Florida Statute 443.101 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXI
LABOR

Chapter 443
REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 443.101

443.101 Disqualification for benefits.—An individual shall be disqualified for benefits:

(1)(a) For the week in which he or she has voluntarily left work without good cause attributable to his or her employing unit or for the week in which he or she has been discharged by the employing unit for misconduct connected with his or her work, based on a finding by the Department of Commerce. As used in this paragraph, the term “work” means any work, whether full-time, part-time, or temporary.

1. Disqualification for voluntarily quitting continues for the full period of unemployment next ensuing after the individual has left his or her full-time, part-time, or temporary work voluntarily without good cause and until the individual has earned income equal to or greater than 17 times his or her weekly benefit amount. As used in this subsection, the term “good cause” includes only that cause attributable to the employing unit which would compel a reasonable employee to cease working or attributable to the individual’s illness or disability requiring separation from his or her work. Any other disqualification may not be imposed.

2. An individual is not disqualified under this subsection for:

a. Voluntarily leaving temporary work to return immediately when called to work by the permanent employing unit that temporarily terminated his or her work within the previous 6 calendar months;

b. Voluntarily leaving work to relocate as a result of his or her military-connected spouse’s permanent change of station orders, activation orders, or unit deployment orders; or

c. Voluntarily leaving work if he or she proves that his or her discontinued employment is a direct result of circumstances related to domestic violence as defined in s. 741.28. An individual who voluntarily leaves work under this sub-subparagraph must:

(I) Make reasonable efforts to preserve employment, unless the individual establishes that such remedies are likely to be futile or to increase the risk of future incidents of domestic violence. Such efforts may include seeking a protective injunction, relocating to a secure place, or seeking reasonable accommodation from the employing unit, such as a transfer or change of assignment;

(II) Provide evidence such as an injunction, a protective order, or other documentation authorized by state law which reasonably proves that domestic violence has occurred; and

(III) Reasonably believe that he or she is likely to be the victim of a future act of domestic violence at, in transit to, or departing from his or her place of employment.

3. The employment record of an employing unit may not be charged for the payment of benefits to an individual who has voluntarily left work under sub-subparagraph 2.c.

4. Disqualification for being discharged for misconduct connected with his or her work continues for the full period of unemployment next ensuing after having been discharged and until the individual is reemployed and has earned income of at least 17 times his or her weekly benefit amount and for not more than 52 weeks immediately following that week, as determined by the department in each case according to the circumstances or the seriousness of the misconduct, under the department’s rules for determining disqualification for benefits for misconduct.

5. If an individual has provided notification to the employing unit of his or her intent to voluntarily leave work and the employing unit discharges the individual for reasons other than misconduct before the date the voluntary quit was to take effect, the individual, if otherwise entitled, shall receive benefits from the date of the employer’s discharge until the effective date of his or her voluntary quit.

6. If an individual is notified by the employing unit of the employer’s intent to discharge the individual for reasons other than misconduct and the individual quits without good cause before the date the discharge was to take effect, the claimant is ineligible for benefits pursuant to s. 443.091(1)(d) for failing to be available for work for the week or weeks of unemployment occurring before the effective date of the discharge.

(b) For any week with respect to which the department finds that his or her unemployment is due to a suspension for misconduct connected with the individual’s work.

(c) For any week with respect to which the department finds that his or her unemployment is due to a leave of absence, if the leave was voluntarily initiated by the individual.

(d) For any week with respect to which the department finds that his or her unemployment is due to a discharge for misconduct connected with the individual’s work, consisting of drug use, as evidenced by a positive, confirmed drug test.

(2) If the Department of Commerce finds that the individual has failed without good cause to apply for available suitable work, accept suitable work when offered to him or her, or return to the individual’s customary self-employment when directed by the department, the disqualification continues for the full period of unemployment next ensuing after he or she failed without good cause to apply for available suitable work, accept suitable work, or return to his or her customary self-employment, and until the individual has earned income of at least 17 times his or her weekly benefit amount. The department shall by rule adopt criteria for determining the “suitability of work,” as used in this section. In developing these rules, the department shall consider the duration of a claimant’s unemployment in determining the suitability of work and the suitability of proposed rates of compensation for available work. Further, after an individual has received 25 weeks of benefits in a single year, suitable work is a job that pays the minimum wage and is 120 percent or more of the weekly benefit amount the individual is drawing.

(a) In determining whether or not any work is suitable for an individual, the department shall consider the degree of risk to the individual’s health, safety, and morals; the individual’s physical fitness, prior training, experience, prior earnings, length of unemployment, and prospects for securing local work in his or her customary occupation; and the distance of the available work from his or her residence.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, work is not deemed suitable and benefits may not be denied to any otherwise eligible individual for refusing to accept new work under any of the following conditions:

1. The position offered is vacant due directly to a strike, lockout, or other labor dispute.

2. The wages, hours, or other conditions of the work offered are substantially less favorable to the individual than those prevailing for similar work in the locality.

3. As a condition of being employed, the individual is required to join a company union or to resign from or refrain from joining any bona fide labor organization.

(c) If the department finds that an individual was rejected for offered employment as the direct result of a positive, confirmed drug test required as a condition of employment, the individual is disqualified for refusing to accept an offer of suitable work.

(3) For any week with respect to which he or she is receiving or has received remuneration in the form of:

(a) Wages in lieu of notice.

(b) Severance pay. The number of weeks that an individual’s severance pay disqualifies the individual is equal to the amount of the severance pay divided by that individual’s average weekly wage received from the employer that paid the severance pay, rounded down to the nearest whole number, beginning with the week the individual is separated from employment.

(c) Compensation for temporary total disability or permanent total disability under the workers’ compensation law of any state or under a similar law of the United States.

If the remuneration referred to in this subsection is less than the benefits that would otherwise be due under this chapter, an individual who is otherwise eligible is entitled to receive for that week benefits reduced by the amount of the remuneration.

(4) For any week with respect to which the department finds that his or her total or partial unemployment is due to a labor dispute in active progress which exists at the factory, establishment, or other premises at which he or she is or was last employed; except that this subsection does not apply if it is shown to the satisfaction of the department that:

(a)1. He or she is not participating in, financing, or directly interested in the labor dispute that is in active progress; however, the payment of regular union dues may not be construed as financing a labor dispute within the meaning of this section; and

2. He or she does not belong to a grade or class of workers of which immediately before the commencement of the labor dispute there were members employed at the premises at which the labor dispute occurs any of whom are participating in, financing, or directly interested in the dispute; if in any case separate branches of work are commonly conducted as separate businesses in separate premises, or are conducted in separate departments of the same premises, each department, for the purpose of this subsection, is deemed to be a separate factory, establishment, or other premise.

(b) His or her total or partial unemployment results from a lockout by his or her employer. As used in this section, the term “lockout” means a situation in which employees have not gone on strike, nor have employees notified the employer of a date certain for a strike, but in which employees have been denied entry to the factory, establishment, or other premises of employment by the employer. However, benefits are not payable under this paragraph if the lockout action was taken in response to threats, actions, or other indications of impending damage to property and equipment or possible physical violence by employees or in response to actual damage or violence or a substantial reduction in production instigated or perpetrated by employees.

(5) For any week with respect to which or a part of which he or she has received or is seeking reemployment assistance or unemployment benefits under a reemployment assistance or unemployment compensation law of another state or of the United States. For the purposes of this subsection, a reemployment assistance or unemployment compensation law of the United States is any law of the United States which provides for payment of any type and in any amounts for periods of unemployment due to lack of work. However, if the appropriate agency of the other state or of the United States finally determines that he or she is not entitled to reemployment assistance or unemployment benefits, this disqualification does not apply.

(6) For making any false or fraudulent representation for the purpose of obtaining benefits contrary to this chapter, constituting a violation under s. 443.071. The disqualification imposed under this subsection shall begin with the week for which the false or fraudulent representation was made and shall continue for a period not to exceed 1 year after the date the Department of Commerce discovers the false or fraudulent representation and until any overpayment of benefits resulting from such representation has been repaid in full. This disqualification may be appealed in the same manner as any other disqualification imposed under this section. A conviction by any court of competent jurisdiction in this state of the offense prohibited or punished by s. 443.071 is conclusive upon the appeals referee and the commission of the making of the false or fraudulent representation for which disqualification is imposed under this section.

(7) If the Department of Commerce finds that the individual is an alien, unless the alien is an individual who has been lawfully admitted for permanent residence or otherwise is permanently residing in the United States under color of law, including an alien who is lawfully present in the United States as a result of the application of s. 203(a)(7) or s. 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, if any modifications to s. 3304(a)(14) of the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, as provided by Pub. L. No. 94-566, which specify other conditions or other effective dates than those stated under federal law for the denial of benefits based on services performed by aliens, and which modifications are required to be implemented under state law as a condition for full tax credit against the tax imposed by the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, are deemed applicable under this section, if:

(a) Any data or information required of individuals applying for benefits to determine whether benefits are not payable to them because of their alien status is uniformly required from all applicants for benefits; and

(b) In the case of an individual whose application for benefits would otherwise be approved, a determination that benefits to such individual are not payable because of his or her alien status may not be made except by a preponderance of the evidence.

If the department finds that the individual has refused without good cause an offer of resettlement or relocation, which offer provides for suitable employment for the individual notwithstanding the distance of relocation, resettlement, or employment from the current location of the individual in this state, this disqualification continues for the week in which the failure occurred and for not more than 17 weeks immediately after that week, or a reduction by not more than 5 weeks from the duration of benefits, as determined by the department in each case.

(8) For any week with respect to which he or she has received, from a base period employer, benefits from a retirement, pension, or annuity program embodied in a union contract or either a public or private employee benefit program, except:

(a) For any week in which benefits from a retirement, pension, or annuity program, as referred to in this subsection, are less than the weekly benefits that would otherwise be due under this chapter, he or she is entitled to receive for that week, if otherwise eligible, benefits reduced by the amount of benefits from the retirement, pension, or annuity program, prorated to a weekly basis;

(b) For any week in which an individual has received benefits from a retirement, pension, or annuity program, as referred to in this subsection, for which program he or she has paid at least one-half of the contributions, the individual is entitled to receive for that week, if otherwise eligible, benefits reduced by one-half of the amount of benefits from the retirement, pension, or annuity program, prorated on a weekly basis; or

(c) For any week in which he or she has received benefits from a retirement, pension, or annuity program under the United States Social Security Act, for which program he or she has paid any contribution, benefits may not be reduced because of the contribution.

For the purpose of this subsection, benefits from the United States Social Security Act, a disability benefit program, or any other similar periodic payment based on the previous work of the individual are considered retirement income, except as provided in paragraph (c).

(9) If the individual was terminated from his or her work as follows:

(a) If the Department of Commerce or the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission finds that the individual was terminated from work for violation of any criminal law, under any jurisdiction, which was in connection with his or her work, and the individual was convicted, or entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, the individual is not entitled to reemployment assistance benefits for up to 52 weeks, pursuant to rules adopted by the department, and until he or she has earned income of at least 17 times his or her weekly benefit amount. If, before an adjudication of guilt, an admission of guilt, or a plea of nolo contendere, the employer proves by competent substantial evidence to the department that the arrest was due to a crime against the employer or the employer’s business, customers, or invitees, the individual is not entitled to reemployment assistance benefits.

(b) If the department or the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission finds that the individual was terminated from work for any dishonest act in connection with his or her work, the individual is not entitled to reemployment assistance benefits for up to 52 weeks, pursuant to rules adopted by the department, and until he or she has earned income of at least 17 times his or her weekly benefit amount. If the employer terminates an individual as a result of a dishonest act in connection with his or her work and the department finds misconduct in connection with his or her work, the individual is not entitled to reemployment assistance benefits.

If an individual is disqualified for benefits, the account of the terminating employer, if the employer is in the base period, is noncharged at the time the disqualification is imposed.

(10) Subject to the requirements of this subsection, if the claim is made based on the loss of employment as a leased employee for an employee leasing company or as a temporary employee for a temporary help firm.

(a) As used in this subsection, the term:

1. “Temporary help firm” means a firm that hires its own employees and assigns them to clients to support or supplement the client’s workforce in work situations such as employee absences, temporary skill shortages, seasonal workloads, and special assignments and projects, and includes a labor pool as defined in s. 448.22. The term also includes a firm created by an entity licensed under s. 125.012(6), which hires employees assigned by a union for the purpose of supplementing or supporting the workforce of the temporary help firm’s clients. The term does not include employee leasing companies regulated under part XI of chapter 468.

2. “Temporary employee” means an employee assigned to work for the clients of a temporary help firm. The term also includes a day laborer performing day labor, as defined in s. 448.22, who is employed by a labor pool as defined in s. 448.22.

3. “Leased employee” means an employee assigned to work for the clients of an employee leasing company regulated under part XI of chapter 468.

(b) A temporary or leased employee is deemed to have voluntarily quit employment and is disqualified for benefits under subparagraph (1)(a)1. if, upon conclusion of his or her latest assignment, the temporary or leased employee, without good cause, failed to contact the temporary help or employee-leasing firm for reassignment, if the employer advised the temporary or leased employee at the time of hire and that the leased employee is notified also at the time of separation that he or she must report for reassignment upon conclusion of each assignment, regardless of the duration of the assignment, and that reemployment assistance benefits may be denied for failure to report. For purposes of this section, the time of hire for a day laborer is upon his or her acceptance of the first assignment following completion of an employment application with the labor pool. The labor pool as defined in s. 448.22(1) must provide notice to the temporary employee upon conclusion of the latest assignment that work is available the next business day and that the temporary employee must report for reassignment the next business day. The notice must be given by means of a notice printed on the paycheck, written notice included in the pay envelope, or other written notification at the conclusion of the current assignment.

(11) If an individual is discharged from employment for drug use as evidenced by a positive, confirmed drug test as provided in paragraph (1)(d), or is rejected for offered employment because of a positive, confirmed drug test as provided in paragraph (2)(c), test results and chain of custody documentation provided to the employer by a licensed and approved drug-testing laboratory is self-authenticating and admissible in reemployment assistance hearings, and such evidence creates a rebuttable presumption that the individual used, or was using, controlled substances, subject to the following conditions:

(a) To qualify for the presumption described in this subsection, an employer must have implemented a drug-free workplace program under ss. 440.101 and 440.102, and must submit proof that the employer has qualified for the insurance discounts provided under s. 627.0915, as certified by the insurance carrier or self-insurance unit. In lieu of these requirements, an employer who does not fit the definition of “employer” in s. 440.102 may qualify for the presumption if the employer is in compliance with equivalent or more stringent drug-testing standards established by federal law or regulation.

(b) Only laboratories licensed and approved as provided in s. 440.102(9), or as provided by equivalent or more stringent licensing requirements established by federal law or regulation may perform the drug tests.

(c) Disclosure of drug test results and other information pertaining to drug testing of individuals who claim or receive compensation under this chapter shall be governed by s. 443.1715.

(12) For any week in which the individual is unavailable for work due to incarceration or imprisonment.

(13) For any week with respect to which the department finds that his or her unemployment is due to a discharge from employment for failure without good cause to maintain a license, registration, or certification required by applicable law necessary for the employee to perform her or his assigned job duties. For purposes of this subsection, the term “good cause” includes, but is not limited to, failure of the employer to submit information required for a license, registration, or certification; short-term physical injury which prevents the employee from completing or taking a required test; and inability to take or complete a required test that is outside the employee’s control.

History.—s. 6, ch. 18402, 1937; s. 4, ch. 19637, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 4151(493); s. 6, ch. 20685, 1941; s. 4, ch. 21983, 1943; s. 1, ch. 24083, 1947; s. 3, ch. 28242, 1953; s. 1, ch. 63-327; s. 1, ch. 63-157; s. 1, ch. 65-45; s. 1, ch. 65-114; s. 1, ch. 65-115; s. 1, ch. 65-244; s. 1, ch. 65-411; ss. 17, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 72-190; s. 4, ch. 77-262; s. 4, ch. 77-399; s. 1, ch. 77-424; s. 1, ch. 78-386; s. 22, ch. 79-7; s. 74, ch. 79-40; s. 2, ch. 79-293; s. 2, ch. 79-308; s. 183, ch. 79-400; ss. 3, 8, 9, ch. 80-95; s. 3, ch. 80-345; s. 1, ch. 81-42; s. 1, ch. 81-137; s. 4, ch. 88-289; s. 1, ch. 92-38; s. 1, ch. 92-84; s. 1, ch. 92-283; s. 2, ch. 93-153; s. 1, ch. 94-158; s. 4, ch. 94-347; s. 4, ch. 96-378; s. 2, ch. 96-411; s. 1060, ch. 97-103; s. 2, ch. 99-131; s. 24, ch. 2003-36; s. 7, ch. 2004-230; s. 1, ch. 2004-237; s. 1, ch. 2008-165; s. 6, ch. 2009-99; s. 15, ch. 2010-90; s. 357, ch. 2011-142; s. 5, ch. 2011-235; s. 7, ch. 2012-30; s. 43, ch. 2013-39; s. 1, ch. 2019-80; s. 10, ch. 2021-25; s. 177, ch. 2024-6.

Note.—Former s. 443.06.

F.S. 443.101 on Google Scholar

F.S. 443.101 on CourtListener

Amendments to 443.101

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 443.101

Total Results: 339

Hines v. Dept. of Labor & Emp. SEC.

455 So. 2d 1104

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1984 | Docket: 1316663

Cited 26 times | Published

requirements of law." This appeal followed. Under section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1983), an individual is

Ford v. Southeast Atlantic Corp.

588 So. 2d 1039, 1991 WL 231784

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1991 | Docket: 1297414

Cited 21 times | Published

affirmed by the Unemployment Appeals Commission. Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), provides that

Hummer v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

573 So. 2d 135, 6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 176, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 129, 1991 WL 1090

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1991 | Docket: 479176

Cited 21 times | Published

if an employee is discharged for misconduct. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1989). "Misconduct" is defined

Mason v. Load King Mfg. Co.

758 So. 2d 649, 2000 WL 565102

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2000 | Docket: 1726191

Cited 20 times | Published

work, whether fulltime, part-time, or temporary. § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1997) (emphasis added). The term

Bulkan v. FLA. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS

648 So. 2d 846, 1995 WL 15517

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1995 | Docket: 1342566

Cited 20 times | Published

receiving unemployment benefits pursuant to section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1993), which provides: An

Tallahassee Housing v. Unemp. Appeals Com'n

483 So. 2d 413, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 27

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1986 | Docket: 1511971

Cited 20 times | Published

and obligations to his employer. [2] Under section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1983), an individual is

Gulf County School Bd. v. Washington

567 So. 2d 420, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 435, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1102, 1990 WL 130211

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1990 | Docket: 1380246

Cited 18 times | Published

good cause attributable to his employer under section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1987). In a split decision

Szniatkiewicz v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

864 So. 2d 498, 2004 WL 32674

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2004 | Docket: 1425693

Cited 17 times | Published

Inc., 685 So.2d 876, 879 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); § 443.101(1)(a)(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). Courts have extended

Betancourt v. Sun Bank Miami, NA

672 So. 2d 37, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 222, 1996 WL 13984

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1996 | Docket: 1763654

Cited 17 times | Published

him for "misconduct connected with his work." § 443.101(1), Fla.Stat. (1993). Under section 443.036(26)

Verner v. State, Unemployment Appeals Com'n

474 So. 2d 909, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2045

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1985 | Docket: 1749805

Cited 17 times | Published

voluntarily resigned her position at the newspaper. Section 443.101(1), Florida Statutes (1983), disqualifies claimants

Lewis v. LAKELAND HEALTH CARE CENTER

685 So. 2d 876, 1996 WL 637253

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1996 | Docket: 1735081

Cited 16 times | Published

to establish that Ms. Lewis "left" or "quit." § 443.101, Fla.Stat. (1995). Ms. Lewis has consistently

Davis v. FLA. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS

472 So. 2d 800, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1985 | Docket: 1793839

Cited 14 times | Published

thereby disentitling her to such benefits under Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1983). Accepting fully

Grossman v. Jewish Community Center

704 So. 2d 714, 1998 WL 2446

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1998 | Docket: 1355106

Cited 13 times | Published

without good cause attributable to her employer. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). Whether that employee

Gilbert v. Department of Corrections

696 So. 2d 416, 1997 WL 352904

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1997 | Docket: 1696227

Cited 13 times | Published

claimant for misconduct connected with work. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). Section 443.036(26)

Gilbert v. Department of Corrections

696 So. 2d 416, 1997 WL 352904

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1997 | Docket: 1696227

Cited 13 times | Published

claimant for misconduct connected with work. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). Section 443.036(26)

Marcelo v. DEPT. OF LABOR & EMP. SEC.

453 So. 2d 927

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1984 | Docket: 1651440

Cited 13 times | Published

A.C.J., and OTT, J., concur. NOTES [1] See § 443.101(1), Fla. Stat. (1981).

Anderson v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

822 So. 2d 563, 2002 WL 1768986

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2002 | Docket: 1757145

Cited 12 times | Published

to receive unemployment compensation benefits. § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (2001); Crosby v. Unemployment Appeals

San Roman v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

711 So. 2d 93, 1998 WL 171472

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1998 | Docket: 1337423

Cited 12 times | Published

not be disqualified from receiving benefits. § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1995). Good cause attributable to

Grossman v. JC PENNEY CO. 2071

689 So. 2d 1206, 1997 WL 115315

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1997 | Docket: 2229723

Cited 12 times | Published

upon employee misconduct connected with work. § 443.101(1), Fla.Stat. (1995). In determining what constitutes

Fiedler v. Burdines, Inc.

654 So. 2d 1276, 1995 WL 302293

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1995 | Docket: 1710309

Cited 12 times | Published

misconduct connected with work pursuant to section 443.101(1), Florida Statutes. The UAC reversed the

Dean v. FLORIDA UNEMP. APPEALS COMM'N

598 So. 2d 100, 1992 WL 57864

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1992 | Docket: 1737702

Cited 12 times | Published

unemployment reserves. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1989). "Good cause," as used in section 443.101(1)(a), comprises

STATE DEPT. OF GEN. SERV. v. English

534 So. 2d 726

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1988 | Docket: 1358922

Cited 12 times | Published

with his work, if so found by the division." § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985). Section 443.036(24)

Sears, Roebuck & Company v. Fla. Unemp. Appeals Com'n

463 So. 2d 465

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1985 | Docket: 448858

Cited 12 times | Published

Ganey would be disqualified for benefits under section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1983). As a starting point

Yost v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

848 So. 2d 1235, 2003 WL 21536703

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2003 | Docket: 1309443

Cited 10 times | Published

for unemployment compensation benefits under section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2001). The UAC affirmed

Brown v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

633 So. 2d 36, 1994 WL 28842

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 1994 | Docket: 1296914

Cited 10 times | Published

receive unemployment compensation benefits. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). This subsection only

Brown v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

820 So. 2d 457, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9773, 2002 WL 1482620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2002 | Docket: 1362280

Cited 9 times | Published

voluntarily left her employment without good cause. § 443.101(1)(a)(1), Fla. Stat. We affirm. The determination

Webb v. Rice

693 So. 2d 1109, 1997 WL 268349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1997 | Docket: 2527427

Cited 9 times | Published

claimant for misconduct connected with work. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla.Stat. (1995). Section 443.036(26),

Miller v. Barnett Bank of Broward County

650 So. 2d 1089, 1995 WL 68746

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1995 | Docket: 1346567

Cited 9 times | Published

her for "misconduct connected with [her] work." § 443.101(1), Fla. Stat. (1993). Under section 443.036(26)

Nelson v. Burdines, Inc.

