Syfert Injury Law Firm

Clarke-Morales v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-03-20

Citation: 271 So. 3d 1128

Snippet: at issue under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440. 3 In addition to the trial court’s May 17, 2017 final

Woodruff v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-01-25

Citation: 208 So. 3d 1265, 2017 WL 362550, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 719

Snippet: guilty was his verdict. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.440 3 and 3.450. 4 The trial court

SC13-1976 Bradley Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, etc. and City of St. Petersburg, etc. v. Bradley Westphal – Corrected Opinion

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-07-07

Snippet: their tort remedies, was repealed. See §§ 440.015, 440.03, Fla. Stat. (2009). Other changes have included

& SC13-1976 Bradley Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, etc. and City of St. Petersburg, etc. v. Bradley Westphal

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-06-09

Citation: 194 So. 3d 311

Snippet: their tort remedies, was repealed. See §§ 440.015, 440.03, Fla. Stat. (2009). Other changes have included

Marvin Castellanos v. Next Door Company

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-28

Citation: 192 So. 3d 431, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 197, 2016 WL 1700521, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 885

Snippet: elimination of the “opt- out” provision, §§ 440.015, 440.03, Fla. Stat.; and (7) the addition of an offer of

Matarranz v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-09-26

Citation: 133 So. 3d 473, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 687, 2013 WL 5355117, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2074

Snippet: Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove & Robeson, 28 U.S. 438, 440, 3 Pet. 433, 7 L.Ed. 732 (1830). [Trial by juries

City of Palm Bay v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-05-16

Citation: 114 So. 3d 924, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 322, 2013 WL 2096257, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1000

Snippet: statute. See Barragan, 545 So.2d at 254 (citing § 440.03, Fla. Stat. (1987)). In Barragan, Chief Justice

Matrix Employee Leasing, Inc. v. Hadley

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-11-29

Citation: 78 So. 3d 621, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18955, 2011 WL 5925050

Snippet: condition that can have but one meaning under section 440.03(22): a condition existing “after the date of maximum

Bifulco v. Patient Business & Financial Services, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-06-24

Citation: 39 So. 3d 1255, 30 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1689, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 368, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 989, 2010 WL 2518200

Snippet: quasi-public corporations therein." And section 440.03, Florida Statutes (2004), provides that "[e]very

In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.430

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-01-17

Citation: 973 So. 2d 437, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 53, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 43, 2008 WL 150688

Snippet: Florida Rules of Judicial Administration 2.430 and 2.440. (3) Comment on proposed amendments to the retention

Gassner v. Bechtel Const.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-11-10

Citation: 702 So. 2d 548, 1997 WL 694960

Snippet: Workers' Compensation Law applies in every detail, § 440.03, Fla. Stat. (1995), collective bargaining agreements

Hallal v. RDV Sports, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-11-22

Citation: 682 So. 2d 1235, 114 Educ. L. Rep. 718

Snippet: summary judgment in favor of the Magic. Section 440.03, Florida Statutes (1995), provides that every employer

In Re Family Law Rules of Procedure

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-11-22

Citation: 663 So. 2d 1049, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 581, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1953, 1995 WL 689537

Snippet: reset the time of trials, subject to rule 12.440; (3) coordinate the progress of the action if complex

Keith v. News & Sun Sentinel Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-09-07

Citation: 667 So. 2d 167, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 454, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1423, 1995 WL 811523

Snippet: worker's compensation law, one must be an employee. § 440.03, Fla. Stat. (1993). The legislature has specifically

United Parcel Service v. Welsh

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-08-25

Citation: 659 So. 2d 1234, 1995 WL 502093

Snippet: Act binds both the employer and the worker. See § 440.03, Fla. Stat. (1991). In this case, there is no dispute

Groth v. Weinstock

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-11-06

Citation: 610 So. 2d 477, 1992 WL 322993

Snippet: section 766.102(1). NME Properties, 590 So.2d at 440. [3] Courts are without power to construe an unambiguous

Schafrath v. Marco Bay Resort, Ltd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-10-29

Citation: 608 So. 2d 97, 1992 WL 312759

Snippet: been mandatory since the 1970 amendment to section 440.03, which section previously made coverage under the

Elliott v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-12-13

Citation: 591 So. 2d 981, 1991 WL 265001

Snippet: County Corke [sic], Ireland.'" 537 N.Y.S.2d at 440); (3) despite defense counsel's alleged sensitivity

Barragan v. City of Miami

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-04-20

Citation: 545 So. 2d 252, 1989 WL 38852

Snippet: on the subject of workers' compensation. Section 440.03, Florida Statutes (1987), states that every "employer"

Smith v. Piezo Technology & Prof. Adm'rs

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-02-03

Citation: 427 So. 2d 182

Snippet: cognizable by a deputy commissioner within Chapter 440.[3] *185 A section 440.205 action is likewise not