Florida Statute 440.25 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXI
LABOR

Chapter 440
WORKERS' COMPENSATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 440.25

440.25 Procedures for mediation and hearings.—

(1) Forty days after a petition for benefits is filed under s. 440.192, the judge of compensation claims shall notify the interested parties by order that a mediation conference concerning such petition has been scheduled unless the parties have notified the judge of compensation claims that a private mediation has been held or is scheduled to be held. A mediation, whether private or public, shall be held within 130 days after the filing of the petition. Such order must give the date the mediation conference is to be held. Such order may be served personally upon the interested parties or may be sent to the interested parties by mail or by electronic means approved by the Deputy Chief Judge. If multiple petitions are pending, or if additional petitions are filed after the scheduling of a mediation, the judge of compensation claims shall consolidate all petitions into one mediation. The claimant or the adjuster of the employer or carrier may, at the mediator’s discretion, attend the mediation conference by telephone or, if agreed to by the parties, other electronic means. A continuance may be granted upon the agreement of the parties or if the requesting party demonstrates to the judge of compensation claims that the reason for requesting the continuance arises from circumstances beyond the party’s control. Any order granting a continuance must set forth the date of the rescheduled mediation conference. A mediation conference may not be used solely for the purpose of mediating attorney’s fees.

(2) Any party who participates in a mediation conference shall not be precluded from requesting a hearing following the mediation conference should both parties not agree to be bound by the results of the mediation conference. A mediation conference is required to be held unless this requirement is waived by the Deputy Chief Judge.

(3) Such mediation conference shall be conducted informally and does not require the use of formal rules of evidence or procedure. Any information from the files, reports, case summaries, mediator’s notes, or other communications or materials, oral or written, relating to a mediation conference under this section obtained by any person performing mediation duties is privileged and confidential and may not be disclosed without the written consent of all parties to the conference. Any research or evaluation effort directed at assessing the mediation program activities or performance must protect the confidentiality of such information. Each party to a mediation conference has a privilege during and after the conference to refuse to disclose and to prevent another from disclosing communications made during the conference whether or not the contested issues are successfully resolved. This subsection and paragraphs (4)(a) and (b) shall not be construed to prevent or inhibit the discovery or admissibility of any information that is otherwise subject to discovery or that is admissible under applicable law or rule of procedure, except that any conduct or statements made during a mediation conference or in negotiations concerning the conference are inadmissible in any proceeding under this chapter.

(a) Unless the parties conduct a private mediation under paragraph (b), mediation shall be conducted by a mediator selected by the Director of the Division of Administrative Hearings from among mediators employed on a full-time basis by the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims. A mediator must be a member of The Florida Bar for at least 5 years and must complete a mediation training program approved by the Deputy Chief Judge. Adjunct mediators may be employed by the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims on an as-needed basis and shall be selected from a list prepared by the Director of the Division of Administrative Hearings. An adjunct mediator must be independent of all parties participating in the mediation conference. An adjunct mediator must be a member of The Florida Bar for at least 5 years and must complete a mediation training program approved by the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims. An adjunct mediator shall have access to the office, equipment, and supplies of the judge of compensation claims in each district.

(b) With respect to any private mediation, if the parties agree or if mediators are not available under paragraph (a), pursuant to notice from the judge of compensation claims, to conduct the required mediation within the period specified in this section, the parties shall hold a mediation conference at the carrier’s expense within the 130-day period set for mediation. The mediation conference shall be conducted by a mediator certified under s. 44.106. If the parties do not agree upon a mediator within 10 days after the date of the order, the claimant shall notify the judge in writing and the judge shall appoint a mediator under this paragraph within 7 days. In the event both parties agree, the results of the mediation conference shall be binding and neither party shall have a right to appeal the results. In the event either party refuses to agree to the results of the mediation conference, the results of the mediation conference as well as the testimony, witnesses, and evidence presented at the conference shall not be admissible at any subsequent proceeding on the claim. The mediator shall not be called in to testify or give deposition to resolve any claim for any hearing before the judge of compensation claims. The employer may be represented by an attorney at the mediation conference if the employee is also represented by an attorney at the mediation conference.

(4)(a) If the parties fail to agree to written submission of pretrial stipulations, the judge of compensation claims shall conduct a live pretrial hearing. The judge of compensation claims shall give the interested parties at least 14 days’ advance notice of the pretrial hearing by mail or by electronic means approved by the Deputy Chief Judge.

(b) The final hearing must be held and concluded within 90 days after the mediation conference is held, allowing the parties sufficient time to complete discovery. Except as set forth in this section, continuances may be granted only if the requesting party demonstrates to the judge of compensation claims that the reason for requesting the continuance arises from circumstances beyond the party’s control. The written consent of the claimant must be obtained before any request from a claimant’s attorney is granted for an additional continuance after the initial continuance has been granted. Any order granting a continuance must set forth the date and time of the rescheduled hearing. A continuance may be granted only if the requesting party demonstrates to the judge of compensation claims that the reason for requesting the continuance arises from circumstances beyond the control of the parties. The judge of compensation claims shall report any grant of two or more continuances to the Deputy Chief Judge.

(c) The judge of compensation claims shall give the interested parties at least 14 days’ advance notice of the final hearing, served upon the interested parties by mail or by electronic means approved by the Deputy Chief Judge.

(d) The final hearing shall be held within 210 days after receipt of the petition for benefits in the county where the injury occurred, if the injury occurred in this state, unless otherwise agreed to between the parties and authorized by the judge of compensation claims in the county where the injury occurred. However, the claimant may waive the timeframes within this section for good cause shown. If the injury occurred outside the state and is one for which compensation is payable under this chapter, then the final hearing may be held in the county of the employer’s residence or place of business, or in any other county of the state that will, in the discretion of the Deputy Chief Judge, be the most convenient for a hearing. The final hearing shall be conducted by a judge of compensation claims, who shall, within 30 days after final hearing or closure of the hearing record, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, enter a final order on the merits of the disputed issues. The judge of compensation claims may enter an abbreviated final order in cases in which compensability is not disputed. Either party may request separate findings of fact and conclusions of law. At the final hearing, the claimant and employer may each present evidence with respect to the claims presented by the petition for benefits and may be represented by any attorney authorized in writing for such purpose. When there is a conflict in the medical evidence submitted at the hearing, the provisions of s. 440.13 shall apply. The report or testimony of the expert medical advisor shall be admitted into evidence in a proceeding and all costs incurred in connection with such examination and testimony may be assessed as costs in the proceeding, subject to the provisions of s. 440.13. No judge of compensation claims may make a finding of a degree of permanent impairment that is greater than the greatest permanent impairment rating given the claimant by any examining or treating physician, except upon stipulation of the parties. Any benefit due but not raised at the final hearing which was ripe, due, or owing at the time of the final hearing is waived.

(e) The order making an award or rejecting the claim, referred to in this chapter as a “compensation order,” shall set forth the findings of ultimate facts and the mandate; and the order need not include any other reason or justification for such mandate. The compensation order shall be filed in the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims at Tallahassee. A copy of such compensation order shall be sent by mail or by electronic means approved by the Deputy Chief Judge to the attorneys of record and any parties not represented by an attorney at the last known address of each, with the date of mailing noted thereon.

(f) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the judge of compensation claims may require the appearance of the parties and counsel before her or him without written notice for an emergency conference where there is a bona fide emergency involving the health, safety, or welfare of an employee. An emergency conference under this section may result in the entry of an order or the rendering of an adjudication by the judge of compensation claims.

(g) To expedite dispute resolution and to enhance the self-executing features of the Workers’ Compensation Law, the Deputy Chief Judge shall make provision by rule or order for the resolution of appropriate motions by judges of compensation claims without oral hearing upon submission of brief written statements in support and opposition, and for expedited discovery and docketing. Unless the judge of compensation claims, for good cause, orders a hearing under paragraph (h), each claim in a petition relating to the determination of the average weekly wage under s. 440.14 shall be resolved under this paragraph without oral hearing.

(h) To further expedite dispute resolution and to enhance the self-executing features of the system, those petitions filed in accordance with s. 440.192 that involve a claim for benefits of $5,000 or less shall, in the absence of compelling evidence to the contrary, be presumed to be appropriate for expedited resolution under this paragraph; and any other claim filed in accordance with s. 440.192, upon the written agreement of both parties and application by either party, may similarly be resolved under this paragraph. A claim in a petition of $5,000 or less for medical benefits only or a petition for reimbursement for mileage for medical purposes shall, in the absence of compelling evidence to the contrary, be resolved through the expedited dispute resolution process provided in this paragraph. For purposes of expedited resolution pursuant to this paragraph, the Deputy Chief Judge shall make provision by rule or order for expedited and limited discovery and expedited docketing in such cases. At least 15 days prior to hearing, the parties shall exchange and file with the judge of compensation claims a pretrial outline of all issues, defenses, and witnesses on a form adopted by the Deputy Chief Judge; provided, in no event shall such hearing be held without 15 days’ written notice to all parties. No pretrial hearing shall be held and no mediation scheduled unless requested by a party. The judge of compensation claims shall limit all argument and presentation of evidence at the hearing to a maximum of 30 minutes, and such hearings shall not exceed 30 minutes in length. Neither party shall be required to be represented by counsel. The employer or carrier may be represented by an adjuster or other qualified representative. The employer or carrier and any witness may appear at such hearing by telephone. The rules of evidence shall be liberally construed in favor of allowing introduction of evidence.

(i) A judge of compensation claims may, upon the motion of a party or the judge’s own motion, dismiss a petition for lack of prosecution if a petition, response, motion, order, request for hearing, or notice of deposition has not been filed during the previous 12 months unless good cause is shown. A dismissal for lack of prosecution is without prejudice and does not require a hearing.

(j) A judge of compensation claims may not award interest on unpaid medical bills and the amount of such bills may not be used to calculate the amount of interest awarded. Regardless of the date benefits were initially requested, attorney’s fees do not attach under this subsection until 30 days after the date the carrier or self-insured employer receives the petition.

(5)(a) Procedures with respect to appeals from orders of judges of compensation claims shall be governed by rules adopted by the Supreme Court. Such an order shall become final 30 days after mailing of copies of such order to the parties, unless appealed pursuant to such rules.

(b) An appellant may be relieved of any necessary filing fee by filing a verified petition of indigency for approval as provided in s. 57.081(1) and may be relieved in whole or in part from the costs for preparation of the record on appeal if, within 15 days after the date notice of the estimated costs for the preparation is served, the appellant files with the judge of compensation claims a copy of the designation of the record on appeal, and a verified petition to be relieved of costs. A verified petition filed prior to the date of service of the notice of the estimated costs shall be deemed not timely filed. The verified petition relating to record costs shall contain a sworn statement that the appellant is insolvent and a complete, detailed, and sworn financial affidavit showing all the appellant’s assets, liabilities, and income. Failure to state in the affidavit all assets and income, including marital assets and income, shall be grounds for denying the petition with prejudice. The Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims shall adopt rules as may be required pursuant to this subsection, including forms for use in all petitions brought under this subsection. The appellant’s attorney, or the appellant if she or he is not represented by an attorney, shall include as a part of the verified petition relating to record costs an affidavit or affirmation that, in her or his opinion, the notice of appeal was filed in good faith and that there is a probable basis for the District Court of Appeal, First District, to find reversible error, and shall state with particularity the specific legal and factual grounds for the opinion. Failure to so affirm shall be grounds for denying the petition. A copy of the verified petition relating to record costs shall be served upon all interested parties. The judge of compensation claims shall promptly conduct a hearing on the verified petition relating to record costs, giving at least 15 days’ notice to the appellant, the department, and all other interested parties, all of whom shall be parties to the proceedings. The judge of compensation claims may enter an order without such hearing if no objection is filed by an interested party within 20 days from the service date of the verified petition relating to record costs. Such proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of this section and with the workers’ compensation rules of procedure, to the extent applicable. In the event an insolvency petition is granted, the judge of compensation claims shall direct the department to pay record costs and filing fees from the Workers’ Compensation Administration Trust Fund pending final disposition of the costs of appeal. The department may transcribe or arrange for the transcription of the record in any proceeding for which it is ordered to pay the cost of the record.

