Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HACKETT,, 260 So. 3d 532 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . review a compensation case in accordance with the procedure prescribed in respect of claims in s. 440.25 . . . holding that term "compensation" as used in § 440.09(3) includes both medical and disability benefits); § 440.25 . . . Because the E/C filed a Petition for Modification initiating litigation as governed by section 440.25 . . .

O. MOISE, v. DISNEY POP CENTURY RESORT, Co., 244 So. 3d 403 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . In this workers' compensation case, we address the interplay between section 440.25(4)(i), Florida Statutes . . . In Limith , this Court reasoned: Although section 440.25(4)(i) states that a JCC "may" dismiss a petition . . . The word "may" must also be considered in context with the rest of section 440.25(4)(i) referencing " . . . As illustrated by the facts of this case, the interaction of sections 440.19 and 440.25(4)(i) can prompt . . . However, the Legislature did not include a similar notice requirement or grace period in section 440.25 . . .

LEWIS, v. DOLLAR RENT A CAR ESIS WC, 220 So. 3d 1246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Section 440.25(6), Florida Statutes (1987), provides that “[a]n injured employee claiming or entitled . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, v. JUNOD,, 217 So. 3d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . An EMA opinion is admissible as provided in § 440.25(4)(d), Fla. . . .

ALTA WIND I OWNER- LESSOR C, I D, v. THE UNITED STATES,, 128 Fed. Cl. 702 (Fed. Cl. 2016)

. . . purchase prices that Plaintiffs paid Terra-Gen in the Alta II-V transactions were (approximately): $440.25 . . .

LOWE S HOME CENTERS, INC. CMS, v. K. BEEKMAN,, 187 So. 3d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes (2013), provides in part: When there is a conflict in the medical . . .

MCALLISTER, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 160 F. Supp. 3d 273 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . Tyrka and $440.25 for the costs incurred in pursuing the matter before this Court. See Pis.’ Mot. . . . The Plaintiffs Should Be Awarded Fees of $7,351.57, and Costs of $440.25 Applying the above formula, . . .

GOMEZ- LUJANO, v. PALM BEACH GRILL- HOUSTON S RESTAURANT AND TRAVELERS INSURANCE,, 178 So. 3d 546 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 440.25(2), Fla. Stat. . . .

RUBIO, v. GYMBOREE CORPORATION, 178 So. 3d 81 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . on an untimely request, would be in contravention of the plain language of sections 440.13(9)(c) and 440.25 . . . the JGC’s appointment of an EMA violates the 210-day deadline for holding a hearing set by section 440.25 . . .

SUAREZ, v. STEWARD ENTERPRISES Co., 164 So. 3d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Sections 440.13(9)(b) and section 440.25(4)(d) anticipate that EMAs may provide “testimony” to the JCC . . . In addition, section 440.25(4)(d) goes on to provide that “the testimony of the [EMA] shall be admitted . . . Accordingly, nothing in sections 440.13 or 440.25 supports the JCC’s conclusion. . . .

LIMITH, v. LENOX ON LAKE FTMI LLC Co. d b a U. S., 163 So. 3d 616 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . We agree; section 440.25(4)(i), Florida Statutes, the authority for motions to dismiss, applies to pending . . . that the claim is no longer brought via a PFB and, therefore, not subject to dismissal under section 440.25 . . . Although section 440.25(4)(i) states that a JCC “may” dismiss a petition for lack of prosecution, that . . . The word “may” must also be considered in context with the rest of section 440.25(4)(i) referencing “ . . . good cause shown”; specifically, section 440.25(4)(i) provides a JCC may dismiss a PFB “unless good cause . . .

SHANNON, v. CHENEY BROTHERS INC., 157 So. 3d 397 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. Stat; Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(b)(1). . . .

JACKSON, v. COLUMBIA PICTURES AND FIREMAN S FUND,, 153 So. 3d 347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Rain, 892 So.2d 1839, 1341 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980) (“While section 440.25(3) (b) [, Florida Statutes (1977 . . .

