Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO., 230 So. 3d 815 (Fla. 2017)

. . . As to whether future lost wages, (ie., -“front pay”) are awardable in a jury trial pursuant to F.S. 448.103 . . . As to whether emotional damages are awardable in a jury trial pursuant to F.S. 448.103(2), see McIntyre . . . March 23, 2007) (damages for emotional distress recoverable in whistle-blower action pursuant to F.S. 448.103 . . .

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. HUNTINGDON VALLEY SURGERY CENTER LLC LLC, 703 F. App'x 126 (3d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 448.103, the doctrine is not applicable here because it applies where the statutes "relate to the . . . Stat. § 448.103 (HCFA); 62 Pa Cons. Stat, § 1401-C (eHealth Partnership Program); and 63 Pa. Cons. . . .

RAMIREZ, v. BAUSCH LOMB, INC., 546 F. App'x 829 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . §§ 448.102(1), 448.103(l)(c). . . . .

R. AERY, v. WALLACE LINCOLN- MERCURY, LLC d b a, 118 So. 3d 904 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . As his prayer for relief, Aery tracked the language of Section 448.103(2), and requested, among other . . . wages, benefits, and other remuneration” and “[a]ny other compensatory damages allowable at law.” § 448.103 . . . The plain and unambiguous language of section 448.103(2)(e) “authorizes the court to award compensatory . . . FWA’s liberal construction, damages in the form of emotional distress are recoverable under section 448.103 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO. UNLAWFUL RETALIATION, 95 So. 3d 106 (Fla. 2012)

. . . This instruction is based on F.S. 448.102 and 448.103(c). 2. . . . As to whether future lost wages, (i.e., “front pay”) are awardable in a .jury trial pursuant to F.S. 448.103 . . . As to whether emotional damages are awardable in a jury trial pursuant to F.S. 448.103(2), see Mcintyre . . . March 23, 2007) (damages for emotional distress recoverable in whistle-blower action pursuant to F.S. 448.103 . . .

PINDER, v. BAHAMASAIR HOLDINGS LIMITED, INC. a, 661 F. Supp. 2d 1348 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . Fla.Stat § 448.103(l)(c). . . .

BERNARD, v. SSA SECURITY, INC. a a. k. a., 299 F. App'x 927 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . . §§ 448.102-448.103, and state law breach of contract. . . .

B. O NEAL, v. FLORIDA A M UNIVERSITY, BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR FLORIDA A M UNIVERSITY,, 989 So. 2d 6 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Most, courts that considered the question of the right to a jury trial under section 448.103, Florida . . . wages, benefits, and other remuneration” and “[a]ny other compensatory damages allowable at law.” § 448.103 . . . view that the ''[cjompensation for lost wages, benefits, and other remuneration,” mentioned in section 448.103 . . . contrary, the private-sector act’s provision for "[a]ny other compensatory damages allowable at law,” § 448.103 . . .

ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI, INC. v. G. MI AGORRI,, 954 So. 2d 640 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . § 448.103(2), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

RIVERA, v. TORFINO ENTERPRISES, INC., 914 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See § 448.103, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . . See §§ 448.103; 760.11, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

CHASE, v. JOWDY INDUSTRIES, INC., 913 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . .” § 448.103(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

GRAHAM COUNTY SOIL WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT v. UNITED STATES WILSON, 545 U.S. 409 (U.S. 2005)

. . . . §§ 112.3187(8)(a), 448.103 (2003) (whistle-blower actions); Ga. . . .

HOWARD, v. DITSWORTH, J. C., 133 F. App'x 664 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . Appellees assert that Howard’s FWA claims are barred by the two-year statute of limitations set forth in § 448.103 . . . Specifically, § 448.103(1)(a) states: An employee who has been the object of a retaliatory personnel . . . Ann. § 448.103(l)(a) (emphasis added). . . . Ann. § 448.103(l)(a). . . .

BELL, v. GEORGIA- PACIFIC CORPORATION,, 390 F. Supp. 2d 1182 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . Section 448.103(l)(c), Fla. Stat., provides. . . .

TRACEY- MEDDOFF, v. J. ALTMAN HAIR BEAUTY CENTRE, INC., 899 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The remedies available under section 448.103(2) are similar to those available under section 112.3187 . . .

HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC. d b a v. HILLMAN,, 906 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Patricia Bosner and Roberta James, who filed a whistle-blower action against Blake pursuant to section 448.103 . . . their supervisors, the Plaintiffs retained counsel to file a whistleblower action pursuant to section 448.103 . . . See § 448.103(l)(a). . . .

HANNA, v. WCI COMMUNITIES, INC., 348 F. Supp. 2d 1332 (S.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . language only lists “compensatory” damages and that the “use of the word ‘compensatory’ in Section 448.103 . . .

