Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 366.04 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 366.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 366.04 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 366.04

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXVII
RAILROADS AND OTHER REGULATED UTILITIES
Chapter 366
PUBLIC UTILITIES
View Entire Chapter
366.04 Jurisdiction of commission.
(1) In addition to its existing functions, the commission shall have jurisdiction to regulate and supervise each public utility with respect to its rates and service; assumption by it of liabilities or obligations as guarantor, endorser, or surety; and the issuance and sale of its securities, except a security which is a note or draft maturing not more than 1 year after the date of such issuance and sale and aggregating (together with all other then-outstanding notes and drafts of a maturity of 1 year or less on which such public utility is liable) not more than 5 percent of the par value of the other securities of the public utility then outstanding. In the case of securities having no par value, the par value for the purpose of this section shall be the fair market value as of the date of issue. The commission, upon application by a public utility, may authorize the utility to issue and sell securities of one or more offerings, or of one or more types, over a period of up to 12 months; or, if the securities are notes or drafts maturing not more than 1 year after the date of issuance and sale, the commission, upon such application, may authorize the utility to issue and sell such securities over a period of up to 24 months. The commission may take final action to grant an application by a public utility to issue and sell securities or to assume liabilities or obligations after having given notice in the Florida Administrative Register published at least 7 days in advance of final agency action. In taking final action on such application, the commission may deny authorization for the issuance or sale of a security or assumption of a liability or obligation if the security, liability, or obligation is for nonutility purposes; and shall deny authorization for the issuance or sale of a security or assumption of a liability or obligation if the financial viability of the public utility is adversely affected such that the public utility’s ability to provide reasonable service at reasonable rates is jeopardized. Securities issued by a public utility or liabilities or obligations assumed by a public utility as guarantor, endorser, or surety pursuant to an order of the commission, which order is certified by the clerk of the commission and which order approves or authorizes the issuance and sale of such securities or the assumption of such liabilities or obligations, shall not be invalidated by a modification, repeal, or amendment to that order or by a supplemental order; however, the commission’s approval of the issuance of securities or the assumption of liabilities or obligations shall constitute approval only as to the legality of the issue or assumption, and in no way shall it be considered commission approval of the rates, service, accounts, valuation, estimates, or determinations of cost or any other such matter. The jurisdiction conferred upon the commission shall be exclusive and superior to that of all other boards, agencies, political subdivisions, municipalities, towns, villages, or counties, and, in case of conflict therewith, all lawful acts, orders, rules, and regulations of the commission shall in each instance prevail.
(2) In the exercise of its jurisdiction, the commission shall have power over electric utilities for the following purposes:
(a) To prescribe uniform systems and classifications of accounts.
(b) To prescribe a rate structure for all electric utilities.
(c) To require electric power conservation and reliability within a coordinated grid, for operational as well as emergency purposes.
(d) To approve territorial agreements between and among rural electric cooperatives, municipal electric utilities, and other electric utilities under its jurisdiction. However, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to alter existing territorial agreements as between the parties to such agreements.
(e) To resolve, upon petition of a utility or on its own motion, any territorial dispute involving service areas between and among rural electric cooperatives, municipal electric utilities, and other electric utilities under its jurisdiction. In resolving territorial disputes, the commission may consider, but not be limited to consideration of, the ability of the utilities to expand services within their own capabilities and the nature of the area involved, including population, the degree of urbanization of the area, its proximity to other urban areas, and the present and reasonably foreseeable future requirements of the area for other utility services.
(f) To prescribe and require the filing of periodic reports and other data as may be reasonably available and as necessary to exercise its jurisdiction hereunder.

No provision of this chapter shall be construed or applied to impede, prevent, or prohibit any municipally owned electric utility system from distributing at retail electrical energy within its corporate limits, as such corporate limits exist on July 1, 1974; however, existing territorial agreements shall not be altered or abridged hereby.

(3) In the exercise of its jurisdiction, the commission shall have the authority over natural gas utilities for the following purposes:
(a) To approve territorial agreements between and among natural gas utilities. However, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to alter existing territorial agreements between the parties to such agreements.
(b) To resolve, upon petition of a utility or on its own motion, any territorial dispute involving service areas between and among natural gas utilities. In resolving territorial disputes, the commission may consider, but not be limited to consideration of, the ability of the utilities to expand services within their own capabilities and the nature of the area involved, including population, the degree of urbanization of the area, its proximity to other urban areas, and the present and reasonably foreseeable future requirements of the area for other utility services.
(c) For purposes of this subsection, “natural gas utility” means any utility which supplies natural gas or manufactured gas or liquefied gas with air admixture, or similar gaseous substance by pipeline, to or for the public and includes gas public utilities, gas districts, and natural gas utilities or municipalities or agencies thereof.
(4) Any customer shall be given an opportunity to present oral or written communications in commission proceedings to approve territorial agreements or resolve territorial disputes. If the commission proposes to consider such material, then all parties shall be given an opportunity to cross-examine or challenge or rebut it. Any substantially affected customer shall have the right to intervene in such proceedings.
(5) The commission shall further have jurisdiction over the planning, development, and maintenance of a coordinated electric power grid throughout Florida to assure an adequate and reliable source of energy for operational and emergency purposes in Florida and the avoidance of further uneconomic duplication of generation, transmission, and distribution facilities.
(6) The commission shall further have exclusive jurisdiction to prescribe and enforce safety standards for transmission and distribution facilities of all public electric utilities, cooperatives organized under the Rural Electric Cooperative Law, and electric utilities owned and operated by municipalities. In adopting safety standards, the commission shall, at a minimum:
(a) Adopt the 1984 edition of the National Electrical Safety Code (ANSI C2) as initial standards; and
(b) Adopt, after review, any new edition of the National Electrical Safety Code (ANSI C2).

The standards prescribed by the current 1984 edition of the National Electrical Safety Code (ANSI C2) shall constitute acceptable and adequate requirements for the protection of the safety of the public, and compliance with the minimum requirements of that code shall constitute good engineering practice by the utilities. The administrative authority referred to in the 1984 edition of the National Electrical Safety Code is the commission. However, nothing herein shall be construed as superseding, repealing, or amending the provisions of s. 403.523(1) and (10).

