|
|
The 2025 Florida Statutes
|
|
|
|
|
F.S. 322.271322.271 Authority to modify revocation, cancellation, or suspension order.—(1)(a) Upon the suspension, cancellation, or revocation of the driver license of any person as authorized or required in this chapter, except a person whose license is revoked as a habitual traffic offender under s. 322.27(5) or a person who is ineligible to be granted the privilege of driving on a limited or restricted basis under subsection (2), the department shall immediately notify the licensee and, upon his or her request, shall afford him or her an opportunity for a hearing pursuant to chapter 120, as early as practicable within not more than 30 days after receipt of such request, in the county wherein the licensee resides, unless the department and the licensee agree that such hearing may be held in some other county. 1(b) A person whose driving privilege has been revoked under s. 322.27(5) may, upon expiration of 12 months from the date of such revocation, petition the department for reinstatement of his or her driving privilege. Upon such petition and after investigation of the person’s qualification, fitness, and need to drive, the department shall hold a hearing pursuant to chapter 120 to determine whether the driving privilege shall be reinstated on a restricted basis solely for business or employment purposes. (c) For the purposes of this section, the term:1. “A driving privilege restricted to business purposes only” means a driving privilege that is limited to any driving necessary to maintain livelihood, including driving to and from work, necessary on-the-job driving, driving for educational purposes, and driving for church and for medical purposes. 2. “A driving privilege restricted to employment purposes only” means a driving privilege that is limited to driving to and from work and any necessary on-the-job driving required by an employer or occupation. Driving for any purpose other than as provided by this paragraph is not permitted by a person whose driving privilege has been restricted to employment or business purposes. In addition, a person whose driving privilege is restricted to employment or business purposes remains subject to any restriction that applied to the type of license which the person held at the time of the order of suspension, cancellation, or revocation. (2) At such hearing, the person whose license has been suspended, canceled, or revoked may show that such suspension, cancellation, or revocation causes a serious hardship and precludes the person from carrying out his or her normal business occupation, trade, or employment and that the use of the person’s license in the normal course of his or her business is necessary to the proper support of the person or his or her family.(a) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the department shall require proof of the successful completion of the applicable department-approved driver training course operating pursuant to s. 318.1451 or DUI program substance abuse education course and evaluation as provided in s. 316.193(5). Letters of recommendation from respected business persons in the community, law enforcement officers, or judicial officers may also be required to determine whether the person should be permitted to operate a motor vehicle on a restricted basis for business or employment use only and in determining whether such person can be trusted to so operate a motor vehicle. If a driver license has been suspended under the point system or under s. 322.2615, the department shall require proof of enrollment in the applicable department-approved driver training course or licensed DUI program substance abuse education course, including evaluation and treatment, if referred, and may require letters of recommendation described in this paragraph to determine if the driver should be reinstated on a restricted basis. If the person fails to complete the approved course within 90 days after reinstatement or subsequently fails to complete treatment, the department shall cancel his or her driver license until the course and treatment, if applicable, is successfully completed, notwithstanding the terms of the court order or any suspension or revocation of the driving privilege. The department may temporarily reinstate the driving privilege on a restricted basis upon verification from the DUI program that the offender has reentered and is currently participating in treatment and has completed the DUI education course and evaluation requirement. If the DUI program notifies the department of the second failure to complete treatment, the department shall reinstate the driving privilege only after notice of completion of treatment from the DUI program. The privilege of driving on a limited or restricted basis for business or employment use may not be granted to a person who has been convicted of a violation of s. 316.193 until completion of the DUI program substance abuse education course and evaluations as provided in s. 316.193(5). Except as provided in paragraph (c), the privilege of driving on a limited or restricted basis for business or employment use may not be granted to a person whose license is revoked pursuant to s. 322.28 or suspended pursuant to s. 322.2615 and who has been convicted of a violation of s. 316.193 two or more times or whose license has been suspended two or more times for refusal to submit to a test pursuant to s. 322.2615 or former s. 322.261. (b) The department may waive the hearing process for suspensions and revocations upon request by the driver if the driver has enrolled in or completed the applicable driver training course approved under s. 318.1451 or the DUI program substance abuse education course and evaluation provided in s. 316.193(5). However, the department may not waive the hearing for suspensions or revocations that involve death or serious bodily injury, multiple convictions for violations of s. 316.193 pursuant to s. 322.27(5), or a second or subsequent suspension or revocation pursuant to the same provision