Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 394.9085 (2025)

Behavioral provider liability.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

394.9085 Behavioral provider liability.—

(1)(a) In any negligence action for damages for personal injury or wrongful death arising out of the provision of services for crisis stabilization brought against a detoxification program, an addictions receiving facility, or a designated public receiving facility, net economic damages shall be limited to $1 million per liability claim, including, but not limited to, past and future medical expenses, wage loss, and loss of earning capacity. In computing net economic damages, such damages shall be offset by any collateral source payment paid in accordance with s. 768.76.

(b) In any negligence action for damages for personal injury or wrongful death arising out of the provision of services for crisis stabilization brought against any detoxification program, an addictions receiving facility, or a designated public receiving facility, noneconomic damages shall be limited to $200,000 per claim.

(2) The limitations on liability of a detoxification program, an addictions receiving facility, or any designated public receiving facility as described in subsection (1) shall be exclusive. Such limitations apply to each employee of the provider when the employee is acting in furtherance of the provider’s responsibilities under its contract with the department. Such limitations do not apply to a provider or employee who acts in a culpably negligent manner or with willful and wanton disregard or unprovoked physical aggression if such acts result in injury or death.

(3) The eligible provider under this section must, as part of its contract, obtain and maintain an insurance policy providing a minimum of $1 million per claim and $3 million per incident in coverage for claims described in subsection (1).

(4) This section does not designate a person who provides contracted services to the department as an employee or agent of the state for purposes of chapter 440.

(5) The Legislature is cognizant of the increasing costs of goods and services each year and recognizes that fixing a set amount of compensation actually has the effect of a reduction in compensation each year. Accordingly, the conditional limitations on damages in this section shall be increased at the rate of 5 percent each year, prorated from July 1, 2006, to the date at which damages subject to such limitations are awarded by final judgment or settlement.

(6) For purposes of this section, the terms “detoxification,” “addictions receiving facility,” and “receiving facility” have the same meanings as those provided in ss. 397.311(27)(a)4., 397.311(27)(a)1., and 394.455(40), respectively.

(7) This section shall not be construed to waive sovereign immunity for any governmental unit or other entity protected by sovereign immunity. Section 768.28 shall continue to apply to all governmental units and such entities.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2006-208; s. 5, ch. 2009-132; s. 7, ch. 2015-100; s. 68, ch. 2016-241; s. 29, ch. 2017-173; s. 20, ch. 2020-39; s. 8, ch. 2024-176; s. 19, ch. 2024-245.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: Renee Hill, etc. v. New Horizons of the Treasure Coast, Inc., 151 So. 3d 47 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Renee Hill, etc. v. New Horizons of the Treasure Coast, Inc., 151 So. 3d 47 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). · cites it 3× “All of those orders reflect the trial court’s determination that the non-economic damages cap contained in section 394.9085(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), applied to all three counts which the plaintiff pled in this case.”

— 394.9085(1)(b) — 1 case

Renee Hill, etc. v. New Horizons of the Treasure Coast, Inc., 151 So. 3d 47 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). “All of those orders reflect the trial court’s determination that the non-economic damages cap contained in section 394.9085(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), applied to all three counts which the plaintiff pled in this case.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.