Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 18
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-02-03
Snippet: steady red light signal, in violation of sections 316.0083, 316.074(1), and 316.075(1)(c)1, Florida Statutes
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-05-03
Citation: 246 So. 3d 219
Snippet: ; § 316.0083(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). In addition to this grant of authority, section 316.0083(1)(a)"does
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-10-28
Citation: 210 So. 3d 191, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16012
Snippet: questions are as follows: 1. DOES SECTION 316.0083(l)(a) AUTHORIZE A MUNICIPALITY TO CONTRACT WITH
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-07-27
Citation: 211 So. 3d 158, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11373
Snippet: do so for the following reasons. First, section 316.0083 of the Florida Statutes authorizes, and provides
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-02-25
Citation: 185 So. 3d 1232, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 61, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 393, 2016 WL 743287
Snippet: the district court held a provision in section 316.0083(1)(d)3., Florida Statutes (2012), known as the
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-05-29
Citation: 170 So. 3d 69, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8188, 2015 WL 2458128
Snippet: issued a traffic citation pursuant to section 316.0083, Florida Statutes (2012), known as the Mark Wandall
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-10-22
Citation: 154 So. 3d 366, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17154
Snippet: dismissing a traffic citation on grounds that section 316.0083(l)(d)3., Florida Statutes (2012), of the Mark
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-10-15
Citation: 154 So. 3d 359, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16790
Snippet: Procedure 9.160(d): 1. Does Florida Statute 316.0083(l)(a) authorize a municipality to delegate and
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-02-05
Citation: 134 So. 3d 1119, 2014 WL 444171, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1452
Snippet: unconstitutional.1 We reverse and hold that section 316.0083(l)(e)l.c., Florida Statutes (2011), does not violate
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-07-25
Citation: 95 So. 3d 324, 2012 WL 3023203, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12095
Snippet: offered the following rationale: Although [section] 316.0083[, Florida Statutes (2010) ] prohibits the exact
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-07-06
Citation: 98 So. 3d 589, 2012 WL 2600293, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10875
Snippet: and highways under their jurisdiction under s. 316.0083.” The Act implemented a statewide red light enforcement
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-03-19
Citation: 82 So. 3d 1196, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4278, 2012 WL 896501
Snippet: negligent acts of Sunbelt's driver violated sections 316.083 and 316.185, Florida Statutes (2006), by failing
Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2010-08-26
Snippet: and highways under their jurisdiction under s. 316.0083. Only a municipality may install or authorize
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-07-27
Citation: 908 So. 2d 536, 2005 WL 1751626
Snippet: $266,128.92 3 08-21-00 $137,316.83 4 09-06-00 $143,008.58
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-12-13
Citation: 573 So. 2d 800, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 651, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1726, 1990 WL 207496
Snippet: 1979), appeal dismissed, 469 U.S. 925, 105 S.Ct. 316, 83 L.Ed.2d 254 (1984), and The Florida Bar: In re
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-02-23
Citation: 356 So. 2d 276
Snippet: 316.0565, 316.057(9), 316.061, 316.081, 316.082, 316.083, 316.084, 316.085, 316.086, 316.087, 316.088, 316
Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1977-07-13
Snippet: 316.0565, 316.057(9), 316.061, 316.081, 316.082, 316.083, 316.084, 316.085, 316.086, 316.087, 316.088,
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-03-09
Citation: 154 So. 331, 114 Fla. 254, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1819
Snippet: W. R. Co. v. City of Connersville, 170 Ind. 316, 83 N.E. 503, affirmed218 U.S. 336, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep