Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 440.077 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 440.077 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 440.077

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXI
LABOR
Chapter 440
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 440.077
440.077 When a corporate officer rejects chapter, effect.An officer of a corporation who is permitted to elect an exemption under this chapter and who elects to be exempt from the provisions of this chapter may not recover benefits under this chapter.
History.s. 3, ch. 91-2; s. 5, ch. 2003-412.

F.S. 440.077 on Google Scholar

F.S. 440.077 on Casetext

Amendments to 440.077


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 440.077
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 440.077.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 440.077

Total Results: 4

Charles Gladden v. Fisher Thomas, Inc., The Green etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-11-19

Snippet: [the Workers’ Compensation Law].” See also § 440.077, Fla. Stat. (2008). The only provision in the

Contractor's Management Services, Inc. v. Dixon

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-04-28

Citation: 734 So. 2d 435, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5458, 1999 WL 247143

Snippet: subcontractor or the general contractor. §§ 440.02(14)(e), 440.077, Fla. Stat. (1997); Swartout v. Lewis & Assoc.

G.T. McDonald Enterprises, Inc. v. Frederick

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-05-06

Citation: 711 So. 2d 1215, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4873, 1998 WL 219711

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 440.077, Fla. Stat. (1993); see also Jones v. Florida Power Corp., 72 So

Gernat v. Gernat

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-01-16

Citation: 378 So. 2d 339, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15601

Snippet: ON MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER ON ATTORNEY’S FEES LETTS, Judge. Pursuant to appeals from a non-final order later consolidated with the plenary appeal, this court per curiam affirmed the lower court. Motions for attorney’s fees were filed by the wife in both the non-final and plenary proceedings. On the same day the lower court was affirmed, we issued an order, identifying both case numbers of the consolidated appeals, which granted the motions for attorney’s fees filed by the wife and remanded to the