(7)(a) As used in this subsection, the term “affected municipal electric utility” means a municipality that operates an electric utility that:
1. Serves two cities in the same county;
2. Is located in a noncharter county;
3. Has between 30,000 and 35,000 retail electric customers as of September 30, 2007; and
4. Does not have a service territory that extends beyond its home county as of September 30, 2007.
(b) Each affected municipal electric utility shall conduct a referendum election of all of its retail electric customers, with each named retail electric customer having one vote, concurrent with the next regularly scheduled general election following the effective date of this act.
(c) The ballot for the referendum election required under paragraph (b) shall contain the following question: “Should a separate electric utility authority be created to operate the business of the electric utility in the affected municipal electric utility?” The statement shall be followed by the word “yes” and the word “no.”
(d) The provisions of the Election Code relating to notice and conduct of the election shall be followed to the extent practicable. Costs of the referendum election shall be borne by the affected municipal electric utility.
(8)(a) The commission shall regulate and enforce rates, charges, terms, and conditions of pole attachments, including the types of attachments regulated under 47 U.S.C. s. 224(a)(4), attachments to streetlight fixtures, attachments to poles owned by a public utility, or attachments to poles owned by a communications services provider, to ensure that such rates, charges, terms, and conditions are just and reasonable. The commission’s authority under this subsection includes, but is not limited to, the state regulatory authority referenced in 47 U.S.C. s. 224(c).
(b) In the development of rules pursuant to paragraph (g), the commission shall consider the interests of the subscribers and users of the services offered through such pole attachments, as well as the interests of the consumers of any pole owner providing such attachments.
(c) It is the intent of the Legislature to encourage parties to enter into voluntary pole attachment agreements, and this subsection may not be construed to prevent parties from voluntarily entering into pole attachment agreements without commission approval.
(d) A party’s right to nondiscriminatory access to a pole under this subsection is identical to the rights afforded under 47 U.S.C. s. 224(f)(1). A pole owner may deny access to its poles on a nondiscriminatory basis when there is insufficient capacity, for reasons of safety and reliability, and when required by generally applicable engineering purposes. A pole owner’s evaluation of capacity, safety, reliability, and engineering requirements must consider relevant construction and reliability standards approved by the commission.
(e) The commission shall hear and resolve complaints concerning rates, charges, terms, conditions, voluntary agreements, or any denial of access relative to pole attachments. Federal Communications Commission precedent is not binding upon the commission in the exercise of its authority under this subsection. When taking action upon such complaints, the commission shall establish just and reasonable cost-based rates, terms, and conditions for pole attachments and shall apply the decisions and orders of the Federal Communications Commission and any appellate court decisions reviewing an order of the Federal Communications Commission regarding pole attachment rates, terms, or conditions in determining just and reasonable pole attachment rates, terms, and conditions unless a pole owner or attaching entity establishes by competent substantial evidence pursuant to proceedings conducted pursuant to ss. 120.569 and 120.57 that an alternative cost-based pole attachment rate is just and reasonable and in the public interest.
(f) In the administration and implementation of this subsection, the commission shall authorize any petitioning pole owner or attaching entity to participate as an intervenor with full party rights under chapter 120 in the first four formal administrative proceedings conducted to determine pole attachment rates under this section. These initial four proceedings are intended to provide commission precedent on the establishment of pole attachment rates by the commission and help guide negotiations toward voluntary pole attachment agreements. After the fourth such formal administrative proceeding is concluded by final order, parties to subsequent pole attachment rate proceedings are limited to the specific pole owner and pole attaching entities involved in and directly affected by the specific pole attachment rate.
(g) The commission shall propose procedural rules to administer and implement this subsection. The rules must be proposed for adoption no later than January 1, 2022, and, upon adoption of such rules, shall provide its certification to the Federal Communications Commission pursuant to 47 U.S.C. s. 224(c)(2).
(9)(a) The commission shall regulate the safety, vegetation management, repair, replacement, maintenance, relocation, emergency response, and storm restoration requirements for poles of communication services providers. This subsection does not apply to a communications services provider that owns no poles.
(b) The commission shall adopt rules to administer and implement this subsection. The rules must be proposed for adoption no later than April 1, 2022, and must address at least the following:
1. Mandatory pole inspections, including repair or replacement;
2. Vegetation management requirements for poles owned by providers of communications services; and
3. Monetary penalties to be imposed upon any communications services provider that fails to comply with any such rule of the commission. Monetary penalties imposed by the commission must be consistent with s. 366.095.
(c) The commission may access the books and records of communications services providers to the limited extent necessary to perform its functions and to exercise its authority under subsection (8), this subsection, and s. 366.97(4). Upon request by a communications services provider, any records that are received by the commission under this paragraph which are proprietary confidential business information under s. 364.183 or s. 366.093 shall retain their status as confidential or exempt from disclosure under s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution.
History.s. 4, ch. 26545, 1951; s. 1, ch. 63-288; s. 1, ch. 63-279; s. 1, ch. 65-52; s. 1, ch. 74-196; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 3, 16, ch. 80-35; s. 2, ch. 81-318; s. 4, ch. 86-173; ss. 2, 20, 22, ch. 89-292; s. 50, ch. 90-331; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 13, ch. 95-146; s. 16, ch. 2006-230; s. 37, ch. 2008-227; s. 32, ch. 2013-14; s. 66, ch. 2014-17; s. 3, ch. 2021-191; s. 29, ch. 2022-4.

F.S. 366.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 366.04 on CourtListener

Amendments to 366.04


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 366.04

Total Results: 57  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

City of Homestead v. Johnson, 760 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 57 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 206, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 544, 2000 WL 283696

...litigation between these parties we said the PSC has authority over *83 these territorial agreements. In Public Service Commission v. Fuller, 551 So.2d 1210 (Fla.1989), we stated: [U]nder chapter 89-292, section 2, Laws of Florida (to be codified at section 366.04(2)(e), Florida Statutes (1989)[ [5] ]), the .OPSC has the power "[t]o resolve, upon petition of a utility or on its own motion, any territorial dispute involving service areas between and among rural electric cooperatives, municipal electric utilities, and other electric utilities under its jurisdiction." We note that the City of Homestead has expressly acknowledged that the PSC has jurisdiction over this territorial agreement, and it has sought enforcement of the agreement under section 366.04(2)....
...ory any time it purchases real property for any purpose, it would only promote expensive, competitive activity, a race to serve, and uneconomic duplication. This result is clearly contrary to the purpose of the Agreement and our mandate, pursuant to Section 366.04, Florida Statutes, to minimize uneconomic duplication....
...1st DCA 1999)(holding the PSC could not issue a notice of proposed agency action without a hearing and then allow the notice to become the final order if it went unchallenged). [5] This provision of chapter 366 remains intact and is applicable to these proceedings. Section 366.04(2)(e), Florida Statutes (1999), provides: [T]he commission shall have power over electric utilities for the following purposes: ....
Copy

PW Ventures, Inc. v. Nichols, 533 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 1988).

Cited 54 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 98 P.U.R.4th 533

...er 366. The regulation of the production and sale of electricity necessarily contemplates the granting of monopolies in the public interest. Storey v. Mayo, 217 So.2d 304 (Fla. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 909, 89 S.Ct. 1751, 23 L.Ed.2d 222 (1969). Section 366.04(3), Florida Statutes (1985), directs the PSC to exercise its powers to avoid "uneconomic duplication of generation, transmission, and distribution facilities." If the proposed sale of electricity by PW Ventures is outside of PSC jurisdiction, the duplication of facilities could occur....
Copy

Ameristeel Corp. v. Clark, 691 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 1997).

Cited 23 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1997 WL 166244

...osed territorial agreement. However, the Commission's order denying intervention expressly apprised AmeriSteel of its opportunity to participate and comment on the proposed territorial agreement at the February 6, 1996, agenda conference pursuant to section 366.04(4), Florida Statutes (1995), and Rules 25-6.0442(1) and 25-22.0021(1) of the Florida Administrative Code....
...approve territorial agreements between utilities. The Commission has jurisdiction "[t]o approve territorial agreements between and among rural electric cooperatives, municipal electric utilities, and other electric utilities under its jurisdiction." § 366.04(2)(d), Fla....
...tatutory mandate to avoid "further uneconomic duplication of generation, transmission, and distribution facilities." Gainesville-Alachua County Reg'l Elec., Water & Sewer Utils. Bd. v. Clay Elec. Coop., Inc., 340 So.2d 1159, 1162 (Fla.1976) (quoting § 366.04(3), Fla. Stat. (1975)). Although sections 366.04(2), (5), and 366.05(7), (8), Florida Statutes (1995), parts of what is informally called the "Grid Act," see ch....
Copy

Lee Cnty. Elec. Co-op., Inc. v. Jacobs, 820 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 2002).