611 So. 2d 1329, 1993 WL 5680

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1993 | Docket: 1680588

Cited 9 times | Published

employment record of the employer as provided in Section 443.101(9) and 443.131(3)(a), Florida Statutes, and

Davidson v. AAA Cooper Transp.

852 So. 2d 398, 2003 WL 21976382

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2003 | Docket: 1305733

Cited 8 times | Published

So.2d 868, 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); see also § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003) (disqualifying those

Eulo v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEAL COM'N

724 So. 2d 636, 1999 WL 2523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 1999 | Docket: 1410348

Cited 8 times | Published

employer and was thus entitled to benefits under section 443.101(1)(a)1., Florida Statutes (1997). The UAC reversed

General Asphalt Co., Inc. v. Harris

563 So. 2d 803, 1990 WL 88091

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1990 | Docket: 1281586

Cited 8 times | Published

connected with his work[1] as provided in Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida *804 Statutes (1989).[2] We

Wright v. FLA. UNEMP. APPEALS COM'N

512 So. 2d 333, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2266

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1987 | Docket: 1517363

Cited 8 times | Published

finding that she was disqualified pursuant to section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1985), because she voluntarily

Alfred v. Fla. Dept. of Labor & Employ. SEC.

487 So. 2d 355

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1986 | Docket: 154902

Cited 8 times | Published

compensation benefits by the Division pursuant to section 443.101(7), Florida Statutes (1985),[1] because they

Smith v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

823 So. 2d 873, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12084, 2002 WL 1939981

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2002 | Docket: 1512771

Cited 7 times | Published

disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001). Whether an employee

Berry v. Scotty's, Inc.

711 So. 2d 575, 1998 WL 97730

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1998 | Docket: 1337306

Cited 7 times | Published

Berry for "misconduct connected with his work." § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). The Unemployment Appeals

Lusby v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

697 So. 2d 567, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8239, 1997 WL 404973

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 1997 | Docket: 1777169

Cited 7 times | Published

... for misconduct connected with his work.' § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995)." On this question, as

DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV. v. Solis

580 So. 2d 146, 1991 WL 78550

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1991 | Docket: 2489435

Cited 7 times | Published

in the United States under color of law. [2] § 443.101(7), Fla. Stat. (1985), provided, in pertinent

Moore v. FLA. UNEMPLOYMENT APP. COMM.

498 So. 2d 992, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2543

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1986 | Docket: 1699781

Cited 7 times | Published

good cause attributable to their employer. Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1985). In the present

South Fla. Water Management Dist. v. Caluwe

459 So. 2d 390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1984 | Docket: 1282501

Cited 7 times | Published

disqualify him for unemployment benefits under section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1983). We therefore affirm

FLA. SHERIFFS YOUTH FUND v. Dept. of Labor and Employment SEC.

436 So. 2d 332

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1983 | Docket: 1701038

Cited 7 times | Published

Commerce, 356 So.2d 1317 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), provides that

HILLSBOROUGH CTY. DEPT. OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES v. Unemp. Appeals Comm.

433 So. 2d 24, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1983 | Docket: 1425838

Cited 7 times | Published

on lack of misconduct connected with work. Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), disqualifies

Arnold v. Florida's Blood Centers, Inc.

949 So. 2d 242, 2007 WL 162148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2007 | Docket: 1720082

Cited 6 times | Published

unemployment compensation statute in leaving. See § 443.101(2), Fla. Stat. (2004) ("An individual shall be

Thomas v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

864 So. 2d 567, 2004 WL 126369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2004 | Docket: 1426071

Cited 6 times | Published

entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002). Section 443.036(29)

Johnson v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

680 So. 2d 1073, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10347, 1996 WL 562435

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1996 | Docket: 1663873

Cited 6 times | Published

misconduct in completing the application. Section 443.101(1)(a)2., Florida Statutes (1995), disqualifies

Scholastic Book Fairs v. UNEMPLOY. APPEALS

671 So. 2d 287, 1996 WL 168914

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1996 | Docket: 1247483

Cited 6 times | Published

conduct did not constitute misconduct under section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1993). The Unemployment

Skf Management v. Unemployment Appeals

664 So. 2d 345, 11 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1995 | Docket: 1230257

Cited 6 times | Published

were entitled to the statutory presumption of section 443.101(11) to establish Anderson used drugs, and in

Georgia v. STATE, UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

647 So. 2d 279, 1994 WL 685609

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1994 | Docket: 600555

Cited 6 times | Published

cause attributable to the employing unit under section 443.101, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992). The referee

Campeanu v. FLORIDA UNEMP. APPEALS COM'N

629 So. 2d 1015, 1993 WL 538200

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1993 | Docket: 1263870

Cited 6 times | Published

without good cause attributable to Eckerd. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1987); see also Gulf County

Rubido v. Brinks, Inc.

601 So. 2d 1298, 1992 WL 153919

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1992 | Docket: 1305319

Cited 6 times | Published

examiner and the claimant filed a timely appeal. See § 443.101(1)(a) 2., Fla. Stat. (1991) (providing for disqualification

Lovett v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

547 So. 2d 1253, 1989 WL 90482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1989 | Docket: 2529747

Cited 6 times | Published

referee, to meet the good cause standard of section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1987), and avoid loss of

Glenn v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM.

516 So. 2d 88, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2758, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11401, 1987 WL 2295

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1987 | Docket: 1267209

Cited 6 times | Published

connected with work within the meaning of section 443.101(1), Florida Statutes. The appeals referee made

Home Fuel Oil v. Florida Unemployment Appeals

494 So. 2d 268, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1965

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1986 | Docket: 1510791

Cited 6 times | Published

his findings of fact to the applicable law, section 443.101(1)(a), Florida *270 Statutes (1985),[1] the

Dept. of Air Force v. St. Unemployment Appeals

486 So. 2d 632, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 759

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1986 | Docket: 1714209

Cited 6 times | Published

attributable to [her] employer" within the meaning of Section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1983); and (3) that the

Thorkelson v. NY Pizza & Pasta Inc.

956 So. 2d 542, 2007 WL 1459846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2007 | Docket: 1740515

Cited 5 times | Published

the Unemployment Compensation Law, including section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2004), which provides:

Howell & O'Neal v. UNEMPLOYMENT APP. COM'N

934 So. 2d 570, 2006 WL 1888591

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2006 | Docket: 1747622

Cited 5 times | Published

or disability requiring separation from work. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005). "Good cause" in this

Brooks v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

695 So. 2d 879, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6957, 1997 WL 336588

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1997 | Docket: 1522061

Cited 5 times | Published

receiving unemployment compensation benefits under section 443.101(1)(a)2, Florida Statutes (1995). Misconduct

Alderman v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

664 So. 2d 1160, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13180, 1995 WL 755125

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1995 | Docket: 1230322

Cited 5 times | Published

cause. The issue before us is whether, under section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1994), a worker

Foote v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

659 So. 2d 1232, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9017, 1995 WL 502087

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1995 | Docket: 2014908

Cited 5 times | Published

discharged for misconduct connected with his work. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993). "Misconduct" is defined

Rosmond v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

651 So. 2d 233, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2070, 1995 WL 84478

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1995 | Docket: 476688

Cited 5 times | Published

discharged for misconduct connected with his/her work. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993). "Misconduct" includes

Amato v. STATE, UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

648 So. 2d 284, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 50, 1995 WL 1646

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1995 | Docket: 1342386

Cited 5 times | Published

be disqualified from receiving benefits. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1993). Good cause has been defined

Spangler v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM.

632 So. 2d 98, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 614, 1994 WL 28840

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 1994 | Docket: 462580

Cited 5 times | Published

cause attributable to his employing unit. Section 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). To constitute "good

Stewart v. Dollar Tree

635 So. 2d 73, 1994 WL 9546

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1994 | Docket: 1353083

Cited 5 times | Published

cause attributable to h[er] employing unit." § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1992). Because we conclude

Hubbard v. BT. TERMITE & PEST CONTROL

627 So. 2d 581, 1993 WL 496057

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1993 | Docket: 1752983

Cited 5 times | Published

disqualify her from unemployment benefits under section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1991). See Seger v

Gadsden v. FLA. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM.

616 So. 2d 1196, 1993 WL 125109

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1993 | Docket: 1366927

Cited 5 times | Published

proper statute to apply to these facts is section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1991).[3] This court

Lake Cnty. Sheriff's Dept. v. Unemp. App. Com'n

478 So. 2d 880

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1985 | Docket: 1484448

Cited 5 times | Published

work and was therefore not entitled to benefits. § 443.101(a), Fla. Stat. (1983). Because the findings of

Parker v. DEPT. OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SEC.

440 So. 2d 438

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1983 | Docket: 1728305

Cited 5 times | Published

27, 1982, by an "adjudicator" pursuant to Section 443.101(1)(a)1, Florida Statutes. Parker appealed and

Vazquez v. GFC Builders Corp.

431 So. 2d 739

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1983 | Docket: 1512040

Cited 5 times | Published

recited in the Referee's Report and is found in Section 443.101(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1981). (a) Conduct

Davis v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

425 So. 2d 198, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18765

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1983 | Docket: 1658086

Cited 5 times | Published

been discharged for misconduct. We affirm. Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), provides that

Flagler Cty. Sheriff's Dept. v. Florida, Etc.

421 So. 2d 1107

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1982 | Docket: 1372531

Cited 5 times | Published

good cause attributable to the employer. See § 443.101(1), Fla. Stat. (1981). On December 9, 1980, Parrish

Del Pino v. Arrow Air, Inc.

920 So. 2d 772, 2006 WL 335515

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2006 | Docket: 1730625

Cited 4 times | Published

discharged for misconduct connected with work. § 443.101(1)(a)(2), Fla. Stat. (2005). The claimant timely

Rodriguez v. Svinga Bros. Corp.

802 So. 2d 455, 2001 WL 1614141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2001 | Docket: 1698783

Cited 4 times | Published

misconduct connected with work pursuant to section 443.101, Florida Statutes (2001), the statute should

Crosby v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

711 So. 2d 260, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6521, 1998 WL 288227

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1998 | Docket: 1337307

Cited 4 times | Published

other than misconduct connected with work." See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996). Devereaux appealed that

Menendez v. River Orchids Inv. Corp.

653 So. 2d 470, 1995 WL 170286

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1995 | Docket: 1529976

Cited 4 times | Published

employment for misconduct connected with work. § 443.101(1)(a)(2), Fla. Stat. (1993). The claimant timely

Wolfson v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

649 So. 2d 363, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1187, 1995 WL 51119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1995 | Docket: 2558150

Cited 4 times | Published

GOSHORN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993).

