Florida Statute 440.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXI
LABOR

Chapter 440
WORKERS' COMPENSATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 440.11

440.11 Exclusiveness of liability.—

(1) The liability of an employer prescribed in s. 440.10 shall be exclusive and in place of all other liability, including vicarious liability, of such employer to any third-party tortfeasor and to the employee, the legal representative thereof, husband or wife, parents, dependents, next of kin, and anyone otherwise entitled to recover damages from such employer at law or in admiralty on account of such injury or death, except as follows:

(a) If an employer fails to secure payment of compensation as required by this chapter, an injured employee, or the legal representative thereof in case death results from the injury, may elect to claim compensation under this chapter or to maintain an action at law or in admiralty for damages on account of such injury or death. In such action the defendant may not plead as a defense that the injury was caused by negligence of a fellow employee, that the employee assumed the risk of the employment, or that the injury was due to the comparative negligence of the employee.

(b) When an employer commits an intentional tort that causes the injury or death of the employee. For purposes of this paragraph, an employer’s actions shall be deemed to constitute an intentional tort and not an accident only when the employee proves, by clear and convincing evidence, that:

1. The employer deliberately intended to injure the employee; or

2. The employer engaged in conduct that the employer knew, based on prior similar accidents or on explicit warnings specifically identifying a known danger, was virtually certain to result in injury or death to the employee, and the employee was not aware of the risk because the danger was not apparent and the employer deliberately concealed or misrepresented the danger so as to prevent the employee from exercising informed judgment about whether to perform the work.

The same immunities from liability enjoyed by an employer shall extend as well to each employee of the employer when such employee is acting in furtherance of the employer’s business and the injured employee is entitled to receive benefits under this chapter. Such fellow-employee immunities shall not be applicable to an employee who acts, with respect to a fellow employee, with willful and wanton disregard or unprovoked physical aggression or with gross negligence when such acts result in injury or death or such acts proximately cause such injury or death, nor shall such immunities be applicable to employees of the same employer when each is operating in the furtherance of the employer’s business but they are assigned primarily to unrelated works within private or public employment. The same immunity provisions enjoyed by an employer shall also apply to any sole proprietor, partner, corporate officer or director, supervisor, or other person who in the course and scope of his or her duties acts in a managerial or policymaking capacity and the conduct which caused the alleged injury arose within the course and scope of said managerial or policymaking duties and was not a violation of a law, whether or not a violation was charged, for which the maximum penalty which may be imposed does not exceed 60 days’ imprisonment as set forth in s. 775.082. The immunity from liability provided in this subsection extends to county governments with respect to employees of county constitutional officers whose offices are funded by the board of county commissioners.

(2) The immunity from liability described in subsection (1) shall extend to an employer and to each employee of the employer which uses the services of the employees of a help supply services company, as set forth in North American Industrial Classification System Codes 561320 and 561330, when such employees, whether management or staff, are acting in furtherance of the employer’s business. An employee so engaged by the employer shall be considered a borrowed employee of the employer and, for the purposes of this section, shall be treated as any other employee of the employer. The employer shall be liable for and shall secure the payment of compensation to all such borrowed employees as required in s. 440.10, except when such payment has been secured by the help supply services company.

(3) An employer’s workers’ compensation carrier, service agent, or safety consultant shall not be liable as a third-party tortfeasor to employees of the employer or employees of its subcontractors for assisting the employer and its subcontractors, if any, in carrying out the employer’s rights and responsibilities under this chapter by furnishing any safety inspection, safety consultative service, or other safety service incidental to the workers’ compensation or employers’ liability coverage or to the workers’ compensation or employer’s liability servicing contract. Without limitation, a safety consultant may include an owner, as defined in chapter 713, or an owner’s related, affiliated, or subsidiary companies and the employees of each. The exclusion from liability under this subsection shall not apply in any case in which injury or death is proximately caused by the willful and unprovoked physical aggression, or by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle, by employees, officers, or directors of the employer’s workers’ compensation carrier, service agent, or safety consultant.

(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 624.155, the liability of a carrier to an employee or to anyone entitled to bring suit in the name of the employee shall be as provided in this chapter, which shall be exclusive and in place of all other liability.

History.—s. 11, ch. 17481, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 5966(11); s. 1, ch. 70-25; s. 1, ch. 71-190; s. 4, ch. 75-209; ss. 2, 23, ch. 78-300; ss. 6, 124, ch. 79-40; s. 21, ch. 79-312; s. 3, ch. 83-305; s. 1, ch. 88-284; ss. 8, 43, ch. 89-289; ss. 16, 56, ch. 90-201; ss. 14, 52, ch. 91-1; s. 16, ch. 93-415; s. 108, ch. 97-103; s. 14, ch. 2003-412; s. 5, ch. 2013-141.

F.S. 440.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 440.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 440.11

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 440.11

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 440.11.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 440.11

Total Results: 20

Bottling Group, LLC v. Giovanni E. Bastien

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-04-24T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: See Byerley, 725 So. 2d at 1232–33; see also § 440.11(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (“[A]n injured employee . . .

