The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXX
SOCIAL WELFARE

Chapter 418
RECREATION DISTRICTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 418.25

418.25 Actions by aggrieved parties.—Any person feeling aggrieved by the adoption of an ordinance granting or amending the charter of a recreation district may bring, within the period hereinafter prescribed, an appropriate action in the circuit court of the state for that county in which the municipality is located for declaratory or injunctive relief on the grounds that the adoption of said ordinance or any part thereof was arbitrary, capricious, confiscatory, or violative of constitutional guarantees. Such action may be brought at any time during a period beginning immediately upon the adoption of said ordinance and ending no later than the earlier to occur of:

(1) One year from the date of adoption of said ordinance; or

(2) The date of judicial validation of the first bonds, tax bonds, or revenue bonds of said district to be authorized and validated after the adoption of the ordinance under chapter 75.

After the expiration of said period, no one shall have any right or cause of action to challenge such ordinance or the existence of any recreation district created thereby, whether such challenge be brought under this law or under any other law.

History.—s. 7, ch. 78-237.

F.S. 418.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 418.25 on Casetext

Amendments to 418.25

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 418.25

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 418.25.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

DUNNER, v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN,, 770 F. Supp. 2d 1054 (C.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . Indeed, the workers’ compensation award for the County Injury was intended to cover onward for 418.25 . . . Plaintiff states that he was entitled to 418.25 weeks of disability, which "works out to slightly over . . .

UNITED STATES v. BLACKWELL,, 853 F.2d 86 (2d Cir. 1988)

. . . When Blackwell emptied his pockets, he had $418.25 in cash including three $100 bills, one $50 bill and . . .