Scott v. Central Florida Tower Corp.

646 So. 2d 842, 1994 WL 700677

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1994 | Docket: 2576558

Cited 4 times | Published

Department of Labor and Employment Security. § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1993). This court lacks authority

Garguilo v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

642 So. 2d 784, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1869

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1994 | Docket: 549675

Cited 4 times | Published

of unemployment compensation benefits under Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1983). Id. (citations

Tierney v. FLA. UNEMPLOYMENT APP. COM'N.

640 So. 2d 154, 1994 WL 390766

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1994 | Docket: 1371167

Cited 4 times | Published

benefits, finding he was disqualified pursuant to section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1993), because he voluntarily

Coelho v. Balasky

631 So. 2d 335, 1994 WL 26362

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1994 | Docket: 1464354

Cited 4 times | Published

employment. Reversed and remanded. NOTES [1] Section 443.101(1)(a) provides in pertinent part: 1. Disqualification

PANAMA CITY HOUSING AUTH. v. Sowby

587 So. 2d 494, 1991 WL 174418

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1991 | Docket: 1405925

Cited 4 times | Published

compensation benefits. Under the provisions of section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), An individual

Pallas v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

578 So. 2d 487, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3765, 1991 WL 61801

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1991 | Docket: 440307

Cited 4 times | Published

connection with this claim. [Emphasis in original]. Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1989) provides that

DEPT. OF GENERAL SERV. v. English

509 So. 2d 1198, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1567

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1987 | Docket: 1362593

Cited 4 times | Published

unemployment compensation benefits. Pursuant to Section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1985), a claimant for such

School Bd. v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS

500 So. 2d 253, 36 Educ. L. Rep. 1284

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1986 | Docket: 1689552

Cited 4 times | Published

Under the "Unemployment Compensation Law," Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes, an individual is disqualified

Wyche v. FLA. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS

469 So. 2d 184, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1268

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1985 | Docket: 1272582

Cited 4 times | Published

law and that its decision requires reversal. Section 443.101(1), Florida Statutes (1983), disqualifies an

LeDew v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

456 So. 2d 1219, 20 Educ. L. Rep. 1039

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1984 | Docket: 1447435

Cited 4 times | Published

unemployment benefits as provided for under Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1981). We disagree

Campbell v. Dept. of Labor & Emp. SEC.

455 So. 2d 569

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1984 | Docket: 1692608

Cited 4 times | Published

entitlement to unemployment benefits by reason of Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1983), which provides

Sollecito v. Hollywood Lincoln Mercury, Inc.

450 So. 2d 928

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1984 | Docket: 1729092

Cited 4 times | Published

attributable to the employer within the meaning of Section 443.101(1), Florida Statutes (1983). As appellee notes

Rycraft v. United Technologies

449 So. 2d 382

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1984 | Docket: 1325453

Cited 4 times | Published

misconduct connected with work as provided in Section 443.101(1), Florida Statutes (1983). We agree with

Nofrio v. DEPT. OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT SEC.

442 So. 2d 268

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1983 | Docket: 258685

Cited 4 times | Published

entitled to unemployment benefits pursuant to section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1981). The Unemployment

Seneca v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

39 So. 3d 385, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8923, 2010 WL 2472274

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2010 | Docket: 2398282

Cited 3 times | Published

established that the disqualification provisions of Section 443.101(1), Florida Statutes ... do not apply to a

Saunders v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

888 So. 2d 69, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15890, 2004 WL 2397189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2004 | Docket: 1697199

Cited 3 times | Published

for misconduct connected with his or her work." § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002). "Misconduct" includes

Smith v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

831 So. 2d 249, 2002 WL 31662389

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 2002 | Docket: 1723055

Cited 3 times | Published

misconduct connected with work pursuant to section 443.101(1), Florida Statutes (2001). The UAC found

Sienkiewicz v. Intrepid Powerboats, Inc.

774 So. 2d 739, 2000 WL 1629293

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2000 | Docket: 1330989

Cited 3 times | Published

unemployment benefits because she had quit her job. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). Sienkiewicz appealed

Cuebas v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

765 So. 2d 882, 2000 WL 1189714

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2000 | Docket: 429063

Cited 3 times | Published

her employer. On appeal the UAC affirmed. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). Ms. Cuebas contends

Rivero v. Miami-Dade County

764 So. 2d 850, 2000 WL 1114534

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2000 | Docket: 1516406

Cited 3 times | Published

from his or her employer with good cause. See § 443.101(1)(a)1, Fla. Stat. (1999); Livingston v. Tucker

Ferguson v. Henry Lee Co.

734 So. 2d 1161, 1999 WL 371361

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1999 | Docket: 1730862

Cited 3 times | Published

good cause attributable to his employer. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat (1997). "Good cause" is defined

Philemy v. Florida Dept. of HRS

731 So. 2d 64, 1999 WL 174063

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1999 | Docket: 1408957

Cited 3 times | Published

employee misconduct connected with work. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995); McKnight v. Florida

Hall v. FLA. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

700 So. 2d 107, 1997 WL 614325

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1997 | Docket: 1719681

Cited 3 times | Published

employee for misconduct connected with work. § 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). Section 443.036(26)

Hall v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS

697 So. 2d 541, 1997 WL 352433

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1997 | Docket: 1777268

Cited 3 times | Published

disqualified from receiving benefits under section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1995), because she did not

Berger v. ASOLO CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC.

686 So. 2d 649, 1996 WL 691393

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1996 | Docket: 1676241

Cited 3 times | Published

Neese rule in 1994 when it added a sentence to section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1993). That section

Krulla v. Barnett Bank

629 So. 2d 1005, 1993 WL 538150

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1993 | Docket: 1677258

Cited 3 times | Published

good cause attributable to Barnett Bank. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. We recognize that it is the

Orange Bank v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

611 So. 2d 107, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13132, 1992 WL 389047

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1992 | Docket: 1674203

Cited 3 times | Published

if an employee is discharged for misconduct. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). Section 443.036(26)

Madison v. Williams Island Country Club

606 So. 2d 687, 1992 WL 240630

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1992 | Docket: 2569139

Cited 3 times | Published

unit for misconduct connected with his work." Section 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). Section 443.036(26)

Krueger v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

555 So. 2d 1225, 1989 WL 102524

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1989 | Docket: 1724711

Cited 3 times | Published

without good cause attributable to [her] employer." § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1987). This statutory disqualification

Gulf County School Bd. v. Washington

544 So. 2d 288, 1989 WL 57837

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1989 | Docket: 1709602

Cited 3 times | Published

his employment. The referee, interpreting Section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1987), determined that because

Terjesen v. State, Unemployment Appeals Com'n

491 So. 2d 1189, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1550, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8783

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1986 | Docket: 1383907

Cited 3 times | Published

the claimant to unemployment benefits under Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1985). The appeals

Kacsir v. ST. UNEMPLOYMENT APP. COMM.

456 So. 2d 528

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1984 | Docket: 2568002

Cited 3 times | Published

misrepresented the duration of his position. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1981). A reviewing court may

Tannariello v. FED'N OF PUBLIC EMPS.

437 So. 2d 799

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1983 | Docket: 1675039

Cited 3 times | Published

benefits unless such separation was for good cause. § 443.101(1), Fla. Stat. (1981). We have previously interpreted

Department of Educ. v. Atwater

417 So. 2d 749, 5 Educ. L. Rep. 1325

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1982 | Docket: 1383987

Cited 3 times | Published

suitable work" disqualification provisions of section 443.101(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1980),[1] as being

Mid-Florida Freezer Warehouses, Ltd. v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

41 So. 3d 1014, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11433, 2010 WL 3056607

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2010 | Docket: 1668378

Cited 2 times | Published

So.2d 1039, 1040 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Under section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2009), an employee

Lewis v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

899 So. 2d 1183, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5058, 2005 WL 840106

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2005 | Docket: 1705616

Cited 2 times | Published

for misconduct connected with his or her work." § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002). "Misconduct" is defined

Rosas v. Remington Hospitality, Inc.

899 So. 2d 390, 2005 WL 713131

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2005 | Docket: 756797

Cited 2 times | Published

discharged for misconduct connected with work. § 443.101(1)(a)(2), Fla. Stat. (2003). The claimant timely

Willick v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

885 So. 2d 440, 2004 WL 2346142

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2004 | Docket: 1685290

Cited 2 times | Published

disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002). "[W]henever feasible

Cooksey-James v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

869 So. 2d 1209, 2004 WL 590389

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2004 | Docket: 1175456

Cited 2 times | Published

which affirmed over a well-reasoned dissent. Section 443.101(1)(a) provides that an individual is "disqualified

Doig v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

862 So. 2d 76, 2003 WL 22668846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2003 | Docket: 1762671

Cited 2 times | Published

her work within the previous 6 calendar months. § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (2000). In a similar case, however

Torres v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

862 So. 2d 26, 2003 WL 22149150

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2003 | Docket: 1762821

Cited 2 times | Published

entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000). Section 443.036(29)

Kelly v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

823 So. 2d 275, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11292, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1826

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2002 | Docket: 458431

Cited 2 times | Published

good cause attributable to the employer. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001). In this context, "good

Groudas v. Pinellas County School Bd.

793 So. 2d 983, 2001 WL 98554

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2001 | Docket: 1677931

Cited 2 times | Published

previous full-time employer, the moving company. Section 443.101(1)(a)(1), Florida Statutes (1999), howevera

King v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

763 So. 2d 1151, 2000 WL 36298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2000 | Docket: 1681805

Cited 2 times | Published

Regulation, 475 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1999), provides that

Novas v. FLA. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

735 So. 2d 563, 1999 WL 371364

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1999 | Docket: 1728546

Cited 2 times | Published

disqualified from receiving such benefits pursuant to section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1997), because she had been

Mikolsky v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

721 So. 2d 738, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14051, 1998 WL 601247

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1998 | Docket: 1323211

Cited 2 times | Published

full-time position.[1] But it reasons that section 443.101(1)(a) was amended to change that result. That

Ryals v. STATE, UNEMPLOYMENT COM'N

722 So. 2d 845, 1998 WL 770650

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1998 | Docket: 2543988

Cited 2 times | Published

compensation benefits. We affirm. *846 Under section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), claimants are

Davis v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

715 So. 2d 1157, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11008, 1998 WL 543271

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1998 | Docket: 798702

Cited 2 times | Published

work, thus making her ineligible for benefits. § 443.101(1), Fla. Stat. We affirm. Davis was an employee

Folden v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

696 So. 2d 537, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7878, 1997 WL 385786

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1997 | Docket: 1695994

Cited 2 times | Published

discharged for misconduct connected with his work. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). "Misconduct" is defined

Easton v. STATE UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

693 So. 2d 712, 1997 WL 269172

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1997 | Docket: 2574652

Cited 2 times | Published

An employee may be denied benefits under section 443.101(1), Florida Statutes (1995), for misconduct

Corman v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM'NS

687 So. 2d 963, 1997 WL 63672

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1997 | Docket: 1370511

Cited 2 times | Published

good cause attributable to his employer. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993). Corman was employed

Gardner v. STATE, UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

682 So. 2d 1222, 1996 WL 668434

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1996 | Docket: 1276702

Cited 2 times | Published

employee's duties and obligations to his employer. Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that

McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc. v. Roman

645 So. 2d 547, 1994 WL 637288

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1994 | Docket: 1223250

Cited 2 times | Published

with his work, if so found by the division." § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). "Misconduct" is defined

Vajda v. FLORIDA UNEMP. APPEALS COM'N

610 So. 2d 645, 1992 WL 367331

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1992 | Docket: 1734873

Cited 2 times | Published

individual requiring separation from his work." § 443.101(1)(a)(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). The undisputed evidence

Garcia v. AT & T COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

575 So. 2d 730, 16 Fla. L. Weekly 573

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1991 | Docket: 1443074

Cited 2 times | Published

448.06, Florida Statutes (1961), renumbered Section 443.101(1)(a) by Chapter 80-95, Laws of Florida, was

Adain v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

523 So. 2d 175, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 868, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1344, 1988 WL 28298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1988 | Docket: 1517203

Cited 2 times | Published

without good cause attributable to his employer. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985). The UAC affirmed that

Buckeye Cellulose Corporation v. Williams

522 So. 2d 39, 1988 WL 2622

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1988 | Docket: 1192261

Cited 2 times | Published

for good cause attributable to his employer. § 443.101, Fla. Stat. "Good cause" for voluntarily quitting

Smalls v. STATE UNEMPLOYMENT APP. COM'N

485 So. 2d 1, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1237

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1985 | Docket: 1680816

Cited 2 times | Published

setting follow either authority in the face of section 443.101, Florida Statutes, which predicates the award

Massey v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

478 So. 2d 1140, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2541

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1985 | Docket: 1484731

Cited 2 times | Published

referee's decision, and this appeal followed. Section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1983), provides in part:

Kinlaw v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM.