O. FLORES- ORELLANA, v. CIRCLE- K, 151 So. 3d 477 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Section 440.25(4), Florida Statutes (2009), sets out the procedure for hearings. . . . The final hearing is to be concluded within 90 days of the mediation conference (see § 440.25(4)(b), . . . Stat.) or 210 days after the PFB is filed (see § 440.25(4)(d), Fla. Stat.). . . . Section 440.25(4)(c) requires the JCC to give the parties at least 14 days’ notice of the final hearing . . . orders are to be conducted “in accordance with the procedure prescribed in respect to claims in s. 440.25 . . .

IN RE LIGHTY, In In, 513 B.R. 489 (Bankr. D.S.C. 2014)

. . . The bill was actually for $440.25, as it included $10 for an active military search and $5.25 for a skip . . .

TREJO- PEREZ, v. ARRY S ROOFING, 141 So. 3d 220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See §§ 440.13(9)(c) & 440.25(4)(d), Fla. Stat. . . .

ALACHUA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD v. OFFICE OF STATE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER FOR DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKER S COMPENSATION,, 138 So. 3d 480 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . protest, it shall refer the matter to the judge of compensation claims for determination pursuant to s. 440.25 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES v. ANDERSON,, 132 So. 3d 900 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . jurisdiction over PFBs that have been filed, but not mediated, because mediation is mandatory under section 440.25 . . .

BANUCHI, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 122 So. 3d 999 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Thereafter, the JCC shall, in accord with sections 440.13(9)(c) and 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes, consider . . .

BANKS, v. ALLEGIANT SECURITY Co., 122 So. 3d 983 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Subsection 440.25(4)(d) requires that the final hearing be held within 210 days from the filing of the . . . The timeframes established in section 440.25, however, are neither inflexible nor inviolable. . . . Subsection 440.25(4)(d) specifically grants a claimant the power to “waive the timeframes within ... . . . section [440.25] for good cause shown.” . . . On the other hand, it should be noted that the actual grant of a continuance under subsection 440.25( . . .

WESTPHAL, v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG RISK MANAGEMENT,, 122 So. 3d 440 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . §§ 440.13(9)(c) & 440.25(4)(d), Fla. Stat.; Romero v. . . . legally required to appoint an Expert Medical Advisor (“EMA”) to resolve the conflict. §§ 440.13(9)(c) & 440.25 . . .

MIAMI DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD v. SMITH,, 116 So. 3d 511 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . post-hearing evidence “for good cause shown” (a standard not used by the JCC here), and under section 440.25 . . . Code R. 60Q-6.121(5); see also § 440.25(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .

AKE, v. UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION, 112 So. 3d 171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Analysis Section 440.25(5)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that “Procedures with respect to appeals . . . mediation (a mandatory condition precedent to the presentation of a claim at a merits hearing, see section 440.25 . . .

CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION v. LATOUR,, 109 So. 3d 1232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . § 440.25(4)(d), Fla. . . .

BLACK, v. TOMOKA STATE PARK, 106 So. 3d 973 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . thereafter resolved, and were not dismissed for lack of prosecution under the authority of section 440.25 . . .

QUIROGA, v. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH AT WESTON, 124 So. 3d 936 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Further, section 440.25(4)(3), Florida Statutes (2008), requires a JCC to draft compensation orders containing . . .

MIRANDA, v. BRIDGE,, 112 So. 3d 500 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . modification shall be handled “in accordance with the procedure prescribed in respect of claims in s. 440.25 . . . ”); see also 440.25, Fla. . . .

NUTEC v. DOLESHALL,, 96 So. 3d 1159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . dismiss this appeal based on the Appellant’s purported failure to post a bond as required under section 440.25 . . .