of this chapter. This paragraph does not preclude the department from requiring a hearing for any suspension or revocation that it determines is warranted based on the severity of the offense. (c) A person whose license has been revoked for a period of 5 years or less pursuant to s. 322.28(2)(a) may, 12 months after the date the revocation was imposed, petition the department for reinstatement of his or her driving privilege on a restricted basis. A person whose license has been revoked for more than 5 years under s. 322.28(2)(a) may, 24 months after the date the revocation was imposed, petition the department for reinstatement of his or her driving privilege on a restricted basis. Reinstatement under this subsection is restricted to business or employment purposes only. In addition, the department shall require such persons upon reinstatement to have not driven and to have been drug free for at least 12 months immediately before the reinstatement, to be supervised by a DUI program licensed by the department, and to report to the program at least three times a year as required by the program for the duration of the revocation period for supervision. Such supervision includes evaluation, education, referral into treatment, and other activities required by the department. Such persons shall assume reasonable costs of supervision. If the person fails to comply with the required supervision, the program shall report the failure to the department, and the department shall cancel the person’s driving privilege. This paragraph does not apply to any person whose driving privilege has been permanently revoked. (d) For the purpose of this section, a previous conviction of driving under the influence, driving while intoxicated, driving with an unlawful blood-alcohol level, or any other similar alcohol-related or drug-related offense outside this state or a previous conviction of former s. 316.1931, former s. 316.028, or former s. 860.01 is considered a previous conviction for violation of s. 316.193. (e) The department, based upon review of the licensee’s application for reinstatement, may require use of an ignition interlock device pursuant to s. 322.2715. (3) Upon such hearing, the department shall either suspend, affirm, or modify its order and may restore to the licensee the privilege of driving on a limited or restricted basis for business or employment use only. (4) Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 322.28(2)(d), a person whose driving privilege has been permanently revoked because he or she has been convicted of DUI manslaughter in violation of s. 316.193 and has no prior convictions for DUI-related offenses may, upon the expiration of 5 years after the date of such revocation or the expiration of 5 years after the termination of any term of incarceration under s. 316.193 or former s. 316.1931, whichever date is later, petition the department for reinstatement of his or her driving privilege.(a) Within 30 days after the receipt of such a petition, the department shall afford the petitioner an opportunity for a hearing. At the hearing, the petitioner must demonstrate to the department that he or she:1. Has not been arrested for a drug-related offense during the 5 years preceding the filing of the petition; 2. Has not driven a motor vehicle without a license for at least 5 years prior to the hearing; 3. Has been drug-free for at least 5 years prior to the hearing; and 4. Has completed a DUI program licensed by the department. (b) At such hearing, the department shall determine the petitioner’s qualification, fitness, and need to drive. Upon such determination, the department may, in its discretion, reinstate the driver license of the petitioner. Such reinstatement must be made subject to the following qualifications:1. The license must be restricted for employment purposes for at least 1 year; and 2. Such person must be supervised by a DUI program licensed by the department and report to the program for such supervision and education at least four times a year or additionally as required by the program for the remainder of the revocation period. Such supervision shall include evaluation, education, referral into treatment, and other activities required by the department. (c) Such person must assume the reasonable costs of supervision. If such person fails to comply with the required supervision, the program shall report the failure to the department, and the department shall cancel such person’s driving privilege. (d) If, after reinstatement, such person is convicted of an offense for which mandatory revocation of his or her license is required, the department shall revoke his or her driving privilege. (e) The department shall adopt rules regulating the providing of services by DUI programs pursuant to this section. (5) Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 322.28(2)(d), a person whose driving privilege has been permanently revoked because he or she has been convicted four or more times of violating s. 316.193 or former s. 316.1931 may, upon the expiration of 5 years after the date of the last conviction or the expiration of 5 years after the termination of any incarceration under s. 316.193 or former s. 316.1931, whichever is later, petition the department for reinstatement of his or her driving privilege.