Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 329 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 329 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 329

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXV
AVIATION
Chapter 329
AIRCRAFT: TITLE; REGISTRATION; LIENS
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 329
TITLE XXV
AVIATION
CHAPTER 329
AIRCRAFT: TITLE; REGISTRATION; LIENS
329.01 Recording instruments affecting civil aircraft.
329.10 Aircraft registration.
329.11 Aircraft identification numbers; penalties.
329.40 Airport facilities; lien for landing and other fees.
329.41 Lien for fuel furnished to aircraft.
329.51 Liens for labor, services, fuel, or material expended upon aircraft; notice.
329.01 Recording instruments affecting civil aircraft.No instrument which affects the title to or interest in any civil aircraft of the United States, or any portion thereof, is valid in respect to such aircraft, or portion thereof, against any person, other than the person by whom the instrument is made or given, the person’s heirs or devisee, and any person having actual notice thereof, until such instrument is recorded in the office of the Federal Aviation Administrator of the United States, or such other office as is designated by the laws of the United States as the one in which such instruments should be filed. Every such instrument so recorded in such office is valid as to all persons without further recordation in any office of this state. Any instrument required to be recorded by the provisions of this section takes effect from the date of its recordation and not from the date of its execution.
History.s. 1, ch. 22673, 1945; s. 1, ch. 84-259; s. 470, ch. 95-148.
329.10 Aircraft registration.
(1) It is unlawful for any person in this state to knowingly have in his or her possession an aircraft that is not registered in accordance with the regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration contained in Title 14, chapter 1, parts 47-49 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
(2) Any aircraft in or operated in this state that is found to be registered to a nonexistent person, firm, or corporation or to a firm, business, or corporation which is no longer a legal entity is in violation of this section. Any firm, business, or corporation that has no physical location or corporate officers or that has lapsed into an inactive state or been dissolved by order of the Secretary of State for a period of at least 90 days with no documented attempt to reinstate the firm, business, or corporation or to register its aircraft in the name of a real person or legal entity in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration regulations is in violation of this section.
(3) A person who knowingly supplies false information to a governmental entity in regard to the name, address, business name, or business address of the owner of an aircraft in or operated in the state is in violation of this section.
(4) It is a violation of this section for any person or corporate entity to knowingly supply false information to any governmental entity in regard to ownership by it or another firm, business, or corporation of an aircraft in or operated in this state if it is determined that such corporate entity or other firm, business, or corporation:
(a) Is not, or has never been, a legal entity in this state;
(b) Is not, or has never been, a legal entity in any other state; or
(c) Has lapsed into a state of no longer being a legal entity in this state as defined in part I of chapter 607 or s. 865.09, and no documented attempt has been made to correct such information with the governmental entity for a period of 90 days after the date on which such lapse took effect with the Secretary of State.
(5) This section does not apply to any aircraft registration or information supplied by a governmental entity in the course and scope of performing its lawful duties.
(6)(a) A violation of this section shall be deemed a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(b) Any violation of this section shall constitute the aircraft to which it relates as contraband, and said aircraft may be seized as contraband by a law enforcement agency and shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to ss. 932.701-932.704.
History.s. 5, ch. 83-272; s. 2, ch. 84-259; s. 21, ch. 87-243; s. 471, ch. 95-148; s. 41, ch. 2014-209.
329.11 Aircraft identification numbers; penalties.
(1)(a) It is unlawful for any person, firm, association, or corporation to knowingly buy, sell, offer for sale, receive, dispose of, conceal, or have in his or her possession, or to endeavor to buy, sell, offer for sale, receive, dispose of, conceal, or possess, any aircraft or part thereof on which the assigned identification numbers do not meet the requirements of the federal aviation regulations.
(b) If any of the identification numbers required by this subsection have been knowingly omitted, altered, removed, destroyed, covered, or defaced, or the real identity of the aircraft cannot be determined due to an intentional act of the owner or possessor, the aircraft may be seized as contraband property by a law enforcement agency and shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to ss. 932.701-932.704. Such aircraft may not be knowingly sold or operated from any airport, landing field, or other property or body of water where aircraft may land or take off in this state unless the Federal Aviation Administration has issued the aircraft a replacement identification number which shall thereafter be used for identification purposes.
(c) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly possess, manufacture, sell or exchange, offer to sell or exchange, supply in blank, or give away any counterfeit manufacturer’s aircraft identification number plate or decal used for the purpose of identification of any aircraft; to authorize, direct, aid in exchange, or give away such counterfeit manufacturer’s aircraft identification number plate or decal; or to conspire to do any of the foregoing.
(d) Any person who violates any provision of this subsection is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(2) The failure to have aircraft identification numbers clearly displayed on the aircraft and in compliance with federal aviation regulations is probable cause for any law enforcement officer in this state to make further inspection of the aircraft in question to ascertain its true identity. A law enforcement officer is authorized to inspect an aircraft for identification numbers:
(a) When it is located on public property; or
(b) Upon consent of the owner of the private property on which the aircraft is stored.
History.s. 3, ch. 83-272; s. 23, ch. 87-243; s. 33, ch. 91-221; s. 472, ch. 95-148.
329.40 Airport facilities; lien for landing and other fees.
(1) The governing body of a publicly owned and operated airport has a lien upon all aircraft landing upon any airport owned and operated by it for all fees and charges for the use of the facilities of such airport by any aircraft when payment of such charges and fees is not made immediately upon demand to the operator or owner of the aircraft by an authorized employee of the airport. The lien for the full amount of the charges and fees due attaches to any aircraft, at the airport, which is owned or operated by the person owing such charges and fees. Such lien may be enforced as provided by law for the enforcement of warehousemen’s liens.
(2) A person may not remove or attempt to remove from the airport any aircraft owned or operated by the person owing such charges or fees after service of notice of the lien upon the owner or operator or after the posting of such notice upon the aircraft. Any person who unlawfully removes or attempts to remove from the airport any aircraft owned or operated by a person owing such charges or fees after service or posting of the notice of lien and before payment of the amount due to the airport is guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
History.s. 1, ch. 83-272; s. 1, ch. 87-324.
329.41 Lien for fuel furnished to aircraft.A person who has furnished fuel to an aircraft has a lien upon the aircraft for any unpaid fuel charges, and possession of the aircraft is not required in order to perfect such lien. The lien is enforceable in the same manner as provided in s. 329.51.
History.s. 1, ch. 93-73; s. 1, ch. 2019-88.
329.51 Liens for labor, services, fuel, or material expended upon aircraft; notice.Any lien claimed on an aircraft under s. 329.41 or s. 713.58 is enforceable when the lienor records a verified lien notice with the clerk of the circuit court in the county where the aircraft was located at the time the labor, services, fuel, or material was last furnished. The lienor is not required to possess the aircraft to perfect such lien. The lienor must record such lien notice within 90 days after the time the labor, services, fuel, or material was last furnished. The notice must state the name of the lienor; the name of the owner; a description of the aircraft upon which the lienor has expended labor, services, fuel, or material; the amount for which the lien is claimed; and the date the expenditure was completed. This section does not affect the priority of competing interests in any aircraft or the lienor’s obligation to record the lien under s. 329.01.
History.s. 2, ch. 83-272; s. 3, ch. 84-259; s. 2, ch. 93-73; s. 473, ch. 95-148; s. 2, ch. 2019-88.

