6016, 2002 WL 851234

Snippet: irreparable harm unless the status quo is maintained, *314 2) no adequate remedy at law and 3) a substantial

Humana of Florida, Inc. v. McKaughan

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-03-03

Citation: 652 So. 2d 852

Snippet: 1992) (upholding constitutionality of section 766.314).[2] As noted in Coy, "obstetricians are not required

Coy v. FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED INJURY COMP. PLAN

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-02-13

Citation: 595 So. 2d 943, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 104, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 210, 1992 WL 24975

Snippet: rather than the Department of Insurance. Section 766.314(2) provides that the association shall submit to the

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1991-12-20

Snippet: 23 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1945), and AGO's 79-16 and 57-314. 2 Where a statute sets forth exceptions, no others

McCormick MacHinery, Inc. v. Julian E. Johnson & Sons, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-03-11

Citation: 523 So. 2d 651, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 640, 7 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 51, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5861, 1988 WL 20585

Snippet: does not define "merchantability," section 672.314(2) sets minimum standards for merchantability. These

Puhalski v. Brevard County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-03-23

Citation: 428 So. 2d 375

Snippet: Restatement of the Law, Second, Torts 2d, Vol. 2, § 314. [2] See Restatement of the Law, Second, Torts 2d

Hartman v. OPELIKA MACH. & WELDING

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-05-28

Citation: 414 So. 2d 1105

Snippet: merchantability. See Section 672.314(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1979) (UCC 2.314(2)(c)). [5] Professor Wade was

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1982-02-23

Snippet: LIGHT OF FLA. STAT. s 400.307(2)(b) (e) AND s 400.314(2)(a) (b): (A) DOES AN OMBUDSMAN COMMITTEE HAVE

Hurd v. Munford, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-12-28

Citation: 378 So. 2d 86, 28 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 63

Snippet: supplies the container. The UCC comment to Section 2.314(2)(e) states that "[p]aragraph (e) applies only where

Cardozo v. True

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-02-23

Citation: 342 So. 2d 1053, 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 69

Snippet: scope of that warranty. From reading Section 672.314(2), the requirement of merchantability most relevant

Boatright v. City of Jacksonville

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-06-23

Citation: 334 So. 2d 339, 93 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2909, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15726

Snippet: him by an agent. Whitlock v. Creswell, 190 S.C. 314, 2 S.E.2d 838 (1939). The terms and conditions of

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1974-05-23

Snippet: violating the Standards of Conduct Law, s. 112.314(2), F.S.; however, he should file a sworn statement

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1974-01-14

Snippet: application in the circumstances here. Section 112.314(2), supra, prohibits personal investments in any "enterprise"

Quintana v. Ordono

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-02-14

Citation: 195 So. 2d 577

Snippet: 2 § 177 footnote 56; Stumberg, supra note 2 at 314; 2 American Law of Property § 7.18 at 165 (Casner