Florida Statute 322.274 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXIII
MOTOR VEHICLES

Chapter 322
DRIVER LICENSES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 322.274

322.274 Automatic revocation of driver license.—

(1) The driver license of any person convicted hereunder of theft of any motor vehicle or parts or components of a motor vehicle shall be revoked. If such revocation shall not be ordered by the court, the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles shall forthwith revoke the same. The department shall not consider the convicted person’s application for reinstatement of such revoked license until the expiration of the full term of the sentence imposed, whether served during actual imprisonment, probation, parole, or suspension.

(2) It shall be grounds for the revocation of any person’s parole or probation if he or she operates a motor vehicle while his or her license is revoked pursuant to this chapter. However, it shall be within the discretion of the trial judge who imposes sentence upon the person convicted hereunder to direct the reinstatement of the person’s driver license on a limited basis after a reasonable time.

History.—s. 1, ch. 70-19; s. 1, ch. 70-439; s. 4, ch. 71-342; s. 65, ch. 74-383; s. 415, ch. 95-148.

Note.—Former s. 814.05.

F.S. 322.274 on Google Scholar

F.S. 322.274 on Casetext

Amendments to 322.274

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 322.274

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 322.274.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 322.274

Total Results: 3

Lite v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1993-04-15T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 617 So. 2d 1058

Snippet: Stat. (1989) (failure to attend high school); § 322.274, Fla. Stat. (1989) (committing theft of parts or

Schottel v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-11-27T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 590 So. 2d 486, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11949, 1991 WL 248627

Snippet: not support their application. See §§ 322.26(8), 322.274, Fla.Stat. (1989). We therefore conclude that there

Douglas v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-04-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 559 So. 2d 732, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2749, 1990 WL 48609

Snippet: of these sections. See §§ 322.26(3), 322.26(8), 322.274, Fla.Stat. (1987). Accordingly, we vacate that