F.S. 329 on Google Scholar

F.S. 329 on Casetext

Amendments to 329


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 329
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S329.10 1 - PROPERTY CRIMES - POSSESS UNREGISTERED AIRCRAFT - F: T
S329.10 2 - PROPERTY CRIMES - POSS OPR AIRCRAFT BY NON LEGAL ENTITY PERSON - F: T
S329.10 3 - FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENT - GIVE FALSE INFO REGARDING AIRCRAFT OWNER - F: T
S329.10 4 - FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENT - RE AIRCRAFT OWNER BY NON LEGAL ENTITY PERSON - F: T
S329.11 1a - PROPERTY CRIMES - BUY SELL POSS DISP CONCEAL AIRCRAFT PARTS - F: T
S329.11 1b - FRAUD - OMIT ALTER COVER DEFACE REMOVE AIRCRAFT ID NUM - F: T
S329.11 1c - COUNTERFEITING OF - MFGR AIRCRAFT ID NUM PLATE/DECAL - F: T
S329.11 1c - PASS COUNTERFEITED - MFGR AIRCRAFT ID NUMBER PLATE/DECAL - F: T
S329.11 1c - POSSESS COUNTERFEITED - MFGR AIRCRAFT ID NUM PLATE/DECAL - F: T
S329.40 - FRAUD - REMOVE OR ATTEMPT TO REMOVE AIRCRAFT UND LIEN - M: S
S341.329 - BRIBERY - REPEALED 2002-20 - F: T