Cited 21 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2002 WL 825704

...embers based on their three-year historical energy usage. On December 8, 1998, LCEC filed its complaint with the PSC, asking the PSC to conduct a full investigation and evidentiary hearing on Seminole's new rate schedule. LCEC based its complaint on section 366.04(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), which gives the PSC power to "prescribe a rate structure for all electric utilities." Seminole moved to dismiss LCEC's complaint, claiming that the PSC is without jurisdiction to review Seminole's wholesale rate schedule. In response, LCEC claimed that the PSC's exercise of jurisdiction falls squarely within the language and intent of section 366.04 and is consistent with the PSC's duty to encourage conservation and ensure the reliability of the electric grid....
...LCEC's complaint. The majority held that the statutes do not "expressly indicate that this Commission has jurisdiction to prescribe a wholesale rate structure for a rural electric cooperative." This appeal follows. The issue in this case is whether section 366.04(2) grants the PSC rate structure jurisdiction over a rural cooperative's wholesale rate schedule established pursuant to contract. Both parties agree that the standard of review is de novo. Based on our interpretation of section 366.04(2), we conclude that the PSC did not err granting the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. In 1974, the Legislature passed the Grid Bill, codified at sections 366.04(2) and 366.05(7)-(8), Florida Statutes (2001)....
...The Grid Bill gives the PSC limited jurisdiction over municipal electric utilities and electric cooperatives: (2) In the exercise of its jurisdiction, the commission shall have power over electric utilities for the following purposes: . . . . (b) To prescribe a rate structure for all electric utilities. § 366.04(2), Fla....
...Surely, the consistency and stability of utility regulation in Florida will not be served by such a piecemeal scheme. SHAW and QUINCE, JJ., concur. APPENDIX A DISSENT COMMISSIONER JACOBS dissents, as set forth below: I disagree with the majority's findings regarding our jurisdiction under Section 366.04(2)(b), Florida Statutes....
...grant the Commission jurisdiction to prescribe a wholesale rate structure for Seminole. A. Plain Language of the Statute In its complaint and petition, LCEC requests that we review Seminole's new rate schedule pursuant to the jurisdiction granted by Section 366.04(2)(b), Florida Statutes, which provides: (2) In the exercise of its jurisdiction, the commission shall have the power over electric utilities for the following purposes: * * * (b) To prescribe a rate structure for all electric utilities....
...s added). Seminole is a rural electric cooperative which owns, maintains, and operates generation and transmission facilities within the state. Seminole concedes it is an "electric utility" as defined in Section 366.02(2), Florida Statutes. Sections 366.04(2)(b) and 366.02(2), Florida Statutes, given their plain and ordinary meaning, clearly and unambiguously convey upon this Commission the jurisdiction to prescribe a rate structure for a rural electric cooperative, such as Seminole, that owns, maintains, and operates a generation and transmission system within the state....
...esent purposes of Chapter 366, Florida Statutes. The Legislature's intent in making its original grant of jurisdiction to this Commission is not determinative of the Legislature's intent in making subsequent grants of authority, such as that made in Section 366.04(2)(b), Florida Statutes....
...It is more appropriate to look to the purpose of the statute in question to *304 determine whether a particular construction of that statute is consistent with its purpose. Seminole, however, has not offered any argument concerning the specific purpose of Section 366.04(2)(b), Florida Statutes. Section 366.04(2)(b), Florida Statutes, was enacted in 1974 as part of Chapter 74-196, Laws of Florida (the "Grid Bill")....
...ities from Commission jurisdiction. Seminole asserts that the lack of an exemption can be interpreted two ways: (1) all such transactions are subject to this Commission's rate structure jurisdiction; or (2) the Legislature never intended or expected Section 366.04(2)(b), Florida Statutes, to confer jurisdiction over wholesale transactions, so no exemption was required....
...ales by investor-owned utilities to municipal and cooperative electric utilities is incorrect. Section 366.11(1), Florida Statutes, provides in pertinent part: No other provision of this chapter shall apply in any manner, other than as specified in ss. 366.04, 366.05(7) and (8), 366.051, 366.055, 366.093, 366.095, 366.14, and 366.80 366.85, ......
...ontracts. (Emphasis supplied.) Clearly, the limited exemption in Section 366.11(1), Florida Statutes, is not intended to diminish our jurisdiction over electric utilities pursuant to the Grid Bill, which includes the jurisdiction granted in Sections 366.04 and 366.05(7) and (8), Florida Statutes, although that jurisdiction may be preempted by FERC....
...exempt the latter. PW Ventures, Inc. v. Nichols, 533 So.2d 281, 283 (Fla.1988). Applying the principle to this case, the most reasonable interpretation of Section 366.11(1), Florida Statutes, read together with the statutes listed therein, including Section 366.04, Florida Statutes, is that the Legislature knew how to exempt wholesale matters from certain aspects of this Commission's jurisdiction but chose not to exempt wholesale sales in their entirety. This interpretation is consistent with the plain language used by the Legislature in Sections 366.02(2) and 366.04(2)(b), Florida Statutes, as discussed above....
...atutes. C. Commission's Past Inaction As noted in the majority opinion, this Commission has not exercised jurisdiction over the wholesale rate structure of a rural electric cooperative or municipal electric utility at any time since the enactment of Section 366.04(2)(b), Florida Statutes. However, we have not affirmatively stated at any time that Section 366.04(2)(b), Florida Statutes, does not give us jurisdiction over the wholesale rate structures of rural electric cooperatives, nor has any court. Seminole contends that by our past inaction we have tacitly acknowledged that we lack such jurisdiction and cannot now abandon our "practical interpretation" of Section 366.04(2)(b), Florida Statutes....
...on interstate commerce. In addition, there is no indication that this Commission has had a clear need yet to exercise jurisdiction in this area. I am not persuaded by Seminole's contention that we cannot now abandon our "practical interpretation" of Section 366.04(2)(b), Florida Statutes....
...this Commission authority over the wholesale rate structures of municipal and cooperative electric utilities. Based on the analysis set forth above, I find no reasonable doubt about the existence of the jurisdiction conferred upon this Commission in Section 366.04(2)(b), Florida Statutes....
...[2] Prior to its amendment in 1989, this subsection provided: (2) In the exercise of its jurisdiction, the commission shall have power over rural electric cooperatives and municipal electric utilities for the following purposes: . . . . (b) To prescribe a rate structure for all electric utilities. § 366.04(2), Fla....
Copy

Florida Power Corp. v. City of Casselberry, 793 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Cited 20 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12976, 2001 WL 1048522

...s. Moreover, the PSC has no jurisdiction over Casselberry at this time. Therefore, the trial court has proper jurisdiction of this case until such time as Casselberry becomes a retail electric utility or exercises its purchase option. See Fla. Stat. § 366.04(2); see also id....
Copy

City Gas Co. v. Peoples Gas Sys., Inc., 182 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 1965).

Cited 18 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...Section 366.03 requires each public utility (i.e., in general, any supplier of gas or electricity to the public) to furnish to all persons applying therefor "reasonably sufficient, adequate and efficient service upon terms as required by the commission." Section 366.04 vests in the commission "jurisdiction to regulate and supervise each public utility with respect to its rates, service and the issuance and sale [of certain] of its securities * * *." In prescribing the powers of the commission under t...
Copy

Praxair, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light Co. Florida Power Corp., 64 F.3d 609 (11th Cir. 1995).

Cited 14 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26483, 1995 WL 519150

...1751 , 23 L.Ed.2d 222 (1969); City Gas Co. v. Peoples Gas System, Inc., 182 So.2d *612 429, 435 (Fla.1965) (Chapter 366 of Florida Statutes “add up to what can be considered a very extensive authority over the fortunes and operation of the regulated entities”); Fla.Stat. § 366.04(3) (directing the Commission to exercise its powers to avoid “uneconomic duplication of generation, transmission, and distribution facilities”); see also PW Ventures, Inc....
...oper consideration to the parties’ conduct and the Commission activity since that time. The validity of a territorial agreement under Florida’s noncompetition policy is premised on Commission approval. See City Gas, 182 So.2d at 436; Fla.Stat. §§ 366.04(2), .05(7)-(8)....
Copy

Consol. Gas Co. of Florida, Inc. v. City Gas Co. of Florida, a Florida Corp., 912 F.2d 1262 (11th Cir. 1990).

Cited 14 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 118 P.U.R.4th 287, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16430, 1990 WL 125506