(c) As a condition of filing a notice of appeal to the District Court of Appeal, First District, an employer who has not secured the payment of compensation under this chapter in compliance with s. 440.38 shall file with the notice of appeal a good and sufficient bond, as provided in s. 59.13, conditioned to pay the amount of the demand and any interest and costs payable under the terms of the order if the appeal is dismissed, or if the District Court of Appeal, First District, affirms the award in any amount. Upon the failure of such employer to file such bond with the District Court of Appeal, First District, along with the notice of appeal, the District Court of Appeal, First District, shall dismiss the notice of appeal.

(6) An award of compensation for disability may be made after the death of an injured employee.

(7) Any interested party shall have the right in any case of death to require an autopsy, the cost thereof to be borne by the party requesting it; and the judge of compensation claims shall have authority to order and require an autopsy and may, in her or his discretion, withhold her or his findings and award until an autopsy is held.

History.—s. 25, ch. 17481, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 5966(25); s. 11, ch. 18413, 1937; s. 7, ch. 20672, 1941; s. 3, ch. 22814, 1945; s. 1, ch. 26967, 1951; s. 8, ch. 28241, 1953; s. 6, ch. 29778, 1955; s. 1, ch. 57-270; s. 2, ch. 59-100; s. 2, ch. 59-142; s. 2, ch. 65-120; s. 1, ch. 65-119; s. 1, ch. 67-374; s. 2, ch. 67-554; ss. 17, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 120, ch. 71-355; s. 1, ch. 74-48; s. 15, ch. 74-197; s. 12, ch. 75-209; ss. 6, 8, ch. 77-290; ss. 8, 23, ch. 78-300; s. 17, ch. 79-7; ss. 19, 124, ch. 79-40; ss. 14, 21, ch. 79-312; s. 180, ch. 79-400; s. 9, ch. 80-236; s. 7, ch. 81-119; s. 9, ch. 83-305; ss. 17, 43, ch. 89-289; ss. 25, 56, ch. 90-201; ss. 23, 52, ch. 91-1; s. 31, ch. 91-46; s. 1, ch. 91-47; s. 30, ch. 93-415; s. 118, ch. 97-103; s. 95, ch. 2000-153; s. 19, ch. 2001-91; s. 37, ch. 2002-194; s. 12, ch. 2002-236; s. 25, ch. 2003-412; s. 63, ch. 2004-5; s. 4, ch. 2011-208.

F.S. 440.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 440.25 on CourtListener

Amendments to 440.25

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 440.25

Total Results: 343

Smith v. Piezo Technology & Prof. Adm'rs

427 So. 2d 182

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1983 | Docket: 2518061

Cited 107 times | Published

adjudication of claims for compensation and benefits. § 440.25(1), Fla. Stat. (1979); Fireman's Fund Insurance

US Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

55 So. 2d 741, 1951 Fla. LEXIS 980

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1951 | Docket: 419081

Cited 78 times | Published

commissioner * * *." (Italics supplied.) *744 Section 440.25, supra, as amended, in addition to providing

Sasso v. Ram Property Management

431 So. 2d 204

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1983 | Docket: 456088

Cited 40 times | Published

appealable order became final, as required by Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes. The E/C argues that

Ball v. Mann

75 So. 2d 758

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1954 | Docket: 474912

Cited 35 times | Published

Commissioner has a duty to make findings of fact. Section 440.25 (3) (b), F.S. 1951, F.S.A. Mere recitals of

Scholastic Systems, Inc. v. Leloup

307 So. 2d 166

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1974 | Docket: 1335301

Cited 34 times | Published

§§ 440.25(4)(d) and 440.27. In relevant part, § 440.25(4)(d) provides: "The order of the commission shall

Palm Springs General Hosp. v. Cabrera

698 So. 2d 1352, 1997 WL 570467

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1997 | Docket: 434007

Cited 33 times | Published

be made a part of the record of the proceeding. § 440.25(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (1995). The statute imposes

Sunland Hospital/State of Fla. v. Garrett

415 So. 2d 783

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1982 | Docket: 459133

Cited 31 times | Published

correct within the time available for correction. Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1981); Genuine Parts

Hardy v. City of Tarpon Springs

81 So. 2d 503

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1955 | Docket: 1283762

Cited 22 times | Published

to the questions at issue." (Italics added.) Section 440.25(3)(c), F.S. 1953, F.S.A. These findings of

Acosta Roofing Co. v. Gillyard

402 So. 2d 1321

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1981 | Docket: 1691586

Cited 21 times | Published

during the 20 day period before it became final. Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1979). Claimant concedes

St. Moritz Hotel v. Daughtry

249 So. 2d 27

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1971 | Docket: 1398545

Cited 21 times | Published

Commission's thinking in this regard. Although Fla. Stat. § 440.25(4) (d), F.S.A., requires only that the Commission

FLA. INDUSTRIAL COM'N EX REL. SPECIAL DISABILITY FUND v. Nat. Trucking Co.

107 So. 2d 397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1958 | Docket: 1335997

Cited 21 times | Published

to review its orders entered pursuant to F.S. § 440.25, F.S.A., and, therefore, cannot be the petitioner

Pierce v. Piper Aircraft Corporation

279 So. 2d 281, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 5121

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1973 | Docket: 425714

Cited 20 times | Published

Commissioner has a duty to make findings of fact. Section 440.25(3)(b), F.S. 1951, F.S.A. Mere recitals of the

Pierce v. Piper Aircraft Corporation

279 So. 2d 281, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 5121

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1973 | Docket: 425714

Cited 20 times | Published

Commissioner has a duty to make findings of fact. Section 440.25(3)(b), F.S. 1951, F.S.A. Mere recitals of the

Magic City Bottle & Supply Company v. Robinson

116 So. 2d 240

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1959 | Docket: 1486399

Cited 19 times | Published

proportionate loss or loss of use of the member." Section 440.25(3) (c), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., requires

Vargas v. Americana of Bal Harbour

345 So. 2d 1052, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4520

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 1976 | Docket: 1477930

Cited 18 times | Published

industrial claims the primary duty of finding facts. Section 440.25(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1975), requires those

Chavarria v. Selugal Clothing, Inc.

840 So. 2d 1071, 2003 WL 215030

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2003 | Docket: 1748393

Cited 17 times | Published

Commissioner has a duty to make findings of fact. Section 440.25(3)(b), F.S.1951, F.S.A. Mere recitals of the

Barrs v. Barrs

505 So. 2d 602, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1001

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1987 | Docket: 1500521

Cited 16 times | Published

NOTES [1] § 120.59(2), Fla. Stat. (1985). [2] § 440.25(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1985); Vargas v. Americana

ESCAMBIA CTY. COUNCIL v. Goldsmith

500 So. 2d 626, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 56

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1986 | Docket: 1295049

Cited 16 times | Published

earning at the time of the industrial accident. Section 440.25(3)(b) specifies that "[n]o deputy commissioner

US SEC. Ins. Co. v. Cimino

754 So. 2d 697, 2000 WL 263418

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2000 | Docket: 431254

Cited 15 times | Published

requested examination is in controversy. [3] Section 440.25(7), Florida Statutes (1997), provides: (7)

US SEC. Ins. Co. v. Cimino

754 So. 2d 697, 2000 WL 263418

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2000 | Docket: 431254

Cited 15 times | Published

requested examination is in controversy. [3] Section 440.25(7), Florida Statutes (1997), provides: (7)

HS Camp & Sons v. Flynn

450 So. 2d 577

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1984 | Docket: 1433900

Cited 15 times | Published

disability language, supra, have removed from § 440.25(3)(c) the former mandate (originally imposed by

Crews v. Town of Bay Harbor Islands

378 So. 2d 1265

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1979 | Docket: 1795626

Cited 15 times | Published

Marshall, 106 So.2d 212, (Fla. 1st DCA 1958); § 440.25(3)(b), Fla. Stat.; § 440.45(3)(j), Fla. Stat.

Wilson v. McCoy Mfg. Co.

69 So. 2d 659, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1209

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1954 | Docket: 464319

Cited 15 times | Published

Florida Industrial Commission entered pursuant to Section 440.25, Florida Statutes 1951, as amended by Section

Millinger v. BROWARD CO. MENTAL HEALTH DIV.

672 So. 2d 24, 1996 WL 108532

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1996 | Docket: 1764148

Cited 14 times | Published

SHAW, J., concurs in result only. NOTES [1] Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), provides that

Power v. Joseph G. Moretti, Inc.

120 So. 2d 443

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1960 | Docket: 1286911

Cited 14 times | Published

deputies become final within the time provided by Section 440.25, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. *446 It is not here

Airey v. WAL-MART/SEDGWICK

24 So. 3d 1264, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20527, 2009 WL 5151631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2009 | Docket: 1443361

Cited 13 times | Published

long, the proper procedure would be to invoke section 440.25(4)(i), Florida Statutes (2008). That provision

Russell Corp. v. Brooks

698 So. 2d 1334, 1997 WL 564204

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1997 | Docket: 1524276

Cited 13 times | Published

not when or whether a notice of denial is filed. § 440.25(1), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1994). If mediation does

Southern Bakeries v. Cooper

659 So. 2d 339, 1995 WL 155374

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1995 | Docket: 1462852

Cited 13 times | Published

related charges as costs in the proceeding. Section 440.25(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (1991). The judge could also

Hunt v. INTERN. MINERALS AND CHEMICAL CORP.

410 So. 2d 640, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19389

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1982 | Docket: 81462

Cited 13 times | Published

only the matured issues. (See in this regard F.S. 440.25 and existing Workers' Compensation Rule of Procedure

Andrews v. Strecker Body Builders

92 So. 2d 521

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1957 | Docket: 1389954

Cited 13 times | Published

that the petitioner's contention is sound. Section 440.25(3) (c), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., requires

Aguilera v. Inservices, Inc.

905 So. 2d 84, 2005 WL 1403993

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2005 | Docket: 2104286

Cited 12 times | Published

to abuses such as these would find relief in section 440.25(4)(h) of the Florida Statutes (2000), see dissenting

Allman v. Meredith Corp.

451 So. 2d 957

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1984 | Docket: 1741127

Cited 12 times | Published

correct within the time available for correction. Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1981); Genuine Parts

Bradley v. Hurricane Restaurant

652 So. 2d 443, 1995 WL 113413

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1995 | Docket: 476174

Cited 11 times | Published

the existing workers' compensation scheme. Section 440.25, entitled "Procedures for mediation and hearings

SQUARE G. CONST. CO. v. Grace

412 So. 2d 397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1982 | Docket: 528652

Cited 11 times | Published

ratings to the degree found by any physician, § 440.25(3)(b). The specificity of such prescriptions suggests

Brown v. Griffin

229 So. 2d 225

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1969 | Docket: 430180

Cited 11 times | Published

67-374, Laws of Florida 1967, which amended Section 440.25(3) (c), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. insofar as

AB Taff & Sons v. Clark

110 So. 2d 428

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1959 | Docket: 1409930

Cited 11 times | Published

"claim" and the clear legislative intent of Section 440.25(2) which provides: "Within ten days after such

Hanna v. INDUSTRIAL LABOR SERV. INC.

636 So. 2d 773, 1994 WL 122354

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1994 | Docket: 1715171

Cited 10 times | Published

findings of ultimate facts in accordance with section 440.25(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1989). Commonwealth

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Sitko

496 So. 2d 920, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1986 | Docket: 427938

Cited 10 times | Published

jurisdiction to resolve this dispute under section 440.25(1), Florida Statutes, and that the deputy correctly

Amos v. Gartner, Inc.

17 So. 3d 829, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12742, 2009 WL 2602304

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2009 | Docket: 1645336

Cited 9 times | Published

the EMA shall be admitted into evidence, see section 440.25(4)(e), Florida *832 Statutes (2004), and the

John Caves Land Development Company v. Suggs

352 So. 2d 44, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3903

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1977 | Docket: 1704455

Cited 9 times | Published

Lakes Nat'l Bank, 322 So.2d 507 (Fla. 1975). [2] § 440.25(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1975). The Commission did not

Brantley v. ADH Building Contractors, Inc.

215 So. 2d 297

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1968 | Docket: 1312413

Cited 9 times | Published

on that date. For purposes of appeal under Fla. Stat. 440.25(4) (1959), F.S.A., such an order becomes final

Phoenix Assurance Company of New York v. Merritt

160 So. 2d 552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1963 | Docket: 1457501

Cited 9 times | Published

prosecuted by the carrier, pursuant to the provision of § 440.25, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. Instead, it complied with

Wheeled Coach Industries, Inc. v. Annulis

852 So. 2d 430, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12560, 2003 WL 21990527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2003 | Docket: 1305790

Cited 8 times | Published

or a final compensation order, as defined in section 440.25(4)(e). The undisputed facts are that Annulis

Lamounette v. Akins

547 So. 2d 1001, 1989 WL 90493

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1989 | Docket: 1474497

Cited 8 times | Published

grant of powers to the deputies contained in section 440.25(1), Florida Statutes, might justify Deputy

EDGEWOOD BOYS'RANCH FOUNDATION v. Robinson

451 So. 2d 532

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1984 | Docket: 1483145

Cited 8 times | Published

period before the order became final pursuant to Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1983). Chain Stores

Deinema v. Pierpoint Condominiums

415 So. 2d 811

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1982 | Docket: 459156

Cited 8 times | Published

That procedure is expressly authorized by Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1979),[3] on those

Piezo Technology v. Smith

413 So. 2d 121

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1982 | Docket: 1344353

Cited 8 times | Published

hear this cause pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 440.205, § 440.25, and § 440.45," and (3) that a prior order denying

Scottie-Craft Boat Corporation v. Smith

336 So. 2d 1150

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1976 | Docket: 1379366

Cited 8 times | Published

entered within the thirty-day period specified in Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes. Claimant was injured

Maryland Casualty Company v. Marshall

106 So. 2d 212

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1958 | Docket: 1331921

Cited 8 times | Published

Orders of the full commission entered pursuant to § 440.25 of this chapter shall be subject to review only

Blount v. State Road Dept.

87 So. 2d 507

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1956 | Docket: 1761474

Cited 8 times | Published

to the rules laid down by the Legislature in Section 440.25(3) (c) and this Court in the cited cases. The

Jellison v. DIXIE SOUTHERN INDUS., INC.

857 So. 2d 365, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16034, 2003 WL 22415329

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2003 | Docket: 1735622

Cited 7 times | Published

order or the procedures utilized by the JCC. Section 440.25, Florida Statutes, clearly contemplates that

Sanz v. Eden Roc Hotel

140 So. 2d 104

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1962 | Docket: 1522678

Cited 7 times | Published

blanket authority is given to the commission under § 440.25(1) in the following words: "* * * the commission

Frix v. Beck

104 So. 2d 81

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1958 | Docket: 1312905

Cited 7 times | Published

Florida Industrial Commission; and "Whereas, Section 440.25(4) (a), F.S.A., requires that the said George

Fort Pierce Growers Association v. Storey

21 So. 2d 451, 155 Fla. 769, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 650

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1945 | Docket: 3271690

Cited 7 times | Published

for furtherproceedings." (Italics furnished.) Section 440.25 (4), Florida Statutes, 1941, and F.S.A. They

Martinolich v. Golden Leaf Management, Inc.

786 So. 2d 613, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5548, 2001 WL 417277

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2001 | Docket: 1681989

Cited 6 times | Published

rights under Florida Worker's Compensation Law, section 440.25, Florida Statutes, (1995), and also in violation

Town of Jupiter v. Andreff

656 So. 2d 1374, 1995 WL 410683

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1995 | Docket: 1283503

Cited 6 times | Published

time, that the matter be heard pursuant to section 440.25(4)(h), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1994),[1] as

Berry Corp. v. Smith

576 So. 2d 1366, 1991 WL 46859

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1991 | Docket: 1669766

Cited 6 times | Published

expense of the independent medical examination. § 440.25(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987).[2]Sanlando Reprographics

B & J WINDOWS v. Sweitzer

420 So. 2d 363

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1982 | Docket: 1711422

Cited 6 times | Published

were mailed to the parties as provided for by section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1979). The issue not

DADE AMERICAN HOSP. SUPPLY v. Perez

417 So. 2d 296

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1982 | Docket: 1383584

Cited 6 times | Published

thirty-day period before the order became final. Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1981); Acosta Roofing

Jones v. Plantation Foods

388 So. 2d 590

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1980 | Docket: 1520832

Cited 6 times | Published

because no issue was raised as to applicability of § 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes, as amended in 1978 to

Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. and Sedgwick CMS v. Sandra K. Beekman

187 So. 3d 318

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 2016 | Docket: 3041619

Cited 5 times | Published

is presumed to be correct.” Id. Section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes (2013), provides in

Lockheed Space Operations v. Pham

600 So. 2d 1261, 1992 WL 134745

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1992 | Docket: 538933

Cited 5 times | Published

for change of venue. The E/C argue that under section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1987),[3] the cause

Brown v. Pumpian

504 So. 2d 481, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 819

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1987 | Docket: 453515

Cited 5 times | Published

were not held within the 90 days prescribed by section 440.25(3)(a), Florida Statutes. They filed this petition

Threat v. Rogers

443 So. 2d 149

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1983 | Docket: 1458366

Cited 5 times | Published

in which this court found such authority in Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes. See also, Morgan Yacht

LeBruno Aluminum Co., Inc. v. Lane

436 So. 2d 1039, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20107

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1983 | Docket: 1339903

Cited 5 times | Published

became final to seek the error's correction. See § 440.25(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1979); Acosta Roofing Company

Plantation Const. Co. v. Ayers

385 So. 2d 1138

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1980 | Docket: 1700449

Cited 5 times | Published

any potential impact of the final sentence of § 440.25(3)(b), Fla. Stat., as amended by § 8, Chapter

Krajenta v. DIV., WKRS'COMPENSATION

376 So. 2d 1200

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1979 | Docket: 1411051

Cited 5 times | Published

Section 3.10 drew its rule-making authority from Section 440.25(1), Ch. 79-40, Laws of Florida,[3] and provides

Farrell v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co.

361 So. 2d 408

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1978 | Docket: 1288559

Cited 5 times | Published

a date beyond the time period prescribed by Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1975). Consequently

In Re Workmen's Compensation Rules of Procedure

343 So. 2d 1273, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3860

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1977 | Docket: 1710473

Cited 5 times | Published

Time. A motion shall, within the limitations of § 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes, and unless otherwise

In Re Florida Workmen's Compensation Rules of Pro.

285 So. 2d 601, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4246

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1973 | Docket: 1743841

Cited 5 times | Published

hearing concerning a claim, made pursuant to Section 440.25(3) (a), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., shall state

Mills v. Laris Painting Company

125 So. 2d 745, 1960 Fla. LEXIS 2068

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1960 | Docket: 1690206

Cited 5 times | Published

" This holding was based on the language of Section 440.25, F.S.A., which provides that the hearing on

Joseph Shannon v. Cheney Brothers Inc. & The Travelers

157 So. 3d 397, 2015 WL 404127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2015 | Docket: 2629734

Cited 4 times | Published

adjudicating jurisdiction, venue, or compensability. § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. Stat; Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(b)(1)

Munroe v. US Food Service

985 So. 2d 654, 2008 WL 2547298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2008 | Docket: 1252714

Cited 4 times | Published

accepts the offer does a contract arise."). Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (2006), provides, in

Valdes v. GALCO CONST.

883 So. 2d 359, 2004 WL 2169030

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2004 | Docket: 1369819

Cited 4 times | Published

order must also be rendered in a timely manner. § 440.25(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2003); Scottie-Craft Boat Corp

Johnson v. TERRY HUNT CONST. CO.

878 So. 2d 1282, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11704, 2004 WL 1773553

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2004 | Docket: 1353510

Cited 4 times | Published

order, which had become final by operation of section 440.25, Florida Statutes. We reverse, determining

Bradley v. Hurricane Restaurant

670 So. 2d 162, 1996 WL 127867

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1996 | Docket: 1246210

Cited 4 times | Published

emergency conference and relief pursuant to section 440.25(4), Florida Statutes (1994). In the motion

Diestel v. Winfrey Plumbing, Inc.

668 So. 2d 283, 1996 WL 69104

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1996 | Docket: 1686919

Cited 4 times | Published

require the appearance of the parties pursuant to section 440.25(4)(h), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). The Employer

Amend. to Fla. Rules of Workers'comp.

664 So. 2d 945, 1995 WL 656744

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1995 | Docket: 1655898

Cited 4 times | Published

14, 1977 W.C.R.P. It derives, in part, from section 440.25(4)(f), Florida Statutes (1979); and rules 9

Fritz v. Courtyard by Marriott

592 So. 2d 1167, 1992 WL 3693

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1992 | Docket: 1429376

Cited 4 times | Published

entered after the 30-day period prescribed in Section 440.25(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1989), was stale,

Ellerbee v. Concorde Roofing Co.

461 So. 2d 206

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1984 | Docket: 464465

Cited 4 times | Published

facts and conclusions of law in accord with section 440.25(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1983). The deputy

Odom v. Wekiva Concrete Products

443 So. 2d 331

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1983 | Docket: 1458541

Cited 4 times | Published

after the hearing contrary to the provisions of Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). The hearing

Butch's Concrete v. Henderson

414 So. 2d 652

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1982 | Docket: 1358334

Cited 4 times | Published

The permanent impairment rating provision of § 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1979),[2] for impairment

McDonnell Douglas v. Holliday

397 So. 2d 366

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1981 | Docket: 1356682

Cited 4 times | Published

due to an unrelated medical problem. However, Section 440.25(5), Florida Statutes provides that an award

University of Florida v. Green

395 So. 2d 258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1981 | Docket: 1317876

Cited 4 times | Published

1214, 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Fla.W.C.R.P. 14; § 440.25(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1977). The duty of the deputy

Central Oil Co. v. Campen

390 So. 2d 191

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1980 | Docket: 1503987

Cited 4 times | Published

with the costs to be borne by the appellants. Section 440.25(3)(b), Fla. Stat., is inapplicable, since there

Rollins v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co.

384 So. 2d 650, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4251

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1980 | Docket: 1678452

Cited 4 times | Published

Third Appellate District. § 35.04, Fla. Stat. [6] § 440.25(3)(b), Fla. Stat. This subsection provides for

Total Appliance Repairs v. Nelson

382 So. 2d 1333

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1980 | Docket: 301459

Cited 4 times | Published

determine all questions in respect to such claims." § 440.25(1), Florida Statutes. See Sardella v. Champion

Carillon Hotel v. Rodriguez

124 So. 2d 3

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1960 | Docket: 1415967

Cited 4 times | Published

THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 440.25, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. [2] St. Johns River

Loziane O. Moise v. Disney Pop Century Resort, and Walt Disney World etc.

244 So. 3d 403

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2018 | Docket: 6379292

Cited 3 times | Published

compensation case, we address the interplay between section 440.25(4)(i), Florida Statutes (2011), permitting

State of Florida Department of Corr. v. Andrew Junod

217 So. 3d 200, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5231

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2017 | Docket: 4685702

Cited 3 times | Published

. An EMA opinion is admissible as provided in § 440.25(4)(d), Fla. Stat., when there is

Black v. Tomoka State Park

106 So. 3d 973, 2013 WL 427146, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1684

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 2013 | Docket: 60228514

Cited 3 times | Published

lack of prosecution under the authority of section 440.25(4)(i), Florida Statutes. In both cases, a subsequent

Black v. Tomoka State Park

106 So. 3d 973, 2013 WL 427146, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1684

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 2013 | Docket: 60228514

Cited 3 times | Published

lack of prosecution under the authority of section 440.25(4)(i), Florida Statutes. In both cases, a subsequent

Hill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

988 So. 2d 1250, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 12909, 2008 WL 3978679

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2008 | Docket: 1385177

Cited 3 times | Published

the mediation confidentiality requirements of section 440.25(3), Florida Statutes (2004). Specifically,

At& T WIRELESS v. Frazier

871 So. 2d 939, 2004 WL 609298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2004 | Docket: 1300742

Cited 3 times | Published

provision and the time limit requirements of section 440.25, Florida Statutes (2002). Section 440.13(9)

Karell v. Miami Airport Hilton/Miami Hilton Corp.

668 So. 2d 227, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 547, 1996 WL 34057

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1996 | Docket: 1686942

Cited 3 times | Published

claims and the commencement of litigation." Section 440.25 contains detailed provisions for mediation

Kimmins Corp. v. Collier

664 So. 2d 299, 1995 WL 704259

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1995 | Docket: 1230320

Cited 3 times | Published

section 440.191 which would make it applicable to section 440.25 proceedings for mediation and hearings before

Sanlando Reprographics v. Vidimos

545 So. 2d 397, 1989 WL 61527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1989 | Docket: 1345557

Cited 3 times | Published

evaluation may be ordered by a deputy pursuant to section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes, in cases involving

Hunley v. AD Weiss Lithograph

489 So. 2d 1206, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1304

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1986 | Docket: 116049

Cited 3 times | Published

deputy's conclusion *1209 should be explained. Section 440.25(3)(c), Florida Statutes. This case is reversed

Bassett's Dairy v. Thomas

429 So. 2d 1356

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1983 | Docket: 1667631

Cited 3 times | Published

the procedure prescribed in respect of claims in § 440.25 and in accordance with such section, issue a new

Rappoport v. American Hospital

406 So. 2d 1244

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1981 | Docket: 450097

Cited 3 times | Published

held the 30 *1245 day period of Florida Statutes § 440.25(3)(b) to be directory only. In Scottie-Craft Boat

Burger King Corp. v. Stark

401 So. 2d 1173

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1981 | Docket: 1290052

Cited 3 times | Published

621 (Fla. 1959). In making this determination, § 440.25(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1978) lists numerous

Westberry v. Copeland Sausage Co.

389 So. 2d 1214

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1980 | Docket: 1282079

Cited 3 times | Published

determination of the claim or other ruling. See Section 440.25(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1977). The duty of

Miller v. Oolite Industries, Inc.

336 So. 2d 1152, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4480

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1976 | Docket: 1379100

Cited 3 times | Published

entered within the thirty-day period specified in Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes. Petitioner, claimant

John Gaul Construction Company v. Harbin

247 So. 2d 33

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1971 | Docket: 1461682

Cited 3 times | Published

not appear for a scheduled deposition. F.S. section 440.25(6), F.S.A., provides a claimant may be required

Wiedman v. Daryl Products Corporation

127 So. 2d 448

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1961 | Docket: 1347503

Cited 3 times | Published

excess of 30 per cent of the body as a whole. Section 440.25(4) (d), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., a part of

Sullivan v. Mayo

106 So. 2d 4

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1958 | Docket: 1331927

Cited 3 times | Published

issues and entering an order accordingly. F.S. § 440.25, F.S.A. *6 United States Casualty Co. v. Maryland

Laura Lewis v. Dollar Rent A Car and ESIS WC Claims

220 So. 3d 1246, 2017 WL 2491550, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8541

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2017 | Docket: 6071339

Cited 2 times | Published

FCE is equivalent to an IME in this case. Section 440.25(6), Florida Statutes (1987), provides that

Anne Marie Limith v. Lenox on the Lake dba FTMI Operator etc.

163 So. 3d 616

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2015 | Docket: 2650265

Cited 2 times | Published

dismiss for lack of prosecution. We agree; section 440.25(4)(i), Florida Statutes, the authority for

Banks v. Allegiant Security

122 So. 3d 983, 2013 WL 5584149, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16287

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2013 | Docket: 60234834

Cited 2 times | Published

requirements set forth in the procedural provisions of section 440.25, Florida Statutes (2012). Subsection 440.25(4)(d)

Snider v. MUMFORD, INC.

65 So. 3d 579, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10576, 2011 WL 2638165

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2011 | Docket: 2361927

Cited 2 times | Published

effect on the date of Claimant's accident, section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1981),[1] provided

University of Miami v. West

8 So. 3d 1193, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6549, 2009 WL 1035011

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2009 | Docket: 1176121

Cited 2 times | Published

of fact or conclusions of law, we reverse. Section 440.25(4)(e), Florida Statutes, requires the JCC only

Above All Drywall v. Shearer

651 So. 2d 195, 1995 WL 73560

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1995 | Docket: 1518243

Cited 2 times | Published

so that it may be clarified is derived from section 440.25(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1989), providing in

MacHin v. LUMBER TRANSPORT, INC.

556 So. 2d 446, 1989 WL 152146

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1990 | Docket: 2543712

Cited 2 times | Published

to comply with the mandatory provisions in section 440.25(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1987), we dismiss

POLK CTY. BD. OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS v. Patterson

433 So. 2d 1298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1983 | Docket: 1425163

Cited 2 times | Published

the order was mailed, before it became final. § 440.25(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1981); see, e.g., B & J Windows

Gunn's Quality Glass & Mirrors, Inc. v. Strode

425 So. 2d 73

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1982 | Docket: 1181883

Cited 2 times | Published

must consider the claim as timely filed under Section 440.25(1). We base our determination that entitlement

Reyes v. Johnstone

388 So. 2d 344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1980 | Docket: 103691

Cited 2 times | Published

Food Corp. v. Dovel, IRC Order 2-3035 (1976). Section 440.25(3)(a) Florida Statutes (1977) requires that

City of Hollywood v. Castora

380 So. 2d 1148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1980 | Docket: 1402686

Cited 2 times | Published

days after copies were mailed to the parties. Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1975). The Commission

In Re Fla. Wkrs.'compensation Rules, Etc.

374 So. 2d 981

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1979 | Docket: 1523329

Cited 2 times | Published

commissioners to the First District Court of Appeal (section 440.25(d)). In light of the short time span between

Keith v. City of Altamonte Springs

344 So. 2d 555

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1977 | Docket: 1517790

Cited 2 times | Published

conducted by judges of industrial claims pursuant to § 440.25. However, no judge of industrial claims shall

Schafer v. St. Anthony's Hospital

327 So. 2d 221, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4392

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1976 | Docket: 1309727

Cited 2 times | Published

supervisory function and judicial economy require. Section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1974). The order

Florida Industrial Commission ex rel. Special Disability Fund v. National Trucking Co.

107 So. 2d 397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1958 | Docket: 60191413

Cited 2 times | Published

to review its orders entered pursuant to F.S. § 440.25, F.S.A., and, therefore, cannot be the petitioner

Walker v. Telfair Stockton Co.

12 So. 2d 177, 152 Fla. 434, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 938

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1943 | Docket: 3266730

Cited 2 times | Published

Workmen's Compensation Act), Paragraph (4), Section 440.25, Florida Statutes, 1941. The notice of appeal

Miami Dade County School Board v. Smith

116 So. 3d 511, 2013 WL 2382471, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8766

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2013 | Docket: 60232373

Cited 1 times | Published

standard not used by the JCC here), and under section 440.25(4)(b), a continuance may be granted where the

Ake v. United States Sugar Corp.

112 So. 3d 171, 2013 WL 1923842, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7601

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2013 | Docket: 60231012

Cited 1 times | Published

incomplete and ultimately unavailing. Analysis Section 440.25(5)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that

CVS Caremark Corp. v. Latour

109 So. 3d 1232, 2013 WL 1235903, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5147

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2013 | Docket: 60229473

Cited 1 times | Published

responsible for claims arising in Flagler County. Cf. § 440.25(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2011) (venue for a claim under

Quiroga v. First Baptist Church at Weston

124 So. 3d 936, 2013 WL 163430, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 565

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2013 | Docket: 60235579

Cited 1 times | Published

to resolve such medical disputes. Further, section 440.25(4)(3), Florida Statutes (2008), requires a

Arnau v. WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC.

76 So. 3d 1117, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20906, 2011 WL 6851187

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2011 | Docket: 2360322

Cited 1 times | Published

of the EMA shall be admitted into evidence. See § 440.25(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2008). The opinion of the EMA

Jean v. MIAMI JEWISH HOME

78 So. 3d 639, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19766, 2011 WL 6141032

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2011 | Docket: 2575439

Cited 1 times | Published

this appeal for lack *640 of jurisdiction. See § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997) (providing that JCC orders

Bocelli v. Southwest Florida Investments

37 So. 3d 964, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8931, 2010 WL 2472186

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2010 | Docket: 1240401

Cited 1 times | Published

follow when dismissing a PFB sua sponte under section 440.25(4)(i). On January 2, 2008, the claimant filed

Holmes v. BROWN, TERRELL, HOGAN, ELLIS

36 So. 3d 919, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8171, 2010 WL 2292911

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2010 | Docket: 2584341

Cited 1 times | Published

DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005) (providing that orders

Kumar v. Richmond

34 So. 3d 197, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6232, 2010 WL 1794160

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2010 | Docket: 75576

Cited 1 times | Published

GRANTED and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. See § 440.25(5)(c), Fla. Stat. (2009); Fraternal Order of Eagles

Luetgert Development Corp. v. Stockford

18 So. 3d 1232, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15170, 2009 WL 3232072

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2009 | Docket: 2535982

Cited 1 times | Published

GRANTED and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. See § 440.25(5)(c), Fla. Stat. (2008); Fraternal Order of Eagles

Vassallo v. Goldwire

18 So. 3d 670, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13573, 2009 WL 2913890

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2009 | Docket: 1178996

Cited 1 times | Published

fee claim for lack of prosecution pursuant to section 440.25(4)(i), Florida Statutes (2008). For the reasons

Garcia v. Fence Masters, Inc.

16 So. 3d 200, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10954, 2009 WL 2392897

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2009 | Docket: 1641310

Cited 1 times | Published

recitation of all of the evidence presented. See § 440.25(4)(e), Florida Statutes (2005), see also Chavarria

Fuentes v. Embro Inc.

8 So. 3d 389, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1902, 2009 WL 559880

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2009 | Docket: 1654713

Cited 1 times | Published

previous 12 months unless good cause is shown." § 440.25(4)(i), Fla. Stat. (2008). The JCC's order is devoid

MD TRANSPORT v. Paschen

996 So. 2d 902, 2008 WL 4949269

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2008 | Docket: 1317040

Cited 1 times | Published

grounds of res judicata and application of section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes. The JCC concluded

Batista v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.

993 So. 2d 570, 2008 WL 4643791

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2008 | Docket: 1516200

Cited 1 times | Published

jurisdiction to vacate his final order under section 440.25(5)(a), Florida Statutes (2007), and Rule 60Q-6

Bowe v. McDONALD'S

933 So. 2d 71, 2006 WL 1419379

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2006 | Docket: 1712292

Cited 1 times | Published

Department of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) by section 440.25(5)(a), Florida Statutes, providing that compensation

Royal & Sunalliance v. Chavez

920 So. 2d 69, 2006 WL 20437

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2006 | Docket: 1441082

Cited 1 times | Published

intelligent review of his decision, as required by section 440.25(4)(e), Florida Statutes. REVERSED and REMANDED

Music v. Hebb

744 So. 2d 1169, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14542, 1999 WL 992696

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1999 | Docket: 64792214

Cited 1 times | Published

permitted in workers’ compensation actions, see § 440.25, Fla. Stat. (1997) (procedures for mediation and

Frank v. Crawford & Co.

670 So. 2d 117, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2011, 1996 WL 93684

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1996 | Docket: 1671294

Cited 1 times | Published

relief in the form of temporary benefits under section 440.25(4)(h), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). We hold

Herrera v. Hojo Inn Maingate

680 So. 2d 439, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 289, 1996 WL 16566

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1996 | Docket: 64767825

Cited 1 times | Published

set forth the findings of ultimate facts....” § 440.25(3)(e), Fla.Stat. (1993). The inclusion of such

Escambia County Transit v. Stallworth

652 So. 2d 905, 1995 WL 121484

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1995 | Docket: 1517967

Cited 1 times | Published

failed to object to the filing of a claim under section 440.25, Florida Statutes, rather than a petition for

Scotty's, Inc. v. Sarandrea

645 So. 2d 121, 1994 WL 630621

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1994 | Docket: 1654588

Cited 1 times | Published

may not order the E/C to pay the cost of an IME. § 440.25(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (1991); Berry, supra; Sanlando

Mirlisena v. Chemlawn Corp.

597 So. 2d 877, 1992 WL 74902

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1992 | Docket: 1704673

Cited 1 times | Published

date of the fee order to pay it or appeal it. Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), provides as

Pitts v. Nimnicht Chevrolet

569 So. 2d 921, 1990 WL 178645

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1990 | Docket: 1660436

Cited 1 times | Published

the procedure prescribed in respect of claims in § 440.25 and, in accordance with such section, issue a

Venable v. Grandeur Arabians

464 So. 2d 625, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1985 | Docket: 1193642

Cited 1 times | Published

shall set forth the findings of ultimate fact. Section 440.25(3)(c), F.S. (1981). Ultimate facts are all

City of Miami v. Harris

452 So. 2d 115, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13471

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1984 | Docket: 2588834

Cited 1 times | Published

(1977), cert. den., 377 So.2d 169 (Fla. 1979); section 440.25(1), Florida Statutes (1978). Furthermore, we

Drexel Properties, Inc. v. Brown

443 So. 2d 150

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1983 | Docket: 1458772

Cited 1 times | Published

the deputy's compensation order became final, § 440.25(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1981), the employer filed a

Mezquita v. Florida Steel Corp.

419 So. 2d 675

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1982 | Docket: 1584847

Cited 1 times | Published

the time available for correction, we affirm. Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes; Sunland Hospital/State

Miami-Dade Water & Sewer Authority v. Cormio

388 So. 2d 1238

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1980 | Docket: 1520953

Cited 1 times | Published

locating nonjudicial hearings within the state, Section 440.25(3)(b). That venue logic emphasizes the convenience

Tolvanen v. Eastern Air Lines

287 So. 2d 299

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1973 | Docket: 1652943

Cited 1 times | Published

We conclude there is no violation of F.S. Section 440.25(c), F.S.A. in the JIC's order in his findings

North West Trailer Sales v. McCann

217 So. 2d 310, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 1997

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1968 | Docket: 64507838

Cited 1 times | Published

respondent McCann. We must decide whether Fla.Stat. § 440.25(3) (b) (1967), permits a deputy commissioner to

Patrylo v. Nautilus Hotel

142 So. 2d 279

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1962 | Docket: 1860552

Cited 1 times | Published

evidence to support the deputy's conclusion. Section 440.25(3) (c), Florida Statutes, F.S.A.; Hardy v.

Beaty v. M & S Maintenance Co.

124 So. 2d 868

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1960 | Docket: 60196084

Cited 1 times | Published

the procedure prescribed in respect of claims in § 440.25 and in accordance with such section, issue a new

Beaty v. M & S Maintenance Co.

124 So. 2d 868

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1960 | Docket: 60196084

Cited 1 times | Published

the procedure prescribed in respect of claims in § 440.25 and in accordance with such section, issue a new

Sedgwick Claims Management Services, the GEO Group, Inc. v. Ryan Thompson

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2025 | Docket: 71258606

Published

address a matter of first impression—whether section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes (2020), governing procedures

Daniel Murphy v. Polk County Board of County Commissioners, and Commercial Risk Management

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2025 | Docket: 71258187

Published

for failure to prosecute. 244 So. 3d at 407; see § 440.25(4)(i), Fla. Stat. (“A judge of compensation claims

Miami Donuts Payroll, Dunkin Donuts v. Villarreal

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2024 | Docket: 69347450

Published

their motion to continue the final hearing. Section 440.25(4)(b), Florida Statutes, states, “Except as

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2023 | Docket: 67875253

Published

Next, rule 9.180 is amended to align with section 440.25(5)(b), Florida Statutes (2023). Specifically

Teresita De Jesus Abreu v. Riverland Elementary School and Broward County etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2019 | Docket: 15788546

Published

statutory processes. Cooper, 659 So. 2d at 340. Section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes, further provides:

United States Fire Insurance Company and Oxford Shops of South Florida v. Virginia Hackett

260 So. 3d 532

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2018 | Docket: 8409764

Published

includes both medical and disability benefits); § 440.25(4)(e), Fla. Stat. (including all orders

Gomez-Lujano v. Palm Beach Grill-Houston's Restaurant & Travelers Insurance

178 So. 3d 546, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17371, 2015 WL 7294568

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2015 | Docket: 60251493

Published

have reserved jurisdiction over these issues. See § 440.25(2), Fla. Stat. (requiring mediation of claims

Rosa Estela Rubio v. Gymboree Corporation and Gallagher Bassett etc.

178 So. 3d 81, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15489, 2015 WL 6445952

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2015 | Docket: 2991524

Published

210-day deadline for holding a hearing set by section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes (2013). The order extending

Maria Suarez v. Steward Enterprises and Travelers Ins. Co.

164 So. 3d 132

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2015 | Docket: 2656167

Published

to serve as EMAs. Sections 440.13(9)(b) and section 440.25(4)(d) anticipate that EMAs may provide “testimony”

Samuel Jackson v. Columbia Pictures and Fireman's Fund

153 So. 3d 347

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2014 | Docket: 2615399

Published

So.2d 1839, 1341 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980) (“While section 440.25(3) (b) [, Florida Statutes (1977),] contemplates

Emerita O. Flores- Orellana v. Circle-K and Constitution State Ser.

151 So. 3d 477

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2014 | Docket: 1311354

Published

has shown she has a clear legal right. Section 440.25(4), Florida Statutes (2009), sets out the procedure

Emerita O. Flores- Orellana v. Circle-K and Constitution State Ser.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 2014 | Docket: 753785

Published

has shown she has a clear legal right. Section 440.25(4), Florida Statutes (2009), sets out the procedure

Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Anderson

132 So. 3d 900, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1976, 2014 WL 562026

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2014 | Docket: 60238572

Published

mediated, because mediation is mandatory under section 440.25(2), Florida Statutes; such unmediated claims

Nutec v. Doleshall

96 So. 3d 1159, 2012 WL 4121376, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15748

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2012 | Docket: 60311479

Published

purported failure to post a bond as required under section 440.25(5)(c), Florida Statutes (2011). Because we

Jones v. Royalty Foods, Inc.

82 So. 3d 1162, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3855, 2012 WL 762073

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2012 | Docket: 60306060

Published

petitions based on claimant’s violation of section 440.25(3), Florida Statutes (2004), confidentiality

Perry v. Ecolab Inc.

79 So. 3d 838, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 366, 2012 WL 104507

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 2012 | Docket: 60305384

Published

an order is final. Even though, pursuant to section 440.25(5)(a), Florida Statutes (2002), an order is

City of Fort Lauderdale v. Miller

58 So. 3d 284, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1585, 2011 WL 479996

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2011 | Docket: 505823

Published

180(b)(2); Fla. Admin. Code R. 60Q-6.119. See also § 440.25(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2010); Byrd v. Moltech Power

Ekechi v. First america/first Student

49 So. 3d 335, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18662, 2010 WL 4967902

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 2010 | Docket: 127607

Published

impose interest on unpaid principle); see also § 440.25(4)(e), Florida Statutes (2008)(limiting JCC's

Brutus v. Mears Transportation Group

49 So. 3d 295, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15587, 2010 WL 4025922

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2010 | Docket: 60296715

Published

dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007) (providing that orders

Noel v. 1641 JEFFERSON, LLC

43 So. 3d 828, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12395, 2010 WL 3351314

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2010 | Docket: 1222994

Published

DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007) (providing that orders

White v. Department of Juvenile Justice

38 So. 3d 166, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2935, 2010 WL 816181

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2010 | Docket: 467359

Published

DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006) (providing that orders

Juarez v. R.B. Baker Construction, Inc.

28 So. 3d 193, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2070, 2010 WL 624232

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 2010 | Docket: 433379

Published

abbreviated final order remains in effect. See § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007); Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(2);

Rodas v. Commercial Forming Corp.

976 So. 2d 620, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 1806, 2008 WL 351053

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2008 | Docket: 64854083

Published

compensation claims also orders the change. See § 440.25(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2007) (providing that a final

Augustus v. Palm Beach County School Board

867 So. 2d 1269, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3523, 2004 WL 546874

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2004 | Docket: 64828891

Published

PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. Section 440.25(4)®, Florida Statutes (2003). WOLF, C.J., PADOVANO and POLSTON

Augustus v. Palm Beach County School Board

867 So. 2d 1269, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3523, 2004 WL 546874

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2004 | Docket: 64828891

Published

PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. Section 440.25(4)®, Florida Statutes (2003). WOLF, C.J., PADOVANO and POLSTON

General Motors v. Lynch

829 So. 2d 987, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16121, 2002 WL 31477562

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2002 | Docket: 64818788

Published

order had already become final by operation of section 440.25(5)(a), Florida Statutes (2002). The republication

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation Procedure

829 So. 2d 791, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 795, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1884, 2002 WL 31084673

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2002 | Docket: 64818760

Published

VENUE (a) Generally. Venue shall be governed by section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes. (b) Consolidated Petitions

Smalbein v. Volusia County School Board

801 So. 2d 169, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17030, 2001 WL 1516936

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2001 | Docket: 1744789

Published

Piezo, 427 So.2d at 185; see also Fla. Stat. § 440.25(1); Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Rich, 220 So.2d

Foster v. E G & G Florida, Inc.

