430.608

Confidentiality of information.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

430.608 Confidentiality of information.—

(1) Identifying information about elderly persons who receive services under ss. 430.601-430.606, which is received through files, reports, inspection, or otherwise by the department or by authorized departmental employees, by persons who volunteer services, or by persons who provide services to elderly persons under ss. 430.601-430.606 through contracts with the department, is confidential and exempt from the provisions of s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution. Such information may not be disclosed publicly in such a manner as to identify an elderly person, unless that person or the person’s legal guardian provides written consent.

(2) This section does not, however, limit the subpoena authority of the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit of the Department of Legal Affairs pursuant to s. 409.920(10)(b).

History.—s. 1, ch. 95-273; s. 281, ch. 96-406; s. 8, ch. 2000-163; s. 25, ch. 2004-344; s. 34, ch. 2009-223.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: City of Tallahassee, Florida v. Florida Police Benevolent Association, Inc.

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

City of Tallahassee, Florida v. Florida Police Benevolent Association, Inc. (2023) fla · cites it 2× “(providing that certain “information may not be disclosed publicly in such a manner as to identify a person who receives [certain] services”) (emphasis added); § 430.608(1), Fla. Stat. (“Identifying information about elderly persons who receive [certain] services .”

— 430.608(1) — 1 case

City of Tallahassee, Florida v. Florida Police Benevolent Association, Inc. (2023) fla “(providing that certain “information may not be disclosed publicly in such a manner as to identify a person who receives [certain] services”) (emphasis added); § 430.608(1), Fla. Stat. (“Identifying information about elderly persons who receive [certain] services .”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.