...3051 (November 9, 1960) [hereinafter "Order"]. 10 Chapter 366 of the Florida Statutes ("chapter 366") empowers the FPSC "to regulate and supervise each public utility with respect to its rates and service and the issuance and sale of its securities." Fla.Stat.Ann. Sec. 366.04....
...4 In fixing rates, the FPSC is authorized to consider "the efficiency, sufficiency, and adequacy of the facilities provided and the services rendered; the cost of providing such service and the value of such service to the public; [and] the ability of the utility to improve such service and facilities...." Id. at Sec. 366.041....
...ity when reasonably necessary to promote the convenience and welfare of the public...." Id. at Sec. 366.05. 11 After 1974, the Florida statute expressly provided the FPSC with the power to authorize territorial agreements between electric utilities. Section 366.04(2) provided: "In the exercise of its jurisdiction, the [FPSC] shall have power over rural electric cooperatives and municipal electric utilities for the following purposes: ... (d) To approve territorial agreements between and among rural electric cooperatives, municipal electric utilities, and other electric utilities under its jurisdiction." Id. at Sec. 366.04(2) (West Supp.1989)....
...Fla.Stat. Sec. 366.01. Section 366.03 addresses the general duties of public utilities: "Each public utility shall furnish to each person applying therefore reasonably sufficient, adequate, and efficient service upon terms as required by the commission." Section 366.04 then describes the duties of the FPSC: "the commission shall have jurisdiction to regulate and supervise each public utility with respect to its rates and service and the issuance and sale of its securities." Thus, section 366.05 provides that the FPSC "shall have power to prescribe fair and reasonable rates and charges ... to be observed by each public utility." The FPSC fixes these rates based on the factors described in section 366.041: 317 In fixing the just, reasonable, and compensatory rates, charges, fares, tolls, or rentals to be observed and charged for service within the state by any and all public utilities under its jurisdiction, the commission is authorize...
...e effective until filed with and approved by the Commission as provided by law." In addition, the FPSC has established procedures to monitor existing rates to ensure that they are fair and just and provide a reasonable rate of return as specified in section 366.041 of the Florida Public Utilities statute....
...require repairs, improvements, additions, and extensions to the plant and equipment of any public utility when reasonably necessary to promote the convenience and welfare of the public and secure adequate service or facilities for those reasonably entitled thereto." (Emphasis added.) Under section 366.04, the FPSC also has jurisdiction "to regulate and supervise each public utility with respect to ......
...Rather, the FPSC assumes a very active role under this regulatory scheme, initially approving the utility's proposed rates, and, in doing so, undertaking an investigation and consideration of a variety of factors as mandated in chapter 366. See id. Secs. 366.041, .06....
...Retail rates are determined through a process known as a "rate case." 3 The FPSC was formerly the Florida Railroad and Public Utilities Commission 4 The statute defines "public utility" as including natural gas distributors, but not LP gas distributors. Fla.Stat.Ann. Sec. 366.02 5 Section 366.04 was revised in 1989 and the new statute expressly empowers the FPSC to approve territorial agreements between natural gas utilities....
Copy

City of Homestead v. Beard, 600 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 1992).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 273, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 877, 1992 WL 91420

...necessity for the state to exercise its police powers," Park Benziger, 391 So.2d at 683, there is no "overriding necessity" in this case because the PSC would still be required to approve any new territorial agreement negotiated by the parties. See § 366.04(2)(d), Fla....
Copy

Gulf Coast Elec. Co-op., Inc. v. Johnson, 727 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 1999).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1999 WL 74016

...In considering this issue, we note that there is no explicit statutory authority for the PSC to impose territorial boundaries. Instead, the PSC's implicit authority to establish boundaries is derived from two separate jurisdictional provisions: its jurisdiction to approve territorial agreements, subsection 366.04(2)(d), Florida Statutes (1997), and its jurisdiction to resolve territorial disputes, subsection 366.04(2)(e)....
...apabilities and the nature of the area involved, including population, the degree of urbanization of the area, its proximity to other urban areas, and the present and reasonably foreseeable future requirements of the area for other utility services. § 366.04(2)(d), (e), Fla. Stat. (1997) (emphasis supplied). [3] Notably, subsection (2)(e) does not require the PSC to set boundaries in order to resolve a territorial dispute between two utilities. Another subsection, 366.04(5), vests the PSC with jurisdiction "over the planning, development, and maintenance" of the power grid throughout Florida "to assure an adequate and reliable source of energy," and to avoid "further uneconomic duplication" of facilities....
...petent substantial evidence supports the PSC's conclusion that even though there is a commingling of facilities in the developed areas, it does not necessarily follow that this duplication is "further uneconomic duplication" within the meaning of subsection 366.04(5) (emphasis supplied)....
...relevant and material that a reasonable mind would accept it as adequate to support the conclusion reached. To this extent the "substantial" evidence should also be "competent." (Citations omitted.) [3] The administrative regulations accompanying subsection 366.04(2)(e) include additional factors to guide the PSC in resolving territorial disputes: (a) the capability of each utility to provide reliable electric service within the disputed area with its existing facilities and the extent to which...
Copy

Extraordinary Title Servs., LLC v. Florida Power & Light Co., 1 So. 3d 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1041, 2009 WL 321581

...he Commission is empowered to set utility rates, § 366.06, Fla. Stat. (2006) 1 ; the rates FPL charges and collects from its customers were approved by the Commission; the rates include a component for estimated federal corporate taxes; pursuant to section 366.04, Florida Statutes (2006), 2 the Commission has exclusive ju *402 risdiction to adjudicate disputes and challenges regarding rates and charges that a public utility imposes on customers; and pursuant to section 501.212, Florida Statutes...
...The trial court entered an amended order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint with prejudice, finding as follows: (1) although the second amended complaint prays for money damages, in essence, the Plaintiff is seeking a refund of alleged overpayments made to FPL; (2) pursuant to section 366.04(1), the Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over matters regarding rates of public utilities; and (3) pursuant to section 501.212, FDUTPA does not apply to activities regulated by the Commission....
...In addition to seeking injunctive relief, the complaint asserted claims for breach of implied contract, breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing, negligence, fraudulent induce *403 ment, and negligent misrepresentations. In its petition for writ of prohibition, FPL argued that, pursuant to section 366.04, the Commission possessed exclusive jurisdiction because Albert Litter Studios was seeking a refund for electrical service charges....
...laim.” Id. at 893 . This Court found that, although Albert Litter Studios’ complaint sought an award of money damages, in reality, its “claim is for a refund of charges for electricity it did not use.” Id. at 894 . Moreover, recognizing that section 366.04(1) provides that “the [Commission shall have jurisdiction to regulate and supervise each public utility with respect to its rates and services” and that “[t]he jurisdiction conferred upon the [Cjommission shall be exclusive and superior to that of all other boards,” id....
...In fact, paragraph 32 of the second amended complaint alleges, in part, that “tax monies initially derived from the bill payments made to [FPL] by said account customers should be refunded to said account customers.” (emphasis added). Therefore, as in Albert Litter Studios, we conclude that, pursuant to section 366.04(1), the Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over the Plaintiffs claim against FPL, and therefore the trial court properly dismissed Count I of the second amended complaint with prejudice. 2. Is FDUTPA applicable to claim asserted against FPL? As we have concluded that the Commission has exclusive jurisdiction under section 366.04(1), we find that the trial court also properly dismissed Count I pursuant to section 501.212(5), which provides that FDUTPA does not apply to “[a]ny activity regulated under laws administered by the Florida Public Service Commission.” B....
...olved, and no change shall be made in any schedule.... [Tjhe commission shall have the authority to determine and fix fair, just, and reasonable rates that may be requested, demanded, charged, or collected by any public utility for its service.... . Section 366.04 provides in relevant part: 366.04 Jurisdiction of commission.— (1) In addition to its existing functions, the commission shall have jurisdiction to regulate and supervise each public utility with respect to its rates and services).] ......
Copy

City of Tallahassee v. Mann, 411 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 1981).

Cited 11 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1981 Fla. LEXIS 2762

...We conclude that the commission has subject-matter jurisdiction and therefore deny the petition. On January 3, 1979, the Public Service Commission issued an order to all rural electric cooperatives and municipal electric utilities to submit rate tariff sheets so it could implement its jurisdiction under section 366.04(2), Florida Statutes (1977)....
...charge and questioning the commission's subject-matter jurisdiction. On September 3, 1980, the commission issued an order to the city to show cause why the surcharge should not be eliminated. The dispute here is over the meaning of "rate structure." Section 366.04(2)(b) clearly grants the commission jurisdiction "To prescribe a rate structure for all electric utilities." The city urges us to construe "rate structure" so that it does not include surcharges, arguing that otherwise the commission w...
Copy

Biglen v. Florida Power & Light Co., 910 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 2291913

...es not support this statement. [2] A "tugger" is an air operated device for hoisting or pulling, similar to a slusher or winch. Compressed Air Management Impact RM Inc., Company Website Glossary of Terms, at http://www.impactrm. com/html/t.html. [3] Section 366.04(6), Florida Statutes (2004), provides that following the standards under the National Electric Safety Code "shall constitute acceptable and adequate requirements for the protection of the safety of the public, and compliance with the m...
Copy

Richter v. Florida Power Corp., 366 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1979 WL 396265

...In § 366.01 the legislature has mandated that the regulation of public utilities "is declared to be in the public interest and this chapter ... shall be liberally construed for the accomplishment of that purpose." Section 366.03 requires that all rates charged by regulated utilities be "fair and reasonable," while § 366.04 gives the PSC exclusive jurisdiction "to regulate and supervise each public utility with respect to its rates......
Copy