795 So. 2d 151, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12427, 2001 WL 1001244

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2001 | Docket: 64808761

Published

caused extreme hardship as contemplated by Section 440.25(4)(h), Florida Statutes. Six days after hearing

Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. v. Taylor

786 So. 2d 1207, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7575, 2001 WL 584343

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2001 | Docket: 64805944

Published

BENTON, J., concurring. As written, section 440.25, Florida Statutes (1997), contemplates compliance

W & W Lumber of Palm Beach, Inc. v. Marrero

780 So. 2d 291, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3351, 2001 WL 252048

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2001 | Docket: 64804346

Published

before the order becomes final [pursuant to section 440.25, Florida Statutes].” However, the proper exercise

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation Procedure

795 So. 2d 863, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 866, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2275, 2000 WL 1508551

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2000 | Docket: 64808988

Published

adopted. This rule is amended to comply with section 440.25(4)(j), Florida Statutes (1999), to indicate

ITT Hartford v. Cleary

737 So. 2d 567, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7558, 1999 WL 371355

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1999 | Docket: 64789438

Published

the circuit court lacked jurisdiction because section 440.25, Florida Statutes (1997), provides the exclusive

Vista Manor Nursing Home v. Estepp

740 So. 2d 41, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3985, 1999 WL 169537

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1999 | Docket: 64790562

Published

entered after an emergency conference under section 440.25(4)(h), Florida Statutes. In this order the

McClung-Gagne v. HARBOUR CITY VOLUNTEER

721 So. 2d 799, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15613, 1998 WL 852301

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1998 | Docket: 1323373

Published

benefits which the JCC has jurisdiction to award. § 440.25(1), Fla. Stat. (1991); Fireman's Fund Ins. Co

Crims/PCA Solutions v. Collier

700 So. 2d 1231, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10284, 1997 WL 537053

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1997 | Docket: 64776375

Published

No. 96-4506 awarded psychiatric care after a section 440.25 emergency conference, notwithstanding a pending

Owens-Illinois v. DeLoach

686 So. 2d 1387, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 253, 1997 WL 26469

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1997 | Docket: 64770606

Published

after an emergency hearing held pursuant to section 440.25(4)(h), Florida Statutes (1995), and assert

Lowes v. Johnson

681 So. 2d 919, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11388, 1996 WL 625518

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1996 | Docket: 64768494

Published

an order awarding medical care pursuant to section 440.25(4)(h), Florida Statutes. Because the finding

Brewer Co. of Florida v. Milian

681 So. 2d 872, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10946, 1996 WL 600384

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1996 | Docket: 64768467

Published

findings of fact necessary for meaningful review. See § 440.25(4)(e), Fla.Stat. (1995); Fla.R.Work. Comp.P. 4

School District of Escambia County v. Cooper

686 So. 2d 613, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10711, 1996 WL 587861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1996 | Docket: 64770400

Published

other reason or justification for such mandate.” § 440.25(4)(e), Fla. Stat. (1995). The pertinent rule adds

Dayco Products v. Rue

676 So. 2d 58, 1996 WL 378320

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1996 | Docket: 1318008

Published

provision of the 1994 Workers' Compensation Act, Section 440.25(4)(h), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). We reverse

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation Procedure

674 So. 2d 631, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 223, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 827, 1996 WL 268079

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1996 | Docket: 64765026

Published

VENUE (a) Generally. Venue shall be governed by section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes. (b) Consolidated Petitions

Guarantee Mutual Life Co. v. McCartney

672 So. 2d 636, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4275, 1996 WL 200229

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1996 | Docket: 64764080

Published

hearing directly from the JCC in accordance with section 440.25(4)(c), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). This section

School Board of Hillsborough County v. Lara

667 So. 2d 368, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12480, 1995 WL 697275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1995 | Docket: 64761967

Published

appellants have failed to post the bond required by section 440.25(5)(c), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1994), or demonstrate

State of Florida-HRS v. Ohayagha

659 So. 2d 411, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8271, 1995 WL 457243

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1995 | Docket: 64758353

Published

of compensation claims entered pursuant to section 440.25(4)(h), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), which

Holder v. Waldrop

654 So. 2d 1059, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5443, 1995 WL 307162

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1995 | Docket: 64756214

Published

details of the benefits alleged to be due. Section 440.25(1) provides that a claim is to be filed with

Millinger v. BROWARD CO. MENTAL HEALTH

655 So. 2d 104, 1994 WL 704795

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1995 | Docket: 1696823

Published

not yet final by operation of section 440.25, Fla. Stat. Section 440.25 provides: "Beginning on October

Wal Mart Stores, Inc. v. Brewer

648 So. 2d 264, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 24, 1995 WL 1528

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1995 | Docket: 64753252

Published

the deputy’s order. Section 440.25(3)(c), Florida Statutes, FSA (now section 440.25(3)(e), Florida Statutes

Breen v. Smith

644 So. 2d 183, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10464, 1994 WL 588183

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1994 | Docket: 64751630

Published

JCC’s final order became final by operation of section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1991),1 Smith filed

Orange County Medical Clinic v. Cappadona

643 So. 2d 1146, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9335, 1994 WL 525513

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1994 | Docket: 64751500

Published

servicing agent to pay for such an examination. § 440.25(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1991); Berry Corp. v. Smith

Stevens v. Pursell's Wrecker & Road Service

645 So. 2d 13, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9041, 1994 WL 502945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1994 | Docket: 64752137

Published

must conform with the procedures stated in Section 440.25(3)(c), Florida Statutes, which provides that

Stevens v. Pursell's Wrecker & Road Service

645 So. 2d 13, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9041, 1994 WL 502945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1994 | Docket: 64752137

Published

must conform with the procedures stated in Section 440.25(3)(c), Florida Statutes, which provides that

Furtick v. Shults

640 So. 2d 123, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7293, 1994 WL 382840

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1994 | Docket: 64749893

Published

chapter 93-45, section 30 renumbered section 440.-25(4) to section 440.25(5), Florida Statutes, and amended

Taylor v. Dick Carroll Goodyear

630 So. 2d 1222, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 286, 1994 WL 17249

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1994 | Docket: 64746023

Published

greatly exceeding the 30 days set forth in section 440.25(3)(d), Florida Statutes. “[Rjeversal for a

Parkway General Hospital v. Ogletree

629 So. 2d 989, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12951, 1993 WL 533762

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1993 | Docket: 64745392

Published

2d 225 (Fla.1962). Because of amendments to section 440.25(3), the phrase “at the first hearing” now refers

City of North Miami v. Marcy

630 So. 2d 601, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12033, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2532

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1993 | Docket: 64745840

Published

order was never raised before the JCC within the § 440.25(4)(a), Fla.Stat., time available for correction)

Port-A-Pit, Inc. v. Jordan

620 So. 2d 1062, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6705, 1993 WL 256699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1993 | Docket: 64697447

Published

Workers’ Compensation Trust Fund pursuant to section 440.25(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), the parties

Port-A-Pit, Inc. v. Jordan

620 So. 2d 1062, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6705, 1993 WL 256699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1993 | Docket: 64697447

Published

Workers’ Compensation Trust Fund pursuant to section 440.25(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), the parties

Thompson v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

618 So. 2d 333, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5349, 1993 WL 153760

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1993 | Docket: 64696260

Published

award was entered on January 14, 1992. . Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes, provided: [The order

State, Department of Labor & Employment Security v. Wolfe

613 So. 2d 578, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1520, 1993 WL 30649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1993 | Docket: 64693993

Published

Claims to be relieved of cost in accordance with section 440.25(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991) and Florida

Maranje v. Brinks of Florida, Inc.

610 So. 2d 1293, 1992 WL 296136

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1993 | Docket: 1414175

Published

So.2d 1000 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Pursuant to section 440.25(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1991), the JCC's order

McConnell v. Florida Furniture Center

611 So. 2d 65, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13337, 1992 WL 385382

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1992 | Docket: 64693136

Published

examination requested by the employer is covered by section 440.25(6), Florida Statutes. Under that section the

Amendments to Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation Procedure

603 So. 2d 425, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 296, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1054, 1992 WL 99236

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1992 | Docket: 64669263

Published

to warn of the jurisdictional nature of (^section 440.-25(4)(f), Florida, Statutes (1979), which provides:

Parker v. Sugar Cane Growers Co-op

595 So. 2d 1022, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2272, 1992 WL 42455

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1992 | Docket: 64666100

Published

seven months after the final hearing. Although Section 440.-25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1987), provides that

Department of Transportation v. Brown

589 So. 2d 1376, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11754, 1991 WL 248695

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1991 | Docket: 64663471

Published

review fails to satisfy the requirements of section 440.-25(3)(e) in a number of ways. The order fails

Castro v. Fellsmere Management

589 So. 2d 425, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11405, 1991 WL 239923

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1991 | Docket: 64663120

Published

full power and authority to hear such claims. See § 440.25(1), Fla. Stat. The JCC, therefore, erred in dismissing

Dowd v. Sun-Crete Construction Co.

582 So. 2d 83, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5728, 1991 WL 109686

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1991 | Docket: 64659981

Published

1979); Rule 4.141, Workers’ Compensation Rules; section 440.25, Fla.Stat. The July 9th order is therefore

Cabell v. Spirco Environmental, Inc.

579 So. 2d 838, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4651, 1991 WL 75642

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1991 | Docket: 64658802

Published

addresses of the employer and employee,.... Section 440.25, Florida Statutes (1987), “Procedure in respect

Southland Corp. v. Farris

576 So. 2d 886, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2558, 1991 WL 39360

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1991 | Docket: 64657456

Published

substance of the original February 9 order under § 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes, providing *887for finality

Area Refrigeration & Air Conditioning v. Glazer

575 So. 2d 332, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1934, 1991 WL 30431

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1991 | Docket: 64656641

Published

carrier in accordance with the requirements of section 440.25(3)(a), Florida Statutes, and rule 4.080, Florida

Pilon v. Okeelanta Corp.

574 So. 2d 1200, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1238, 1991 WL 17936

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1991 | Docket: 64656508

Published

furnishings, and personal vehicle. See Fla.Stat. § 440.25(4)(b). Both the employer/carrier and the Division

Albertson's, Inc. v. Walter

570 So. 2d 1018, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8273, 1990 WL 164974

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1990 | Docket: 64654782

Published

and confuse everyone, particularly the JCC. Section 440.25(3)(f), Fla.Stat., requires the JCC to submit

Grieco v. Lehigh Corp.

549 So. 2d 748, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2338, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5338, 1989 WL 113243

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1989 | Docket: 64645271

Published

findings of ultimate facts, in contravention of section 440.25(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1987). Reversed and

Tufco, Inc. v. Jernigan

533 So. 2d 325, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2477, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5016, 1988 WL 120315

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1988 | Docket: 64638306

Published

jurisdiction of the deputy commissioner under section 440.25(1), Florida Statutes, with respect to the employee’s

The Florida Bar

535 So. 2d 243, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 1479, 1988 WL 135851

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1988 | Docket: 64639166

Published

proceedings is to warn of the jurisdictional nature of § 440.25(4)(f), Fla. Stat.1979, which provides: Beginning

Fountain Motor Co. v. Zibrin

526 So. 2d 182, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1332, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2329, 1988 WL 55787

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1988 | Docket: 64635216

Published

1986), in which this Court stated, en banc: Section 440.25(3)(b) specifies that “[n]o deputy commissioner

Tasse v. Interamerican Transport Co.

516 So. 2d 287, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2665, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11226, 1987 WL 1898

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 1987 | Docket: 64631344

Published

period before the order became final under Section 440.-25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1985). Compare e.g

Riley-Stoker v. Pearson

508 So. 2d 1297, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8962, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1481

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1987 | Docket: 64628128

Published

accomplished only upon full compliance with section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1985), the applicable

Parsons v. Orkin Exterminating Co.

