Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 335.18 (2025)
Short title.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1984–1988 · leading case: Paradyne Corp. v. State, Dept. of Transp., 528 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).
Paradyne Corp. v. State, Dept. of Transp., 528 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). “ntrary to the conclusion of the hearing officer, DOT determined that subsequent to the issuance of the 1981 permit, traffic has increased on Ulmerton to a degree which necessitates a modification and redesign of the private road located on Paradyne's property, as well as a…”
Paradyne Corp. v. Miller, 455 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). “It is possible that DOT will find that the intersection, as designed, does not meet the standards in section 335.18, Florida Statutes (1981). In this event, DOT should be allowed to redesign the connector road to meet the standards of section 335.”
— 335.18(1) — 1 case
Paradyne Corp. v. State, Dept. of Transp., 528 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). “ntrary to the conclusion of the hearing officer, DOT determined that subsequent to the issuance of the 1981 permit, traffic has increased on Ulmerton to a degree which necessitates a modification and redesign of the private road located on Paradyne's property, as well as a…”
— 335.18(4) — 1 case
Paradyne Corp. v. Miller, 455 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). “It is possible that DOT will find that the intersection, as designed, does not meet the standards in section 335.18, Florida Statutes (1981). In this event, DOT should be allowed to redesign the connector road to meet the standards of section 335.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.