JONES, v. ROYALTY FOODS, INC., 82 So. 3d 1162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (reversing JCC’s dismissal of petitions based on claimant’s violation of section 440.25 . . .

PERRY, v. ECOLAB INC. BROADSPIRE,, 79 So. 3d 838 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Even though, pursuant to section 440.25(5)(a), Florida Statutes (2002), an order is not final until thirty . . . Seven-Up Bottling Co., 83 So.2d 269, 270 (Fla.1955) (“Section 440.25(4), supra, specifying when the award . . .

ARNAU, v. WINN- DIXIE STORES, INC. CMS,, 76 So. 3d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 440.25(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

JEAN, v. MIAMI JEWISH HOME, 78 So. 3d 639 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. . . .

SNIDER, v. MUMFORD, INC. d b a, 65 So. 3d 579 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . The statute in effect on the date of Claimant’s accident, section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1981 . . . Florida Statutes (1987), but JCC may not require E/C to pay for examination unless, as stated in section 440.25 . . . Eventually, the “tie-breaker” provision in section 440.25(3)(b) became the EMA provision codified at . . .

CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE v. MILLER,, 58 So. 3d 284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See also § 440.25(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2010); Byrd v. . . .

EKECHI, v. FIRST AMERICA FIRST STUDENT, 49 So. 3d 335 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . employee’s repayment of indemnity benefits), does not impose interest on unpaid principle); see also § 440.25 . . .

BRUTUS, v. MEARS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, 49 So. 3d 295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. . . .

NOEL, v. JEFFERSON, LLC d b a, 43 So. 3d 828 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. . . .

BOCELLI, v. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INVESTMENTS, 37 So. 3d 964 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . for the Judges of Compensation Claims (JCC) to follow when dismissing a PFB sua sponte under section 440.25 . . . See § 440.25(4)(i), Fla. Stat. . . . And section 440.25(4)(i) specifically contemplates that such notices will be filed because that is one . . .

ROMERO, v. JB PAINTING WATERPROOFING, INC., 38 So. 3d 836 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . “On the other hand, sections 440.13(9)(c) and 440.25(4)(d) contemplate resort to an [EMA], even if the . . .

R. HOLMES, v. BROWN, TERRELL, HOGAN, ELLIS,, 36 So. 3d 919 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. . . .

KUMAR, v. RICHMOND M. D. P. A., 34 So. 3d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 440.25(5)(c), Fla. Stat. (2009); Fraternal Order of Eagles v. . . .

WHITE, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE, 38 So. 3d 166 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. . . .

JUAREZ, v. R. B. BAKER CONSTRUCTION, INC. Co., 28 So. 3d 193 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007); Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(2); Millinger v. . . .

AIREY, v. WAL- MART SEDGWICK,, 24 So. 3d 1264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . based on his belief that it had been pending too long, the proper procedure would be to invoke section 440.25 . . .

LUETGERT DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. STOCKFORD, 18 So. 3d 1232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 440.25(5)(c), Fla. Stat. (2008); Fraternal Order of Eagles v. . . .

A. VASSALLO, v. GOLDWIRE,, 18 So. 3d 670 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . by dismissing, with prejudice, his attorney’s fee claim for lack of prosecution pursuant to section 440.25 . . . a hearing, the JCC found that she had the authority to dismiss the fee petition pursuant to section 440.25 . . . First, the JCC erred in relying on section 440.25(4)(i) to dismiss the petition with prejudice. . . . Section 440.25(4)(i), Florida Statutes, provides: A judge of compensation claims may ... dismiss a petition . . . P., 891 So.2d 474, 479 (Fla.2004), and it was effectively replaced by section 440.25(4)(i). . . .

AMOS, v. GARTNER, INC., 17 So. 3d 829 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Further, the report or testimony of the EMA shall be admitted into evidence, see section 440.25(4)(e) . . .

B. GARCIA, v. FENCE MASTERS, INC. AIG, 16 So. 3d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 440.25(4)(e), Florida Statutes (2005), see also Chavarria v. . . .

UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI v. WEST,, 8 So. 3d 1193 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 440.25(4)(e), Florida Statutes, requires the JCC only to “set forth the findings of ultimate . . .

FUENTES, v. EMBRO INC., 8 So. 3d 389 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . .” § 440.25(4)(i), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . . discretion by dismissing Claimant’s petitions without complying with the statutory requirements of section 440.25 . . .

R. IVESTER, Jr. C. v. P. MILLER,, 398 B.R. 408 (M.D.N.C. 2008)

. . . . §§ 1-440.4; l-440.16(a)(6); 1-440.25. . . .

M. D. TRANSPORT v. PASCHEN,, 996 So. 2d 902 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . The remaining two grounds challenge the JCC’s determination that sections 440.25(4)(d) and 440.192(9) . . . psychiatric care, the E/C argued the claim was barred on grounds of res judicata and application of section 440.25 . . . Finally, the JCC found section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes, was substantive and did not apply to the . . . At issue here is the addition of the following language at the end of section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes . . .

BATISTA, v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS, INC., 993 So. 2d 570 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . JCC Harnage was correct in determining he had jurisdiction to vacate his final order under section 440.25 . . . Section 440.25(5)(a), Florida Statutes, provides that a JCC’s order becomes final 30 days after mailing . . . Because JCC Harnage’s order was not final under section 440.25(5)(a), Florida Statutes, and because JCCs . . .

In YATKO A. v., 416 B.R. 193 (Bankr. W.D.N.C. 2008)

. . . effected by the Sheriff levying on the defendant’s property under the garnishment procedure found at 1-440.25 . . . Section 1-440.25 contemplates a levy by the Sheriff delivering to the garnishee, or his legal agent, . . . Gen.Stat. 1-440.25. . . . An exception to the 1 — 440.25 method of levy applies where the asset to be garnished is a stock interest . . . distribution could either be considered a stock interest under 1-440.19 or a debt owed to him under 1-440.25 . . .

HILL, v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC. USA,, 988 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . for sanctions based on Claimant’s violation of the mediation confidentiality requirements of section 440.25 . . . In the instant case, Claimant violated section 440.25(3), Florida Statutes (2004), which provides, in . . .

MUNROE, v. U. S. FOOD SERVICE, 985 So. 2d 654 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (2006), provides, in part: “In the event both parties agree, the . . .

RODAS, F. F. v. COMMERCIAL FORMING CORP. CNA,, 976 So. 2d 620 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 440.25(4)(d), Fla. . . .

BOWE, v. MCDONALD S, 933 So. 2d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . bar on one who did not move for a vacation of the order within the 30-day period provided in section 440.25 . . . Abbreviated final orders under section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes, shall be enforceable under section . . . by operation of law became final, i.e., 30 days after mailing copies of the order to the parties. § 440.25 . . . Section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes (2005), relating to mediation proceedings, permits a JCC to "enter . . . Section 440.25(4)(e) requires, among other things, that the order contain "findings of ultimate facts . . .

ROYAL SUNALLIANCE v. J. CHAVEZ,, 920 So. 2d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . shall make findings sufficient to permit intelligent review of his decision, as required by section 440.25 . . .

AGUILERA, v. INSERVICES, INC., 905 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 2005)

. . . filed for an emergency medical hearing before the judge of compensation claims pursuant to section 440.25 . . . Section 440.25(4)(h) states: Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the judge of compensation . . . Yet, there is no allegation or evidence that Aguilera ever sought relief under section 440.25(4)(h) or . . . dissent voices the view that a worker subjected to abuses such as these would find relief in section 440.25 . . . Section 440.25 is not an available optional procedure that provides relief or compensation for these . . .

POSADA, v. JAMES CELLO, INC., 135 F. App'x 250 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 440.25. . . . F.S.A. § 440.25; see Clover v. Total System Services, Inc., 176 F.3d 1346 (11th Cir.1999). . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE, 891 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 2004)

. . . the basis for its authority to adopt the rules came from the Legislature and sections 440.29(3) and 440.25 . . .

VALDES, v. GALCO CONSTRUCTION GAB-, 883 So. 2d 359 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . . § 440.25(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2003); Scottie-Craft Boat Corp. v. Smith, 336 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1976). . . .

JOHNSON, v. TERRY HUNT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 878 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . he lacked jurisdiction to vacate his previous order, which had become final by operation of section 440.25 . . . statutory or procedural authority to vacate and/or amend orders which became final by operation of section 440.25 . . . amend orders is expressly limited to those orders ‘which are not yet final by operation of section 440.25 . . . DCA 1998), is misplaced because that argument does not take into account the requirement of section 440.25 . . . See § 440.25(4)(e), Fla. Stat; Millinger, 672 So.2d at 27; Taylor, 520 So.2d at 560; W.T. . . .

FOSTER, v. EG G FLORIDA, INC., 879 So. 2d 75 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . review a compensation case in accordance with the procedures prescribed in respect of claims in s. 440.25 . . .

AT T WIRELESS v. FRAZIER,, 871 So. 2d 939 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . and misinterpreted the interplay between that provision and the time limit requirements of section 440.25 . . . The time limitations of section 440.25 are directory, not mandatory. See Brown v. . . .

AUGUSTUS, f b o, v. PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD F. A., 867 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Section 440.25(4)®, Florida Statutes (2003). WOLF, C.J., PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur. . . .

B. JELLISON, v. DIXIE SOUTHERN INDUSTRIAL, INC., 857 So. 2d 365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 440.25, Florida Statutes, clearly contemplates that a final order will be issued within 30 days . . .

WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES, INC. v. ANNULIS,, 852 So. 2d 430 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . cannot be considered a conclusion on the merits or a final compensation order, as defined in section 440.25 . . .

CHAVARRIA, v. SELUGAL CLOTHING, INC. Co., 840 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 440.25(3)(b), F.S.1951, F.S.A. . . . In 1967, the Florida Legislature amended section 440.25(3)(c), Florida Statutes, to provide: The order . . . Statutes (1975): The detail in which such findings must be stated is succinctly described in Section 440.25 . . . Moreover, the statute relied upon in Pierce remains unchanged today and is codified at section 440.25 . . . Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1951), provided in pertinent part: "The order rejecting the claim . . . discussion of the JCC’s fact-finding responsibility following the legislature’s amendment to section 440.25 . . .

GENERAL MOTORS v. LYNCH,, 829 So. 2d 987 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . final order, but by that time, the abbreviated order had already become final by operation of section 440.25 . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE, 829 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 2002)

. . . Venue shall be governed by section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes. (b) Consolidated Petitions. . . . The changes were made to make rule 4.105 consistent with section 440.25(4)(j), Florida Statutes. . . . Abbreviated final orders entered under section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes, shall not be subject to . . . This rule codifies the procedure for mandatory mediation required by section 440.25, Florida Statutes . . . See also section 440.25(5)(b), Florida Statutes. . . .

SMALBEIN, v. VOLUSIA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,, 801 So. 2d 169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . . § 440.25(1); Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. Rich, 220 So.2d 369 (Fla.1969); Belam Florida Corp. v. . . .

FOSTER, v. E G G FLORIDA, INC., 795 So. 2d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . disability benefits and denial of indemnity benefits has caused extreme hardship as contemplated by Section 440.25 . . . Since the Claimant proceeded under § 440.25(4)(h), Florida Statutes, rather than a merit hearing and . . . Taylor, 786 So.2d 1207, 1208 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (Benton, J., concurring) (“As written, section 440.25 . . . With this in mind, section 440.20(6) should be construed in pari materia with section 440.25(4)(h), Florida . . . Section 440.25(4)(h) provides: Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the judge of compensation . . .