West Florida Elec. Co-operative Ass'n v. Jacobs, 887 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 2004).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2004 WL 2359979

...ECS in turn sought to contract with Gulf Power to provide electricity to drive the motors. When ECS and Gulf Power requested the commission's approval through a petition for declaratory statement, West Florida petitioned the commission for resolution of the territorial dispute. Section 366.04, Florida Statutes (2000), grants the commission authority to resolve territorial disputes between utilities. The commission's overarching concern in settling such disputes is the avoidance of uneconomic duplication. Section 366.04(5) provides that the commission "shall further have jurisdiction over the planning, development, and maintenance of a coordinated electric power grid throughout Florida to assure ......
...mic duplication of facilities in its decisions regarding territorial agreements and territorial disputes"). The statute also outlines certain factors that the commission "may consider, but not be limited to consideration of," in resolving a dispute. § 366.04(2)(e), Fla....
..., including population, the degree of urbanization of the area, its proximity to other urban areas, and the present and reasonably foreseeable future requirements of the area for other utility services." Id. The commission's regulations implementing section 366.04 are contained in the Florida Administrative Code....
...cal right to service by a particular utility merely because he deems it advantageous to himself," Lee County Elec. Coop. v. Marks, 501 So.2d 585, 587 (Fla.1987), the commission's order in no *1205 way violates this principle. The commission followed section 366.04, Florida Statutes, and rule 25-6.0441(2) by assessing a number of factors....
...der customer preference. It contends that the commission failed to consider the utility's historical presence in the area. Neither the statute nor the rule, however, requires the commission to consider a utility's historical presence in an area. See § 366.04, Fla....
...Because the listed factors are not exclusive, however, the commission is free to consider other factors, including historical presence. See id. The governing statute charges the commission to avoid "further uneconomic duplication of generation, transmission, and distribution facilities." § 366.04(5), Fla....
...rty and customer had never before received electric service. Under Florida law, the PSC is not limited in its analysis to the specifically enunciated factors of Rule 25-6.0441(2). See Gulf Power Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 480 So.2d 97, 98 (Fla.1985); § 366.04, Fla....
Copy

Utils. Com'n of New Smyrna Beach v. Fla. Psc, 469 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 1985).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 177

...It did not say that anyone would be harmed by the agreement. The PSC has jurisdiction "[t]o approve territorial agreements between and among rural electric cooperatives, municipal electric utilities, and other electric utilities under its jurisdiction." § 366.04(2)(d), Fla....
...avoid "further uneconomic duplication of generation, transmission, and distribution facilities." Gainesville-Alachua County Regional Electric, Water & Sewer Utilities Board v. Clay Electric Coop., Inc., 340 So.2d 1159, 1162 (Fla. 1976), quoting from § 366.04(3), Fla....
Copy

Ft. Pierce, Etc. v. Florida Pub. Serv. Com'n, 388 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 1980).

Cited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1980 WL 579665

...Since we find such reservation of jurisdiction by the Commission to be lawful, we reject petitioners' argument as to the first issue. With respect to the second issue, the authority of the Commission to regulate the issuance and sale of securities by an intrastate natural gas distribution company arises from section 366.04(1), Florida Statutes (1977), which reads in pertinent part as follows: In addition to its existing functions, the Florida Public Service Commission shall have jurisdiction to regulate and supervise each public utility with respect to its rates, service and the issuance and sale of its securities......
Copy

Florida Pub. Serv. Com'n v. Bryson, 569 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 1990).

Cited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 583, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1582, 1990 WL 177000

...its proceedings pending the outcome here. [3] The PSC derives its authority solely from the legislature, which defines the PSC's jurisdiction, duties, and powers. See, e.g., United Tel. Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 496 So.2d 116, 118 (Fla. 1986). In section 366.04(1) of the Florida Statutes (1987), the legislature granted the PSC exclusive jurisdiction over matters respecting the rates and service of public utilities: [T]he commission shall have jurisdiction to regulate and supervise each public utility with respect to its rates and service......
...exclusive jurisdiction); Willis, 310 So.2d at 1 (the circuit court had no jurisdiction to entertain lawsuits concerning noncompetitive agreements between common carriers regulated by the PSC). The PSC in this case relied on the language in sections 366.04(1) and 366.02(1) as the basis of its jurisdiction....
Copy

Pub. Serv. Com'n v. Fuller, 551 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. 1989).

Cited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 566, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 1134, 1989 WL 139086

...26, 1980), two utility customers sought to have the PSC terminate or modify the PSC order approving the subject territorial agreement. The City of Homestead, seeking dismissal of the complaint, acknowledged that the PSC had jurisdiction over the agreement and that the agreement was governed by section 366.04(2), Florida Statutes (1979)....
...agreements since before the parties executed the instant agreement. People's Gas System; City Gas Co. Subsequently, in 1974, the Florida Legislature made the implicit authority explicit by enacting chapter 74-196, Laws of Florida. As a result, under section 366.04(2)(d), Florida Statutes (1989), the PSC now has the express authority "[t]o approve territorial agreements between and among rural electric cooperatives, municipal electric utilities, and other electric utilities under its jurisdiction. However, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to alter existing territorial agreements as between the parties to such agreements." In addition, under chapter 89-292, section 2, Laws of Florida (to be codified at section 366.04(2)(e), Florida Statutes (1989)), the PSC has the power "[t]o resolve, upon petition of a utility or on its own motion, any territorial dispute involving service areas between and among rural electric cooperatives, municipal electric utilities, and other electric utilities under its jurisdiction." We note that the City of Homestead has expressly acknowledged that the PSC has jurisdiction over this territorial agreement, and it has sought enforcement of the agreement under section 366.04(2)....
Copy

Consol. Gas Co. of Fla. v. City Gas Co. of Fla., 665 F. Supp. 1493 (S.D. Fla. 1987).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6926

...ower to establish exclusive territories for telephone companies (Fla.Stat. § 364.335-.337), [9] and water and sewer utilities *1529 (Fla.Stat. § 367.041-.055), [10] and to resolve territorial disputes between rural electric cooperatives (Fla.Stat. § 366.04)....
...the need or lack of need for service in the territory sought to be deleted, and the existence or non-existence of service from other sources within geographical proximity to the territory sought to be deleted. [11] The relevant portion of Fla.Stat. § 366.04 (1985) provides as follows: Jurisdiction....
Copy

Devon-Aire Villas Home. v. Americable Assoc., 490 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1985 WL 1083647

...cluded by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel from bringing this action against Americable. [5] E.g., Section 366.02(1), Florida Statutes (1985), defines "public utility" as an entity supplying electricity or gas to the public, and Section 366.04, Florida Statutes (1985), gives the Commission jurisdiction over such entity....
Copy

Florida Power & Light Co. v. Glazer, 671 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 148584

...ectric and magnetic fields or EMFs. According to FP & L's petition, Glazer has confined his claim in this case solely to magnetic fields. [2] Chapter 366 of the Florida Statutes deals generally with the PSC's jurisdiction and function. Specifically, section 366.04(1) provides in part that "the commission shall have jurisdiction to regulate and supervise each public utility with respect to its rates and service...." That same subsection later states that "[t]he jurisdiction conferred upon the com...
...erior to that of all other boards, agencies, political subdivisions, municipalities, towns, villages, or counties, and, in case of conflict therewith, all lawful acts, orders, rules, and regulations of the commission shall in each instance prevail." § 366.04(1)....
Copy

Peoples Gas Sys., Inc. v. City Gas Co., 167 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1964 WL 117711

...must come from the statute. The problem is may a power come to the Commission by its general grant of authority, (1) to regulate and supervise each utility with respect to its rates and service as well as to the issuance and sale of its securities. § 366.04, Fla....
Copy

Gulf Coast Elec. v. Fla. Pub. Serv. Com'n, 462 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 1985).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...Gulf Coast challenges the order on two grounds: first, that the consideration of estimated cost was procedurally improper, and, second, that the finding that Gulf Coast's estimated cost was lower is not supported by the record. We reject both arguments and affirm the PSC. Section 366.04(2)(e), Florida Statutes (1983), enumerates the factors the Commission should use in evaluating a territorial dispute between a rural electric cooperative such as Gulf Coast and other electric utilities....
Copy