(a) Within 30 days after receipt of a petition, the department shall provide for a hearing, at which the petitioner must demonstrate that he or she:1. Has not been arrested for a drug-related offense for at least 5 years prior to filing the petition; 2. Has not driven a motor vehicle without a license for at least 5 years prior to the hearing; 3. Has been drug-free for at least 5 years prior to the hearing; and 4. Has completed a DUI program licensed by the department. (b) At the hearing, the department shall determine the petitioner’s qualification, fitness, and need to drive, and may, after such determination, reinstate the petitioner’s driver license. The reinstatement shall be subject to the following qualifications:1. The petitioner’s license must be restricted for employment purposes for at least 1 year; and 2. The petitioner must be supervised by a DUI program licensed by the department and must report to the program for supervision and education at least four times a year or more, as required by the program, for the remainder of the revocation period. The supervision shall include evaluation, education, referral into treatment, and other activities required by the department. (c) The petitioner must assume the reasonable costs of supervision. If the petitioner does not comply with the required supervision, the program shall report the failure to the department, and the department shall cancel such person’s driving privilege. (d) If, after reinstatement, the petitioner is convicted of an offense for which mandatory license revocation is required, the department shall revoke his or her driving privilege. (e) The department shall adopt rules regulating the services provided by DUI programs pursuant to this section. (6) A person may not be issued a commercial driver license during a period in which such person is disqualified from operating commercial motor vehicles or in which the driving privilege of such person is suspended, revoked, or canceled. (7) Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 322.2615(10)(a) and (b), a person who has never previously had a driver license suspended under s. 322.2615, has never been disqualified under s. 322.64, has never been convicted of a violation of s. 316.193, and whose driving privilege is now suspended under s. 322.2615 is eligible for a restricted driving privilege pursuant to a hearing under subsection (2).(a) For purposes of this subsection, a previous conviction outside of this state for driving under the influence, driving while intoxicated, driving with an unlawful blood-alcohol level, or any other alcohol-related or drug-related traffic offense similar to the offense of driving under the influence as provided in s. 316.193 will be considered a previous conviction for a violation of s. 316.193, and a conviction for violation of former s. 316.028, former s. 316.1931, or former s. 860.01 is considered a conviction for a violation of s. 316.193. (b) The reinstatement shall be restricted to business purposes only, as defined in this section, for the duration of the suspension imposed under s. 322.2615. (c) Acceptance of the reinstated driving privilege as provided in this subsection is deemed a waiver of the right to formal and informal review under s. 322.2615. The waiver may not be used as evidence in any other proceeding. History.—s. 6, ch. 59-278; s. 4, ch. 72-175; s. 6, ch. 74-384; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 20, ch. 78-95; s. 8, ch. 82-155; s. 9, ch. 84-359; s. 7, ch. 86-296; s. 2, ch. 89-525; s. 1, ch. 90-102; s. 3, ch. 90-253; ss. 11, 22, ch. 91-255; s. 5, ch. 93-246; s. 84, ch. 94-306; s. 940, ch. 95-148; s. 9, ch. 95-326; s. 42, ch. 95-333; s. 7, ch. 96-330; s. 11, ch. 96-414; s. 9, ch. 98-223; s. 7, ch. 99-234; s. 1, ch. 2005-138; s. 13, ch. 2009-183; s. 62, ch. 2010-5; ss. 36, 37, ch. 2010-223; s. 59, ch. 2013-160; s. 10, ch. 2025-125. 1Note.—Section 10, ch. 2025-125, amended paragraph (1)(b), effective July 1, 2026, to read:(b) A person whose driving privilege has been revoked under s. 322.27(5) may, upon expiration of 12 months from the date of such revocation, petition the department for reinstatement of his or her driving privilege. Upon such petition and after investigation of the person’s qualification, fitness, and need to drive, the department shall hold a hearing pursuant to chapter 120 to determine whether the driving privilege shall be reinstated on a restricted basis solely for business or employment purposes. If such person is granted a limited driving privilege and subsequently violates the conditions of the restricted driving privilege, the restricted driving privilege must be revoked and the person is not eligible for any driving privilege for the remaining duration of the 5-year period after his or her initial license revocation.
| |
Annotations, Discussions, Cases:
Cases Citing Statute 322.271
Total Results: 55
842 So. 2d 782
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2003 | Docket: 1730513
Cited 15 times | Published
revocation of driver's licenses. Section 9 amends section 322.271, Florida Statutes, which deals with petitions
761 So. 2d 417, 2000 WL 668488
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2000 | Docket: 1709278
Cited 15 times | Published
revocation provided for in the above subsection, section 322.271(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), states:
(b)
761 So. 2d 417, 2000 WL 668488
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2000 | Docket: 1709278
Cited 15 times | Published
revocation provided for in the above subsection, section 322.271(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), states:
(b)
138 So. 2d 513
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1962 | Docket: 1404183
Cited 10 times | Published
at the total during any specific period. By Section 322.271, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., the Department of
805 So. 2d 1034, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17, 2002 WL 10071
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2002 | Docket: 1669470
Cited 9 times | Published
revocation of driver's licenses. Section 9 amends section 322.271, Florida Statutes, which deals with petitions
79 So. 3d 118, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 812, 2012 WL 181453
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2012 | Docket: 2357556
Cited 6 times | Published
Legislature used the term "driving privilege" in section 322.271(1)(b) when referring to section 322.27(5),
985 So. 2d 1078, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 434, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 1221, 2008 WL 2608621
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2008 | Docket: 201250
Cited 5 times | Published
Lescher's license was permanently revoked.