SMURFIT- STONE CONTAINER CORP. RSKCO, v. TAYLOR,, 786 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . As written, section 440.25, Florida Statutes (1997), contemplates compliance with sections 440.191 (requiring . . . Section 440.25(4)(h) does not in terms confer jurisdiction on the judge of compensation claims where . . . The reference to "this section" is to section 440.25, which pertains to "[pjrocedures for mediation and . . . Section 440.25 begins: "Within 21 days after a petition for benefits is filed under s. 440.192.” . . . An order granting motion for emergency medical care under 440.25(4)(h) was entered on December 13, 1999 . . . purposes of this case, that Appellee’s filing of'his Motion for Emergency Conference, pursuant to section 440.25 . . .

MARTINOLICH, v. GOLDEN LEAF MANAGEMENT, INC., 786 So. 2d 613 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Martinolich in retaliation for exercising his rights under Florida Worker’s Compensation Law, section 440.25 . . .

W W LUMBER OF PALM BEACH, v. MARRERO,, 780 So. 2d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . of a motion for rehearing may not be practicable before the order becomes final [pursuant to section 440.25 . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE, 795 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 2000)

. . . This rule is amended to comply with section 440.25(4)(j), Florida Statutes (1999), to indicate that claims . . . The changes were made to make rule 4.105 consistent with section 440.25(4)(j), Florida Statutes. . . . This rule codifies the procedure for mandatory mediation required by section 440.25, Florida Statutes . . . NOTICE OF MEDIATION CONFERENCE AND ORDER In accordance with section 440.25(1), Florida Statutes, 1994 . . . Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes, mandates a pretrial hearing in all cases.] . . .

U. S. SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY a k a U. S. v. M. CIMINO,, 754 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 2000)

. . . Section 440.25(7), Florida Statutes (1997), provides: (7) An injured employee claiming or entitled to . . .

M. MUSIC J. a v. L. HEBB, Jr. L. Sr. M. J. a v. L. Jr. L. Sr., 744 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Although impairment rating evidence is specifically permitted in workers’ compensation actions, see § 440.25 . . .

ITT HARTFORD, a v. A. CLEARY,, 737 So. 2d 567 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction because section 440.25 . . .

VISTA MANOR NURSING HOME Co. v. ESTEPP,, 740 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . attempting to appeal a workers’ compensation order entered after an emergency conference under section 440.25 . . .

McCLUNG- GAGNE, v. HARBOUR CITY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD, INC., 721 So. 2d 799 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . . § 440.25(1), Fla. Stat. (1991); Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. Rich, 220 So.2d 369, 371 (Fla.1969). . . .

H. GASSNER, v. BECHTEL CONSTRUCTION, 702 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . to the exclusion of the mediation, pretrial and hearing and review processes contained in Sections 440.25 . . . dispute resolution system to displace “pretrial and hearing and review processes contained in Sections 440.25 . . . the alternative dispute resolution system the agreement established was intended to supplant sections 440.25 . . .

PALM SPRINGS GENERAL HOSPITAL SIF, v. CABRERA,, 698 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . On the other hand, sections 440.13(9)(c) and 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes (1995), contemplate resort . . . or testimony of the expert medical advisor shall be made a part of the record of the proceeding. § 440.25 . . .

RUSSELL CORPORATION GAB v. A. BROOKS,, 698 So. 2d 1334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . § 440.25(1), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1994). . . . . § 440.25(4), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

CRIMS PCA SOLUTIONS v. COLLIER,, 700 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . (Fla.1996); and the order under review in case No. 96-4506 awarded psychiatric care after a section 440.25 . . .

OWENS- ILLINOIS v. DeLOACH,, 686 So. 2d 1387 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . employer/carrier (e/c) appeal an order entered after an emergency hearing held pursuant to section 440.25 . . . and assert that the order should be reversed because the claimant failed to expressly cite section 440.25 . . . conference did not adequately inform the e/c that the hearing was being requested pursuant to section 440.25 . . . Section 440.25(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1995), requires that an “order making an award ... shall set . . .

