Florida Statute 337.106 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXVI
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Chapter 337
CONTRACTING; ACQUISITION, DISPOSAL, AND USE OF PROPERTY

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 337.106

337.106 Professional service providers; requirement for professional liability insurance.—Except for any person or firm providing professional services of a research or training nature, any person or firm rendering legal, architectural, engineering, or other professional services to the department shall have and maintain during the period the services are rendered a professional liability insurance policy or policies with a company or companies authorized to do business in the state affording professional liability coverage for the professional services rendered, in an amount deemed sufficient by the department. The requirement for professional liability insurance set forth in this section may be waived by the department, if the person or firm providing professional services obtains and maintains an unexpired, irrevocable letter of credit, established pursuant to chapter 675, in an amount not less than the minimum insurance coverage required by the contract with the department. The letter of credit shall be solely for the benefit of the department and must remain valid until 3 years after final acceptance of the project of which the professional services were a part. The letter of credit shall be approved by the department comptroller and be payable to the department as beneficiary upon presentment of a final judgment indicating liability and awarding damages to be paid to the department by the professional service provider or upon presentment of a settlement agreement signed by all parties. The letter of credit shall be nonassignable and nontransferable. The letter of credit shall be issued by any bank or savings association organized and existing under the laws of this state or any bank or savings association organized under the laws of the United States that has its principal place of business in this state or has a branch office which is authorized under the laws of this state or of the United States to receive deposits in this state.

History.—s. 3, ch. 70-168; s. 138, ch. 84-309; s. 1, ch. 88-299; s. 51, ch. 90-136; s. 119, ch. 92-152; s. 2, ch. 92-318.

F.S. 337.106 on Google Scholar

F.S. 337.106 on Casetext

Amendments to 337.106

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 337.106

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 337.106.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 337.106

Total Results: 8

MacHin v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-08-06

Citation: 213 So. 2d 499

Snippet: during the trial. In Sanford v. State, 90 Fla. 337, 106 So. 406 (1925), it was held that where the record

Brooks v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-01-27

Citation: 117 So. 2d 482

Snippet: So.2d 517 and Sanford v. State, 1925, 90 Fla. 337, 106 So. 406. [4] 2 Wharton's Criminal Evidence, p

Cullaro v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1957-09-18

Citation: 97 So. 2d 40

Snippet: 256, 11 So. 611; and Sanford v. State, 90 Fla. 337, 106 So. 406. The trial court, nonetheless, acted within

Acree v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1943-10-08

Citation: 15 So. 2d 262, 153 Fla. 561, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 699

Snippet: Fla. 189, 84 So. 535; Sanford v. State, 90 Fla. 337, 106 So. 406, and many other cases. Section 199 of

Baston v. Shelton

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1943-05-07

Citation: 13 So. 2d 453, 152 Fla. 879, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 1053

Snippet: Fla. 348, 96 So. 381; Sanford v. State, 90 Fla. 337, 106 So. 406; Hall v. State,78 Fla. 420, 83 So. 518;

Mardorff v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-05-21

Citation: 196 So. 625, 143 Fla. 64, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1158

Snippet: evidence. In the case of Sanford v. State, 90 Fla. 337, 106 So. 406, this Court said: "There was no error

Smith v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-03-22

Citation: 194 So. 873, 142 Fla. 468, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1390

Snippet: error was committed. See Sanford v. State, 90 Fla. 337, 106 So. 406; Seay v. State,139 Fla. 291, 190 So. 702

Tige Scholl v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-12-17

Citation: 115 So. 43, 94 Fla. 1138

Snippet: opinion in the case of Sanford v. State, 90 Fla. 337,106 So. 406, in which the Court say: "The question