Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 335.182 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 335.182 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 335.182

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXVI
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Chapter 335
STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 335.182
335.182 Regulation of connections to roads on State Highway System; definitions.
(1) Vehicular access and connections to or from the State Highway System shall be regulated by the department in accordance with the provisions of this act in order to protect the public health, safety, and welfare.
(2) The department shall adopt, by rule, administrative procedures for its issuance and modification of access permits, closing of unpermitted connections, and revocation of permits in accordance with this act.
(3) As used in this act, the term:
(a) “Connection” means driveways, streets, turnouts, or other means of providing for the right of reasonable access to or from the State Highway System.
(b) “Significant change” means a change in the use of the property, including land, structures or facilities, or an expansion of the size of the structures or facilities causing an increase in the trip generation of the property exceeding 25 percent more trip generation (either peak hour or daily) and exceeding 100 vehicles per day more than the existing use.
History.s. 5, ch. 88-224; s. 100, ch. 92-152; s. 79, ch. 99-385.

F.S. 335.182 on Google Scholar

F.S. 335.182 on Casetext

Amendments to 335.182


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 335.182
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 335.182.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 335.182

Total Results: 6

Cordis Corporation v. Sonics International, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-02-28T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 427 So. 2d 782

Snippet: Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co., 30 Cal.2d 335, 182 P.2d 182 (1947); see also, Portuguese-American

Oceancoast Corp. v. City of Miami Beach

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1969-04-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 221 So. 2d 802

Snippet: decision, State ex. rel. Holloway v. Keller, 133 Fla. 335, 182 So. 779 (1938), a Tampa occupational license tax

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Town of Surfside

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1966-05-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 186 So. 2d 777

Snippet: State ex rel. Holloway v. Keller, 1938, 133 Fla. 335, 182 So. 779, simply held that the enactment of the

City of St. Petersburg v. Siebold

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1950-10-23T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 48 So. 2d 291

Snippet: as Tax Collector of the City of Tampa, 133 Fla. 335, 182 So. 779, 781, is decisive of this controversy.

Lenfestey Supply Co. v. City of Tampa

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1940-04-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 195 So. 412, 142 Fla. 610

Snippet: rel. Holloway v. Keller, Tax Collector, 133 Fla. 335, 182 So. 779, contrary to the contention of appellant

Bentley-Gray Dry Goods Co. v. City of Tampa

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1939-05-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 188 So. 758, 137 Fla. 641

Snippet: ex rel. Holloway, et al., v. Keller, 133 Fla. 335, 182 So. 779. It is contended that the opinion and