LOWES v. JOHNSON,, 681 So. 2d 919 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Appellants seek review of an order awarding medical care pursuant to section 440.25(4)(h), Florida Statutes . . .

BREWER COMPANY OF FLORIDA AGC v. MILIAN,, 681 So. 2d 872 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . See § 440.25(4)(e), Fla.Stat. (1995); Fla.R.Work. Comp.P. 4.080(c). REVERSED and REMANDED. . . .

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ESCAMBIA COUNTY, v. COOPER,, 686 So. 2d 613 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . .” § 440.25(4)(e), Fla. Stat. (1995). The pertinent rule adds nothing to this requirement. Fla. R. . . .

DAYCO PRODUCTS v. L. RUE,, 676 So. 2d 58 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . granted relief under the emergency conference provision of the 1994 Workers’ Compensation Act, Section 440.25 . . . This conference, under the statute, must be held within twenty-one (21) days after the petition. § 440.25 . . . hold a pretrial hearing, establish a discovery schedule, and ultimately to conduct a final hearing. § 440.25 . . . Section 440.25(4)(h), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), the section under review today, provides: Notwithstanding . . . The scope of the conference convened pursuant to section 440.25(4)(h) is limited by the emergency situation . . . affirm the judge’s order finding the circumstances in this case constitute an emergency under section 440.25 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE, 674 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 1996)

. . . Venue shall be governed by section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes. (b) Consolidated Petitions. . . . It, too, is derived-sufestantially from section 440.25(3)(a), Flor-ida Statutes — (4979). . . . NOTICE OF MEDIATION CONFERENCE AND ORDER In accordance with section 440.25(1), Florida Statutes, 1994 . . . Section 440.25(3-)(-b)2(4)(a), Florida Statutes, mandates a pretrial hearing in all cases.] . . . APPLICATION FOR EXPEDITED HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 440.25(4)(i), FLORIDA STATUTES The (claimant) ( . . .

GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE COMPANY v. McCARTNEY M. C., 672 So. 2d 636 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . because they did not receive notice of the final hearing directly from the JCC in accordance with section 440.25 . . .

BRADLEY, v. HURRICANE RESTAURANT, 670 So. 2d 162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . On the same date, claimant filed a motion for emergency conference and relief pursuant to section 440.25 . . .

MILLINGER, v. BROWARD COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH DIVISION AND RISK MANAGEMENT,, 672 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 1996)

. . . .' §§ 440.25 and 440.45, Florida Statutes (1975). . . . Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), provides that a JCC's order shall become final 30 days . . . amend orders is expressly limited to those orders which are "not yet final by operation of section 440.25 . . .

FRANK, v. CRAWFORD COMPANY,, 670 So. 2d 117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Compensation Claims providing for emergency relief in the form of temporary benefits under section 440.25 . . . Frank’s motion was heard, with the judge relying on section 440.25(4)(h) as authority for the emergency . . . We agree, however, with the first district which held that an order entered under section 440.25(h) is . . .

DIESTEL, v. WINFREY PLUMBING, INC., 668 So. 2d 283 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . emergency that would have enabled the judge to require the appearance of the parties pursuant to section 440.25 . . .

KARELL, v. MIAMI AIRPORT HILTON MIAMI HILTON CORPORATION,, 668 So. 2d 227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . authority can be implied from several statutory provisions as follows: sections 440.30; 440.33(1); 440.25 . . . Section 440.25 contains detailed provisions for mediation and final hearings after the filing of a petition . . . We note that under section 440.25(1), Florida Statutes (1994), the JCC or the division may order an injured . . .

HERRERA, v. HOJO INN MAINGATE, 680 So. 2d 439 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . .” § 440.25(3)(e), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .