Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 316.272 (2025)

Exhaust systems, prevention of noise.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
316.272 Exhaust systems, prevention of noise.
(1) Every motor vehicle shall at all times be equipped with an exhaust system in good working order and in constant operation, including muffler, manifold pipe, and tailpiping to prevent excessive or unusual noise. In no event shall an exhaust system allow noise at a level which exceeds a maximum decibel level to be established by regulation of the Department of Environmental Protection as provided in s. 403.061(11) in cooperation with the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. No person shall use a muffler cutout, bypass or similar device upon a vehicle on a highway.
(2) The engine and power mechanism of every motor vehicle shall be so equipped and adjusted as to prevent the escape of excessive fumes or smoke.
(3) A violation of this section is a noncriminal traffic infraction, punishable as a nonmoving violation as provided in chapter 318.
History.s. 1, ch. 71-135; s. 1, ch. 72-39; s. 1, ch. 73-89; s. 27, ch. 79-65; s. 135, ch. 94-356; s. 204, ch. 99-248; s. 30, ch. 2006-1.

Civil Citations under F.S. 316.272

Driver's license points · R = revocation · S = suspension
§316.272NOISE - MUFFLER - No/Improper (cutouts, bypass, etc.)
§316.272(1)NOISE - Loud defective muffler
§316.272(2)NOISE - Emit excess exhaust fumes
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case: State v. Cobbs, 411 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
State v. Cobbs, 411 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). · cites it 5× “be equipped with an exhaust system in good working order and in constant operation, including muffler, manifold pipe, and tailpiping to prevent excessive or unusual noise," Section 316.272(1), Florida Statutes (1979), compels the conclusion that this equipment requirement…”
State v. Gibson, 560 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). · cites it 2× “The trial court expressly did not address the issue of the validity of the defendants' consent to search the vehicle, so that issue remains for determination by the trial court after remand.”
Classy Cycles, Inc. v. Bay Cnty., 201 So. 3d 779 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016). “271 (horns and warning devices), § 316.272 (exhaust system), § 316.293 (noise), § 316.”
Clark v. Collier Cnty. Sheriff Kevin Rambosk (M.D. Fla. 2025). · cites it 2× “” Fla. Stat. § 316.272 (1), (3). Relatedly, “[n]o person shall modify the exhaust system of a motor vehicle or any other noise-abatement device of a motor vehicle operated or to be operated upon the highways of this state in such a manner that the noise emitted by the motor…”
— 316.272(1) — 2 cases
State v. Cobbs, 411 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). “be equipped with an exhaust system in good working order and in constant operation, including muffler, manifold pipe, and tailpiping to prevent excessive or unusual noise," Section 316.272(1), Florida Statutes (1979), compels the conclusion that this equipment requirement…”
State v. Gibson, 560 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). “The trial court expressly did not address the issue of the validity of the defendants' consent to search the vehicle, so that issue remains for determination by the trial court after remand.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.

This Florida statute resource is curated by an Orange Park personal injury and workers' comp lawyer, a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney (Florida Bar No. 39104). Attorney Syfert regularly handles Chapter 316 matters in the context of traffic and automobile accident law and represents clients throughout Northeast Florida. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.