508 So. 2d 529, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1452, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8914

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1987 | Docket: 64627841

Published

become “final by operation of Section 440.25, Florida Statutes.” Section 440.25(4)(a) provides that the deputy’s

Talisman Sugar Corp. v. Jaime

498 So. 2d 516, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2371, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10637

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1986 | Docket: 64623463

Published

The question of proper venue is controlled by Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1983), which mandates

Nelson v. Venice Hospital

485 So. 2d 844, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 591, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1986 | Docket: 64618275

Published

fact and conclusions of law in accord with section 440.25{3)(c), Florida Statutes. If necessary, the

E.M. Scott Contractors v. Baker

479 So. 2d 292, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2713, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17257

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1985 | Docket: 64615903

Published

claim required the deputy, under Florida Statutes § 440.-25(3)(a) to hold a hearing, with adequate notice

Rinker Materials Corp. v. Hill

469 So. 2d 233, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1334, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14215

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1985 | Docket: 64612153

Published

given by Dr. Ticktin. They argue that under section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1978 Supp.), the deputy

Stone v. Bernadora Farm

464 So. 2d 1329, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 646, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13034

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1985 | Docket: 64610477

Published

order shall set forth findings of ultimate facts. § 440.25(3)(c), Fla.Stat. (1981); Venable v. Grandeur Arabians

Public Gas Co. v. Shaw

464 So. 2d 1243, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 435, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12464

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1985 | Docket: 64610432

Published

an order entered after the 30-day period of Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1979), stale and to

Payne v. Griner-Woodruff, Inc.

462 So. 2d 518, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 102, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11877

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1985 | Docket: 64609439

Published

wage-loss. Claimant is entitled to proceed under Section 440.25, Florida Statutes, and to have his wage-loss

Florida Bar re Workers' Compensation Rules of Procedure

460 So. 2d 898, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 497, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3647

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1984 | Docket: 64608778

Published

hearing. *900Comment — 1984 Revision: Implements section 440.25(3)(a), Florida Statutes. RULE 4.080 NOTICE

Alro Metals v. Pullins

451 So. 2d 1001, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13571

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1984 | Docket: 64605502

Published

v. Garrett, 415 So.2d 783 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); § 440.25(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1981). We do so only because

Kennedy v. Marcona Ocean Industries

451 So. 2d 530, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13546

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1984 | Docket: 64605395

Published

error within the time available for correction. Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1978 Supp.); Mezquita

Florida Welding & Erection Service v. Martin

452 So. 2d 101, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13315

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1984 | Docket: 64605624

Published

opinions of those two doctors. Appellants cite section 440.-25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1983) and K-Mart Corp

Juma Construction v. Villanueva

437 So. 2d 715, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20162

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1983 | Docket: 64599488

Published

thirty days of rendition of the order, see Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes; Polk County Board

Mendez v. Florida Power & Light Co.

436 So. 2d 309, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20016

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1983 | Docket: 64599071

Published

were mailed to the parties, as provided in Section 440.-25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978). Section

Chisholm v. McCormick, Conduit, Buckley

437 So. 2d 699, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19565

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1983 | Docket: 64599484

Published

only the matured issues. (See in this regard F.S. 440.25 and existing Workers’ Compensation Rule of Procedure

Davis v. Hunt

432 So. 2d 650, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19542

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1983 | Docket: 64597408

Published

Davis’ failure to post bond as required by Section 440.25(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1981). We decline

Miller v. Hospitality Care Center

431 So. 2d 254, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19328

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1983 | Docket: 64596950

Published

Compared to the more detailed petition required by section 440.25(4)(b), typically filed at a later time not

Cabrera v. Universal Trusses, Inc.

429 So. 2d 768, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19063

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1983 | Docket: 64596355

Published

course to explicit statutory requirements. Gf., § 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes, and Paradise Fruit Co

Kent Insurance v. Hobbs

421 So. 2d 658, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21556

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1982 | Docket: 64593126

Published

questions” in respect to workers’ compensation claims. § 440.25(1), Fla.Stat.; Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company

Seacoast Building Supply v. Jackson

419 So. 2d 379, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21104

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1982 | Docket: 64592070

Published

further medical evaluation authorized by the order. § 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes. Without foreclosing the

Hoboken Drywall Co. v. Telfair

417 So. 2d 1169, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20887

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1982 | Docket: 64591673

Published

change of venue and did not agree to the change. Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), provides that

Sambo's v. Scott

417 So. 2d 759, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20578

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1982 | Docket: 64591516

Published

McCrory Corp., 228 So.2d 900 (Fla.1969). . § 440.25, Florida Statutes (1978), citing eight critical

Duval County School Board v. Rupp

414 So. 2d 556, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1982 | Docket: 64590251

Published

that might otherwise inspire needless appeals. Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1981); Suarez v. American

Florida Department of Corrections v. Carro

410 So. 2d 629, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19395

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1982 | Docket: 64588278

Published

but apparent conclusion of the majority that § 440.-25(3)(b), Florida Statutes, is a procedural statute

Florida Department of Corrections v. Carro

410 So. 2d 629, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19395

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1982 | Docket: 64588278

Published

but apparent conclusion of the majority that § 440.-25(3)(b), Florida Statutes, is a procedural statute

Chittick v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.

410 So. 2d 598, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1982 | Docket: 64588262

Published

certified mail.” That rule is supplemented by Section 440.25(3)(a) (1980 Supp.), requiring the deputy commissioner

Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. Beach

409 So. 2d 1160, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19255

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 1982 | Docket: 64587972

Published

Butler, 400 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); section 440.25(3)(b), Fla.Stat. (1978 Supp.). Claimant’s average

State v. McCall

406 So. 2d 1288, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21989

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1981 | Docket: 64586676

Published

v. Laws, 384 So.2d 722 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1978). The award of

Ridge Pallets, Inc. v. John

406 So. 2d 1292, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21991

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1981 | Docket: 64586678

Published

initial BCL-13b wage loss request. In addition, Section 440.25(1), allowing the self-executing features of

National Linen Service v. Stubblefield

403 So. 2d 1147, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21123

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1981 | Docket: 64585151

Published

S.A. v. Alexis, 370 So.2d 1128 (Fla.1978). Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1978 Supp.), effective

Chittick v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.

403 So. 2d 595, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21003

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1981 | Docket: 64585030

Published

forum for her workers’ compensation claim. Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1979). Claimant’s

City of Cocoa v. Jones

403 So. 2d 589, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20991

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1981 | Docket: 64585027

Published

the employer/carrier noted for the record that § 440.25(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1978 Supp.), prohibited

Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. American States Insurance Co.

402 So. 2d 560, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1981 | Docket: 64584679

Published

June 7, 1977 from the first accident. Under Section 440.25(3)(a) Fla. Stat. (1978), since repealed, the

Baird-Ray Datsun v. Butler

400 So. 2d 1038, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20463

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1981 | Docket: 64583826

Published

78-300, 79 — 40 and 79-312, Laws of Florida, to Section 440.25(3)(b) have modified the rule in Magic City

Theatre v. Capps

396 So. 2d 280, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19138

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1981 | Docket: 64581482

Published

on loss of wage earning capacity is governed by § 440.25(3)(a), Florida Statute (1978), which provides

JUDICIAL ADMIN. COM'N v. Marks

394 So. 2d 211

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 1981 | Docket: 1315802

Published

first and third issues presented on appeal. Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1978), reads in pertinent

Cenvill Communities, Inc. v. Pierre

393 So. 2d 662, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1981 | Docket: 64580216

Published

Authority, 153 So.2d 722, 723-24 (Fla.1963). Section 440.25(3)(b), Fla.Stat. (1979), provides in part that

Hall v. Red Bishop Roofing

393 So. 2d 618, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19446

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1981 | Docket: 64580190

Published

determining average weekly wage, as required by § 440.-25(3)(c), we cannot review the sufficiency of the

Halphen v. Western Contracting Corp.

389 So. 2d 1254, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18058

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1980 | Docket: 64578739

Published

had not become a final order under the terms of § 440.25(4)(f), Florida Statutes (1979), and no appeal

Krispy Kreme Doughnut Co. v. Pipkins

389 So. 2d 1243, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18064

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1980 | Docket: 64578734

Published

SHIVERS, JJ., concur. . A statutory change, Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1978), although not

Atlanta National Real Estate Trust v. Rain

392 So. 2d 1339, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23718

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1980 | Docket: 64579969

Published

Fla.Stat. (1977) authorize such examinations; section 440.25(6) Fla.Stat. (1977) requires injured employees

COLONIAL & SEMORAN SHELL v. Grissom

389 So. 2d 1219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1980 | Docket: 264171

Published

permanent impairment, it is erroneous because Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1978), which was in

In re Florida Workers' Compensation Rules of Procedure

390 So. 2d 698, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4395

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1980 | Docket: 64578981

Published

reasons. In the first instance, the Statute, F.S. 440.25(3)(a) requires notice by certified mail, and

Bell Rentals & Sales v. Harvey

387 So. 2d 507, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17544

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1980 | Docket: 64577899

Published

in the 1979 accident. That amendment, now in Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1978), states

Hall v. Division of Workers' Compensation, Department of Labor & Employment Security

381 So. 2d 333, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16306

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1980 | Docket: 64575090

Published

party, the division, or a deputy commissioner.” Section 440.25(1) states: (1) Subject to the provisions of

Town of Pembroke Park v. McCarthy

380 So. 2d 1205, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16093

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1980 | Docket: 64574871

Published

proper notice of the hearing as is required by Section 440.25(3), Florida Statutes (1977). Claimant first

Security Aluminum Windows v. Smith

381 So. 2d 300, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16296

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1980 | Docket: 64575081

Published

still had a right to full and adequate notice. § 440.25(3)(a), Fla.Stat. (1977); Lundy’s Market, Inc.

Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. v. Sams

381 So. 2d 262, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16280

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1980 | Docket: 64575067

Published

was a good faith work search as required by Section 440.25(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1978). More importantly

Key Biscayne Hotel v. McKenney

378 So. 2d 1277, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16296

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1979 | Docket: 64573779

Published

Marshall, 106 So,2d 212 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958); § 440.25(3)(b), Fla.Stat.; § 440.45(3)0), Fla.Stat.

Remodeling v. Hatcher

378 So. 2d 1269, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16292

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1979 | Docket: 64573775

Published

Marshall, 106 So.2d 212 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958); § 440.25(3)(b), Fla.Stat.; § 440.45(3)(j), Fla.Stat.

Boling v. Wardco Insurance Co.

378 So. 2d 1279, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1979 | Docket: 64573781

Published

Marshall, 106 So.2d 212 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958); § 440.25(3)(b), Fla.Stat.; § 440.45(3)(j), Fla.Stat.

Piper Aircraft Corp. v. Mills

378 So. 2d 1275, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16295

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1979 | Docket: 64573778

Published

Marshall, 106 So.2d 212, (Fla. 1st DCA 1958); § 440.25(3)(b), Fla.Stat.; § 440.45(3)(j), Fla.Stat.

Brown v. Wackenhut Corp.

378 So. 2d 1273, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16294

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1979 | Docket: 64573777

Published

Marshall, 106 So.2d 212 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958); § 440.25(3)(b), Fla.Stat.; § 440.45(3)0), Fla.Stat.

Maria Manor Health Care Center v. Valdes

378 So. 2d 1271, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16293

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1979 | Docket: 64573776

Published

Marshall, 106 So.2d 212, (Fla. 1st DCA 1958); § 440.25(3)(b), Fla.Stat.; § 440.45(3)(j), Fla.Stat.