417 So. 2d 802, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20773

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1982 | Docket: 1484710

Cited 2 times | Published

was discharged for misconduct as defined in section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1981). See also Varig Brazilian

Florida Afl-Cio v. State of Florida Department of Labor and Employment Security

676 F.2d 513, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19222, 94 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 13,595

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 17, 1982 | Docket: 485172

Cited 2 times | Published

HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: Florida Statutes § 443.101(1) and (2) provide that a claimant for unemployment

In re Mendoza

597 B.R. 686

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Mar 4, 2019 | Docket: 65791195

Cited 1 times | Published

statutory formulation of eligibility in Fla. Stat. § 443.101(7) (1985) ); Solis v. Department of Health and

Taylor v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

84 So. 3d 1234, 2012 WL 1231073, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5644

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2012 | Docket: 2552856

Cited 1 times | Published

competent substantial evidence. We disagree. Section 443.101(1), Florida Statutes (June-July 2010), provides:

Arroyo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

60 So. 3d 492, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5571, 2011 WL 1485999

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2011 | Docket: 2363053

Cited 1 times | Published

would disqualify her from receiving benefits. Section 443.101(1)(a), of the Florida Statutes disqualifies

Cochran v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

46 So. 3d 1195, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17138, 2010 WL 4483710

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2010 | Docket: 2558769

Cited 1 times | Published

Ms. Cochran was discharged for misconduct. Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2009), governs disqualification

Dann Ocean Towing, Inc. v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

37 So. 3d 968, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8952, 2010 WL 2472200

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2010 | Docket: 1289426

Cited 1 times | Published

conducted in compliance with the requirements of section 443.101(11), Florida Statutes (2008). Accordingly,

Jones v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

36 So. 3d 808, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7427, 2010 WL 2079665

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2010 | Docket: 1118361

Cited 1 times | Published

Commission upheld the referee's order. Under section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2008), a person is

F.R. Aleman & Associates, Inc. v. Cisneros

35 So. 3d 158, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7308, 2010 WL 2076968

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2010 | Docket: 1645989

Cited 1 times | Published

actions did not rise to the level of misconduct. Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2008) disqualifies

Waggle Bros., Inc. v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

37 So. 3d 873, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4510, 2010 WL 1329082

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2010 | Docket: 159296

Cited 1 times | Published

voluntarily quit, he was not entitled to benefits. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008) (stating that "[a]n individual

Diaz v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

31 So. 3d 271, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3917, 2010 WL 1131439

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2010 | Docket: 1647621

Cited 1 times | Published

633 So.2d 36, 38 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (citing § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991)). "`Good cause' for voluntarily

Diaz v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

10 So. 3d 695, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6987, 2009 WL 1423420

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2009 | Docket: 1559348

Cited 1 times | Published

valid personal reasons for quitting his job, section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2008), disqualifies

Meyerowitz v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

9 So. 3d 738, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3439, 2009 WL 1066069

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2009 | Docket: 60309076

Cited 1 times | Published

incident is insufficient to deny benefits. Section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes, provides: “An individual

Presnell v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

1 So. 3d 1113, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 254, 2009 WL 102218

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2009 | Docket: 1653459

Cited 1 times | Published

good cause attributable to the employer. See § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007); see also, Kloepper v

Porter v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

1 So. 3d 1101, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 133

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2009 | Docket: 1653902

Cited 1 times | Published

recover unemployment compensation benefits under section 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007), notwithstanding the

Hernandez v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

995 So. 2d 620, 2008 WL 5156649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2008 | Docket: 2522291

Cited 1 times | Published

employment without good cause, pursuant to section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2007). "Whether an

Grayson v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

980 So. 2d 1193, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 6148, 2008 WL 1883884

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2008 | Docket: 2531984

Cited 1 times | Published

without good cause attributable to the employer. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007); Miot v. Dade County

Space Science v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

968 So. 2d 1036, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18816, 2007 WL 4207391

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2007 | Docket: 1745500

Cited 1 times | Published

Com'n, 899 So.2d 426 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Section 443.101(1)(a) of the Florida Statutes (2004) provides:

Lawnco Services v. Unemployment Appeals

946 So. 2d 586, 2006 WL 3733273

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2006 | Docket: 2545423

Cited 1 times | Published

determination of the claims adjudicator. [2] Section 443.101, Florida Statutes, states that an employee

Benson v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

927 So. 2d 49, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4642, 2006 WL 846836

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2006 | Docket: 1765371

Cited 1 times | Published

690 So.2d 752, 753 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)). Section 443.101(1), Florida Statutes (2004), disqualifies individuals

Forte v. Florida Unemployment Appeals

899 So. 2d 1159, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4670, 2005 WL 766972

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 2005 | Docket: 1705665

Cited 1 times | Published

, 872 So.2d 457 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Under section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2004), a claimant

Andres v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

888 So. 2d 119, 2004 WL 2729701

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2004 | Docket: 1697279

Cited 1 times | Published

cause for voluntarily leaving a job under section 443.101(1)(a)1. Even though an illness is not factually

City of Largo v. Rodriguez

884 So. 2d 121, 2004 WL 1498182

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2004 | Docket: 1282093

Cited 1 times | Published

employer for misconduct connected with work. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). "[D]ishonesty is and

Fillmore v. FLORIDA UNEMP. APPEALS COM'N

873 So. 2d 1256, 2004 WL 1176164

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2004 | Docket: 1451433

Cited 1 times | Published

disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002); Smith v. Unemployment

Kloepper v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

871 So. 2d 997, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5243, 2004 WL 813475

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2004 | Docket: 1300678

Cited 1 times | Published

to receive unemployment compensation benefits. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. This subsection only protects

Action Labor of Florida v. Liberty Mut.

879 So. 2d 1240, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5230, 2004 WL 784774

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2004 | Docket: 1514422

Cited 1 times | Published

of any part of such contractor's contract.... § 443.101(10)(a)(1), Florida Statutes (1997), defines a

Action Labor of Florida v. Liberty Mut.

879 So. 2d 1240, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5230, 2004 WL 784774

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2004 | Docket: 1514422

Cited 1 times | Published

of any part of such contractor's contract.... § 443.101(10)(a)(1), Florida Statutes (1997), defines a

Ayers v. STATE, UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

848 So. 2d 1239, 2003 WL 21537155

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2003 | Docket: 1309361

Cited 1 times | Published

without good cause attributable to the employer. § 443.101(1)(a)(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). Whether good cause

Lyster v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOY. APPEALS COM'N

826 So. 2d 482, 2002 WL 31094142

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2002 | Docket: 1197547

Cited 1 times | Published

basis of "misconduct connected with ... work." § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001). Because the employer

Rochussen v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

795 So. 2d 1075, 2001 WL 1104551

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2001 | Docket: 1673243

Cited 1 times | Published

Sess. (Fla.1994). Prior to the amendment, section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), stated: Disqualification

Sekinger v. Heritage Ins., Inc.

718 So. 2d 358, 1998 WL 667462

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1998 | Docket: 726997

Cited 1 times | Published

good cause attributable to the employer. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1997). The Unemployment Appeals Commission

Quincy Corp. v. Aguilar

704 So. 2d 1055, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2543

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1997 | Docket: 1354070

Cited 1 times | Published

that the labor dispute disqualification of section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1995), no longer applied

Gorr v. Sheridan Travels, Inc.

655 So. 2d 1310, 1995 WL 353464

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1995 | Docket: 2546264

Cited 1 times | Published

voluntarily leave employment, within the meaning of section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes. See generally O'Brien

Castillo v. Sally Beauty Co., Inc.

637 So. 2d 269, 1994 WL 137787

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1994 | Docket: 2582485

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida's unemployment compensation law, Section 443.101(1), Florida Statutes (1993), provides that

Sun States Services v. Unemp. App. Com'n

629 So. 2d 858, 1993 WL 323149

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1993 | Docket: 1264559

Cited 1 times | Published

whether she was disqualified for benefits under section 443.101(2), Florida Statutes (1991), for "fail[ing]

Palm Beach Cty. Sch. Bd. v. State, Unemp. App. Com'n

576 So. 2d 362, 1991 WL 27945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1991 | Docket: 1242492

Cited 1 times | Published

then she would be disqualified for benefits. § 443.101(2), Fla. Stat. (1989). Such a result is repugnant

Solis v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVS.