Section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes (1997), formerly provided
828 So. 2d 1062, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15487, 2002 WL 31373750
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2002 | Docket: 429982
Cited 5 times | Published
driving under the influence (DUI). At that time, section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes (1987), provided that
883 So. 2d 300, 2004 WL 1877725
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2004 | Docket: 1370241
Cited 4 times | Published
reinstatement upon meeting certain criteria. See § 322.271(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). However, in 1998, the
20 So. 3d 915, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14399, 2009 WL 3047325
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2009 | Docket: 1639907
Cited 3 times | Published
offender's application for license reinstatement (see § 322.271 (2)(d)). However, in the context of these provisions
946 So. 2d 1140, 2006 WL 3733197
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2006 | Docket: 1770991
Cited 3 times | Published
his petition for certiorari.
In the past, section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes, authorized a person whose
891 So. 2d 1202, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 873, 2005 WL 236084
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 2005 | Docket: 2581250
Cited 3 times | Published
April 2004, the law in effect at that time was section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes (2003), which provides:
592 So. 2d 1202, 1992 WL 7213
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1992 | Docket: 1429648
Cited 3 times | Published
business or employment purposes only, as defined by § 322.271, if the person is otherwise qualified for such
94 So. 3d 652, 2012 WL 3101520, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12519
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2012 | Docket: 60310932
Cited 2 times | Published
may apply for a permit after five years. See § 322.271(5), Fla. Stat. (2010). Appellant alleges that
980 So. 2d 1118, 2008 WL 611015
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 2008 | Docket: 1417547
Cited 2 times | Published
favor, holding that the amended version of section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes (1997), is void ab initio
891 So. 2d 643, 2005 WL 176423
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2005 | Docket: 1704421
Cited 2 times | Published
reinstated. Because the current version of section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes (2004), is applicable
660 So. 2d 775
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1995 | Docket: 1647140
Cited 2 times | Published
"restricted to business or employment purposes only." § 322.271(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1993). Once reinstated, petitioner
297 So. 2d 128
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1974 | Docket: 451212
Cited 2 times | Published
should not be confused with that provided in § 322.271 in which all those whose licenses have been suspended
244 So. 3d 356
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2018 | Docket: 6366189
Cited 1 times | Published
“driver
license or learner’s driver license”); § 322.271(1)(b), Fla. Stat.
(2016) (stating, “[a] person
198 So. 3d 1151, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13279, 2016 WL 4607547
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2016 | Docket: 4418859
Cited 1 times | Published
419. To reach that conclusion, we relied on section 322.271(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), which deals
118 So. 3d 264, 2013 WL 3814960, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11612
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2013 | Docket: 60233144
Cited 1 times | Published
Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. See § 322.271, Fla. Stat. (2008) (suspension, cancellation,
24 So. 3d 176, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 655, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 2016, 2009 WL 4347311
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2009 | Docket: 1648799
Cited 1 times | Published
eligibility for restricted licenses pursuant to section 322.271(2)(b), Florida Statutes, shall be assessed
960 So. 2d 819, 2007 WL 1827631
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2007 | Docket: 1131162
Cited 1 times | Published
certified in Lescher:
Does the amendment to section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes, which eliminated hardship
913 So. 2d 1176, 2005 WL 2508711
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2005 | Docket: 1698325
Cited 1 times | Published
Legislature's enactment, effective July 1, 1998, of section 322.271, Florida Statutes, which prevents persons with
828 So. 2d 486, 2002 WL 31323248
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2002 | Docket: 429800
Cited 1 times | Published
fair hearing utilizing the 1997 version of section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes.
Certiorari review of
816 So. 2d 1190, 2002 WL 1021559
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2002 | Docket: 1753560
Cited 1 times | Published
reinstatement after five years, pursuant to section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes (2000).
775 So. 2d 989, 2000 WL 1742046
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2000 | Docket: 1185227
Cited 1 times | Published
requested an administrative hearing under section 322.271, Florida Statutes. The Department is required
204 So. 3d 169, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17646
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2016 | Docket: 63630539
Published
petitioning for a “hardship license” under section 322.271, Florida Statutes. During the administrative
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2016 | Docket: 4108987
Published
419. To reach that conclusion, we relied on section 322.271(1)(b), Florida Statutes
185 So. 3d 632, 2016 WL 455625
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2016 | Docket: 3033937
Published
the cancellation of his hardship license. Section 322.271 is entitled “Authority to modify revocation
148 So. 3d 816, 2014 WL 5033392
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2014 | Docket: 1436087
Published
the hearing officer noted the requirement in section 322.271, Florida Statutes, that there be no driving
975 So. 2d 1270, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3451, 2008 WL 649703
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2008 | Docket: 64854000
Published
certified in Lescher:
Does the amendment to section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes, which eliminated hardship
972 So. 2d 924, 2007 WL 4320756
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2007 | Docket: 2564482
Published
a restricted, hardship license pursuant to section 322.271, Florida Statutes. Because the appellant did
959 So. 2d 434, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10343, 2007 WL 1931361
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2007 | Docket: 64851286
Published
installed thereon. The Department appeals.
‘Under section 322.271(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2005), the Department
946 So. 2d 1240, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 420, 2007 WL 101040
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2007 | Docket: 64848634
Published
great public importance:
Does the amendment to section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes, which eliminated hardship
920 So. 2d 1220, 2006 WL 398628
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2006 | Docket: 1730715
Published
both proceedings under case number 3D05-511.
Section 322.271(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2003) allows the DMV
923 So. 2d 530, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2492, 2006 WL 437506
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2006 | Docket: 64842971
Published
they may be admitted in proceedings under section 322.271 (providing for administrative hearing on suspension
884 So. 2d 478, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14634, 2004 WL 2251869
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2004 | Docket: 64833564
Published
suspensions from applying for a work permit license. § 322.271, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1998). In the instant case
870 So. 2d 47, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15645, 2003 WL 22358154
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2003 | Docket: 64829601
Published
determine, in light of the criteria set out in section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes (1997), whether the hearing
802 So. 2d 459, 2001 WL 1614144
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2001 | Docket: 1705750
Published
suspension cannot apply for a work permit. See § 322.271, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998).
The trial court denied
745 So. 2d 1024, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13703, 1999 WL 945926
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1999 | Docket: 64792660
Published
based this decision on its conclusion that section 322.271(4)(a)(S), Florida Statutes (1997), which states
719 So. 2d 339, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11541, 1998 WL 601341
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1998 | Docket: 64783576
Published
though she had refused to take a breath test. Section 322.271 provides that such hardship license is not
697 So. 2d 230, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8588, 1997 WL 423445
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1997 | Docket: 64775138
Published
who has not fulfilled the requirements of Section 322.271(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), including enrolling
688 So. 2d 996, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1792, 1997 WL 82583
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1997 | Docket: 64771508
Published
concur.
. § 316.193(3), Fla.Stat. (1993).
. § 322.271, Fla. Stat. (1993).
664 So. 2d 25, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12300, 1995 WL 689541
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1995 | Docket: 64760537
Published
substance abuse education course as required under section 322.271(2)(a), Florida Statutes.
We approve the trial
660 So. 2d 775, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9770, 1995 WL 548346
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1995 | Docket: 64758888
Published
“restricted to business or employment purposes only.” § 322.271(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1993). Once reinstated, petitioner
634 So. 2d 742, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3081, 1994 WL 98851
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1994 | Docket: 64747408
Published
Legislature, during its 1990 session, had amended section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes (1989), to allow individuals
608 So. 2d 451, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 668, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1825, 1992 WL 301685
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1992 | Docket: 64692018
Published
eligibility for restricted licenses pursuant to section 322.271(2)(b), Florida Statutes, shall be assessed
581 So. 2d 214, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5149, 1991 WL 93530
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1991 | Docket: 64659474
Published
date of revocation, except as provided for in § 322.271. Any person whose license is revoked may, by petition
531 So. 2d 150, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 553, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 1474, 1988 WL 95021
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1988 | Docket: 64636984
Published
eligibility for restricted licenses pursuant to section 322.271(2)(b), Florida Statutes, shall be assessed
530 So. 2d 274, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 510, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 885, 1988 WL 90343
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1988 | Docket: 64636676
Published
eligibility for restricted licenses pursuant to section 322.271(2)(b), Florida Statutes, shall be assessed
536 So. 2d 181, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 1471, 1988 WL 143332
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1988 | Docket: 64639474
Published
eligibility for restricted licenses pursuant to section 322.271(2)(b), Florida Statutes, shall be assessed
494 So. 2d 1129, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 493, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2670
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1986 | Docket: 64621890
Published
eligibility for restricted licenses pursuant to section 322.271(2)(b), Florida Statutes, shall be assessed
294 So. 2d 352, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7228
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1974 | Docket: 64538850
Published
use of their license for business purposes. Section 322.271, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. We cannot amend the
288 So. 2d 260, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8151
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1974 | Docket: 64536572
Published
traffic offender, the Legislature also amended § 322.271 to exclude those persons whose licenses had been
