Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 326.002 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 326.002 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 326.002

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXIV
VESSELS
Chapter 326
YACHT AND SHIP BROKERS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 326.002
326.002 Definitions.As used in ss. 326.001-326.006, the term:
(1) “Broker” means a person who, for or in expectation of compensation: sells, offers, or negotiates to sell; buys, offers, or negotiates to buy; solicits or obtains listings of; or negotiates the purchase, sale, or exchange of, yachts for other persons.
(2) “Division” means the Division of Florida Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation.
(3) “Salesperson” means a person who, for or in expectation of compensation, is employed by a broker to perform any acts of a broker.
(4) “Yacht” means any vessel that is propelled by sail or machinery in the water, exceeds 32 feet in length, and is:
(a) Manufactured or operated primarily for pleasure; or
(b) Leased, rented, or chartered to someone other than the owner for the other person’s pleasure.
(5) “Person” means an individual, partnership, firm, corporation, association, or other entity.
History.ss. 2, 7, ch. 88-282; s. 2, ch. 89-128; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 34, ch. 94-218; s. 950, ch. 95-148; s. 14, ch. 2008-240; s. 1, ch. 2024-195.

F.S. 326.002 on Google Scholar

F.S. 326.002 on Casetext

Amendments to 326.002


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 326.002
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 326.002.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 326.002

Total Results: 9

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Pembroke Pines MRI, Inc., a/a/o Elias Cruz

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-08-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 171 So. 3d 814, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11958, 2015 WL 4747535

Snippet: benefits from its insured. The Clinic billed $8,326 for two MRIs. State Farm paid $1,773.04, which was 80%

Jones v. Jones

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-02-17T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 920 So. 2d 800, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1990, 2006 WL 357832

Snippet: $66,262.05. In 2002, the husband’s total income was $78,326.02. In 2001, the husband’s income was $88,661.45.

Storm v. Allied Universal Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-04-09T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 842 So. 2d 245

Snippet: his former employer, ALLIED (Trial, p. 260-261, 326).[2] Post-trial discovery indisputably has established

Lynch Austin Realty, Inc. v. Engler

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1994-12-15T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 647 So. 2d 988

Snippet: creditor while in the buyer's possession. § 672.326(2). In order to prevail over a creditor's claim

Mahler v. Allied Marine

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1987-08-25T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 513 So. 2d 677

Snippet: Commercial Code § 2-326:16 (3d ed. 1983), UCC § 2-326 and 2-327 regulate the transaction that becomes a sale

Hyland v. Rodney

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1939-07-11T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 195 So. 574, 142 Fla. 319, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 2057

Snippet: connection therewith, during which period of two *Page 326 (2) years no foreclosure proceedings may be instituted

Standard Accident Insurance v. Hancock

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1936-06-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 169 So. 617, 124 Fla. 725, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1187

Snippet: So. 516; Vickers v. Glenn, 102 Fla. 535,136 So. 326; 2 R.C.L. 509-510, 580-584; Union Securities Co. v

Taylor v. Thomas

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1933-06-29T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 149 So. 397, 111 Fla. 252, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1957

Snippet: jurisdiction since 1846. See 6 Ency. Pl. Prac. 326; 2 Fla. Digest Annotated 798; Sylvester v. Lichtenstein

Alvarino v. Rauch

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1926-02-22T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 108 So. 555, 91 Fla. 293

Snippet: judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $28,326.02 with costs. See former writ of error, Alvarino