Florida Statute 373.123 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXVIII
NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION, AND USE

Chapter 373
WATER RESOURCES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 373.123

373.123 Penalty.—Any person, real or artificial, that shall construct or enlarge, or cause to be constructed or enlarged, a canal or shall enlarge or deepen a natural stream in such a manner as to permit salt water to move inland of an established saltwater barrier line, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.083. Each day such movement of salt water shall continue, shall constitute a separate offense of the provisions of this law.

History.—s. 3, ch. 63-210; s. 324, ch. 71-136; s. 25, ch. 73-190.

Note.—Former s. 373.195.

F.S. 373.123 on Google Scholar

F.S. 373.123 on Casetext

Amendments to 373.123

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 373.123

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S373.123 - CONSERVATION-ENVIRONMENT - ALLOW SALT WATER TO MOVE INLAND - M: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 373.123

Total Results: 8

Rodriguez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-12-22

Citation: 443 So. 2d 286

Snippet: unintentionally). See Lassiter v. State, 98 Fla. 370, 373, 123 So. 735 (1929) (Brown, J., dissenting); Taylor

Martyn v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-12-15

Citation: 257 So. 2d 576, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5327

Snippet: to quiet title. Cook v. Pontious, 1929, 98 Fla. 373, 123 So. 765. 5) A mortgagee of lands sought to be

Martyn v. FIRST FED. SAV. & L. ASS'N OF W. PALM BEACH

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-12-15

Citation: 257 So. 2d 576

Snippet: to quiet title. Cook v. Pontious, 1929, 98 Fla. 373, 123 So. 765. 5) A mortgagee of lands sought to be

Guernsey v. Haley

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-11-19

Citation: 107 So. 2d 184

Snippet: 137 So. 128; Cook v. Pontious, 1929, 98 Fla. 373, 123 So. 765; Micou v. McDonald, 1908, 55 Fla. 776

Masser v. the London Operating Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-08-23

Citation: 145 So. 72, 106 Fla. 474

Snippet: 104, 137 So.2d 128; Cook vs. Pontious,98 Fla. 373, 123 So.2d 765; Micou vs. McDonald, 55 Fla. 776,46

Norris Et Ux. v. Eikenberry

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-10-16

Citation: 137 So. 128, 103 Fla. 104

Snippet: have not noticed it. Cook v. Pontious, 98 Fla. 373, 123 So.2d 765; Micou v. McDonald, 55 Fla. 776, 46

Woodman v. Jones

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-04-14

Citation: 133 So. 620, 101 Fla. 177

Snippet: procedure." See also Cook et al. vs. Pontious, 98 Fla. 373, 123 So. 765, and cases there cited. The bill of complaint

Tangeman v. Sjoblom

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-10-29

Citation: 130 So. 603, 100 Fla. 1059

Snippet: 1087, 114 So. R. 767; Cook v. Pontious,98 Fla. 373, 123 So. R. 765; Empire Securities Corp. v. Pontious