The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXI
LABOR

Chapter 448
GENERAL LABOR REGULATIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 448.20

448.20 Short title.—This part may be cited as the “Labor Pool Act.”

History.—s. 1, ch. 95-332.

F.S. 448.20 on Google Scholar

F.S. 448.20 on Casetext

Amendments to 448.20

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 448.20

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 448.20.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

R. DUBY, R. v., 451 B.R. 664 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2011)

. . . Although the Debtor sought to recover $74,039.00 in attorney’s fees for 448.20 hours, the bankruptcy . . .

MALLETIER, v. APEX CREATIVE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,, 687 F. Supp. 2d 347 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . take a seventeen percent discount in his hourly rate, yielding an hourly rate of between $435 and $448.20 . . . at $475/hr $1,011 10.5 hrs at $435.75 8.72 hrs at $435.75/hr $3,799 16.3 hrs at $448.2 13.53 hrs at $448.20 . . . to $540/hr; applying the 17 percent discount to this new billing rate renders an effective rate of $448.20 . . .

LINER, v. WORKERS TEMPORARY STAFFING, INC., 990 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 2008)

. . . At the relevant time, the Act consisted of sections 448.20-25, Florida Statutes (2004). . . . .

LINER, v. WORKERS TEMPORARY STAFFING, INC., 962 So. 2d 344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . This case concerns the constitutionality of a section of the Labor Pool Act, Sections 448.20-448.25, . . .

D. McLEMORE, v. LFH ACQUISITION CORP. d b a, 957 So. 2d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . appeals an order dismissing with prejudice his complaint for violations of the Labor Pool Act, section 448.20 . . .

D. PIERCE, Jr. v. RITTER, CHUSID, BIVONIA COHEN, 133 F. Supp. 2d 1344 (S.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . . § 448.20, which prohibits a labor pool from charging a day laborer for the cashing of checks. . . .

In WALKER. K. v., 276 B.R. 133 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 2000)

. . . The plaintiffs attorney submitted bills totaling $448.20 for medical services and $240.63 for prescriptions . . .

ATTERBURY v. UNITED STATES, 59 F.2d 300 (Ct. Cl. 1932)

. . . Y.)........... 448.20 War stamps (old)............ 256.32 Accounts receivable .......... 12,364,726.37 . . .

LEVITEN v. BICKLEY, MANDEVILLE WIMPLE,, 35 F.2d 825 (2d Cir. 1929)

. . . paid what was left from the $700 margin deposited on the October 1st trade, the two together making $448.20 . . . Thereafter Levi-ten received payment of the balance of his account, $448.20, which included the $46.44 . . .