546 So. 2d 1073, 1989 WL 59547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1989 | Docket: 1731053

Cited 1 times | Published

residing in the United States under color of law." § 443.101(7), Fla. Stat. (1985).[3] After careful consideration

Sun State Services v. FLA. UNEMP APP. COM'N

503 So. 2d 373, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 534

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1987 | Docket: 624600

Cited 1 times | Published

Illinois to take care of an ailing sister. Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1983); Moore v. Florida

Glasco v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Comm'n

247 So. 3d 70

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2018 | Docket: 64681818

Published

weeks, and until Appellant has earned $4675. See § 443.101(1)(a)2., Fla. Stat. (2017). We therefore remand

Glasco v. Reemployment

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2018 | Docket: 6773030

Published

weeks, and until Appellant has earned $4675. See § 443.101(1)(a)2., Fla. Stat. (2017). We therefore remand

Angel Contreras v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission and Harold L. Simpson

178 So. 3d 953, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16968, 2015 WL 7247364

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2015 | Docket: 3011963

Published

“for misconduct connected with his or her work.” § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). “Misconduct” includes

Alleyn v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

169 So. 3d 1289, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11644, 2015 WL 4624010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2015 | Docket: 60248857

Published

for “good cause” attributable to the employer. § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). The phrase “good cause”

Steven A. Salvatore v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

168 So. 3d 351

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2015 | Docket: 2675487

Published

affirm the Commission’s final order. Section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2014), provides that

Beach Community Bank v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

164 So. 3d 798

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2015 | Docket: 2661167

Published

therefore not disqualified for benefits under section 443.101, Florida Statutes. Because the Bank fails to

Soler v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

143 So. 3d 1152, 2014 WL 3844150, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12036

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2014 | Docket: 60242270

Published

to the claimant’s right to claim any benefits. § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (2014). In its supplemental briefing

Dowden v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

132 So. 3d 1198, 2014 WL 562934, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2032

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2014 | Docket: 60238339

Published

Donuts on that date due to lack of child care. Section 443.101(l)(a) provides that “[a]n individual shall

Ramirez v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

135 So. 3d 408, 2014 WL 471972, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1750

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2014 | Docket: 60239616

Published

benefits soon thereafter. This was job abandonment. § 443.101(2), Fla. Stat. (2013). Sympathy and a degree of

Noel v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

125 So. 3d 1022, 2013 WL 3335015, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10678

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2013 | Docket: 60235626

Published

amounts to misconduct per se for purposes of section 443.101(l)(a).”). WARNER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ

Laneri v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

101 So. 3d 1277, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21093, 2012 WL 6061119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2012 | Docket: 60226179

Published

receiving unemployment compensation benefits. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (2011). As part of the legislative

Crespo v. Florida Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

128 So. 3d 49, 2012 WL 6027761, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20865

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2012 | Docket: 60237103

Published

referee, and this appeal followed. ANALYSIS Section 443.101, Florida Statutes (2011), provides, “[a]n individual

Guillen v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

103 So. 3d 207, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20052, 2012 WL 5895081

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2012 | Docket: 60227004

Published

contact Republic, his employment was terminated. Section 443.101(l)(a) of the Florida Statutes provides that

Guillen v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

103 So. 3d 207, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20052, 2012 WL 5895081

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2012 | Docket: 60227004

Published

contact Republic, his employment was terminated. Section 443.101(l)(a) of the Florida Statutes provides that

Alliance Business Solutions, Inc. v. Florida Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

98 So. 3d 692, 2012 WL 4512771, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16514

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2012 | Docket: 60312525

Published

issue are the Commission’s application of section 443.101(10)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), and its finding

Ogle v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

87 So. 3d 1264, 2012 WL 1868934, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8279

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2012 | Docket: 60307927

Published

with good cause attributable’ to the employer. § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). ‘Good cause’ includes

Sullivan v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

93 So. 3d 1047, 2012 WL 1673258, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7543

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 2012 | Docket: 60310415

Published

applied the law to the facts of the case. Section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes, disqualifies an individual

Peace River Distributing, Inc. v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

80 So. 3d 461, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3322, 2012 WL 669846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2012 | Docket: 2415598

Published

conducted in conformity with the requirements of section 443.101(11), Florida Statutes. See Dann Ocean Towing

Delhomme v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

88 So. 3d 205, 2011 WL 4578462, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15727

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2011 | Docket: 60308192

Published

referee’s decision. This appeal followed. Section 443.101, Florida Statutes (2010) provides: An individual

Rivera v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

99 So. 3d 505, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8951, 2011 WL 2496689

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2011 | Docket: 60313033

Published

cause attributable to his or her employing unit_” § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008); see Ferguson v. Henry

Martinez v. FORD MIDWAY MALL, INC.

59 So. 3d 168, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2681, 2011 WL 710154

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2011 | Docket: 2361080

Published

claimants."). To effectuate this purpose, section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2009), provides that

Craven v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

55 So. 3d 650, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1581, 2011 WL 479977

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2011 | Docket: 2407060

Published

she declined for health-related reasons. Section 443.101(2), Florida Statutes (2009), states that if

Lopez v. A Aaron Super Rooter, Inc.

54 So. 3d 575, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1534, 2011 WL 613694

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2011 | Docket: 60298331

Published

for unemployment compensation benefits under section 443.101(l)(a)2. . In those cases, such as Montalbano

Viera v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

54 So. 3d 541, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 197, 2011 WL 148390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2011 | Docket: 60298314

Published

statutory test for good cause for leaving the job. § 443.101(l)(a)l., Fla. Stat. (2010); Humble v. Unemployment

Rumayor v. Biohealth Medical Laboratory, Inc.

45 So. 3d 984, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15825, 2010 WL 4103163

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2010 | Docket: 60296096

Published

]” Chs. 99-131, § 2, Laws of Fla., codified as § 443.101(l)(a)l., Fla. Stat. (2008). See generally Rochussen

Belevan v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

44 So. 3d 236, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14475, 2010 WL 3766835

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2010 | Docket: 2576669

Published

good cause attributable to his employer, see § 443.101(1)(a)(1), Fla. Stat. (2009); Home Fuel Oil Co

Perrone v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

40 So. 3d 31, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8942, 2010 WL 2472264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2010 | Docket: 2483380

Published

cause to voluntarily leave work. We agree. Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes, provides that an individual

Gallagher v. STATE, UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

29 So. 3d 345, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 913, 2010 WL 366588

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2010 | Docket: 1643605

Published

for misconduct connected with his or her work." § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008). In other words, an employee

Hernandez v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

23 So. 3d 824, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18415, 2009 WL 4281282

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 2009 | Docket: 60282071

Published

him and had replaced him with someone else. Section 443.101(l)(a) of the Florida Statutes (2008) provides

Borakove v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

14 So. 3d 249, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9129, 2009 WL 1940705

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2009 | Docket: 60241302

Published

without “good cause,” as this term is used in section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2008). See § 443.031

Halstead v. Florida Unemployment Appeals

12 So. 3d 858, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8235, 2009 WL 1531627

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2009 | Docket: 60233835

Published

is required to prove to receive benefits, see § 443.101(l)(a)l, Fla. Stat. (2007), the appeals referee

Mattice v. STATE, UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

992 So. 2d 428, 2008 WL 4643796

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2008 | Docket: 1723281

Published

HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 443.101(1), Fla. Stat. (2007), provides that individuals

Humble v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

963 So. 2d 956, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13870, 2007 WL 2481672

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2007 | Docket: 64852060

Published

because the referee failed to properly apply section 443.101(l)(a)(l), Florida Statutes (2005), in determining

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Feb 12, 2007 | Docket: 3256849

Published

entitled to aid for dependent children under section 443.101(7), Florida Statutes (1985), providing that

Bogardus v. JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE COM'N

943 So. 2d 256, 2006 WL 3302531

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2006 | Docket: 1526761

Published

competent substantial evidence, we affirm. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005) (disqualifying an individual

Franks v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

938 So. 2d 642, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16901, 2006 WL 2871860

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2006 | Docket: 64847085

Published

Ms. Franks timely appealed to this court. Section 443.101(l)(a) disqualifies a person for unemployment

Casales v. Rezdrums 2 Inc.

939 So. 2d 1129, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16636, 2006 WL 2819645

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2006 | Docket: 64847345

Published

discretion which is not deemed misconduct undpr section 443.101(1), Florida Statutes (2005). Further, the record

Gibson v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

937 So. 2d 213, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14708, 2006 WL 2520680

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2006 | Docket: 64846588

Published

Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission. Under Section 443.101(2), Florida Statutes (2005), “[a]n individual

Nelson v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

935 So. 2d 1237, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13445, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2006 | Docket: 64846166

Published

receiving unemployment compensation benefits. See § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005). We have been shown no

Aldana-Chiles v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm'n

930 So. 2d 808, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8533, 2006 WL 1479598

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2006 | Docket: 64845211

Published

work and therefore eligible for benefits. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (2005). In due course, the UAC reversed

Large v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

927 So. 2d 1066, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7047, 2006 WL 1235919

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2006 | Docket: 64844492

Published

individual requiring separation from his or her work. § 443.101(l)(a)(l), Fla. Stat.; Stanick v. T & B Metal Works

Nelson v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

927 So. 2d 190, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6158, 2006 WL 1114978

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2006 | Docket: 64844222

Published

he politely stood his ground and resigned. See § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003) (an employee who voluntarily

Tittsworth v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

920 So. 2d 139, 2006 WL 229898

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2006 | Docket: 1730615

Published

without good cause attributable to the employer, section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2004), and "should

Careerxchange, Inc. v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

916 So. 2d 68, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 21138, 2005 WL 3416159

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2005 | Docket: 64841172

Published

meaning of the statute. The statute at issue, section 443.101(10), Florida Statutes (2004), provides in relevant

Salinas v. Eastern Aero Marine

908 So. 2d 1169, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13588, 2005 WL 2030302

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2005 | Docket: 64840048

Published

unemployment compensation benefits. Pursuant to section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2004), a claimant

Sardinas v. State, Unemployment Appeals Commission

906 So. 2d 1204, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11055, 2005 WL 1682574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2005 | Docket: 64839630

Published

and was qualified for unemployment benefits. § 443.101(l)(a)l, Fla. Stat (2003). We reverse. “The determination

Alvarez v. Department of Transportation

902 So. 2d 291, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7953, 2005 WL 1226152

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2005 | Docket: 64838418

Published

without good cause attributable to the employer, § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004), the order below which

Lozano v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

926 So. 2d 388, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6468, 2005 WL 1027093

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2005 | Docket: 64843928

Published

for good cause attributable to her employer. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004). “Good cause” is defined

Abascal v. SOUTH DADE REHAB ASSOCIATES LP

900 So. 2d 721, 2005 WL 957179

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2005 | Docket: 1514242

Published

those who voluntarily leave their employment. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). While the act does excuse

Miller v. America's Best Painting & Waterproofing, Inc.

897 So. 2d 512, 2005 WL 474836

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2005 | Docket: 114878

Published

voluntarily leaving employment without good cause. Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2002), provides that

Yiannopoulos v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

892 So. 2d 1174, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1049, 2005 WL 264108

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2005 | Docket: 64835846

Published

from receiving unemployment compensation. Section 443.101, Florida Statutes, provides that if “the division

Jorge v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

889 So. 2d 1010, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20036, 2004 WL 3001145

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2004 | Docket: 64835204

Published

good cause attributable to his employer, see § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004), the order disqualifying

LaCharite v. State, Unemployment Appeals Commission

890 So. 2d 354, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19467, 2004 WL 2921807

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2004 | Docket: 64835271

Published

defined by the statute. Under the provisions of section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2003), an individual

Belcher v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

882 So. 2d 486, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13745, 2004 WL 2071035

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 2004 | Docket: 64832563

Published

cause attributable to her employer pursuant to section 443.101(1), Florida Statutes (2002), and that the UAC

Hamilton v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

880 So. 2d 1284, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13264, 2004 WL 1948656

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2004 | Docket: 64832332

Published

in advance, but was unable to do so. Under section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2002), a claimant

Johnson v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

884 So. 2d 228, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11670, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1782

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2004 | Docket: 64833458

Published

entitled. WHATLEY and SALCINES, JJ., concur. . § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001). . Mr. Johnson also

Longsworth v. H R2 Inc.

934 So. 2d 478, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11427, 2004 WL 1737336

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2004 | Docket: 64845821

Published

good cause attributable to his employer. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003); Perez v. State Dep’t

Cabeza v. Hoffman Sootin & Erro DDS PA

877 So. 2d 25, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7375, 2004 WL 1162233

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2004 | Docket: 64831685

Published

attributable to her employer, we affirm. See § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001); Sollecito v. Hollywood

Browning v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

874 So. 2d 1204, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6718, 2004 WL 1073658

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2004 | Docket: 64831001

Published

individual requiring separation from his or her work.” § 443.101(1)(a)(1), Fla. Stat. (2003). The hearing officer

Florida Department of Revenue v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

872 So. 2d 376, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5830, 2004 WL 892524

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2004 | Docket: 64830200

Published

unemployment compensation benefits. See, e.g., § 443.101(1)(a)1., Fla. Stat. (2002); Yarabothu v. Unemployment

Morris v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

866 So. 2d 1269, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2357, 2004 WL 355611

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2004 | Docket: 64828530

Published

quitting his employment due to physical disability. § 443.101(l)(a)l., Fla. Stat. (2001). See Lewis v. Lakeland

Stanick v. T & B Metal Works, Inc.