FERNANDO GALUE v. CLOPAY CORPORATION

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-08-30T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: statutory employer under sections 440.10(1)(b) and 440.11(1), Florida Statutes. Galue, Clopay, and Julian

BAL HARBOUR TOWER CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. MARTIN BELLORIN

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-10-19T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: compensation immunity from civil liability under section 440.11, Florida Statutes (2021). Bellorin responded that

DIVESTON MERLIEN v. JM FAMILY ENTERPRISES, INC., SHERIDIAN 441, LLC and BENDLES RENTALS, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-07-22T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: claims arising out of the same injury.” (citing § 440.11(1), Fla. Stat. (2012)). AlliedBarton’s disclaimer…employee.”), superseded by statute on other grounds, § 440.11(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003), as noted in R.L. Haines… 3d 528, 530-31 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014); see also § 440.11(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2017) (the intentional tort

LEONIREZ HEREDIA v. JOHN BEACH & ASSOCIATES, INC. AND MICHAEL MELENDES GROSS

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-07-24T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: 2Subject to limited exceptions, section 440.11(1) provides that [t]he liability

Teresita De Jesus Abreu v. Riverland Elementary School and Broward County etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-06-18T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: occasioned primarily by the influence of drugs.”); § 440.11(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (workers’ compensation is the

Sedgwick CMS and The Hartford/Sedgwick CMS v. Tammitha Valcourt-Williams

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-04-05T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: accidental injury from a covered employer. See § 440.11, Fla. Stat. But for workers’ compensation protection…would be to render this statutory provision [§ 440.11, Fla. Stat.] meaningless. In this case, the notice…currently immune from suit for negligence under section 440.11(1), Florida Statutes. If exclusivity does not apply

Sedgwick CMS and The Hartford/Sedgwick CMS v. Tammitha Valcourt-Williams

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-04-05T00:53:00-07:00

King v. Starks

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-01-25T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 262 So. 3d 705

Snippet: concurs. I agree affirmance is appropriate. See § 440.11, Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.110. No.

King v. Starks

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-01-25T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 262 So. 3d 705

Snippet: concurs. I agree affirmance is appropriate. See § 440.11, Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.110. No.

Darryl Bernard King v. Sharita Starks, Sailormen, Inc. d/b/a Popeyes Chicken and Biscuits

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-01-24T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: I agree affirmance is appropriate. See § 440.11, Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.110.

Nora LaFreniere, Vice President and General Counsel of Otis Elevator Company v. Catherine Craig-Myers, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Robert Myers

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-12-28T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 264 So. 3d 232

Snippet: Immunity provided in Section 440.11(1)(b)2, Florida Statutes.” Section 440.11(1)(b), Florida Statutes, provides… 9 Appellant. See § 440.11(1)(b), Fla. Stat. However, section 440.11(1)(b) does not declare that…Compensation Employer/Manager Immunity Provided in Section 440.11(1)(b)2, Florida Statutes.” Appellee’s amended complaint

Ramsey v. Dewitt Excavating

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-06-11T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: So. 2d 259, 262 (Fla. 2007)). However, section 440.11(1)(b) of the Florida Statutes (2013) creates an…reads, in relevant part, as follows: 440.11 Exclusiveness of liability.— (1) …cause such injury or death . . . . § 440.11(1)(b)2., Fla. Stat. (2013) (emphasis added).

Miami-Dade County v. Pozos

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-06-06T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: the exclusivity provision set forth in section 440.11 of the Workers’ Compensation Act is an affirmative

Citizens Property Ins. Corp. v. Calonge

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-04-18T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: the exclusivity provision set forth in section 440.11 of the Workers’ Compensation Act is an affirmative

Citizens Property Ins. Corp. v. Calonge

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-04-18T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: the exclusivity provision set forth in section 440.11 of the Workers’ Compensation Act is an affirmative

Charles Gladden v. Fisher Thomas, Inc., The Green etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-11-18T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: immune from tort liability for a workplace injury. § 440.11(1), Fla. Stat. (2008) (except as otherwise provided…Appellees qualify for tort immunity under section 440.11. In Weber, the Florida Supreme Court expressly…action based on the immunity provisions in section 440.11, Florida Statutes (1983). Id. at 958. The issue… circumvent the immunity protections of section 440.11, except as provided by section 440.075. We therefore

Morera v. Waste Management Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-05-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 218 So. 3d 449, 2017 WL 2131497, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7023

Snippet: Management was immune from liability pursuant to section 440.11(2), Florida Statutes (2010), as appellant was an…Industry Number 7363 is incorporated through section 440.11(2), Florida Statutes, which provides: The immunity…treated as any other employee of the employer. § 440.11(2), Fla. Stat. No. 4D14-3135 District

Wert v. Camacho

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-09-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 200 So. 3d 787, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13276, 2016 WL 4607535

Snippet: unrelated works exception contained within [section] 440.11(1),” Florida Statutes (2010). The Camachos filed…exception to the immunity applies under section 440.11 because the subcontractors were engaged in unrelated…scope of employment. See §§ 440.09, .10. “[S]ection 440.11(1) provides that this liability is ‘exclusive and…immunity afforded to the employer under section 440.11(1) also extends to ‘each employee of the employer… public employment.’” Id. (quoting § 440.11(1)). This exception is known as the unrelated works

SC13-1976 Bradley Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, etc. and City of St. Petersburg, etc. v. Bradley Westphal – Corrected Opinion

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-07-07T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: facially unconstitutional as long as it contains § 440.11 as an exclusive replacement remedy.”), overruled