Lee Cnty. Elec. Co-Op. v. Marks, 501 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1987).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 75

...as the PSC's duty to police "the planning, development, and maintenance of a coordinated electric power grid throughout Florida to assure ... the avoidance of further uneconomic duplication of generation, transmission, and distribution facilities." § 366.04(3), Fla....
Copy

Tampa Elec. Co. v. Garcia, 767 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2000 WL 422871

...available to the applicant or its members which might mitigate the need for the proposed plant and other matters within its jurisdiction which it deems relevant. [6] See 15 U.S.C. § 79z-5a (1994). [7] New Smyrna is regulated by the PSC pursuant to section 366.04(2), Florida Statutes (1997)....
Copy

Gainesville-alachua, Etc. v. Clay Elec. Co-op., 340 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 1976).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...utes. However, a 1974 statutory amendment extended Commission jurisdiction for certain purposes including resolution of "any territorial dispute involving service areas between ... rural electric cooperatives [and] municipal electric utilities... ." Section 366.04(2)(e), Florida Statutes....
...lities and the nature of the area involved, including population and the degree of urbanization of the area and its proximity to other urban areas and the present and reasonably foreseeable future requirements of the area for other utility services. Section 366.04(2)(e), Florida Statutes....
...Storey v. Mayo, 217 So.2d 304 (Fla. 1968). This Commission has the statutory power to approve such agreements, as well as the responsibility to supervise planning of a statewide power system, in part to avoid unnecessary duplication of facilities. Section 366.04(2)(d), (3), Florida Statutes." *1162 Initially, we find that the letter of complaint filed by Clay with the Public Service Commission was sufficient under the rules of the Commission to invoke its jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter in dispute. Petitioner Board contends that Section 366.04(2)(d) and (e), Florida Statutes, constitute unlawful delegations of legislative authority....
...As respondent asserts, subsections (d) and (e) are limited in scope in providing for jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission over municipalities and rural electric cooperatives for the approval of territorial agreements and the resolution of territorial disputes. Furthermore, Section 366.04(3), Florida Statutes, provides the limitation or guideline incident to such jurisdiction, as follows: "(3) The commission shall further have jurisdiction over the planning, development, and maintenance of a coordinated electric power g...
Copy

Florida Power Corp. v. Seminole Cnty., 579 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 1991).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 286, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 717, 1991 WL 66662

...a) and (b), Florida Statutes (1989). Both the city and the county rely heavily upon section 337.403(1), Florida Statutes (1989), which was cited by the circuit judge as authority for his ruling. Upon consideration, we conclude that FPC must prevail. Section 366.04(1), Florida Statutes (1989), expressly confers jurisdiction on the Public Service Commission to "regulate and supervise each public utility with respect to its rates and service." This section further provides that the jurisdiction conferred upon the commission "shall be exclusive and superior to that of all ... municipalities ... or counties, and, in case of conflict therewith, all lawful acts, orders, rules, and regulations of the commission shall in each instance prevail." § 366.04(1), Fla....
...§ 366.05(1), Fla. Stat. (1989). Requiring FPC to place its power lines underground clearly affects its rates if not its service. As with any other regulated public utility, FPC is entitled to charge rates sufficient to make a reasonable rate of return. § 366.041(1), Fla....
...right of way. If there was any doubt that the legislature did not intend that cities and counties could dictate the decision of whether public utilities should convert their overhead systems to underground, this was laid to rest by the enactment of section 366.04(7)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), which provides in pertinent part that: By July 1, 1990, the commission shall make a determination as to the cost-effectiveness of requiring the installation of underground electric utility distribution a...
Copy

Florida Power & Light v. LITTER STUDIOS, 896 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 475441

...JURISDICTION OVER REFUNDS FOR OVERCHARGES The Florida Public Utilities Commission is a creature of the state legislature. *895 Accordingly, its authority — including its jurisdiction, duties, and powers — is derived solely from the legislature. Florida Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Bryson, 569 So.2d 1253, 1254 (Fla.1990). Section 366.04 of the Florida Statutes states: "[T]he commission shall have jurisdiction to regulate and supervise each public utility with respect to its rates and service ......
Copy

Gulf Power Co. v. Pub. Serv. Com'n, 480 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1985).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 627

...Prior to any construction, the utility had two separate lines within 100 and 250 feet of the subdivision. The PSC found Gulf Power's relatively extravagant expenditures in providing service reckless and irresponsible, as well as an uneconomic duplication of electrical facilities prohibited by section 366.04(3), Florida Statutes (1983)....
...iteria. We disagree, and affirm the PSC's decision in this case. Gulf Power contends that the PSC erred in focusing its analysis upon the utilities' respective costs, and additionally failed to properly apply certain statutory criteria enumerated in section 366.04(2)(e) as properly bearing on the resolution of such a territorial dispute....
...ice within the subdivision would be approximately equal. The principal question before the PSC, therefore, concerned the utilities' respective costs in reaching the subdivision. While such costs are not among those factors specifically enumerated in section 366.04(2)(e), Florida Statutes (1983), as properly bearing on the resolution of a territorial dispute between utilities, the statutory list does not purport to be exclusive. Additionally, section 366.04(3), Florida Statutes (1983), grants the PSC jurisdiction over the development of Florida's utility service in order to avoid uneconomic duplication of electrical facilities....
Copy

Citizens of the State of Florida, etc. v. Florida Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 146 So. 3d 1143 (Fla. 2014).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 519, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 2581, 2014 WL 4257733

...jurisdiction over matters respecting the rates and service of public utilities.”); Chiles v. Pub. Serv. Comm’n Nominating Council, 573 So. 2d 829, 832 (Fla. 1991) (“[R]ate- making by the [Commission] is a legislative function.”). Further, section 366.04, Florida Statutes, provides the Commission with jurisdiction to regulate and supervise each public utility with respect to its rates and service, and prescribe a rate structure for all electric utilities. § 366.04(1)-(2), Fla....
...3d at 192 (quoting Heart of Adoptions, 963 So. 2d at 199). The Legislature enacted section 350.001, titled “Legislative intent,” with specific language providing that the Commission perform its duties independently and also enacted sections 366.04(1) and 366.06(1), which provide that the Commission has exclusive jurisdiction to fix fair, just, and reasonable rates of electric utilities....
...We now turn to each of Citizens’ arguments sequentially. As noted below, we affirm the Commission’s final order because its findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence. 11. When a settlement addresses rate levels and structures, section 366.041, Florida Statutes (2012), provides that the Commission may “give consideration, among other things, to the efficiency, sufficiency, and adequacy of the facilities provided and the services rendered; the cost of providing such servic...
Copy

Ramos v. Florida Power & Light Co., 21 So. 3d 91 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15801, 2009 WL 3364872

...a foreclosure of the property, loss of crops, and other compensatory damages as a result. After pretrial discovery and two amendments to the complaint, FPL's motion for final summary judgment was heard and granted. The PSC, the Rules, and the Tariff Section 366.04, Florida Statutes (1997), grants to the PSC jurisdiction "to regulate and supervise each public utility with respect to its rates and service...." Section 366.05(1) grants to the PSC "power to prescribe fair and reasonable rates and ch...
Copy

Leah Vitrano, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of Nicholas Vitrano v. Florida Power & Light Co., 190 So. 3d 89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4268, 2015 WL 1334270

...Finally, violation of any other type of statute constitutes evidence of negligence, not negligence per se. Accord Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Forbes, 783 So. 2d 1215, 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). 4 The Florida legislature enacted section 366.04, Florida Statutes (1986), adopting the NESC standards for electric utilities....
Copy

BARRANADA v. Florida Power & Light Co., 905 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2459, 2005 WL 475426

...line located on the opposite side of the alleyway, fourteen feet nine inches from the building under construction. This distance is greater than the minimum of seven feet five inches required by the National Electric Safety Code [NESC] as adopted by section 366.04(6)(b), Florida Statutes (1999)....
Copy

City Gas Co. v. Florida Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 501 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 1987).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 27, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1389

