Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 414.122 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 414.122 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 414.122

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXX
SOCIAL WELFARE
Chapter 414
FAMILY SELF-SUFFICIENCY
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 414.122
414.122 Withholding of payments based on evidence of fraud.The department shall withhold payment from a recipient of temporary cash assistance when, after redetermination of eligibility or at any other time, the department obtains evidence that may indicate fraud on the part of the recipient. When evidence of such fraud is obtained, the recipient shall be notified that because of such evidence of fraud the following payment will be withheld unless the recipient meets with a representative of the department by a specified date, which must be within 10 days after the date of the notice, to discuss and resolve the matter. The department shall make every effort to resolve the matter within a timeframe that will not cause payment to be withheld from an eligible recipient of temporary cash assistance.
History.s. 87, ch. 96-175; s. 12, ch. 97-173.

F.S. 414.122 on Google Scholar

F.S. 414.122 on Casetext

Amendments to 414.122


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 414.122
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 414.122.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 414.122

Total Results: 2

Hale v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2004-12-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 891 So. 2d 517

Snippet: as specific circumstances require." Id. at 414, 122 S.Ct. 867. White, slip op. at 506. As the Supreme

State v. White

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2004-12-22T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 891 So. 2d 502

Snippet: as specific circumstances require." Id. at 414, 122 S.Ct. 867. Finally, Crane agreed that Hendricks…as a lack of control." Crane, 534 U.S. at 414, 122 S.Ct. 867. The Supreme Court noted that its cases