Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 366.095 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 366.095 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 366.095

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXVII
RAILROADS AND OTHER REGULATED UTILITIES
Chapter 366
PUBLIC UTILITIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 366.095
366.095 Penalties.The commission shall have the power to impose upon any entity subject to its jurisdiction under this chapter that is found to have refused to comply with or to have willfully violated any lawful rule or order of the commission or any provision of this chapter a penalty for each offense of not more than $5,000, which penalty shall be fixed, imposed, and collected by the commission. Each day that such refusal or violation continues shall constitute a separate offense. Each penalty shall be a lien upon the real and personal property of the entity, enforceable by the commission as a statutory lien under chapter 85.
History.ss. 2, 15, ch. 82-25; ss. 12, 20, 22, ch. 89-292; s. 4, ch. 91-429.

F.S. 366.095 on Google Scholar

F.S. 366.095 on Casetext

Amendments to 366.095


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 366.095
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 366.095.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 366.095

Total Results: 9

Citizens of the State of Florida, etc. v. Andrew Giles Fay, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-14

Snippet: times, often in describing costs. See, e.g., § 366.95(1), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“The commission shall issue

Valdes v. Valdes

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-03-02

Citation: 62 So. 3d 7, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2665, 2011 WL 710171

Snippet: + $83,699 = $95,276) from the 2000 value ($109,366—$95,276 = $14,090), and then to reduce this amount

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2005-03-03

Snippet: 366.05(7) and (8),4 366.051,5366.055,6 366.093,7 366.095,8 366.14,9 and 366.80—366.85,10 to utilities owned

LEE COUNTY ELEC. CO-OP., INC. v. Jacobs

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-05-02

Citation: 820 So. 2d 297, 2002 WL 825704

Snippet: 366.05(7) and (8), 366.051, 366.055, 366.093, 366.095, 366.14, and 366.80 366.85, ... to the sale of

Lambert v. Berkley South Condominium Ass'n

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-09-11

Citation: 680 So. 2d 588, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9441, 1996 WL 511557

Snippet: GUNTHER, Chief Judge. Appellant, James Lambert, appeals from the trial court’s award of damages in his breach of contract case against Appellee, Berkley South Condominium Association (“the Association”), claiming that the damage award was insufficient. The Association cross-appeals the trial court’s interpretation of key condominium documents. We affirm as to all issues, except one on cross-appeal. Lambert owned several commercial units in Berkley South condominium. Berkley South houses twenty-eight

Lambert v. BERKLEY SO. CONDO. ASS'N, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-09-11

Citation: 680 So. 2d 588

Snippet: George Preste, and Leon Alaluf, Appellees. Nos. 95-0366, 95-2654. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1995-09-18

Snippet: Ch. 119, Fla. Stat. See, e.g., Chs. 95-133, 95-366, 95-386, Laws of Florida, creating trade secret exemptions

Gulf Power Co. v. Wilson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-04-09

Citation: 597 So. 2d 270, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 232, 92 FPSC 630, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 753, 1992 WL 68951

Snippet: Commission has exceeded its authority. Section 366.095, Florida Statutes (1989), which authorizes the

Harvey v. Rowe

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-01-09

Citation: 192 So. 878, 141 Fla. 287, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 775

Snippet: 147 Ala. 508, 41 So. 902; Love v. Peel, 79 Ark. 366,95 S.W. 998; Gage v. Atwater, 136 Cal. 170, 68 P.