W. BRUNER, v. GC- GW, INC. d b a, 880 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Jenkins, 752 So.2d 561, 565-66 (Fla. 2000) (holding that any ambiguities in paragraph 448.103(l)(c), . . .

F. BRANCHE, v. AIRTRAN AIRWAYS, INC., 314 F. Supp. 2d 1194 (M.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . Stat. § 448.103(2). . . . Section 448.103(2) states that: [i]n any action brought pursuant to subsection (1), the court may order . . . No court has yet construed the availability of punitive damages under Section 448.103(2). . . . are available because Section 448.103(2) does not explicitly preclude punitive damages as a remedy. . . . Stat. § 448.103(2)(e). . . .

BRASINGTON, v. EMC CORPORATION,, 855 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Act of 1992, Chapter 760, Florida Statutes and the Florida Whistleblower Act, sections 448.102(3) and 448.103 . . .

F. BRANCHE, v. AIRTRAN AIRWAYS, INC. a, 342 F.3d 1248 (11th Cir. 2003)

. . . Stat. 448.103(l)(a) ("An employee who has been the object of a retaliatory personnel action in violation . . .

DAHL, v. ECKERD FAMILY YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC. a d b a, 843 So. 2d 956 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . complaint was filed within the two-year limitations period for the private-sector whistleblower statute, § 448.103 . . .

NEW WORLD COMMUNICATIONS OF TAMPA, INC. d b a WTVT- TV, v. AKRE,, 866 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . applying different standards to prevailing plaintiffs and defendants apply to cases brought under section 448.103 . . .

ALLOCCO, v. CITY OF CORAL GABLES, A A, 221 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (S.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . . § 448.103(l)(a) (emphasis added). . . .

R. TERRELL, v. AMSOUTH INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC., 217 F. Supp. 2d 1233 (M.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . See § 448.103, Fla.Stat. . . .

L. PADRON, v. BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. a, 196 F. Supp. 2d 1250 (S.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . . § 448.103(1)(c). The Court applies the state’s substantive law in this diversity case. . . .

HOLLEY, v. INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY OF DESTIN, INC. a, 803 So. 2d 749 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Section 448.103(l)(a), Florida Statutes, provides that an employee subjected to retaliatory personnel . . .

RIDENER, v. LDAR, INC. a d b a, 771 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Scott Ridener brought a whistle-blower claim against his former employer pursuant to section 448.103, . . .

McEOWEN, v. JONES CHEMICAL, INC., 758 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 2000)

. . . the district courts regarding the extent of the written notice requirement of sections 448.102 and 448.103 . . . unlawful activity, the employee is not required to comply with the written notice requirement of section 448.103 . . .

GOLF CHANNEL, v. JENKINS,, 752 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 2000)

. . . the majority’s resolution of this case because I am concerned that their interpretation of section 448.103 . . . This subsection is section 448.103(1), and is applicable to all causes of action, whether the action . . . when an action is brought pursuant to section 448.102(1) renders meaningless the language of section 448.103 . . . As the Second District said: Section 448.103(l)(a) provides a civil cause of action to employees who . . . I believe that section 448.103(l)(c) makes the notice requirement applicable to all subsections of section . . . . 2d DCA 1996), regarding the interpretation of the notice provisions found in sections 448.102 and 448.103 . . . The next section, section 448.103, entitled “[ejmployee’s remedy; relief,” provides a cause of action . . . BACKGROUND Martin Jenkins brought a whistle-blower claim under section 448.103 against his employer, . . . Sections 448.102 and 448.103 are closely related. . . . In fact, subsection 448.103(1)(c) specifically incorporates the written notice provision of subsection . . .

McEOWEN, v. JONES CHEMICAL, INC., 745 So. 2d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . he sent to his supervisor, prior to his termination, satisfied the notice requirement of subsection 448.103 . . . This court has interpreted subsection 448.103(1)(e) to mean that the notice requirement of subsection . . . We reaffirm this court’s interpretation of subsection 448.103(1)(c) and certify conflict with the third . . . Thus, the memoranda are insufficient to satisfy the notice requirement under subsection 448.103(1)(e) . . . See § 448.103(1)(c); see also Schultz v. Tampa Elec. . . .

ARMSTRONG SURGICAL CENTER, INC. v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL L. N. H. H. P. R. T., 185 F.3d 154 (3d Cir. 1999)

. . . . §§ 448.103, 448.704(b). . . .

JUDD, v. ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, a HCA a, 739 So. 2d 627 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . There is no question that some ambiguity exists between sections 448.102 and 448.103 concerning the necessity . . .