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 329

Total Results: 20

J.B. Harris, P.A. v. Virage Capital Management LP

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-27

Snippet: Advent Christian Home & Orphanage, 199 So. 329, 332 (Fla. 1940). 4 Other states have reached

Coury v. City of Tampa

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-27

Snippet: 53, 54–56 (1988); see also Celotex, 477 U.S. at 329 ("[T]he Court has not clearly explained what

Bravo v. Johnson F/K/A Donlan

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-13

Snippet: State, Dep’t of Revenue v. Fleet, 679 So. 2d 326, 329 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We conclude that the same remedy

Thomas Van Lent v. the Everglades Foundation, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-30

Snippet: Our answer is yes.”); Cantrell v. Commonwealth, 329 S.E.2d 22, 26–27 (Va. 1985) (“We agree with the

Philip Morris USA Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Bryan Rintoul, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Edward Caprio

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-23

Snippet: based on Sheffield v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 329 So. 3d 114 (Fla. 2021). Rintoul, 342 So. 3d at 659

Eric Nashon Pinkney v. the State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-16

Snippet: Richardson hearing); Austin v. State, 199 So. 3d 327, 329 n. 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (noting that “even if the

Robert Alan McCartney v. the State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-16

Snippet: eruption); United States v. Correa, 182 F. Supp. 2d 326, 329 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (excluding time following September

George Buchanan v. Miami-Dade County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-30

Snippet: personal property.”); Levine v. Knowles, 197 So. 2d 329, 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967) (noting that “[u]nder the

USAA Casualty Insurance Company v. David L. Deehl

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-30

Snippet: Owens v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc., 802 So. 2d 315, 329 (Fla. 2001)). We find no error with the trial

Steven Edward Stein v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-19

Snippet: forum. 2 2. Stein v. State, 995 So. 2d 329, 342 (Fla. 2008) (affirming denial of initial postconviction

Alexander Garcia v. Yellow Cab Company

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-18

Snippet: attorney-client privilege. Millan L. Firm, P.A. v. Zambrano, 329 So. 3d 814, 814 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).1 Because they

Loran Cole v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-23

Snippet: (omission in original) (quoting Dailey v. State, 329 So. 3d 1280, 1285 (Fla. 2021)). We agree with the

Norman J. Martinez v. Ring-Central, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-07

Snippet: See, e.g., Moscatiello v. Hilliard, 939 A.2d 325, 329 (Pa. 2007); New England Utils. v. Hydro-Quebec, 10

M.B., Father of S.V., etc. v. Department of Children and Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-02

Snippet: _____________________________ No. 1D2024-0329 _____________________________

Michele Mendez v. Adrian Mendez and Charles A. Lowe, III

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-07-10

Snippet: Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Locklin, 965 So. 2d 325, 329 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). However, when Locklin was decided

JOHNSTON v. JOHNSTON

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-07-10

Snippet: provision no effect. See Williams-Paris v. Joseph, 329 So. 3d 775, 783 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021).

JOHNSTON v. JOHNSTON

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-07-10

Snippet: provision no effect. See Williams-Paris v. Joseph, 329 So. 3d 775, 783 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021).

Marissa N. McConnell v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-07-09

Snippet: 2021-CF-000371 2021-CF-000329 2021-CT-001331

Pinellas County, Florida v. Gary Joiner, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-06-27

Snippet: Principality of Monaco v. Mississippi, 292 U.S. 313, 329- 30 (1934) (recognizing state sovereign immunity);

Ron DeSantis, Governor v. Dream Defenders

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-06-20

Snippet: 18-9-101(2) (2021); Iowa Code § 723.1 (2021); La. R.S. 14:329.1 (2014); Mo. Rev. Stat. § 574.040 (2000); N.C. Gen