448.20

Short title.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

448.20 Short title.—This part may be cited as the “Labor Pool Act.”

History.—s. 1, ch. 95-332.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2001–2023 · leading case: Pierce v. Ritter, Chusid, Bivonia & Cohen

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Pierce v. Ritter, Chusid, Bivonia & Cohen (2001) flsd · cites it 2× “of Fla. Stat. § 448.20 , which prohibits a labor pool from charging a day laborer for the cashing of checks.”

McLemore v. LFH ACQUISITION CORP. (2007) fladistctapp “Walter McLemore, a day laborer, appeals an order dismissing with prejudice his complaint for violations of the Labor Pool Act, section 448.20 et seq., Florida Statutes.”

Duran v. Joekel (2023) flmd · cites it 2× “) The Complaint alleges that four corporate defendants and two individual defendants violated the Florida Labor Pool Act of 1995 (the FLPA), Fla. Stat. § 448.20 , et seq., by employing plaintiff (and others similarly situated) as day laborers and charging them an amount in…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.