...services rendered; the cost of providing such service and the value of such service to the public; the ability of the utilities to improve such service and facilities; and energy conservation and the efficient use of alternative energy resources.” § 366.041, Fla.Stat....
...thin its discretionary authority in denying the petition. City Gas’s second point on appeal is that the commission exceeded its statutory authority by awarding an exclusive service territory to Miller Gas. Its argument is premised on the fact that section 366.04, Florida Statutes (1985), authorizes the commission to approve and disapprove territorial agreements and resolve territorial disputes among electric utilities, but says nothing about gas utilities....
Copy

Lewis v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 463 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 1985).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 89, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3411

...The PSC denied the motion, finding that subsection 366.06(3), Florida Statutes *229 (1983), 2 authorizes the PSC to direct the disposition of unclaimed utility refunds. The PSC has jurisdiction over the rate structure of municipal electric utilities. § 366.04(2)(b), Fla.Stat....
Copy

City of Tallahassee v. Talquin Elec. Coop., Inc., 549 So. 2d 725 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2275, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5370, 1989 WL 113236

...tatutes to adjudicate the request for injunctive relief; the record contains an evidentiary foundation to support the injunction; Talquin’s motion was adequately pled; and the appealed order is sufficiently specific. We recognize that, pursuant to Section 366.04, Florida Statutes, any territorial disputes that may arise in this case should be resolved by the Public Service Commission....
Copy

Escambia River Elec. Coop., Inc. v. Florida Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 421 So. 2d 1384 (Fla. 1982).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2597, 1982 WL 893104

petition with the Commission under authority of section 366.-04(2)(e), Florida Statutes (1980 Supp.), seeking
Copy

Praxair, Inc. v. FL Power & Light (11th Cir. 1995).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...1751, 23 L.Ed.2d 222 (1969); City Gas Co. v. Peoples Gas System, Inc., 182 So.2d 429, 435 (Fla.1965) (Chapter 366 of Florida Statutes "add up to what can be considered a very extensive authority over the fortunes and operation of the regulated entities"); Fla.Stat. § 366.04(3) (directing the Commission to exercise its powers to avoid "uneconomic duplication of generation, transmission, and distribution facilities"); see also PW Ventures, Inc....
...not give proper consideration to the parties' conduct and the Commission activity since that time. The validity of a territorial agreement under Florida's noncompetition policy is premised on Commission approval. See City Gas, 182 So.2d at 436; Fla.Stat. §§ 366.04(2), .05(7)-(8)....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1974).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

apply in any matter other than as specified in section 366.04(2) . . . to utilities owned and operated by
Copy

Peoples Gas Sys., Inc. v. Lynch, 254 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 5th DCA 1971).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 91 P.U.R.3d 523, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5733

Kuykendall, 135 Fla. 644, 185 So. 448 (1938); F.S. § 366.04, F.S.A. We hold that the trial court improperly
Copy

Gainesville-Alachua Cnty. Reg'l Elec., Water & Sewer Utils. Bd. v. Clay Elec. Coop., Inc., 340 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 1976).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4617

...However, a 1974 statutory amendment extended Commission jurisdiction for certain purposes including resolution of “any territorial dispute involving service areas between . . . rural electric cooperatives [and] municipal electric utilities . . . .” Section 366.04(2)(e), Florida Statutes....
...lities and the nature of the area involved, including population and the degree of urbanization of the area and its proximity to other urban areas and the present and reasonably foreseeable future requirements of the area for other utility services. Section 366.04(2)(e), Florida Statutes....
...n. Storey v. Mayo, 217 So.2d 304 (Fla.1968). This Commission has the statutory power to approve such agreements, as well as the responsibility to supervise planning of a statewide power system, in part to avoid unnecessary duplication of facilities. Section 366.04(2)(d), (3), Florida Statutes.” *1162 Initially, we find that the letter of complaint filed by Clay with the Public Service Commission was sufficient under the rules of the Commission to invoke its jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter in dispute. Petitioner Board contends that Section 366.04(2)(d) and (e), Florida Statutes, constitute unlawful delegations of legislative authority....
...As respondent asserts, subsections (d) and (e) are limited in scope in providing for jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission over municipalities and rural electric cooperatives for the approval of territorial agreements and the resolution of territorial disputes. Furthermore, Section 366.04(3), Florida Statutes, provides the limitation or guideline incident to such jurisdiction, as follows: “(3) The commission shall further have jurisdiction over the planning, development, and maintenance of a coordinated electric power...
Copy

Gulf Coast Elec. Coop., Inc. v. Clark, 674 So. 2d 120 (Fla. 1996).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 169 P.U.R.4th 662, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 221, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 900, 1996 WL 271187

...ity services; (c) the cost of each utility to provide distribution and subtransmission facilities to the disputed area presently and in the future; and (d) customer preference if all other factors are substantially equal. The Commission also applied section 366.04(5), Florida Statutes (1993), which provides: (5) The commission shall further have jurisdiction over the planning, development, and maintenance of a coordinated electric power grid throughout Florida to assure an adequate and reliable...
Copy

Citizens of the State of Florida v. Art Graham, etc., 191 So. 3d 897 (Fla. 2016).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...upervise each public utility with respect to its rates and service and to prescribe a rate structure for all electric utilities. § 366,04(l)-(2), Fla. Stat. (2014); Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. Bryson, 569 So.2d 1253, 1254 (Fla.1990) (noting that “[i]n section 366.04(1) ......
...In fixing the fair, just, and reasonable rates charged for service by the “public utilities under its jurisdiction, the commission is authorized to give Consideration, among other'things, to ... the cost of providing such service and the value of such service to the public[.]” § 366.041(1), Fla....
Copy

& SC15-505 Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners Indian River Cnty., Florida v. Art Graham, etc. & Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of Indian River Cnty., Florida v. Art Graham, etc., 191 So. 3d 890 (Fla. 2016).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...t least with respect to property located in the franchise area, the City had standing to ask the PSC to provide a declaratory statement as to how the territorial orders (entered pursuant to the PSC’s “exclusive and superior” authority under section 366.04, Florida Statutes) apply to its particular set of circumstances....
...with the PSC-approved territorial orders after the Franchise Agreement expires.6 Instead, the PSC simply declared that the City must continue to serve pursuant to the territorial orders. As the entity the Florida Legislature vested with “exclusive and superior” jurisdiction under section 366.04, Florida Statutes, to (among other things) determine “which utility has the right and the obligation to serve a particular geographical area,” Fla....
...Accordingly, we reject the County’s argument that the PSC’s order improperly grants the County’s property rights to the City. Were we to hold otherwise, counties could do indirectly through franchise agreements what the PSC’s “exclusive and superior” jurisdiction precludes them from doing directly. § 366.04(1), Fla....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2005).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

...2 The powers and duties of the Public Service Commission (PSC) are generally set forth in Chapter 366 , Florida Statutes. Section 366.11 , Florida Statutes, provides certain exemptions from the PSC's jurisdiction, stating in part: "(1) No provision of this chapter shall apply in any manner, other than as specified in ss. 366.04 , 3 366.05 (7) and (8), 4 366.051 , 5 366.055 , 6 366.093 , 7 366.095 , 8 366.14 , 9 and 366.80 — 366.85 , 10 to utilities owned and operated by municipalities, whether within or without any municipality, or by cooperatives organized...
...mmission prior to the transfer. 14 As noted above, section 366.11 , Florida Statutes, generally exempts utilities owned and operated by a municipality from the commission's jurisdiction, with certain exceptions. One such exception is the language of section 366.04 (2), Florida Statutes, which provides: "In the exercise of its jurisdiction, the commission shall have power over electric utilities for the following purposes: (a) To prescribe uniform systems and classifications of accounts....
...retail electrical energy within its corporate limits, as such corporate limits exist on July 1, 1974; however, existing territorial agreements shall not be altered or abridged hereby." Staff for the PSC have specifically referenced the provisions of section 366.04 (2)(c),(d) and (e)....
...No information, however, has been presented to this office in the instant inquiry of any territorial dispute or that the transfer of ownership of electric distribution system assets involves the adoption or revision of a territorial agreement. While section 366.04 (2)(c) gives the PSC the authority to require electric power conservation and reliability within a coordinated grid, for operational as well as emergency purposes, I cannot conclude that this provision alone grants the PSC the authorit...
...Department of Environmental Protection and provides that the department shall approve the transfer of a permit unless it determines that the proposed new permittee cannot provide reasonable assurances that conditions of the permit will be met. 3 See s. 366.04 (2), Fla....
Copy