J. MOLENDA, v. HOECHST CELANESE CORPORATION,, 60 F. Supp. 2d 1294 (S.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . . § 448.103(2). . . . Fla.Stat. § 448.103(1)(c). . . . See Fla.Stat. § 448.103(1)(c). . . .

MARINER HEALTH CARE OF NASHVILLE, INC. v. BAKER,, 739 So. 2d 608 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Janelle Baker sued Mariner Health Care for retaliatory discharge under section 448.103, Florida Statutes . . .

D. GRAY, v. WEBCO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, a, 36 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (M.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . Ch. 448.103(l)-(2) (1997). . . .

JENKINS, v. GOLF CHANNEL a k a, TGC,, 714 So. 2d 558 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . However, subsection 448.103(1), setting forth an employee’s remedy for being the victim of retaliatory . . . Paragraph (c) of subsection 448.103(1) provides that an employee may not recover in any action if he . . . Id. § 448.103(l)(c) [emphasis in original] [footnote omitted]. . . . The second district rejected this argument: Section 448.103(1) affords a remedy to employees who have . . . This remedy is only available, however, if the employee has complied with section 448.103(l)(c). . . .

GOLDEN, v. DODGE- MARKHAM CO. INC., 1 F. Supp. 2d 1360 (M.D. Fla. 1998)

. . . . § 448.103 (1997). . . . Under section 448.103(2): In any action brought pursuant to subsection (1), the court may order relief . . . Stat. § 448.103. . . .

ROBINSON, v. JEWISH CENTER TOWERS, INC., 993 F. Supp. 1475 (M.D. Fla. 1998)

. . . Defendant challenges Plaintiffs Count II complaint of a violation of the Florida Whistleblower’s Act, § 448.103 . . . Section 448.103(1) of the Florida Statute states that “retaliatory personnel action” includes not only . . .

BIO- MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF FLORIDA, INC. d b a NW v. KROLL, 702 So. 2d 288 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . complaint for retaliatory firing based on the employee’s failure to give the notice required in section 448.103 . . .

CRAY, v. NATIONSBANK OF NORTH CAROLINA, N. A., 982 F. Supp. 850 (M.D. Fla. 1997)

. . . vacate the award against NationsSe-eurities, his employer and the only entity that can be liable under § 448.103 . . . Moreover, Defendants point the court to § 448.103(2), Florida Statutes, which expressly provides for . . . See § 448.103(2), Florida Statutes. . . . One of the remedies for violation the whistleblower’s act provided in § 448.103(2), Florida Statutes, . . .

POTOMAC SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, INC. a v. A. DEERING,, 683 So. 2d 180 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . action because PSE was not given written notice of any alleged illegal activity pursuant to section 448.103 . . . Section 448.103(1) affords a remedy to employees who have been retaliated against for actions they have . . . This remedy is only available, however, if the employee has complied with section 448.103(l)(c). . . . We read section 448.103(l)(c) to provide that an employee may not recover in any action brought pursuant . . . to section 448.103(1) if he fails to notify the employer about the illegal activity, policy, or practice . . .

TEMPLE, v. S. AUJLA, M. D., 681 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . We note that, in enacting section 448.103, Florida Statutes (1995), the legislature expressly provided . . .

LOPEZ, v. TRIANGLE AUTO CENTER, INC. a d b a a k a, 677 So. 2d 114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . § 448.103(l)(b), Fla.Stat. (1995). Reversed. . . .

BAITON, v. CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, INC., 661 So. 2d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . §§ 448.101(5), 448.103; see also Forrester v. John H. . . . 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1993), Baiton asserts that his allegations state a cause of action under section 448.103 . . . activity, policy, or practice of the employer which is in violation of a law, rule, or regulation. 448.103 . . . Id. § 448.103(l)(e) (emphasis added). . . .

ARROW AIR, INC. v. WALSH,, 645 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 1994)

. . . Section 448.103, Florida Statutes (1993), provides: Employee’s remedy; relief— (1)(a) An employee who . . .

HARRISBURG HOSPITAL, v. L. THORNBURGH,, 616 F. Supp. 699 (M.D. Pa. 1985)

. . . . § 448.103. These people may not necessarily object to new health care services. . . . . § 448.103, of which plaintiffs and consumers of health care would also be part of, but whose rights . . .

GILBERT IMPORTED HARDWOODS, INC. Co. v. PACKAGES OF GUATAMBU SQUARES, MORE OR LESS, M V ALMIRANTE GRACA ARANHA,, 508 F.2d 1116 (5th Cir. 1975)

. . . in which A & H claims that the 189,996 board feet of guatambu evidenced by the bills of lading equal 448.103 . . .