Original Crispy Pizza of Miami v. Palmeri

377 So. 2d 49, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16124

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1979 | Docket: 64572925

Published

SHIVERS, JJ., concur. . Chapter 79-312 amended Section 440.25 to provide in new subsection (f): Beginning

Krajenta v. Division of Workers' Compensation, Department of Labor & Employment Security

376 So. 2d 1200, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15660

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1979 | Docket: 64572807

Published

Section 3.10 drew its rule-making authority from Section 440.-25(1), Ch. 79 — 10, Laws of Florida,3 and provides

In re Florida Workers' Compensation Rules of Procedure

374 So. 2d 981, 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4794

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1979 | Docket: 64571875

Published

proceedings is to warn of the jurisdictional nature of § 440.25(4)(f), Fla.Stat. 1979, which provides: Beginning

Special Disability Trust Fund v. TROPICANA, ETC.

358 So. 2d 1

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1978 | Docket: 1691018

Published

justifications are specifically not required. Section 440.25(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1975). Review of the

Steed v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

355 So. 2d 1239, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15055

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1978 | Docket: 64563252

Published

result is dictated by statutory and case law. Section 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1975) provides in

Hun v. Goode

353 So. 2d 169, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 17183

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1977 | Docket: 64561868

Published

Supreme Court construed the following language of Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1975): “. . . The

Saxony Hotel v. Zins

343 So. 2d 838, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3849

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1977 | Docket: 64557673

Published

entered within the 30-day period set forth in Section 440.-25(3)(b), Florida Statutes. The Commission’s order

Misal Industries v. Hartman

339 So. 2d 655, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4531

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1976 | Docket: 64556008

Published

entered within the thirty-day period specified in Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes. Since the entry of

Bay Plumbing Co. v. Harbin

337 So. 2d 799, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4498

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1976 | Docket: 64555213

Published

Section 440.19(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1975). Section 440.25(2), Florida Statutes (1975), requires the employer

Ledger v. Geiger-Jones Construction Co.

329 So. 2d 3, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4282

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1976 | Docket: 64552944

Published

Commission by any assignment of error, and under Section 440.-25(4) (a), Florida Statutes (1973), the Commission

City of Miami v. Powers

313 So. 2d 35, 1975 Fla. LEXIS 3811

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1975 | Docket: 64546574

Published

petition or application for review was dismissed. See § 440.25(4) (b), Florida Statutes. Petitioner now urges

Riggle v. Board of County Commissioners

284 So. 2d 194, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4270

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1973 | Docket: 64534967

Published

of Industrial Claims is contained in Fla.Stat. § 440.25(4) (a), F.S.A., which provides for review of any

Henry MacAllister House Mover v. Johnson

281 So. 2d 306, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 5003

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1973 | Docket: 64533794

Published

Commission dismissed the application for review, citing § 440.25(4)(a), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., and Rule 4, I

Collins v. Town of Palm Beach

272 So. 2d 479, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4889

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1973 | Docket: 64530077

Published

sufficient to show the basis of the award. Fla.Stat. § 440.-25(3)(c), F.S.A. This Court defined “ultimate facts”

Dean v. McLeod

270 So. 2d 726, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3179

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1972 | Docket: 64529409

Published

procedure prescribed in respect of claims in § 440.-25 and in accordance with such section, issue a new

Hermansen v. Webster Outdoor Advertising Co.

230 So. 2d 145, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2530

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1969 | Docket: 64512750

Published

support the judge’s conclusion as required by § 440.25 (3) (c), Florida Statutes” concerning the temporary

Lewis v. Sperry Auto Sales

224 So. 2d 293, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2241

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1969 | Docket: 64510410

Published

further proceedings * * (emphasis added) Fla.Stat. § 440.25(4) (d), F.S.A.

Lewis v. Mundy

219 So. 2d 35, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2452

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1969 | Docket: 64508462

Published

with the appeal bond requirements of Fla.Stat. § 440.25(4) (a) (1967), F.S.A., although at the time he

Crawford v. Farm Stores Processing, Inc.

218 So. 2d 755, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2502

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1969 | Docket: 64508405

Published

Commission is quite correct in concluding that Section 440.25(4) (d), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. operates to

Knight v. Munday Plastering Co.

220 So. 2d 357, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 1977

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1968 | Docket: 64508955

Published

the claim be set for a hearing pursuant to Section 440.25(3) (a), Florida Statutes, which states that

Honeywell, Inc. v. Haley

216 So. 2d 745, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2041

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1968 | Docket: 64507705

Published

here the order entered by the Commission. F.S. section 440.25(4) (b), F.S.A. requires an appellant to have

Pinellas Towers, Inc. v. Osborne

215 So. 2d 735, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2084

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1968 | Docket: 64507323

Published

of the Act. When one views the provisions of Section 440.25(1) of the Act in light of the provisions of

Hammersla v. Price

190 So. 2d 765, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3324

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1966 | Docket: 64498307

Published

to the questions at issue.’ (Italics added.) Section 440.25(3) (c), F.S. 1953, F.S.A. These findings of

McKinney v. Deel Motors, Inc.

184 So. 2d 644, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3799

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1966 | Docket: 64496178

Published

Rules of Procedure and the provisions of F.S. Section 440.25(4) (b) F.S.A. promulgated for the orderly dispatch

Garcia v. Continental Vending Machine Corp.

176 So. 2d 329, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3189

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1965 | Docket: 64493363

Published

an essential element óf the deputy’s order. Section 440.25(3) (c), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., makes it

Direct Oil Corp. v. Brown

178 So. 2d 13, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3127

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1965 | Docket: 64494025

Published

authority for review by that body of such an order. Section 440.25(3) (c) reads: “The order rejecting the claim

Jeffers v. Pan American Envelope Co.

172 So. 2d 577, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3263

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1965 | Docket: 64492283

Published

procedures for processing an original claim. Section 440.25, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. In the ultimate,

B. F. Todd Electrical Contractors v. Hammond

164 So. 2d 513, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2709

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1964 | Docket: 60221686

Published

Industrial Commission Rule 6(a) and Florida Statute' § 440.25(4), F.S.A. having to do with the time for filing

Wenshaw v. Smith

151 So. 2d 3, 1963 Fla. LEXIS 3118

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1963 | Docket: 60210803

Published

the procedure prescribed in respect of claims in § 440.25 and in accordance with such section, issue a new

Shell's City, Inc. v. Coles

145 So. 2d 489

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1962 | Docket: 60207340

Published

Rodriguez, Fla.1960, 124 So.2d 3, quoting F.S. § 440.25, F.S.A

Perry v. W. R. Robbins & Son Roofing Co.

145 So. 2d 225, 1962 Fla. LEXIS 2513

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1962 | Docket: 60207223

Published

notice.” The full commission relied confidently on § 440.25(3) (a), which provides in part, “If a hearing

Conroy v. Anthony Abraham Co.

138 So. 2d 317

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1962 | Docket: 60201806

Published

commissioner dated March 11, 1959, became final under § 440.25(4), Florida Statutes 1959, F.S.A., and (2) whether

Young v. Dreamland Bedding Co.

133 So. 2d 414

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1961 | Docket: 60198512

Published

he determined as of the time of his injury.8 Section 440.25 (3), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., requires the

Cook v. Georgia Grocery, Inc.

125 So. 2d 837, 1960 Fla. LEXIS 2071

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1960 | Docket: 60196388

Published

Maryland Casualty Co., Fla.1051, 55 So.2d 741. . Section 440.25(4) (d), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. . Andrews

Leonard v. Cook & Pruitt Masonry, Inc.

126 So. 2d 136

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1960 | Docket: 60196484

Published

that same was not timely filed as required by § 440.25(4) (a), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., and that same

Holland v. Puritan Dairy, Inc.

120 So. 2d 1, 1960 Fla. LEXIS 2431

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1960 | Docket: 60194802

Published

before the entry of a compensation award. See § 440.25 (3) (b), Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The commission is then

Finkley v. John Raffa Lathing

120 So. 2d 9, 1960 Fla. LEXIS 2433

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1960 | Docket: 60195008

Published

contends that the full commission violated Section 440.25(4) (d) by allegedly considering the rehabilitation

Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Proudfoot

116 So. 2d 245

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1959 | Docket: 60193790

Published

agency. We are called upon to- determine whether Section 440.25(4) (a), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., makes the

Josey v. Hooper Construction Co.

115 So. 2d 183

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1959 | Docket: 60193472

Published

authority testing the validity of the award. Section 440.25(3) (c), Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Charlton v. Dan Brosnahan

Berke Displays, Inc. v. Mick

114 So. 2d 425

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1959 | Docket: 60193202

Published

before the entry of a compensation award. See § 440.25(3) (b), Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The commission is then

Hodges v. State Road Department

112 So. 2d 593, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1959 | Docket: 60192615

Published

Chambers, Fla.App.1958, 102 So.2d 171. . F.S. § 440.25(3) (b), F.S.A. . United States Casualty Co.

Griffith v. Vecchiarelli

97 So. 2d 691

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1957 | Docket: 64489696

Published

failure to post bond, as provided for in Florida Statute 440.25(4) (a), F.S.A., and whether said statute

Fischer v. John W. Thomson & Son, Inc.

92 So. 2d 526

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1957 | Docket: 64488760

Published

is sufficient in the light of prior cases. Section 440.25(3) (c), Florida Statutes 1953, F.S.A., requires

Fischer v. John W. Thomson & Son, Inc.

92 So. 2d 526

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1957 | Docket: 64488760

Published

is sufficient in the light of prior cases. Section 440.25(3) (c), Florida Statutes 1953, F.S.A., requires

Fournigault v. Jackson Memorial Hospital Standard Accident Insurance

87 So. 2d 102, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 3712

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1956 | Docket: 64488002

Published

Deputy but was too late to the full Commission. Section 440.25(4)' (a), as amended in 1953 and 1955, provides

Rutherford v. Seven-Up Bottling Co.

83 So. 2d 269

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1955 | Docket: 64487356

Published

agree with the theory of the full Commission. ‘Section 440.25(4), supra, specifying when the award becomes

Straehla v. Bendix-We-Launder-Rite

81 So. 2d 657, 1955 Fla. LEXIS 3637

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1955 | Docket: 64487006

Published

Commissioner to make findings of fact as required by Section 440.25(3) (c), F.S.1951, F.S.A., was fatal to the

H. W. Sperry, Inc. v. Matthews

76 So. 2d 487, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1914

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1954 | Docket: 64486186

Published

presentation of the application. The commission cited Section 440.25(4), Florida Statutes 1953, and F.S.A., which

Ferlita v. Florida Art Stucco Corp.

74 So. 2d 893, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1186

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1954 | Docket: 64485985

Published

the procedure prescribed in respect of claims in § 440.25, and ■ in accordance with such section, issue

Virginian, Inc. v. Ponder

72 So. 2d 781, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1444

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1954 | Docket: 64485567

Published

investigation 'of the merits of the claim. Section 440.25 explicitly provides that the employer is an

American Airmotive Corp. v. Stutz

72 So. 2d 665, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1427

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1954 | Docket: 64485543

Published

Florida Industrial Commission entered pursuant to Section 440.25, Florida Statutes 1951, as amended by Section

Superior Home Builders v. Moss

70 So. 2d 570, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1284

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1954 | Docket: 64485126

Published

the procedure prescribed in respect of claims in § 440.25, and in accordance with such section, issue a

Wheeler v. Hendry Corp.

70 So. 2d 557, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1279

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 1954 | Docket: 64485122

Published

would be referred to as “the full Commission”. Section 440.25(4) F.S.-1953, F.S.A., states, “the full Commission

Roberts v. Wofford Beach Hotel

67 So. 2d 670, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1696

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1953 | Docket: 64484790

Published

finding in this case is a compliance with F.S.A. § 440.25(3) (b), which provides in part that the “order

Faulk v. Harper

62 So. 2d 62, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1891

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1952 | Docket: 64483852

Published

compensation-under the Act. In accordance with Section 440.25(4) F.S.A. the employee, within the time allowed