Action Grp. v. Deason, 615 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 1993).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 156, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 443, 1993 WL 74254

...sion’s jurisdiction. The Action Group focuses on but one facet of the ratemaking formula— the actual delivery of electric power. It ignores all other statutory factors, including the costs of providing that service to a given class of customers. Section 366.041(1), Florida Statutes (1991), provides that in fixing the “just, reasonable, and compensatory rates, charges, fares, tolls, or rentals” to be charged for service by utilities under its jurisdiction, the commission is authorized to...
...equacy of the facilities provided and the services rendered; the cost of ■providing such service and the value of such service to the public; the ability of the utility to improve such service and facilities.... (Emphasis added.) Subsection (2) of section 366.041 provides that the Commission’s authority to set such rates, charges, fares, tolls, or rentals is to be “construed liberally.” 1 Section 366.05(1), Florida Statutes (1991), provides that in the exercise of its jurisdiction the Co...
...in the Sebring service area. We do not address the Action Group's peripheral noncity resident discrimination claim because the issue was not raised below and it in no way affects the Commission’s jurisdiction, the only issue properly before us. . Section 366.04(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), grants the Commission power “[t]o prescribe a rate structure for all electric utilities."
Copy

Lake Worth Utils. Auth. v. Barkett, 433 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20837

discriminatory. This is statutorily provided in Section 366.-04(1), Florida Statutes (1981). Further, the primacy
Copy

Rosalind Holding Co. v. Orlando Utils. Comm'n, 402 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20623, 1981 WL 610480

...2 The Commission is empowered to set the utility rates, and the City is required to pay for any OUC utilities it uses. During the period 1970 through June 1974, Florida excluded municipally owned utilities from regulation by the Florida Public Service Commission (PSC). 3 Effective July 1, 1974, section 366.04(2), Florida Statutes, was added to give the PSC power over municipal electric utilities......
Copy

Choctawhatchee Elec. Coop., Inc. v. Art Graham, etc., 132 So. 3d 208 (Fla. 2014).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1, 2014 WL 68138, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 36

...The jurisdiction of the Commission is set forth in chapter 366, Florida Statutes (2010), which governs public utilities. Specifically, the Commission’s authority to settle territorial disputes such as the present one between CHELCO and Gulf Power is found in section 366.04(2), which provides that “the commission shall have power over electric utilities ....
.... [t]o resolve, upon petition of a utility or on its own motion, any territorial dispute involving service areas between and among rural electric cooperatives, municipal electric utilities, and other electric utilities under its jurisdiction.” § 366.04(2)(e), Fla....
...(2010). -4- When resolving territorial disputes, the Commission must be especially mindful of its responsibility to avoid “further uneconomic duplication of generation, transmission, and distribution facilities.” § 366.04(5), Fla....
...ties and the nature of the area involved, including population, the degree of urbanization of the area, its proximity to other urban areas, and the present and reasonably foreseeable future requirements of the area for other utility services.” § 366.04(2)(e), Fla....
...CHELCO also challenges the Commission’s conclusion that awarding Gulf Power the right to serve Freedom Walk would not result in uneconomic duplication of facilities. The Florida Legislature has emphasized the Commission’s duty to avoid uneconomic duplication in section 366.04(5),which provides as follows: The commission shall further have jurisdiction over the planning, development, and maintenance of a coordinated electric power grid throughout Florida to assure an adequate and reliable source of energy for operational and emergency purposes in Florida and the avoidance of further uneconomic duplication of generation, transmission, and distribution facilities. § 366.04(5), Fla....
Copy

Florida Power Corp. v. Hawkins, 367 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 1979).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4555, 1979 WL 396361

...It is clear the statute was designed to provide accelerated rate relief without sacrificing the protections inherent in the overall regulatory scheme. In the case sub judice Florida Power filed its proposed rates and within thirty days the Commission entered its Order No. 7791 pursuant to Section 366.04(4), Florida Statutes (1975)....
Copy

Roemmele-Putney v. Reynolds, 106 So. 3d 78 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1756, 2013 WL 440222

...The motion was briefed, 3 argued, and ultimately granted (with prejudice) by the circuit court. This appeal followed. Analysis Although KES is not a “public utility” within the definition of section 366.02(1), Florida Statutes (2011), it is an “electric utility” under the subsection which follows, section 366.02(2). Section 366.04, “Jurisdiction of commission,” in subsection (5), grants the PSC jurisdiction over “the planning, development, and maintenance of a coordinated electric power grid throughout Florida to assure an adequate and reliable source of e...
...e and territorial agreement (approved by the PSC in 1991) relating to new customers and “end use facilities” is subject to the PSC’s statutory power over all “electric utilities” and any territorial disputes over service areas, pursuant to section 366.04(2)(e), Florida Statutes (2011). The PSC’s jurisdiction, when properly invoked (as here), is “exclusive and superior to that of all other boards, agencies, political subdivisions, municipali *81 ties, towns, villages, or counties.” § 366.04(1)....
Copy

Florida Power & Light Co. v. FEO, 24 So. 3d 737 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20043, 2009 WL 4927938

...c Service Commission ["PSC"]. Fla. Admin. Code R. 25-17.0021 (granting PSC authority to establish conservation goals for utilities and to oversee/regulate progress in meeting same). Therefore, the PSC has exclusive jurisdiction over this matter. See § 366.04, Fla....
Copy

Florida Progress Corp. v. United States, 156 F. Supp. 2d 1265 (M.D. Fla. 1999).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1999 WL 33305818

...Florida Power is subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the Florida Public Service Commission (hereinafter "FPSC") for sales to retail customers and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (hereinafter "FERC") for sales to wholesale customers. See 42 U.S.C. § 7172(a)(1)(B), 16 U.S.C. § 824 and Fla. Stat. § 366.04....
...Florida Power's Accounting Florida Power is subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the Florida Public Service Commission, FPSC, for sales to retail customers and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC, for sales to wholesale customers. See 42 U.S.C. § 7172(a)(1)(B), 16 U.S.C. § 824 and Fla. Stat. § 366.04....
Copy

Florida Power & Light Co. v. Nichols, 516 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1987).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 90 P.U.R.4th 562, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 601, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2562

...lectric power grid throughout Florida to assure an adequate and reliable source of energy for operational and emergency purposes in Florida and the avoidance of further uneconomic duplication of generation, transmission, and distribution facilities. § 366.04(3), Fla.Stat....
...Appellant presents several arguments in support of its position that sections 366.-04(3), 366.05(9), and 366.055(3) do not authorize PSC to set the terms and conditions for wheeling QF produced power. These arguments boil down to two assertions: (1) sections 366.04(3) and 366.055(3) were enacted as part of the Grid Bill in 1974, before the development of QF produced power, and the legislature could not have contemplated the wheeling of QF power; and (2) section 366.05(9) only addresses the purchase of QF produced power, it could have but did not address wheeling....
Copy

Nelson P. Schwob v. James C. Goss (Fla. 2d DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...rights to the City. Were we to hold otherwise, counties could do indirectly through franchise agreements what the PSC's "exclusive and superior" jurisdiction precludes them from doing directly. § 366.04(1), Fla....
Copy

Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Florida Power & Light Co., 208 So. 3d 111 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 46 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20080, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5953

...$2.5 billion. Both the City and the County relied on section 337.403(1), Florida Statutes (1989), which the circuit judge cited as authority for his ruling. Id. The Supreme Court of Florida ruled in favor of FPC. Id. The Court stated that section 366.04(1), Florida Statutes (1989), expressly confers jurisdiction on 16 the Public Service Commission to “regulate and supervise each public utility with respect to its rates and service.” Id....
...at 107. The Court went on to state that “if there was any doubt that the legislature did not intend that cities and counties could dictate the decision of whether public utilities should convert their overhead systems to underground, this was laid to rest by the enactment of section 366.04(7)(a), Florida Statutes (1989),” which provides in pertinent part that: By July 1, 1990, the commission shall make a determination as to the cost-effectiveness of requiring the installation of underground elect...

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.