867 So. 2d 523, 2004 WL 350743

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2004 | Docket: 1453988

Published

by failing to properly consider and apply section 443.101(1)(a)1., Florida Statutes (2002). The law provides

Peaden v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

865 So. 2d 690, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1815, 2004 WL 314308

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2004 | Docket: 1232162

Published

from receiving unemployment benefits under section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2003), which bars

Morales v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

864 So. 2d 563, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 456, 2004 WL 88055

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2004 | Docket: 64827662

Published

good cause attributable to the employer. See § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). The claimant timely

Rodriguez v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

851 So. 2d 247, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11420, 2003 WL 21749529

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2003 | Docket: 64824212

Published

employment with Telemundo, but stresses that section 443.101, Florida Statutes (2002), disqualifies individuals

Smith v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.

852 So. 2d 297, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10873, 2003 WL 21673034

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2003 | Docket: 64824360

Published

compensation after leaving Bankers Life. See § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001). Although the appeals

Thompson v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

848 So. 2d 493, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10138, 2003 WL 21511303

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2003 | Docket: 64823808

Published

disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. “Good cause for voluntarily

Engel v. Louis Wohl & Sons, Inc.

841 So. 2d 553, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2890, 2003 WL 826896

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 2003 | Docket: 64821748

Published

employer, Louis Wohl & Sons, Inc., pursuant to section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2001). The referee

McEnery v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

835 So. 2d 290, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18582, 2002 WL 31828161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2002 | Docket: 64820056

Published

individual requiring separation from his or her work.” § 443.101(1)(a)(1), Fla. Stat. (2000). “[T]he law permits

Dunn v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

832 So. 2d 168, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18266, 2002 WL 31777907

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2002 | Docket: 64819437

Published

disqualified to receive benefits pursuant to section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2001), under circumstances

Scrosati v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

827 So. 2d 1051, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14611, 2002 WL 31267578

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2002 | Docket: 64818070

Published

demanded separation from employment. Fla. Stat. § 443.101(1)(a)1 (2001); e.g., Krulla v. Barnett Bank, 629

Project Health, Inc. v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

824 So. 2d 324, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12360

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 2002 | Docket: 64817075

Published

Health and are disqualified for benefits. See § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000). Therefore, we reverse

Anderson v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

822 So. 2d 563, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10901

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2002 | Docket: 64816652

Published

to receive unemployment compensation benefits. § 443.101, Fla.' Stat. (2001); Crosby v. Unemployment Appeals

Diaz-Perna v. Evens

833 So. 2d 795, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8537, 2002 WL 1332738

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 2002 | Docket: 64819754

Published

attributable to his or her employing unit .... ” § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001). In this case the appellant

McGill v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

821 So. 2d 341, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8396, 2002 WL 1301470

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2002 | Docket: 64816405

Published

obligations owed his employer, as defined by section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes. We affirm. This is

Gomez v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

808 So. 2d 1273, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2398, 2002 WL 341646

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2002 | Docket: 64812983

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 443.101(l)(a)l., (9), Fla. Stat. (2001).

Critical Intervention Services, Inc. v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

802 So. 2d 463, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17832, 2001 WL 1614406

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2001 | Docket: 64811026

Published

to support the appeals referee’s finding. Section 443.101(1), Florida Statutes (2000), provides that

Copple v. U.S. Postal Service

805 So. 2d 922, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15193, 2001 WL 1334318

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2001 | Docket: 64811968

Published

construed in favor of the claimant.” Id. at 500. Section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2000), provides, in

Fine v. State Unemployment Appeals Commission

804 So. 2d 414, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14169, 2001 WL 1189908

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2001 | Docket: 64811557

Published

good cause attributable to the employer. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000); Ryals v. State Unemployment

Antonucci v. State

793 So. 2d 1116, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12516, 2001 WL 1007805

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2001 | Docket: 64808219

Published

without good cause attributable to her employer. § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). “Good cause” is that

Yaeger v. FLA. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

786 So. 2d 48, 2001 WL 514191

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2001 | Docket: 1279067

Published

findings of fact, met the good cause standard of section 443.101(1)(a). Yet, the referee denied Yaeger benefits

Ching v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

783 So. 2d 367, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5938, 2001 WL 467554

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2001 | Docket: 64804994

Published

in any section. However, the disqualifying section, 443.101(3), although not mentioning back pay, disqualifies

DeStefano v. APED ACQUISITION CO. INC.

784 So. 2d 1206, 2001 WL 355793

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 2001 | Docket: 156465

Published

was disqualified from receiving benefits. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). In fact, the testimony

Astengo v. Miami Behavioral Health Center

774 So. 2d 803, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16634, 2000 WL 1854011

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2000 | Docket: 64802759

Published

good cause attributable to his employer. See § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000). We have reviewed the

Horvath v. Southwest Airlines Co.

761 So. 2d 1250, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8952, 2000 WL 966298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2000 | Docket: 64798555

Published

DCA 1998), the referee erred in interpreting section 443.101(l)(e), Florida Statutes. We therefore REVERSE

Hardy v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

764 So. 2d 684, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6790, 2000 WL 718195

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2000 | Docket: 64799398

Published

of absence by virtue of becoming pregnant. Section 443.101(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1999), disqualifies

Lewis v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

744 So. 2d 1207, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14782, 1999 WL 1015155

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1999 | Docket: 64792234

Published

affirmed the denial of benefits pursuant to section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1997). The statute, in pertinent

Durall v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

743 So. 2d 166, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13748, 1999 WL 966735

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1999 | Docket: 64791674

Published

obligations to his or her employer. See also § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1997). The employer has the burden

Miot v. Dade County School Board

741 So. 2d 641, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13182, 1999 WL 791553

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1999 | Docket: 64791102

Published

without good cause attributable to [her] employer.” § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). Reversed.

Clark v. Professional Call Centers, Inc.

743 So. 2d 95, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12132, 1999 WL 770712

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1999 | Docket: 64791654

Published

contradicts Appellant’s statement. According to section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), a claimant

Abbas v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

732 So. 2d 450, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5790, 1999 WL 279471

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1999 | Docket: 64788195

Published

receiving unemployment compensation benefits. § 443.101(l)(a)2, Fla. Stat. (1997). Therefore, the issue

Jilani v. South Motor Co. of Dade County

731 So. 2d 117, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5123, 1999 WL 228735

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1999 | Docket: 64787827

Published

entered by the Unemployment Appeals Commission. See § 443.101(1)(a), Pla. Stat. (1997); Ritenour v. Unemployment

Markland v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

730 So. 2d 756, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2682, 1999 WL 129163

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1999 | Docket: 64787637

Published

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). COBB, GOSHORN and ANTQON, JJ., concur

Roberts v. Holland & Knight LLP

728 So. 2d 327, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2564, 1999 WL 123743

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1999 | Docket: 64786799

Published

discharged for misconduct connected to his work. See § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). By definition, “misconduct”

Recio v. Kent Security Services, Inc.

727 So. 2d 320, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1462, 1999 WL 72235

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1999 | Docket: 64786490

Published

good cause attributable to the employer. See § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. -Stat. (1993). The standard of review

Somerset on Lake Saunders, Inc. v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

725 So. 2d 421, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 489, 1999 WL 22396

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1999 | Docket: 64785934

Published

good cause attributable to her employer. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1997). However, the record evidence

O'Connor v. Florida Blood Services, Inc.

725 So. 2d 382, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14851, 1999 WL 2610

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1998 | Docket: 64785921

Published

good cause attributable to her employer. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1997). The Unemployment Appeals Commission

Maxfield v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

716 So. 2d 859, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11282, 1998 WL 559651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1998 | Docket: 64782499

Published

an employee is discharged for misconduct. See § 443.101,. Fla. Stat. (1995). Section 443.036(26) defines

Bomar v. Rolling In Dough Cookie Co.

715 So. 2d 333, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9690, 1998 WL 428814

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1998 | Docket: 64782035

Published

contends that the legislature’s 1994 amendment of section 443.101(l)(a) which defines “work” to mean any work

Brainard v. Willa Merriott Realty, Inc.

716 So. 2d 801, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8470, 1998 WL 390410

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1998 | Docket: 64782451

Published

were based on her request to void the check.” Section 443.101(l)(a)l, Florida Statutes (1997), defines “good

Abreu v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

715 So. 2d 1004, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8173, 1998 WL 380479

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1998 | Docket: 64782130

Published

the disqualification provision of section 443.101. Section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1995), commonly

Rosemarin v. State Unemployment Appeals Commission

712 So. 2d 1188, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7187, 1998 WL 314683

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1998 | Docket: 64781594

Published

disqualified from receiving benefits pursuant to section 443.101(8)(a), Florida Statutes (1997). We construe

Corley v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

708 So. 2d 697, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4789, 1998 WL 210344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1998 | Docket: 64779990

Published

receive unemployment compensation benefits. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1997). The record evidence supports

Grosso v. Massey-Yardley, Inc.

708 So. 2d 688, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4300, 1998 WL 187380

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1998 | Docket: 64779970

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee,

Shu v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

710 So. 2d 108, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3855, 1998 WL 171366

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1998 | Docket: 64780741

Published

“voluntarily initiated” her leave of absence. Section 443.101(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1995) disqualifies

Giordani v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

706 So. 2d 897, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1197, 1998 WL 56413

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1998 | Docket: 64779291

Published

discharged for misconduct connected with her work. Section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1995) provides that

Berthe v. George G.

698 So. 2d 1386, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10635, 1997 WL 578321

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1997 | Docket: 64775663

Published

good cause attributable to the employer. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1995). The Unemployment Appeals Commission

Suarez v. Burdines, Inc.

698 So. 2d 1373, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10603, 1997 WL 577527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1997 | Docket: 64775641

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 443.101(9), Fla. Stat. (1995); Lopez v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n

Musawa v. Brumley Enterprises, Inc.

698 So. 2d 1375, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10605, 1997 WL 577567

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1997 | Docket: 64775647

Published

him from unemployment compensation benefits, § 443.101(1)(a)1, Fla. Stat. (1995); Garcia v. A T & T Communications

Gilbert v. Department of Corrections

696 So. 2d 416, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7244

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1997 | Docket: 64774718

Published

claimant for misconduct connected with work. § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). Section 443.036(26)

Laidler v. Polk County Board of County Commissioners

697 So. 2d 875, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6737, 1997 WL 330413

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1997 | Docket: 64775279

Published

good cause attributable to the employer. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1995). The Unemployment Appeals Commission

Malouf v. LISN, Inc.

684 So. 2d 344, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13441, 1996 WL 734845

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1996 | Docket: 64769594

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 443.101(2), Fla. Stat. (1996); Fla. Admin. Code R. 38B-3.019.

Calio v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

684 So. 2d 884, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13230, 1996 WL 728350

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1996 | Docket: 64769701

Published

associated with her work within the meaning of section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1993). The order stated:

Hill v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

686 So. 2d 658, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12784, 1996 WL 695290

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1996 | Docket: 64770406

Published

offer of work. See § 443.101, Fla.Stat. (1995). “Suitable” is described in section 443.101(2)(a): In determining

Nolan v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

680 So. 2d 595, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9773, 1996 WL 531053

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1996 | Docket: 64767902

Published

disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. Section 443.101, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1994), provides that

Colon v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

676 So. 2d 46, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6717, 1996 WL 349965

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1996 | Docket: 64765995

Published

disqualifying circumstances. We cannot agree. Section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), precludes unemployment

Fernandez v. Metropolitan Dade County

675 So. 2d 250, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6514, 1996 WL 334297

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1996 | Docket: 64765276

Published

claimants from receiving unemployment benefits. § 443.101(1), Fla. Stat. (1995). Affirmed.

Pallin v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

664 So. 2d 78, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12731, 1995 WL 736296

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1995 | Docket: 64760587

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 443.101(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993); Jones v. Creative World School, Inc., 603 So

Advanced Mobilehome v. Uac

663 So. 2d 1382, 1995 WL 712530

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1995 | Docket: 1313909

Published

without good cause attributable to the employer. § 443.101(1), Fla. Stat. (1993). "To voluntarily leave employment

Pugh v. Regal Development Corp.

662 So. 2d 1355, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12180, 1995 WL 686058

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1995 | Docket: 64760207

Published

leaving was not attributable to the employer. See § 443.101(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1994). We conclude that

AAA Gold Coast Moving & Storage, Inc. v. Weiss

654 So. 2d 281, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4625, 1995 WL 253787

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1995 | Docket: 64755900

Published

time the employee was hired. According to section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), an individual

Tarr v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

651 So. 2d 1246, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2385, 1995 WL 96820

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1995 | Docket: 64755037

Published

cause attributable to the employing unit under section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1993). The UAC reversed

Galletti v. Piedmont Airlines, Inc.

652 So. 2d 408, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1949, 1995 WL 79925

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1995 | Docket: 64755136

Published

We note that the Commission concedes that section 443.101(9)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), which provides

International Ass'n of Machinists v. Tucker

652 So. 2d 842, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1851, 1995 WL 73566

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1995 | Docket: 64755209

Published

receive unemployment compensation benefits. Section 443.101, Florida Statutes provides: An individual shall

Walker v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

649 So. 2d 359, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 985, 1995 WL 49115

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1995 | Docket: 64753822

Published

cause attributable to employer, pursuant to Section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes. We accept the findings

Brownstein v. Hartwell Enterprises, Inc.

647 So. 2d 1004, 1994 WL 706226

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1994 | Docket: 1524742

Published

referee's decision, and Brownstein appeals. Section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), provides that

LaRocca v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

643 So. 2d 1199, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10112, 1994 WL 576113

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1994 | Docket: 64751517

Published

W. SHARP and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur. . See § 443.101(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1992); § 443.036(26), Fla

Rohan v. Trakker Maps, Inc.

633 So. 2d 1176, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2623, 1994 WL 90520

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1994 | Docket: 64747041

Published

unemployment compensation claim was then heard. Section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1991) provides an

Dyer v. Florida Supermarkets, Inc.

627 So. 2d 1345, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13095, 1993 WL 536022

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1993 | Docket: 64744712

Published

1984), review denied, 462 So.2d 1106 (Fla.1985); § 443.101(1)(a)1., Fla.Stat. (Supp. 1992).

Mesa v. Key Colony, III

627 So. 2d 137, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12393, 1993 WL 517209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1993 | Docket: 64744312

Published

review denied, 462 So.2d 1106 *138(Fla.1985); § 443.101(1)(a)1., Fla.Stat. (Supp.1992).

Beck v. Capeletti Bros., Inc.

626 So. 2d 324, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11570, 1993 WL 469331

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1993 | Docket: 64743932

Published

Comm’n, 516 So.2d 88, 89 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991).

Sassi v. Five Star Productions

623 So. 2d 864, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9189, 1993 WL 349940

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1993 | Docket: 64698572

Published

Commission affirmed the referee’s decision. Section 443.101(1) disqualifies from the receipt of unemployment

Harper v. State, Unemployment Appeals Commission

623 So. 2d 839, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9062, 1993 WL 340943

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1993 | Docket: 64698552

Published

because he would not write them down. Under section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1991), a person is disqualified

Charlebois v. Biscayne Bay Transitional Living Center

622 So. 2d 1117, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8336, 1993 WL 302475

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1993 | Docket: 64698246

Published

separate inquiry must be undertaken under section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1991), which pertains to

Smith v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

619 So. 2d 519, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6503, 1993 WL 210582

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1993 | Docket: 64696659

Published

refusing “suitable work” offered to her. See § 443.-101(2), Fla.Stat. (1991). In determining the *520suitability

Nelson v. Dade County Aviation Department

616 So. 2d 56, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2898, 1993 WL 72273

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1993 | Docket: 64695227

Published

had previously employed him, as required by section 443.101(l)(a)l., Florida Statutes (1991). Nelson argues

Lewis v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

598 So. 2d 318, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5422, 1992 WL 106962

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1992 | Docket: 64667169

Published

purposes of the unemployment compensation law. Section 443.101(1)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989). That law provides

Iglesias v. Eagle National Bank of Miami

598 So. 2d 262, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5084, 1992 WL 98201

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1992 | Docket: 64667140

Published

cause attributable to the employer” [e.s.], see § 443.101(1)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989), having made all reasonable

Shaw v. Hansa Mold Tool & Die, Inc.

592 So. 2d 1228, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 638, 1992 WL 16017

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1992 | Docket: 64664856

Published

terminated for those actions, as required by section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), which provides

Cabaniss v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

589 So. 2d 440, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11512, 1991 WL 240711

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 1991 | Docket: 64663129

Published

ineligibility for unemployment benefits. Pursuant to section 443.101(8)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), the fact that

Diaz v. Winn-Dixie Store, Inc.

587 So. 2d 677, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10762, 1991 WL 217862

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1991 | Docket: 64662343

Published

cause attributable to the employer” [e.s.], see § 443.101(1)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989), having made all reasonable

Ahlswede v. Brumm Contracting, Inc.

583 So. 2d 438, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8320, 1991 WL 152919

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1991 | Docket: 64660547

Published

receiving unemployment compensation benefits. See § 443.-101(2), Fla.Stat. (1989). The appeals referee considered

Klein v. CHR Associates, Inc.

584 So. 2d 1089, 1991 WL 152948

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1991 | Docket: 64661115

Published

denied unemployment compensation benefits. Section 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1989). But we are not persuaded

Macdonald v. Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security, Unemployment Appeals Commission

568 So. 2d 1319, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8197, 1990 WL 162386

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1990 | Docket: 64654162

Published

claimant, it must consider certain factors. Section 443.101(2), Florida Statutes (1987), provides: (a)

Green v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.

565 So. 2d 811, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5650, 1990 WL 107811

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1990 | Docket: 64652406

Published

one from receiving unemployment compensation. § 443.101(4), Fla.Stat. (1989). Because the appellants were

Florida State University v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

548 So. 2d 768, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2029, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4942, 1989 WL 101061

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1989 | Docket: 64644819

Published

ineligible for unemployment compensation. Section 443.-101, F.S. (1987). Recently, subsequent to the

Zulauf v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

533 So. 2d 890, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2468, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4861, 1988 WL 117606

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1988 | Docket: 64638548

Published

of bonding was not due to culpable conduct. Section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1985), provides for

State, Department of General Services v. English

534 So. 2d 726, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2336, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1988 | Docket: 64638882

Published

with his work, if so found by the division.” § 443.101(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1985). Section 443.036(24) defines

Nicora v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

525 So. 2d 927, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1770, 1988 WL 41098

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1988 | Docket: 64634995

Published

475 So.2d 1277, 1281-82 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); § 443.101(l)(a)(l), Fla.Stat. (1987).

Sturaitis v. Montanari Clinical School, Inc.

522 So. 2d 429, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 648, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 952, 1988 WL 18568

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1988 | Docket: 64633658

Published

compensation benefits and was denied pursuant to section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1985), because he had been

Halpin v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

516 So. 2d 1027, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2742, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11318, 1987 WL 2221

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1987 | Docket: 64631500

Published

without good cause attributable to his employer. § 443.101(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1985). Appellant appealed the

Hannon v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

513 So. 2d 215, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12192, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2292

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1987 | Docket: 64629777

Published

discharged for misconduct connected with his work. Section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1985), states that “[a]n

EVAC Ambulance v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

509 So. 2d 382, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1614, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9117

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1987 | Docket: 64628214

Published

resulting uninsurability amounts to misconduct. Section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1985) provides that an individual

Amaya v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

508 So. 2d 504, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8733

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1987 | Docket: 64627831

Published

Appeals Comm’n, 456 So.2d 528 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); § 443.101(1), Fla.Stat. (1985).

Thurston v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

507 So. 2d 728, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8326, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1296

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1987 | Docket: 64627349

Published

is not disqualified from receiving benefits. § 443.101(1)(a)(1), Fla.Stat. (1985); see Uniweld Products

Philbin v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph

503 So. 2d 1375, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 792, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12070

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1987 | Docket: 64625861

Published

an employee who is discharged for misconduct. § 443.101, Fla.Stat. (1983). Section 443.036(24), Florida

Vaughn v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

482 So. 2d 593, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 369, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6237

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1986 | Docket: 64617163

Published

recommendation and appellant filed this appeal. Section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1985), provides that

Goldstein v. Kalai

480 So. 2d 695, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 100, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6032

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1985 | Docket: 64616395

Published

affirming the decision of the appeals referee. Section 443.101(l)(a)2, Florida Statutes (1983), provides:

Prison Rehabilitation Industries & Diversified Enterprises v. State, Unemployment Appeals Commission

476 So. 2d 1309, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2136, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15878

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1985 | Docket: 64614773

Published

legally disqualified to receive benefits under section 443.101 for having “voluntarily left his employment

Lewis v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

473 So. 2d 6, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1714, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15118

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1985 | Docket: 64613292

Published

of the employer’s reasonable requirement. Section 443.101(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Act, Florida

Kartman v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

454 So. 2d 1073, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1865, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14932

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1984 | Docket: 64606549

Published

her for benefits. The commission affirmed. Section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1983), provides that

Kartman v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

454 So. 2d 1073, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1865, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14932

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1984 | Docket: 64606549

Published

her for benefits. The commission affirmed. Section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1983), provides that

Marcelo v. Department of Labor & Employment Security

453 So. 2d 927, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1761, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14546

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1984 | Docket: 64606245

Published

REVERSED. GRIMES, A.C.J., and OTT, J„ concur. . See § 443.101(1), Fla.Stat. (1981).

Harlow v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

446 So. 2d 1115, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11841

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 1984 | Docket: 64603481

Published

good cause attributable to his employer. See section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1981). Appellant’s

Castor v. Department of Labor & Employment Security

429 So. 2d 829, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19090

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1983 | Docket: 64596387

Published

[an employee’s] work” within the meaning of Section 443.101, Florida Statutes (1981), which disqualifies

Arredondo v. Jackson Memorial Hosp.

412 So. 2d 912

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1982 | Docket: 528648

Published

attributable to his employer, within the meaning of Section 443.101(1), Florida Statutes. Therefore we must reject

Port Carriers, Inc. v. Simmons

412 So. 2d 910, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19589

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1982 | Docket: 64589335

Published

entitled to notice of redeter-minations under § 443.101. The division did this in Rule 38B-2.14 F.A.C